Aims. Shoulder arthroplasty is effective in the management of end-stage glenohumeral joint arthritis. However, it is major surgery and patients must balance multiple factors when considering the procedure. An understanding of patients’ decision-making processes may facilitate greater support of those considering shoulder arthroplasty and inform the outcomes of future research. Methods. Participants were recruited from waiting lists of three consultant upper limb surgeons across two NHS hospitals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 participants who were awaiting elective shoulder arthroplasty. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Systematic coding was performed; initial codes were categorized and further developed into summary narratives through a process of discussion and refinement. Data collection and analyses continued until thematic saturation was reached. Results. Two overall categories emerged: the motivations to consider surgery, and the information participants used to inform their decision-making. Motivations were, broadly, the relief of pain and the opportunity to get on with life and regain independence. When participants’ symptoms and restrictions prevented them enjoying life to a sufficient extent, this provided the motivation to proceed with surgery. Younger participants tended to focus on maintaining employment and recreational activities, and older patients were eager to make the most of their remaining lifetime. Participants gathered information from a range of sources and were keen to optimize their recovery where possible. An important factor for participants was whether they trusted their surgeon and were prepared to delegate responsibility for elements of their care. Conclusion. Relief of pain and the opportunity to get on with life were the primary reasons to undergo shoulder arthroplasty. Participants highlighted the importance of the patient-surgeon relationship and the need for accurate information in an accessible format which is relevant to people of different ages and functional demands. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):543–549

Escalating health care expenditure worldwide is driving the need for effective resource decision-making, with medical practitioners increasingly making complex resource decisions within the context of patient care. Despite raising serious legal and ethical issues in practice, this has attracted little attention in Australia, or internationally. In particular, it is unknown how orthopaedic surgeons perceive their obligations to the individual patient, and the wider community, when rationing care, and how they reconcile competing obligations. This research explores legal and ethical considerations, and resource allocation by Australian orthopaedic surgeons, as a means of achieving public health cost containment driven by macro-level policy and funding decisions. This research found that Australian orthopaedic surgeon's perceptions, and resource allocation decision making, can be explained by understanding how principles of distributive justice challenge, and shift, the traditional medical paradigm. It found that distributive justice, and challenges of macro level health policy and funding decisions, have given rise to two new medical paradigms. Each which try to balance the best interests of individual patients with demands in respect of the sustainability of the health system, in a situation where resources may be constrained. This research shows that while bedside rationing has positioned the medical profession as the gate keepers of resources, it may have left them straddling an increasingly irreconcilable void between the interests of the individual patient and the wider community, with the sustainability of the health system hanging in the balance

Background. Knee replacement surgery is currently facing three dilemmas: a high dissatisfaction rate; increasing demand with financial constraints; and variation in utilisation. A patient centred approach, usually achieved through shared decision-making, has the potential to help address these dilemmas. However, such an approach requires an understanding of the factors involved in patient decision-making. This is the first study examining decision-making in knee replacements that includes patients at different stages of decision-making – this is critical when considering decision-making as a process. We base our findings in a theoretical model, proposed by Elwyn et al, that highlights the distinction between deliberation and decision-making, and propose modifications to this model specific to knee replacement decision-making. Methods. This study used two focus groups of six patients each and in-depth interviews with 10 patients to examine the factors that affect patient decision-making and their interaction at different points in the decision-making process. A qualitative analysis of themes, based on a constant comparative method, is used to analyse the data. This study was approved by the Dyfed Powys Research Ethics Committee (13/WA/0140). Results. We describe 10 themes that affect patient deliberation over the decision: decision-making style; coping strategies; expectation of outcome; decision-making stress; personal situation; preferred model of care; trust in doctor; sources of information; mental state; and loss of control. We add to Elwyn's model by demonstrating the boundary between deliberation and decision-making is the decision-making threshold. Conclusion. This study provides increased detail on a theoretical model that can be used to describe decision-making, and an understanding of the factors that affect decision-making for patients considering knee replacement. Such an understanding will aid patient centred care, and has particular relevance in developing interventions aimed at delivering information. This is likely to affect the satisfaction rate, demand, and utilisation of knee replacements. Level of evidence. 4

There has been a marked increase in the number of hip arthroscopies performed over the past 16 years, primarily in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Insights into the pathoanatomy of FAI, and high-level evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of arthroscopy in the management of FAI, have fuelled this trend. Arthroscopic management of labral tears with repair may have superior results compared with debridement, and there is now emerging evidence to support reconstructive options where repair is not possible. In situations where an interportal capsulotomy is performed to facilitate access, data now support closure of the capsule in selective cases where there is an increased risk of postoperative instability. Preoperative planning is an integral component of bony corrective surgery in FAI, and this has evolved to include computer-planned resection. However, the benefit of this remains controversial. Hip instability is now widely accepted, and diagnostic criteria and treatment are becoming increasingly refined. Instability can also be present with FAI or develop as a result of FAI treatment. In this annotation, we outline major current controversies relating to decision-making in hip arthroscopy for FAI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):532–540

Aims. Accurate diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents a significant challenge for hip surgeons. Preoperative diagnosis is not always easy to establish, making the intraoperative decision-making process crucial in deciding between one- and two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Calprotectin is a promising point-of-care novel biomarker that has displayed high accuracy in detecting PJI. We aimed to evaluate the utility of intraoperative calprotectin lateral flow immunoassay (LFI) in THA patients with suspected chronic PJI. Methods. The study included 48 THAs in 48 patients with a clinical suspicion of PJI, but who did not meet European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) PJI criteria preoperatively, out of 105 patients undergoing revision THA at our institution for possible PJI between November 2020 and December 2022. Intraoperatively, synovial fluid calprotectin was measured with LFI. Cases with calprotectin levels ≥ 50 mg/l were considered infected and treated with two-stage revision THA; in negative cases, one-stage revision was performed. At least five tissue cultures were obtained; the implants removed were sent for sonication. Results. Calprotectin was positive (≥ 50 mg/l) in 27 cases; out of these, 25 had positive tissue cultures and/or sonication. Calprotectin was negative in 21 cases. There was one false negative case, which had positive tissue cultures. Calprotectin showed an area under the curve of 0.917, sensitivity of 96.2%, specificity of 90.9%, positive predictive value of 92.6%, negative predictive value of 95.2%, positive likelihood ratio of 10.6, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.04. Overall, 45/48 patients were correctly diagnosed and treated by our algorithm, which included intraoperative calprotectin measurement. This yielded a 93.8% concordance with postoperatively assessed EBJIS criteria. Conclusion. Calprotectin can be a valuable tool in facilitating the intraoperative decision-making process for cases in which chronic PJI is suspected and diagnosis cannot be established preoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):118–124

Introduction. Shared decision making (SDM) was introduced in hospital Lillebelt in 2019 and research reports that patients are more satisfied with their treatment, if they play an active role in choosing treatment. A Decision-Helper was constructed and introduced in the treatment for Colles fractures. This study aimed to understand how patients experience shared decision-making (SDM) for an acute illness, and how it affects them when making decisions about the treatment of their distal radius fracture. Method. An exploratory, qualitative study design was performed to understand the patient's experience, during the choice of treatment with SDM. 12 were recruited when they came to their first follow-up 5 days after the injury, in the outpatient clinic. 10 were interviewed; 3 face to face and 7 by telephone. All women aged 57-87 years and all had a displaced Colles fracture, which had been reduced in the Emergency Room. Result. Analyzing the interviews three themes emerged: 1) Acute situation. Patients was positive towards SDM, but found it demanding to participate in. Patients was still in crisis, 5 days after suffering from a fracture. Patients were unable to remember the information given in the ER, regarding the use of the Decision helper. Few had prepared themselves for the consult in the outpatient clinic. 2) Influence on treatment choice. It was unclear to the majority of patients, that cast or surgery, resulted in similar clinical outcomes. 3) The treatment decision was based on personal factors, more than the information received during the consult. Conclusion. Patients wants to be included in the treatment decision. It is important to highlight that booth treatments are equal in clinical outcome, before introducing the Decision-Helper. The doctor´s demeanor is of great importance to the patient's experience. Introducing SDM in the clinical setting requires training and repeated observations, to succeed

Purpose of the Study and Background. With a strong political agenda for change towards patient-centred healthcare, the notion of shared decision-making is reported to substantially improve patient experience, adherence to treatment and health outcomes. In clinical practice however, observational studies have shown shared decision-making is rarely implemented and patient preferences are seldom met. The aim of this study was to measure the extent of shared decision-making in clinical encounters involving physiotherapists and patients with low back pain. Methods and Results. Eighty outpatient encounters (from 12 clinicians) were observed, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the OPTION instrument. This measures 12 decision-making items, rated on a scale 0–4, which are summated and scaled to give a percentage: The higher the score, the greater the shared decision-making competency. The mean OPTION score was 24.0% (range 10.4%–43.8%). Providing patients with a list of treatment options was the only behaviour exhibited by every clinician, however in 73.8%, this was not demonstrated beyond a perfunctory level. Failure to offer the choice of doing nothing, or deferring the decision precluded clinicians from attaining a higher OPTION score. Conclusion. Despite the political agenda, a paternalistic view of care was evident and shared decision-making was under-developed in this cohort of patients with back pain. Providing a comprehensive outline of the available treatment options forms part of the duty-of-care and, whilst clinicians may have altruistic motives and a strong desire to treat, depending on patient preference and clinical indicators, doing nothing could be a legitimate option

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(5):306–308.

Surgical decision-making in lumbar spinal stenosis involves assessment of clinical parameters and the severity of the radiological stenosis. We suspected that surgeons based surgical decisions more on dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) than on the morphology of the dural sac. We carried out a survey among members of three European spine societies. The axial T2-weighted MR images from ten patients with varying degrees of DSCA and morphological grades according to the recently described morphological classification of lumbar spinal stenosis, with DSCA values disclosed in half the assessed images, were used for evaluation. We provided a clinical scenario to accompany the images, which were shown to 142 responding physicians, mainly orthopaedic surgeons but also some neurosurgeons and others directly involved in treating patients with spinal disorders. As the primary outcome we used the number of respondents who would proceed to surgery for a given DSCA or morphological grade. Substantial agreement among the respondents was observed, with severe or extreme stenosis as defined by the morphological grade leading to surgery. This decision was not dependent on the number of years in practice, medical density or specialty. Disclosing the DSCA did not alter operative decision-making. In all, 40 respondents (29%) had prior knowledge of the morphological grading system, but their responses showed no difference from those who had not. This study suggests that the participants were less influenced by DSCA than by the morphological appearance of the dural sac. . Classifying lumbar spinal stenosis according to morphology rather than surface measurements appears to be consistent with current clinical practice

Aims

A recent study used the RAND Corporation at University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) method to develop anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) appropriateness criteria. The purpose of our study was to determine how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) vary based on appropriateness.

Introduction

Various biomaterials and bone graft substitute technologies for use in osteomyelitis treatment are currently used in clinal practice. They vary in mode of action (with or without antibiotics) and clinical application (one-stage or two-stage surgery). This systematic review aims to compare the clinical evidence of different synthetic antimicrobial bone graft substitutes and antibiotic-loaded carriers in eradicating infection and clinical outcome in patients with chronic osteomyelitis.

The foot and ankle are very commonly affected in various paralytic conditions. Paralysis of different muscles acting on the foot results in characteristic gait aberrations. The gait abnormalities are a result of one or more of the consequences of paralysis including: loss of function, muscle imbalance, deformity and instability of joints. The aims of treatment of the paralysed foot and ankle are to: make the foot plantigrade, restore active dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait (if this is not possible then prevent the foot from ‘dropping’ into plantar flexion during swing), ensure that the ankle and subtalar joints are stable throughout the stance phase of gait, facilitate a powerful push-off at the terminal part of the stance phase (if this is not possible, at least prevent a calcaneal hitch in terminal stance). The specific aims of treatment in each patient depend on the pattern and the severity of paralysis that is present and hence the aims are likely to vary. In order to determine what treatment options are available in a particular patient, it is imperative that a careful clinical assessment of the foot is done. Based on the clinical assessment, these questions need to be answered before planning treatment: What are the muscles that are paralysed What is the power of each muscle that is functioning? Is there muscle imbalance at the ankle, subtalar or midtarsal joints that has either already produced a deformity or has the potential to produce a deformity in future? Are there any muscles of grade V power that can be spared for a tendon transfer without producing a fresh imbalance or instability. To facilitate responses to these questions, the muscle power of each muscle can be charted on a template that facilitates graphic representation of the muscle balance around the axes of the ankle and subtalar joints. This assessment clarifies whether a tendon transfer is a feasible option. If a tendon transfer is considered feasible, then the following questions also need to be answered: Is there a fixed, static deformity that needs to be corrected prior to a tendon transfer? If a tendon transfer was performed, would the child be capable of comprehending and cooperating with the post-operative muscle re-education programme?. The decision-making process will be outlined and the use of the template in choosing the tendon transfer and deciding the site of anchorage of the transferred tendon will be explained. With suitable examples the choice of tendon transfers in different patterns of paralysis would be illustrated

Aims

We quantitatively compared the 3D bone density distributions on CT scans performed on scaphoid waist fractures subacutely that went on to union or nonunion, and assessed whether 2D CT evaluations correlate with 3D bone density evaluations.

Following ankle sprain, there can be many causes of disability including ligament injuries, soft tissue or bony impingement, Peroneal tendon tears, osteochondral defects (OCD), synovitis and Osteoarthritis (OA). Aim: To assess the use of Ankle MRI in clinical decision-making in patients with pain and/or chronic instability following ankle sprains. Method: A retrospective case note review was undertaken for all ankle scopes performed and all Ankle MRI ordered by a single surgeon (AOA) over a three-year period (April 2004 – April 2007). Results: During this period 54 Ankle arthroscopies were performed. 24 had pre op MRI scans (16 ordered by AOA and 8 by others who then referred the patient) and 30 had no MRI. 8 case notes were not available. In 43 of the 46 available notes the patients presented with either chronic ankle pain or instability following ankle sprain. 32 had Anterolateral soft tissue impingement on arthroscopy. Of these 24 had MRI scans with only 3 reporting a soft tissue impingement. 13 patients had lateral ligament reconstruction. All 13 of these patients showed signs of instability on examination under anaesthesia (EUA). Of these 9 had MRI scans with 4 reporting a ligamentous injury. Five other patients had MRI scans that showed a lateral ligament injury but had a normal EUA and did not undergo a ligament reconstruction. 10 patients had moderate to severe OA on arthroscopy of the ankle. Of these 4 had MRI scans with 2 reporting OA changes but 2 reported as OCD. Conclusion: Analysing the available data suggests that the indication to perform an arthroscopy is not dependent on the results of the MRI scan but is a clinical one. The decision to reconstruct/repair the lateral ligament complex is a clinical one dependent on patient symptom and the EUA findings

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(9):598–600.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate whether including the stages of ulnar physeal closure in Sanders stage 7 aids in a more accurate assessment for brace weaning in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Increasingly often diagnosed by sophisticated investigation, rotator cuff disease may be treated conservatively or surgically. Surgical options are decompression alone, decompression and debridement, partial rotator cuff repair, full reconstruction, tendon transfer and prosthetic replacement.

Emphasising the quality of the repair rather than the classification of the injury, this paper details the criteria used in reaching a decision about the type of surgical treatment. Clinical, radiological, ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings are used. The prognosis is directly related to the repair.

Introduction

Dissatisfaction rates after TKA are reported to be between 15 – 25%, with unmet outcome expectations being a key contributor. Shared decision making tools (SDMT) are designed to align a patient's and surgeon's expectations. This study demonstrates clinical validation of a patient specific shared decision making tool.