Technology within medicine has great potential to bring about more accessible, efficient, and a higher quality delivery of care. Paediatric supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fracture in children and at our institution often have high rates of unnecessary long term clinical follow-up, leading to an inefficient use of healthcare and patient resources. This study aims to evaluate patient and clinical factors that significantly predict necessity for further clinical visits following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. A total of 246 children who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning following supracondylar humerus fractures were prospectively enrolled over a two year period. Patient demographics, perioperative course, goniometric measurements, functional outcome measures, clinical assessment and decision making for further follow up were assessed. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed and screened for significance via bivariate regression. Significant covariates were used to develop a predictive model through multivariate logistical regression. A probability cut-off was determined on the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve using the Youden index to maximize sensitivity and specificity. The regression model performance was then prospectively tested against 22 patients in a blind comparison to evaluate accuracy. 246 paediatrics patients were collected, with 29 cases requiring further follow up past the three month visit. Significant predictive factors for follow up were residual nerve palsy (p < 0 .001) and maximum active flexion angle of injured elbow (p < 0 .001). Insignificant factors included other goniometric measures, subjective evaluations, and functional outcomes scores. The probability of requiring further clinical follow up at the 3 month post-op point can be estimated with the equation: logit(follow-up) = 11.319 + 5.518(nerve palsy) − 0.108(maximum active flexion). Goodness of fit of the model was verified with Nagelkerke R2 = 0.574 and Hosmer & Lemeshow chi-square (p = 0.739). Area Under Curve of the ROC curve was C = 0.919 (SE = 0.035, 95% CI 0.850 – 0.988). Using Youden's Index, a cut-off for probability of follow up was set at 0.094 with the overall sensitivity and specificity maximized to 86.2% and 88% respectively. Using this model and cohort, 194 three month clinic visits would have been deemed medically unnecessary. Preliminary blind prospective testing against the 22 patient cohort demonstrates a model sensitivity and specificity at 100% and 75% respectively, correctly deeming 15 visits unnecessary. Virtual clinics and automated clinical decision making can improve healthcare inefficiencies, unclog clinic wait times, and ultimately enhance quality of care delivery. Our regression model is highly accurate in determining medical necessity for physician examination at the three month visit following supracondylar fracture closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. When applied correctly, there is potential for significant reductions in health care expenditures and in the economic burden on patient families by removing unnecessary visits. In light of positive patient and family receptiveness toward technology, our promising findings and predictive model may pave the way for remote health care delivery, virtual clinics, and automated clinical decision making

Significance. In ideal shared decision making (SDM), evidence-based treatment options, their likelihood of success, and the probability of adverse events is discussed with the patient. However, current SDM is fundamentally flawed because evidence for patient-specific treatment effectiveness and patient-specific adverse event risks is lacking. Observational outcome registries are better than randomized clinical trials for determining patient prognostic factors for outcomes and adverse events. No orthopaedic SDM clinical tools exist to predict patient-specific outcomes. Hypothesis: A patient-specific shared decision making tool can predict clinically significant outcomes and adverse events for total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Methods. A web–based prospective observational outcome registry collects patient reported outcomes (PROs) for TKR surgery. The data set for TKR surgery includes: (1) European quality of life (EQ-5D); (2) Oxford Knee Score (OKS); (3) Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS); and (4) Pain Likert Scale (PLS). A TKR outcome calculator predicts patient-specific functional outcome with a regression model using patient-specific pre-operative Oxford Knee Scores, diagnosis, co-morbidities, and demographics. Patient-specific joint infection relative risk is calculated using diagnosis, co-morbidities, and demographics. Functional outcomes are presented as minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs). MCID=σ. Δ. /2. Results. The MCID for the EQ-5D Health State Score (HSS) is 0.094 (0.000–1.000). The MCID for the EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is 9.1 (0–100). The MCID for the OKS is 4.45 (0–48). The MCID for the LEAS is 1.6 (1–18). The MCID for the PLS is 1.4 (0–10). Examples. (1) A 55-year-old white male with post-traumatic arthritis (ICD-9 716.16, BMI = 28.7, non-diabetic, recently quit smoking) has a pre-operative Oxford Knee Score of 10. His predicted outcome is 6.3 MCIDs and his relative risk of infection is 6.1 (4.4%) (Figure 1). He is expected to have an excellent outcome. His risk of infection can be reduced by using antibiotic-laden cement. Depending on the patient's preferences, he is an excellent candidate for a total knee replacement. (2) A 60-year-old white male with osteoarthritis (ICD-9 715.16, BMI = 25.0, non-diabetic, non-smoker) has a pre-operative Oxford Knee Score of 45. He has full thickness cartilage loss on his medial femoral condyle by MRI only. His predicted outcome is 0.67 MCIDs and his relative risk of infection is 1.9 (1.4%) (Figure 2). He is expected to have a poor outcome even though his risk of infection is low. Although he has full thickness cartilage loss on MRI, his pre-operative Oxford Knee Score of 45 demonstrates that he is very functional and has minimal opportunity for improving his knee function with a total knee replacement. He is a poor candidate for TKR surgery. Conclusions. The patient-specific SDM tool for TKR surgery can distinguish between excellent and poor surgical candidates when both patients meet radiographic criteria for surgery. The pre-operative Oxford Knee Score assesses knee function and/or disability. Patients with relatively high OKSs are less likely to achieve clinically significant improvements after total knee replacement surgery

Introduction. Limb deformity is usually assessed clinically assisted by long leg alignment radiographs and further imaging modalities (MRI and CT). Often decisions are made based on static imaging and simple gait interpretation in clinic. We have assessed the value of gait lab analysis in surgical decision making comparing surgical planning pre and post gait lab assessment. Materials & Methods. Patients were identified from the local limb reconstruction database. Patients were reviewed in the outpatient clinic and long leg alignment radiographs and a CT rotational limb profile were performed. A surgical plan was formulated and documented. All patients then underwent a formal gait lab analysis. The gait lab recommendations were then compared to the initial plan. Results. Twelve patients (8 female) with mean age of 14 (range 12–16) were identified. Nine were developmental torsional malalignments, one arthrogryposis, one hemiparesis secondary to spinal tumour resection and one syndromic limb deficiency. The gait lab recommended conservative management in four patients and agreed with eight surgical plans with one osteotomy level changing. Five patients are post-operative: two bilateral distal tibial osteotomies, two de-rotational femoral osteotomy with de-rotational tibial osteotomies and one bilateral femoral de-rotational osteotomies. Conclusions. Limb deformity correction is major surgery with long rehabilitation and recovery period. Gait lab analysis can identify who would benefit from conservative management rather than surgery with our study showing changes to surgical planning in one third of patients. The gait lab analysis helps to identify patients with functional and neuromuscular imbalances where correcting the bony anatomy may not actually benefit the patient

Introduction. It is standard practice to send samples for microbiological and histological analysis during revision surgery in suspected prosthetic joint infection. The aim of our study was to analyse the utility of histology in decision making in these patients. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of all revision hip arthroplasty patients between from September 2013 and August 2016 from the hospital database. We analysed the results of aspiration, culture and sensitivity, histology from intra-operative samples and inflammatory markers. Diagnostic utility statistics were performed. Results. 135 revisions were included. The mean age of the patients was 64.2±2.34 years.114 patients had a single stage revision and 21 patients had more than one procedure. 4 patients grew organisms in 3/5 microscopy samples and 5 patients grew organisms in 1 or 2 samples. Histology showed infection in 4 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of microbiology tests in detecting infection were 90.9% and 93% respectively (positive predictive value ppv =58.8, negative predictive value npv = 99.2). The sensitivity and specificity for histology were 57.1% and 92.5% respectively (ppv = 40% and npv = 74.4%). The cost of performing histology analysis in these patients is £206.50. The financial savings if none of the patients had a histological analysis would have been £27877.50. Discussion. Histology does not add any information to the results of microbiological analysis in prosthetic joint infection. It does not contribute to any change in the management. The cost of performing a histological analysis in one patient is substantial with no clinical utility. Conclusion. We conclude that sending intra-operative samples for histology in addition to microbiological analysis has limited clinical utility and may be safely discontinued without any compromise in clinical decision making capacity and substantial financial savings

Significance. In spite of evidence that total knee replacement (TKR) surgery is effective, numerous studies have demonstrated that approximately 20 percent of patients who have undergone TKR surgery are not satisfied. This relatively high rate of patients who are not satisfied is the result of unmet patient expectations. The strongest predictor of dissatisfaction after TKR is unmet expectations (RR = 10.7, Bourne, Chesworth, et al, 2010). This is confirmed by Dunbar, Richardson, and Robertsson (2013): “Unmet expectation seems to be a major cause of unsatisfactory outcomes and satisfaction is most strongly correlated with relief of pain, followed by improvement in physical function.” Objective: To develop patient reported outcome (PRO) recovery graphs for knee function, activity level, and pain relief to be used as a shared decision making tool for total knee replacement surgery. Methods. A proprietary joint arthroplasty database of patient reported outcomes (PROs) was analyzed to determine the recovery curve means and standard deviations of four PROs at six time points: pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-operatively for total knee replacement surgery. The recovery graphs are stratified by percentile (10%, 26%, 50%, 75%, and 90%) The PROs analyzed were: (1) European quality of life (EQ-5D); Oxford Knee Score (OKS); (3) Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS); and (4) Likert Pain Scale (LPS). The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using a distribution method where the MCID equals one half the standard deviation of the score change, MCID = σΔ/2. The LEAS and LPS are used to measure patients’ expectations for pain relief and activity improvement. Prior to discussing surgery, patients are asked to report their pre-operative pain and activity levels and to specify their expected pain relief and activity improvement one year after surgery. Results. EQ-5D: MCID 0.086, mean pre-op 0.695, 1 year post op 0.845, mean change 0.150 (1.74 MCIDs). Oxford Knee Score: MCID 4.55, mean pre-op 25.7, 1 year post op 39.7, mean change 14.0 (3.08 MCIDs). Lower Extremity Activity Scale: MCID 1.61, mean pre-op 9.08, 1 year post op 10.82, mean change 1.74 (1.08 MCIDs). Likert Pain Scale: MCID 1.26, mean pre-op 5.98, 1 year post op 1.41, mean change −4.57 (3.63 MCIDs). Stratified recovery graphs for Oxford Knee Score, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, and Likert Pain Scale are attached. Conclusions. Pain relief (3.63 MCIDs) and improved knee function (3.08 MCIDs) will be the most dramatic improvements for patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery. Stratified recovery graphs can be used as a shared decision making tool to manage both realistic and unrealistic expectations. The recovery graphs delineate the time course for rehabilitation. Patients typically do not exceed their pre-operative activity level until three months after surgery

Purpose. To determine whether MRI done prior to reduction altered the surgeon's choice of reduction method. Method. One hundred and four patients were included in this retrospective review. The first component of this study identified the presence of uncontained, herniated discs in this patient group. The MRI scans were reviewed by two teams including a radiology team and orthopaedic team. These scans were assessed without clinical information and the teams did not have access to the patient notes. An Interrater agreement assessment was applied to the data and the most reliable inter-observer variables of disc injury were chosen to identify the presence of a herniated uncontained intervertebral disc. The second part of this study entailed a detailed clinical note review specifically looking at type of reduction, whether it was intended and the reason why a certain type of reduction was chosen. These naturally divided the 104 patients into 5 cohorts including; closed reduction, Intended open reduction due to the documented presence of a ‘dangerous disc’, open reduction following failed closed reduction, open reduction with no documented reason and open reduction due to delay in presentation. Since closed reduction would not be considered in delayed presentations this cohort was removed from data analysis. Additionally the pre and post reduction neurological status was noted. Results. The cohort that included ‘Intended open reduction due to presence of an uncontained disc’ included 11.5% of patients in this data subset. These cases all had MRI's that were documented to have influenced the type of reduction (p=0.006). However 57% of patients with uncontained discs had had attempted closed reduction; 31% were successful and 27% failed. Using the binomial exact test we calculate the 95% confidence interval showing .054 and .208; thus the reduction method was significantly changed by performing MRI. One patient developed neurological compromise after failed closed reduction. This formed 3.6% of 28 uncontained discs that had attempted closed reduction. Conclusion. The risk of neurological deterioration with closed reduction in the presence of an uncontained disc the risk is 3.6% with an overall risk of 2.2% for this cohort. This study confirms pre-reduction MRI to significantly affect surgeon's decision making. Therr is a significant cost to MRI investigation and the incidence of neurological deterioration of 2.2% needs to be seen against this. ONE DISCLOSURE

Cartilage lesions vary in the spectrum from benign enchondromas to highly malignant dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas. From the treatment perspective, enchondromas are observed, Grade 1 chondrosarcomas are curetted like aggressive benign tumors, and rest are resected like other sarcomas. Although biopsy for tissue diagnosis is the gold standard for diagnosis and grade determination in chondrosarcoma, tumor heterogeneity limits the grading in patients following a biopsy. In the absence of definite pre-treatment grading, a surgeon is therefore often in a dilemma when deciding the best treatment option. Radiology has identified aggressive features and aggressiveness scores have been used to try and grade these tumors based on the imaging characteristics but there have been very few published reports with a uniform group and large number of cases to derive a consistent scoring and correlation.

The authors asked these study questions :(1) Does Radiology Aggressiveness and its Score correlate with the grade of chondrosarcoma? (2) Can a cut off Radiology Agressiveness Score value be used to guide the clinician and add value to needle biopsy information in offering histological grade dependent management?

A retrospective analysis of patients with long bone extremity intraosseous primary chondrosarcomas were correlated with the final histology grade for the operated patients and Radiological parameters with 9 parameters identified a priori and from published literature (radiology aggressiveness scores - RAS) were evaluated and tabulated. 137 patients were identified and 2 patients were eliminated for prior surgical intervention. All patients had tissue diagnosis available and pre-treatment local radiology investigations (radiographs and/or CT scans and MRI scans) to define the RAS parameters.

Spearman correlation has indicated that there was a significant positive association between RAS and final histology grading of long bone primary intraosseous chondrosarcomas. We expect higher RAS values will provide grading information in patients with inconclusive pre-surgery biopsy to tumor grades and aid in correct grade dependant surgical management of the lesion. Prediction of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma from higher RAS will be attempted and a correlation to obtain a RAS cut off, although this may be challenging to achieve due to the overlap of features across the intermediate grade, high grade and dedifferentiated grades.

Radiology Aggressiveness correlates with the histologic grade in long bone extremity primary chondrosarcomas and the correlation of radiology and biopsy can aid in treatment planning by guiding us towards a low-grade neoplasm which may be dealt with intralesional extended curettage or high-grade lesion which need to be resected. Standalone RAS may not solve the grading dilemma of primary long bone intraosseous chondrosarcomas as the need for tissue diagnosis for confirming atypical cartilaginous neoplasm cannot be eliminated, however in the event of a needle biopsy grade or inconclusive open biopsy it may guide us towards a correlational diagnosis along with radiology and pathology for grade based management of the chondrosarcoma.

Introduction

Purpose: Injuries to the long bones of the upper limb resulting in bone defects are rare but potentially devastating. Literature on the management of these injuries is limited to case reports and small case series. The aim of this study was to collate the most recent published work on the management of upper limb bone defects to assist with evidence based management when confronted with these cases.

The burden of metastatic bone disease (MBD) in our Canadian cancer population continues to increase. MBD has a significant effect on patient morbidity, mortality, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There are various technical options used to surgically stabilize MBD lesions, surgical decision-making is variable and largely dependent on anatomic and surgeon-based factors. There is a paucity of research examining how surgical decision-making for MBD can be modified or individualized to improve quality of life (QOL) and functional outcomes, while more accurately aligning with patient-reported goals and expectations. The objective of this study was tosurvey MBD patients, support persons, physicians, and allied health care providers (HCP) with the goal of identifying 1) important contributors to HRQOL, 2) discordance in peri-operative expectations, and 3) perceived measures of success in the surgical management of MBD.

This project is a longitudinal patient-engaged research initiative in MBD. A survey was developed based on HRQOL themes in the literature and based on feedback from our patient research partners. Participants were asked to identify 1) important contributors to HRQOL and 2) perceived measures of success relevant to the surgical management of MBD. Participants were asked to rank themes from ‘extremely important’ to ‘not important at all’. Using open-ended questions, participants were asked to identify areas of improvement. Responses from the open-ended questions were analyzed by an experienced qualitative researcher using conventional content analysis. Participant's demographics were calculated using descriptive statistics. Concordance or discordance of perceived measure of success was assessed via a Chi-Square test of independence. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS® software.

Nine patients, seven support persons, 23 orthopaedic surgeons, 11 medical oncologists, 16 radiation oncologists, 16 nurses, and eight physiotherapists completed the survey. Regarding perceived measures of success, increased life expectancy (p Two main themes emerged around the timeliness of surgical care and the coordination of multidisciplinary care from patients and support persons. Patients and support persons expressed a sense of urgency in progressing to surgery/treatment, and frustration at perceived delays in treatment. Within coordination of care, patients and support persons would like clearer communication from the health care team.

There is discordance between patient/support person goals compared to physicians/HCP goals in the surgical management of MBD. Surgical decision-making and operative techniques that minimize disease progression and improve survival are important to MBD patients. Timely access to surgery/surgical consultation and improved multidisciplinary communication is important to patients. This data suggests improved peri-operative communication and education is needed for MBD patients. Furthermore, future research evaluating how modern orthopaedic surgical techniques influence survival and disease progression in MBD is highly relevant and important to patients with MBD.

Introduction

With many stakeholders, healthcare decisions are complex. However, patient interests should be prioritized. This maximizes healthcare value (quality divided by cost), simultaneously minimizing costs (objective) and maximizing quality (subjective). Unfortunately, even ‘high value’ procedures like total knee arthroplasty (TKA) suffer from recovery assessment subjectivity (i.e. high assessment variability) and increasing costs. High TKA costs and utilization yield high annual expenditures (∼$22B), including postoperative physical therapy (PT) accounting for ∼10% of total costs (∼$2.3B annually). Post-TKA PT is typically homogenous across subjects ensuring most recover, however recent work shows outcomes unimpacted by PT. Accordingly, opportunities exist improving healthcare value by simultaneously reducing unnecessary PT expenditures and improving outcomes. However, discerning recovery completion relies on discrete ROM measures captured clinically and subjective clinician experience (i.e. intuition about recovery). Accordingly, our goal was developing objective post-TKA performance assessment methods utilizing gait knee ROM and statistical analyses to categorize patient recovery (‘accelerated,’ ‘delayed,’ or ‘normal’).

Michael Robinson has been a Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom for 10 years. His special interests include the treatment of proximal humeral and clavicle fractures, and shoulder instability.

The majority of proximal humerus fractures can be managed non-operatively with surgery reserved for approximately 10–20% of patients. The choice of surgical treatment is usually between a humeral head head-conserving fracture reduction and internal fixation and humeral head sacrifice hemiarthroplasty. Current indications for primary hemiarthroplasty include a displaced four-part fracture (with or without associated dislocation of the humeral head) and a head-splitting fracture (with involvement of >40% of the articular surface), due to the high associated risk of avascular necrosis. However, the indications for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures have expanded over the last decade, and many fractures which have previously been considered unsalvageable and treated either non-operatively or with hemiarthroplasty are now deemed reconstructable. This is partially as a result of improved appreciation of sub-groups of fractures which have a better prognosis from head-salvage, the possibility that subsequent development of osteonecrosis may be relatively asymptomatic and the realisation that functional results after hemiarthroplasty are often sub-optimal.

The purpose of this talk is to discuss the current concepts in fracture classification and the indications for operative treatment for these fractures. The novel surgical approaches, techniques and implants which have renewed interest in their treatment are also highlighted.

None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study.

Introduction

The available scoring methods and outcome analysis methods in lower extremity skeletal trauma with vascular injuries are not always specific. Biochemical parameters like venous blood lactate, bicarbonate and serum CPK (at the time of admission and serial monitoring) were measured to assess whether they supplement clinical parameters in predicting limb salvageability in lower extremity skeletal trauma with vascular injuries. Materials and methods: 74 adult patients with long bone fracture of lower limb associated with vascular injury (open and closed) were included in the study group. Patients with significant head injury (who cannot provide informed consent) and those with mangled extremities (MESS score>8) were excluded.

Introduction. Introduction: Pre-operative counselling to prepare patients for frame surgery is important to ensure expectations of recovery and rehabilitation are realistic and anxiety is reduced. The aim of the study was to ascertain whether the current clinical nurse specialist frames counselling session (CNS FCS) prepared patients adequately for life with a frame as well as to explore information patients felt was missing. Materials & Methods. Materials and Method: Patient reported questions were used to assess frames patient views on the CNS FCS. Thirty frames patients were asked about the CNS FCS information, involvement in decision making, factors influencing frames surgery decision and patient experience. Results. Results: There were 27 patients who received CNS frames counselling and 82% of those (N=22) said they definitely received enough information to make a decision when faced with a choice of surgical plans. 85% (N=23) reported definitely feeling involved in the decision making process with factors contributing to choosing frame treatment being lower risk of deep infection, quicker / safer recovery and advice from the limb reconstruction team. 48% (N=13) definitely felt the CNS FCS gave them a realistic idea of what it's like to live with a frame and 52% (N=14) answered yes to some extent. Feedback on providing more information around sleeping with a frame was provided which has been added to future CNS FCS. Conclusions. Conclusion: The current CNS FCS does prepare patients for frames surgery and life with a circular frame and important points raised by patients in this study have been added to future patient information sessions. Regular patient satisfaction audits should be carried out to ensure information remains useful and current patient needs and concerns are met

Purpose. Surgical training is based on an apprenticeship model. This training can be divided broadly into three main categories: practical skills, knowledge and decision making. The operating room is the nexus of a large part of surgical teaching. The supervising surgeon imparts both practical teaching as well as didactic information to the trainee during surgical procedures. A large amount of decision making skills are also acquired in the OR. Indeed, a large part of the surgical teams time is spent in the operating room which makes it an ideal educational environment. Bench model training is one teaching modality whereby the novice surgeon is taught surgical skills on life-like models. This practice enhances and accelerates the ability of the trainee to acquire fundamental, technical and surgical skills in the operating room. Whether bench model training provides an advantage on the ability of the trainee to acquire knowledge and decision making skills is unknown. Based on the motor learning theories, it is hypothesized that bench-model training will allow junior residents to be more interactive than trainees lacking similar active hands-on training. In this study, we examined whether bench model training provides an advantage on the ability of the trainee to acquire knowledge and decision making skills. Method. 30 junior surgical residents from various surgical divisions, with minimal knowledge of technical, procedural and cognitive skills related to the ulna bone fixation (primary task), were recruited in this study. 15 residents, randomly assigned, were given instructions and the benefit of practice on a bench model, and 15 were given instructions but not the chance to practice the skill on a bench model. All residents, while tested for their accuracy and time taken for ulna fixation (secondary task, decision making skills), were also verbally taught information on different aspects of primary bone healing. This information was evaluated by a multiple-choice test (knowledge acquisition). Results. Residents who practiced outperformed those without practice in ulna fixation in accuracy (P<0.05) and total time (p=0.0409, n=30). The group that were given bench model training also scored higher (P<0.05) on the multiple choice questions than the group that did not have the benefit of bench model training prior to testing. This showed that the trained group of residents had better ability for knowledge acquisition while performing the procedure than the untrained group. Conclusion. Bench model training can provide a means of enhancing learning, both in decision making skills and knowledge acquisition, in addition to motor learning activities inside the operating room

Operative management of clavicle fractures is increasingly common. In the context of explaining the risks and benefits of surgery, understanding the impact of incisional numbness as it relates to the patient experience is key to shared decision making. This study aims to determine the prevalence, extent, and recovery of sensory changes associated with supraclavicular nerve injury after open reduction and plate internal fixation of middle or lateral clavicle shaft fractures. Eighty-six patients were identified retrospectively and completed a patient experience survey assessing sensory symptoms, perceived post-operative function, and satisfaction. Correlations between demographic factors and outcomes, as well as subgroup analyses were completed to identify factors impacting patient satisfaction. Ninety percent of patients experienced sensory changes post-operatively. Numbness was the most common symptom (64%) and complete resolution occurred in 32% of patients over an average of 19 months. Patients who experienced burning were less satisfied overall with the outcome of their surgery whereas those who were informed of the risk of sensory changes pre-operatively were more satisfied overall. Post-operative sensory disturbance is common. While most patients improve, some symptoms persist in the majority of patients without significant negative effects on satisfaction. Patients should always be advised of the risk of persistent sensory alterations around the surgical site to increase the likelihood of their satisfaction post-operatively

Escalating health care expenditure worldwide is driving the need for effective resource decision-making, with medical practitioners increasingly making complex resource decisions within the context of patient care. Despite raising serious legal and ethical issues in practice, this has attracted little attention in Australia, or internationally. In particular, it is unknown how orthopaedic surgeons perceive their obligations to the individual patient, and the wider community, when rationing care, and how they reconcile competing obligations. This research explores legal and ethical considerations, and resource allocation by Australian orthopaedic surgeons, as a means of achieving public health cost containment driven by macro-level policy and funding decisions. This research found that Australian orthopaedic surgeon's perceptions, and resource allocation decision making, can be explained by understanding how principles of distributive justice challenge, and shift, the traditional medical paradigm. It found that distributive justice, and challenges of macro level health policy and funding decisions, have given rise to two new medical paradigms. Each which try to balance the best interests of individual patients with demands in respect of the sustainability of the health system, in a situation where resources may be constrained. This research shows that while bedside rationing has positioned the medical profession as the gate keepers of resources, it may have left them straddling an increasingly irreconcilable void between the interests of the individual patient and the wider community, with the sustainability of the health system hanging in the balance

The ability to calculate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) would enhance treatment decision making and facilitate economic analysis. QALYs are calculated using utilities, or health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) weights. An instrument designed for cervical myelopathy disease would increase the sensitivity and specificity of HRQoL assessments. The objective of this study is to develop a multi-attribute utility function for the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) Score. We recruited a sample of 760 adults from a market research panel. Using an online discrete choice experiment (DCE), participants rated 8 choice sets based on mJOA health states. A multi-attribute utility function was estimated using a mixed multinomial-logit regression model (MIXL). The sample was partitioned into a training set used for model fitting and validation set used for model evaluation. The regression model demonstrated good predictive performance on the validation set with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.80-0.82)). The regression model was used to develop a utility scoring rubric for the mJOA. Regression results revealed that participants did not regard all mJOA domains as equally important. The rank order of importance was (in decreasing order): lower extremity motor function, upper extremity motor function, sphincter function, upper extremity sensation. This study provides a simple technique for converting the mJOA score to utilities and quantify the importance of mJOA domains. The ability to evaluate QALYs for DCM will facilitate economic analysis and patient counseling. Clinicians should use these findings in order to offer treatments that maximize function in the attributes viewed most important by patients

We have previously reported on the medium-term outcomes following a non-operative protocol of a short period of splinting followed by early movement to treat simple dislocations of the elbow. We undertook extended follow up of our original patient study group to determine whether the excellent results previously reported were maintained in the very long-term. A secondary question was to determine the rate and need for any late surgical intervention. We attempted to contact all patients in the original patient study group. Patients were requested to complete the Oxford elbow score (OES), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and a validated patient satisfaction questionnaire. Patients were requested to attend a face-to-face assessment where they underwent a clinical examination including neurovascular assessment, range-of-motion and an assessment of ligamentous stability. Seventy-one patients (65%) from the original patient study group agreed to participate in the study. The mean duration of follow-up was 19.3 years. At final follow-up patients reported excellent functional outcome scores and a preserved functional range of movement in the injured elbows. The mean DASH score was 5.22 points and the mean Oxford Elbow Score was 91.6 points. The mean satisfaction score was 90.9 points. Our study shows that the excellent outcomes following treatment with a protocol of a short period of splinting and early movement remain excellent and are maintained into the very long term. These findings support our hypothesis that this treatment protocol is appropriate and suitable for most patients with simple dislocations of the elbow. The role for primary ligamentous repair for this patient group should be carefully considered. Work to more clearly define the anticipated benefits of surgery for specific patient groups or injury patterns would help to support informed decision making

The role of dual consultant operating (DCO) in general orthopaedics has not been researched; where it has shown benefit in other specialties, there is a lack of information on how DCO affects the surgeons themselves. We wanted to explore the potential effects of DCO on stress, as a foundation for further research to guide support for our surgeons. We conducted a survey among orthopaedic consultants around New Zealand, containing questions pertaining to the demographics of respondents, their experience with DCO, what the expected risks and benefits of DCO would be, and provided two high-stress exemplar clinical scenarios where respondents were asked to rate their expected stress level at baseline, with a more junior consultant present, and with a more senior consultant present. We found 99% of respondents had been involved in DCO at some point in their careers, yet only 38% were involved in DCO on at least a monthly basis. Perceived benefits greatly outweighed potential risks: 95% felt DCO would decrease their stress, 91% felt it improved intraoperative decision making, and 89% felt it provided more enjoyment at work and enhanced collegiality. A decrease in perceived stress was seen from baseline with a more junior consultant available and a greater decrease in stress seen with a more senior consultant, particularly in a complex elective setting. All respondents felt there is benefit in DCO and the vast majority feel it has positive effects on stress levels. In a time where burnout is more prevalent, using tools such as DCO could be an effective way to decrease stress, enhance enjoyment and collegiality — challenging some key contributors to burnout — and support mentorship with further skill acquisition. This research provides a good base to pursue further qualitative and quantitative research into the area, with a view to addressing barriers to provision of regular DCO

Introduction. Knee arthrodesis is a useful limb salvage technique to maintain function in patients with complex and infected total knee arthroplasties (TKA). There are a number of commonly used external fixators, but no consensus on which of these are optimal. The aim of this study was to synthesise the current literature to guide clinical decision making and improve patient outcomes. We systematically review the literature to compare outcomes of external fixators in arthrodesis following infected TKA. Materials & Methods. A systematic review of the literature of primary research articles investigating the use of external fixators for knee arthrodesis after an infected TKA was conducted. Relevant articles were identified with a search strategy on online databases (EMBASE and Medline) and reviewed by two independent reviewers. Clinical outcome measures were independently extracted by two reviewers which included union rate, infection eradication rate, complication rate, time to fusion, and time in frame. Results. Circular frames were more likely to result in union compared to biplanar (OR 1.40 p=0.456) and monoplanar frames (OR 2.28 p=0.018). Infection recurrence was least likely in those treated by circular frames when compared to monoplanar (OR 0.12 p=0.005) and biplanar external fixators (0.41 P=0.331). Complication rates were highest in the circular fixator group, followed by the monoplanar fixator group and biplanar fixator group at 34%, 31% and 11% respectively. Conclusions. Analysis of the available literature suggests higher union and infection eradication rates with circular frames over the other two fixation methods despite a higher complication rate. There is a paucity in the literature and therefore, no firm conclusions can be drawn. Further research investigating the variations and biomechanical properties between different external fixation methods for knee arthrodesis is necessary. Further clarity in reporting and pooled data would be useful for future analysis