Background. PROMs have become an integral assessment tool of clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction. To date, PROMs for lumbar discectomy are not an NHS requirement, although voluntary collection via the British Spine Registry is encouraged. Despite this, PROMs for day case microdiscectomy is scarcely reported. We present PROMs for day case microdiscectomy at Lancashire Teaching Hospitals. Aims. 1). To review PROMs to quantify leg pain, back pain, EQ5D and ODI scores. 2). Evaluate PROMs data collection compliance. Methods. We studied PROMs data, taken prospectively as part of routine clinical care for all patients who underwent single level day case microdiscectomy between January 2013 to December 2015. PROMs included VAS for back and leg pain, EQ5D and ODI scores. Preoperative PROMs were compared to all available postoperative PROMs at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. Paired student T-tests were used to compare preoperative to postoperative scores. Results. Preoperative PROMs were recorded for 132 patients. Postoperative PROMs were recorded for 48 patients at 3 months, 51 patients at 6 months, 37 patients at 12 months and 15 patients at 24 months. Significant postoperative improvements (p<0.05) were found at all time points for back pain, leg pain, EQ5D and ODI, with the exception EQ5D at 24 months (p = 0.10). Conclusion. There was significant improvement in VAS back and leg scores, as well as ODI scores over 24 months. Further work is needed to improve compliance with postoperative PROMs and to optimise the benefit of these health assessment tools. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Aim. To assess the safety of day case lumbar decompressive surgery. Method. Retrospective study of 233 consecutive patients undergoing DCLDS who were identified from a prospective electronic database. Results. Between Jan 2011 and April 2014, 131 open and 102 microscopic surgeries were done in patients with mean age of 46 (16–88) years and male: female ratio of 136 (59%):97 (41%). Inclusion criteria were no known anesthetic reaction, ASA grade I or II, BMI <35, less than 30 minutes travel time and responsible home carer. Patients were discharged after clinical assessment with cauda equina advice and emergency contact number. 215 (92%) procedures were single level, of which 188(87%) unilateral and 27 (13%) were bilateral procedures. 18 (8%) procedures were multiple levels, of which 12(67%) unilateral and 6 (33%) were bilateral procedures. Majority, 107 (50%), 97 (45%) procedures were done at L5/S1 and L4/L5 levels respectively and rest 11(5%) at higher level. The 7 day and 30 day re-presentation figures were 7 (3%) & 15(6.4%) as following: Pain (n=3), Medication (n=2), Wound issues (n=5), Infection (n=2), Headache (n=2), ?VTE (n=1). Eleven were sent home and 4 (1.7%) were admitted with 2 requiring further surgery, one revision discectomy and one wound washout. No cauda equina or compressive haematoma were encountered. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that open and microscopic lumbar discectomy at single or multiple levels can be performed safely as a day case procedure. The representation rate to the ED can be potentially reduced by better advice and pain management. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Background. Advances in surgical and anesthetic technique have resulted in a reducing length of stay for lumbar decompression, with the first day case procedure published in the literature in 1980. Current evidence suggests day case surgery is associated with improved patient satisfaction, faster recovery, reduced infection rates and financial savings. Following the introduction of a locally agreed day case protocol for lumbar microdiscectomy, we reviewed our 30-day postoperative complication rates. Aims. To review postoperative complication rates for patients who underwent day case primary lumbar microdiscectomy. Methods. We studied all patients that met a locally agreed day case protocol for lumbar microdiscectomy and were operated upon between 1. st. March 2013 and 31. st. December 2015. Results. 134 patients underwent primary day case microdiscectomy (70 males, 64 females). The cohort had a mean age of 41 years (16–82). 96% (n=129) were single level procedures, 93% were unilateral (n=125). 81% (n=109) took place at either L4/L5 or L5/S1. All patients were discharged on the same day as admission and operation. 3% (n=4) of patients re-presented to hospital within 30 days of which 75% (n=3) were reviewed and discharged from the emergency department within 4 hours, following a satisfactory clinical review. One patient required an inpatient stay for a washout of a superficial postoperative infection. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that with adherence to robust listing and discharge protocols, day case lumbar microdiscectomy can be safely performed. Our 30-day postoperative complication rate of under 1% is comparable to that of traditional inpatient primary lumbar microdiscectomy. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Aims

With resumption of elective spine surgery services in the UK following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a multicentre British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) collaborative study to examine the complications and deaths due to COVID-19 at the recovery phase of the pandemic. The aim was to analyze the safety of elective spinal surgery during the pandemic.

Purpose and Background. This pilot study aimed to determine the accuracy of lumbar spine combined movement (CM) testing for diagnosing facet joint mediated pain, by comparing CM to medial branch blocks (MBB) - the gold standard in the diagnosis of facet joint pain. A regular compression pattern of CM combines active extension and lateral flexion, which is believed to compress the facet joints greater than physiological uni-planar movements. Method and Results. 96 patients attending a pain clinic day case unit for diagnostic MBB were recruited. Patients' pain responses to CMs were measured prior to and thirty minutes following MBB. The effect of weight bearing and recumbence, RMDQ, EQ-5D and MYMOP were also measured. The regular compression CM test had 80% sensitivity (95%CI: 71% to 89%) and 50% specificity (95%CI: 28% to 71%). The regular compression CM group had the largest pre-post VAS difference (median 4 points). The patients whose pain was not relieved in recumbence (n=15) showed a significant VAS difference of 6 points p=0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the pre and post pain scores, p<0.001. There was no association between MBB response and RMDQ, EQ-5D, MYMOP scores, duration of symptoms or standing as a provoking activity. Conclusion. Regular compression CM testing can be used as a diagnostic tool to identify patients with facet joint mediated pain, particularly when associated with high pain scores. Low back pain (LBP) provoked by standing and relieved with recumbence are common features in the LBP population but are not indicators of facet joint pathology, contrary to many clinicians' beliefs

Aims

The current pandemic caused by COVID-19 is the biggest challenge for national health systems for a century. While most medical resources are allocated to treat COVID-19 patients, several non-COVID-19 medical emergencies still need to be treated, including vertebral fractures and spinal cord compression. The aim of this paper is to report the early experience and an organizational protocol for emergency spinal surgery currently being used in a large metropolitan area by an integrated team of orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons.