Literature has suggested that obese (BMI >30) and morbidly obese (BMI > 35) patients should not be offered surgery as a day case due to increases in complication and readmission rates. At Torbay hospital, patients are routinely offered day case surgery, in a specialist day case unit, regardless of BMI. This is done with minimal complications and enables a higher throughput of patients and at least 75% of surgical procedures to be performed as a day case, as per NHS guidelines. We present 12 year data of day case knee arthroscopy surgery performed at Torbay hospital. Over 12 years, 3421 knee arthroscopies were performed. 649 were performed on obese patients and 222 on morbidly obese patients. No anaesthetic complications were observed in any of the obese patient groups and readmissions rates (up to 28 days) were 0.8% in the morbidly obese group and 0.9% in the Obese group, compared to 0.9% for patients with BMI <30. Our data shows that day case surgery can be performed on all patients regardless of BMI and patient obesity. We believe that other units should offer surgery to obese and morbidly obese patients to allow increased efficiency and achievement of NHS day case guidelines.
Due to widespread cancellations in elective orthopaedic procedures, the number of patients on waiting list for surgery is rising. We aim to determine and quantify if disparities exist between inpatient and day-case orthopaedic waiting list numbers; we also aim to determine if there is a ‘hidden burden’ that already exists due to reductions in elective secondary care referrals. Retrospective data were collected between 1 April 2020 and 31 December 2020 and compared with the same nine-month period the previous year. Data collected included surgeries performed (day-case vs inpatient), number of patients currently on the orthopaedic waiting list (day-case vs inpatient), and number of new patient referrals from primary care and therapy services.Aims
Methods
Unicompartmental knee replacements offer improved function with more rapid recovery compared to TKR. There is no published experience with introducing this procedure as a day case in the UK. We report on our experience with a new protocol allowing the patient to be discharged on the day of surgery. A new combination of anaesthetic and surgical techniques are employed. Paracetamol, ibuprofen and pregabalin are given pre-operatively. Patients receive a GA and a subsartorial saphenous nerve block is administered under ultrasound control. The surgery is performed using a routine minimally invasive technique. The joint and surrounding tissues are infiltrated with a combination of LA and adrenaline. Wound closure is with subcutaeneous suture and tissue glue. Patients are mobilised on the day of surgery and if comfortable discharged on paracetamol, codeine, ibuprofen, tramadol P.R.N and buprenorphine patch. Length of stay, pain scores, presence of nausea/vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, post-operative bleeding and patient satisfaction are all recorded. 18 out of 19 patients have been discharged on the day of surgery. All record high satisfaction. Patients can be safely discharged on the day of surgery after UKR with high levels of satisfaction. We believe we are the first unit in the UK to achieve this.
Background. Benefits of day case foot and ankle surgery includes reduced hospital stay, associated cost savings for the hospital, high patient satisfaction and quicker recovery with no increase in complication rates. In 2007, we set up the preoperative foot and ankle group. Patients were seen three weeks before surgery by a specialist nurse, physiotherapist and a preoperative evaluation is done. The therapist explains the patient's weightbearing status and advices on how to carry this out. Our aim was to reduce inpatient hospital stay and increase our day case procedures. Methods. We evaluated length of stay and physiotherapy intervention for all our patients during the first three months of 2007 to 2011. Mean length of stay was calculated and Mann-Whitney U test was performed using median. Results. Mean length of stay for combined forefoot and midfoot group reduced by 1.92 days and median reduction was statistically significant(p< 0.01). For forefoot surgery alone, the mean length reduced by 2.14 and median reduction was significant(p< 0.001) and for midfoot surgery alone, the mean stay reduced by 1.34 days and median was significant (p< 0.001). Hind foot patient's mean length of stay reduced by 6.78 days and the median was significant (p< 0.001). But for the ankle group the mean length of stay did reduce but the median was not statistically significant (p=0.225). Day case surgery increased by 43.5% for forefoot, 23.2% for midfoot and 14% for ankle surgeries but not for hindfoot. Conclusions. The overall results show that the preoperative foot and ankle group has resulted in reduction of inpatient stay and increase in
