As patient data continues to grow, the importance of efficient and precise analysis cannot be overstated. The employment of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), specifically Chat GPT-4, in the realm of medical data interpretation has been on the rise. However, its effectiveness in comparison to manual data analysis has been insufficiently investigated. This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate the accuracy and time-efficiency of Generative AI (GPT-4) against manual data interpretation within extensive datasets pertaining to patients with orthopaedic injuries. A dataset, containing details of 6,562 orthopaedic trauma patients admitted to a district general hospital over a span of two years, was reviewed. Two researchers operated independently: one utilised GPT-4 for insights via prompts, while the other manually examined the identical dataset employing Microsoft Excel and IBM® SPSS® software. Both were blinded on each other's procedures and outcomes. Each researcher answered 20 questions based on the dataset including injury details, age groups, injury specifics, activity trends and the duration taken to assess the data. Upon comparison, both GPT-4 and the manual researcher achieved consistent results for 19 out of the 20 questions (95% accuracy). After a subsequent review and refined prompts (prompt engineering) to GPT-4, the answer to the final question aligned with the manual researcher's findings. GPT-4 required just 30 minutes, a stark contrast to the manual researcher's 9-hour analytical duration. This quality improvement project emphasises the transformative potential of Generative AI in the domain of medical data analysis. GPT-4 not only paralleled the accuracy of manual analysis but also achieved this in significantly less time. For optimal accurate results, data analysis by AI can be enhanced through human oversight. Adopting AI-driven approaches, particularly in orthopaedic data interpretation, can enhance efficiency and ultimately improve patient care. We recommend future investigations on large and more varied datasets to reaffirm these outcomes

Studies and meta-analyses worldwide show an increased use of one-stage revisions for treating periprosthetic hip infections, often yielding comparable or better outcomes than two-stage revisions. However, it remains unclear if these successful results can be consistently achieved nationwide besides large centers. This observational cohort study used data from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) to compare the mortality and re-revision rates between one-stage (n=8183) and two-stage (n=657) first-time revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). Kaplan-Meier estimates were applied to evaluate the re-revision rate and cumulative mortality for RTHA. There was a significant difference in mortality between one-stage and two-stage RTHA (p=0.02). One-year post-surgery, the mortality rate was 9.4% for one-stage revisions and 5.5% for two-stage revisions. At the five-year follow-up, the mortality rate for one-stage revisions was 25.5%, compared to 20.0% for two-stage revisions. No significant differences (p=0.30) were found in re-revision rates between one-stage and two-stage revisions after one year (one-stage 16.5% vs. two-stage 13.5%) or five years (one-stage 21.6% vs. two-stage 20.8%). For multiple revisions, the mortality differences were even larger (p<0.001), with a one-year mortality rate of 12.8% for one-stage RTHA and 5.7% for two-stage RTHA. Despite the excellent results of one-stage RTHA in the literature from individual large centers, it shows a significantly higher mortality rate with equal re-revision rate compared to two-stage revision in the nationwide care besides large centers. Significant differences can already be seen within the first year, indicating an increased perioperative mortality for one-stage revision, which might be explained by longer surgery duration, blood-loss and patient selection or maybe a lack of experience concerning proper surgical debridement for one-stage revision. This illustrates the need to establish centers for joint-revision surgery that provide interdisciplinary care and high case numbers to improve perioperative outcomes

Since 1977 we did implant ceramic on ceramic THR in younger and active population. In 1991 we published (JBJS B N°4) data's in a consecutive group of patients under 50 years of age. What about the same patients for more than 30 years? Eighty-six hips in 75 patients, 41 males 34 females, mean age 43 (18 to 50), mean weight 68 kg (36 to 100), Charnley class: 38 A, 28 (38 hips) B, 9 patients (10 hips) C. Sixty-six primary procedures, 20 revisions (18 failed arthroplasties: 6 THR, 5 resurfacing, four single cup, two hemiarthroplasty, one bipolar), one after acetabular fractures. Four hips previously infected. Eight Patients deceased (8 hips) prosthesis still in place, ten lost to follow-up before 2 years, eight hips in 8 patients were revised before the review, partially followed: from 2 to 20 years: 35, completely followed: 25 hips in 23 patients resuming in: No pain in 20, slight pain in 2, severe disability in 3 not related to the hip, no radiolucent lines in 22, radiolucent lines in 3, no osteolysis in 25. Revision for: early sepsis in one, socket loosening in 8 (3 revisions cases), femoral head fractures in 2: one extra small head (22mm) for Crowe 3 DDH, one fractured at 24 years. Inertness, stability related to fibrous tissue generation, no noise

Osteoarthritis of the hip is common and the mainstay of surgical treatment for end-stage disease is total hip replacement. There are few RCTs comparing long-term outcomes between prostheses; therefore, surgeons and patients are reliant on single-centre case-series and recently, analysis of joint registries, when making evidence-based implant choices. We conducted a systematic review, conforming to PRISMA, of Medline and Embase in September 2017. Single-centre case-series and papers analysing registries were included. Series looking at disease-specific cohorts (other than OA), under 15 years follow-up or lacking survival analyses were excluded. Resurfacings, revisions and complex-primaries were also excluded. 2750 abstracts were screened, resulting in 299 full-text articles. Following full review 124 articles were excluded and 21 series added from references, resulting in 150 analyses of individual prostheses/constructs and 12 papers from registries. We also analysed annual reports of registries. Registry data indicated cemented prostheses tended to better outcomes at late follow-ups, whereas case-series showed cementless prostheses tended to have better survival past 15 years with revision for any reason (of stem, cup or either component) as the end-point. The discrepancy between results from registry data and single-centre case series is stark, and whilst the reasons for these differences may be multifactorial, single-centre case-series included in this review often lacked sufficient power to provide precise estimates of survival. This is contrasted to data from registries, which tended to have far greater numbers from multiple centres, allowing results to be generalised to the population. The difference between these two modes of analysis suggests bias exists in selection and outcomes from single-centre series. The varied quality of reporting in case-series make it difficult for a reader to adequately assess bias, and accurately inform contemporary decision making. Surgeons and patients should be cautious when interpreting single-centre case series and systems relying on data generated from them

There is an increasing demand worldwide for total hip arthroplasty in patients over 80 years old. This study is the largest of its kind reporting long term outcomes and clinical survivorship of patients over 80 years old undergoing THR. 13171 patients 80 years or older who underwent THR between 2000 and 2019 were included. Demographic and operative data was collected including age, sex, laterality, date of surgery and operative technique. Presence and date of complications were collected. Data was also collected for the same time period on 80910 patients aged 51–79 years undergoing THR for comparison. 4103 (31.2%) male and 9068 female (68.8%) patients were included in the 80year old cohort. Median age was 83 (IQR 81–83, range 80–98). 32682 (40.4%) male and 48227 (59.6%) females were included in the 50–79year old cohort. Median age was 68 (IQR 62–73, range 50–79). The 80 cohort was more likely to sustain post operative complications in the 6 months following surgery including DVT (81/13171 vs 364/80910, P<0.05), myocardial infarction (177/13171 vs 341/80910, P<0.05), acute renal failure (371/12800 vs 812/80910 P<0.05). The 50–79year old cohort was over twice as likely to undergo revision surgery than the 80 year old cohort (HR 2.55, 95% CI 2.216–2.932, p<0.001). Of those requiring revision surgery, the elderly cohort were more likely to undergo earlier revision surgery (378days, 95%CI 236–519d vs 1586days, 95%CI 1471–1700d, p<0.001). In those undergoing revision surgery, a higher proportion were done for infection in the 80 year old cohort (39/219 (17.8%) vs 215/2809 (7.7%), p<0.05. This study demonstrates good outcomes in terms of medical complications and a low overall risk of requiring revision surgery in patients 80years old undergoing THR. Patients over the age of 80 should be counselled on the relatively increased risk of medical complications post operatively

The documentation of deep infection rates in joint replacement is fraught with multiple difficulties. Deep infections acquired in theatre may present late, but some later presenting deep infections are clearly haematogenous, and not related to surgical management. The effect of Ultra Clean Air on infection rates was published by Charnley in 1972 (CORR,87:167–187). The data is valuable because large numbers of THRs were performed in standard and Ultra Clean theatres, and detailed microbiology of the air was also recorded. No IV antibiotics were used, so only the effect of air quality was studied. We extracted the data on theatre type and numbers from Table 3, and numbers and intervals from surgery of deep infections from Table 7. Theatre types with 300 air changes per hour and 3.5 CFU/M. 3. were classified as Ultra Clean. A logistic regression model was used to examine the effect of theatre type and time elapsed after procedure on the probability of becoming infected. The model suggests that, controlling for time period, Ultra Clean Air is associated with a significantly lower probability of infection, with an OR of 0.30, p = 2.74 × 10. −6. The effect is larger earlier post-surgery, but it does persist. The results are best reviewed as a graphic, which shows that Ultra Clean Air clearly affects the deep infection rate for up to four years post-surgery. Ultra Clean Air reduces infection rates for up to four years post-surgery, so it is safe to assume that infections presenting after this are haematogenous. Ultra Clean Air does not eliminate early deep infection, so some early infections are not related to air quality. It is not practical to undertake widespread detailed retrospective analyses of cases. When monitoring infection rates there needs to be a balance between failing to record infections related to surgical technique and waiting many years to record low numbers of very late presenting problems. We suggest that registries should regard infections documented within three years of surgery as treatment complications. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

The National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) started collecting data on peri-prosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF) in December 2019. We reviewed the data from the first year of data collection to describe the patients being admitted with PPFF and the care they received according to established Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used in hip fracture surgery. We performed a retrospective review of the NHFD between 1 January and 31 December 2020. Analyses consisted of the summary statistics used to generate the NHFD annual report. Of the KPIs used in hip fracture, data were available for PPFF on time to assessment by a geriatrician (KPI 1), time to theatre (if applicable) (KPI 2), and mobilisation the day after surgery (if applicable) (KPI 4). There were 2,411 PPFF fractures around a hip or knee replacement reported out of a total of 2,606 PPFF. Of the 171 hospitals reporting data to the NHFD, 135 reported at least one. The median number of fractures per hospital was 14 (IQR 8, 25, range 1 to 110). The median age of patients was 84 (range 60 to 104) and 1,604 (67%) patients were female. Of the 1,850 occasions a time to geriatrician review was documented, review within 72 hours was achieved on 89.2% of occasions. Of the 1,973 patients who underwent operative interventions, 546 patients went to theatre before the 36-hour target (28.4%). Of patients who had surgery 1,323 (67.4%) were mobilised the following day. In the first year collecting data on PPFF we can give the first idea of the incidence of these life changing injuries. Whilst geriatrician review with 72 hours was achieved in a high proportion of cases nationally, our data suggest fewer patients are mobilised the day after surgery. Notably, only 28.4% of patients who were managed operatively went to theatre within 36 hours of admission. We provide the first insight into the incidence and management of these injuries

Disease specific or generic Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) can be completed by patients using paper and postal services (pPROMS) or via computer, tablet or smartphone (ePROMs) or by hybrid data collection, which uses both paper and electronic questionnaires. We have investigated whether there are differences in scores depending on the method of PROMs acquisition for the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the EQ-5D scores, at one and two years post operatively. Patients for this study were identified retrospectively from a prospectively compiled arthroplasty database held at the study centre. Patient demographics, mode of preferred data collection and pre- and post-operative PROMs for Total Hip Replacements (THRs) performed at this centre between 1. st. January 2018 and 31. st. December 2018 were collected. During the study period, 1494 patients underwent THRs and had complete one and two-year PROMs data available for analysis. All pre-operative scores were obtained by pPROMS. The average OHS and EQ-5D pre-operatively scores were 19.51 and 0.36 respectively. 72.02% of the patients consented to undertake post-operative questionnaires using ePROMs. The remaining 27.98% opted for pPROMS. The one and two-year OHS for ePROMS patients increased to 41.31 and 42.14 while the OHS scores for pPROMS patients were 39.80 and 39.83. At the one and two-year post-operative time intervals, a Mann-Whitney test showed statistical significance between the modes of administration for OHS (P-Value =0.044 and 0.01 respectively). The one and two-year EQ-5D for ePROMS patients increased to 0.83 and 0.84 while the EQ-5D scores for pPROMS patients were 0.79 and 0.81. The P-Value for Mann-Whitney tests comparing the modes of administration for EQ-5D were 0.13 and 0.07 respectively. Within Orthopaedics, PROMs have become the most widely used instrument to assess patients’ subjective outcomes. However, there is no agreed mode of PROMs data acquisition. While we have demonstrated an apparent difference in scores depending on the mode of administration, further work is required to establish the influence of potentially confounding factors such as patient age, gender and familiarity with computer technology

Controversy persists over whether cemented or uncemented fixation is more effective in reducing revision and mortality risks following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite a shift towards uncemented THA in Europe, Australia, and the US, no consensus exists on superior outcomes. This ambiguity in evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies necessitates advanced research methodologies to derive more definitive conclusions. This study investigates the causal impact of THA fixation type on 2-year and 5-year revision rates, along with 90-day mortality, utilizing a regression discontinuity (RD) design in scenarios where fixation choice is guided by patient age. Employing data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register, we conducted a cohort study on primary THAs for osteoarthritis from 2007 to 2019. A “fuzzy” RD design was executed to compute the Local Average Treatment Effect for subjects around the age-based selection threshold for fixation type. The main outcome of interest was the revision rate at 2 years post-operation. Analysis for the 2-year revision endpoint, covering any cause, included 2,344 females and 1,671 males across 5 hospitals each, with no significant variation in revision rates observed. For the 5-year mark, 1,058 females in 3 hospitals and 214 males in 1 hospital were examined, similarly showing no significant differences. Mortality within 90 days post-operation was also investigated in 5 female and 7 male cohorts, with 2,180 and 2,145 surgeries respectively, yielding no substantial disparities. In conclusion, the RD analysis revealed no notable differences in revision rates at 2 and 5 years or in early mortality based on the fixation method used in THA. These outcomes suggest that the age-based preference for THA fixation may not influence the revision or mortality risk, underscoring the value of RD design in deriving causal insights from observational data

The aim of this study is the comparative assessment of long term clinical (subjective and objective), functional and quality of life outcome data between primary and revision THA. 122 patients (130 hips) who underwent cementless revision THA of both components (TMT cup, Wagner SL stem, Zimmer Biomet) for aseptic loosening only (Group A) were compared to a matched group of 100 patients (100 hips) who underwent cementless primary THA for osteoarthritis (Synergy stem, R3 cup, Smith & Nephew) (Group B). Outcomes were evaluated with survival analysis curves, Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford hip score (OHS), Short form-12 health survey (SF-12) and EQ-5D-5L scales. Mobility was assessed with walking speed, timed up and go test (TUG), Parker mobility, Lower extremity function score (LEFS) and UCLA scores. At a mean follow up of 14.4 years (10 to 20) a cumulative success rate of 96% (95% CI 96 to 99%) in Group A and 98% (95% CI 97 to 99%) in Group B with operation for any reason as an end point was recorded. Statistically significant differences between groups were developed for WOMAC (Mann-Whitney U test, p= 0.014), OHS (Mann-Whitney U test, p= 0.020) and physical component of SF-12 scores (Mann-Whitney U test, p= 0.029) only. In Group A, in multiple regression analysis, patients’ cognition (p=0.001), BMI (p=0.007) and pain (p=0.022) were found to be independent factors influencing functional recovery (WOMAC). Similarly, pain (p=0.03) was found to influence quality of life (EQ-5D-5). In the long term, revision THA shows satisfactory but inferior clinical, functional, and quality of life outcomes when compared to primary THA. Residual pain, BMI and cognitive impairment independently affect functional outcomes

Introduction. Registry data from around the world demonstrates instability following primary THA is a leading indication for revision. However, the burden of THA dislocation is poorly documented and is not routinely recorded or reported at a national level. Our aim was to determine the rate of dislocation following primary THA in contemporary practice and in doing so determining the burden of THA dislocation to the NHS in Wales. Method. We considered all Welsh residents who underwent primary THA from 2011–2016. Via clinical coding linkage using Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW), the equivalent of HES data in England, we were able determine re-admission for dislocation, revision THA following dislocation and all cause revision at 1 to 5 years follow-up. Results. In a cohort of 20,816 primary THA the dislocation rate at 1-year follow-up was 1.1% (95%CI 0.97–1.25). This increased incrementally to 2.2% (95%CI 1.78–2.72) at 5 years. At 1 year the overall revision rate was 1.3% of which 0.3% was following instability. The median time to dislocation was 46 days and 67.8% of first time dislocations occurred within 6 months of index surgery. We undertook a clinical coding data validation for a sub-group of 2,677 THA procedures, cross-referencing hospital records and theatre logbooks with PEDW data and demonstrated a correlation of 90.6% (95%CI 75.8–96.8). We observed 229 first time dislocation events, but during the total study period there were 1179 emergency admissions for dislocated THA with a mean hospital length of stay of 5.5 days. Discussion & Conclusions. This study provides benchmarking data at a national level regarding the risk of dislocation for patients undergoing primary THA. Importantly it demonstrates the significant accumulative burden of dislocation following THA for both patients and impact on NHS resources

Total hip replacement (THR) for end-stage osteoarthritis is a commonly performed cost-effective procedure, which provides patients with significant clinical improvement. Estimating the future demand for joint replacement is important to identify the healthcare resources needed. We estimated the number of primary THRs that will need to be performed up to the year 2060. We used data from The National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man on the current volume of primary THR (n=94,936) performed in 2018. We projected future numbers of THR using a static estimated rate from 2018 applied to population growth forecast data from the UK Office for National Statistics up to 2060. By 2060, primary THR volume would increase from 2018 levels by an estimated 37.7% (n=130,766). For both males and females demand for surgery was also higher for patients aged 70 and over, with older patients having the biggest relative increase in volume over time: 70–79 years (144.6% males, 141.2% females); 80–89 years (212.4% males, 185.6% females); 90 years and older (448.0% males, 298.2% females). By 2060 demand for THR is estimated to increase by almost 40%. Demand will be greatest in older patients (70 years+), which will have significant implications for the health service that requires forward planning given morbidity and resource use is higher in this population. There is a backlog of current demand with cancellation of elective surgery due to seasonal flu pressures in 2017 and now Covid-19 in 2020. Orthopaedics already has the largest waiting list of any speciality. These issues will negatively impact the health services ability to deliver timely joint replacement to many patients for a number of years and require urgent planning

Aims. Natural Language Processing (NLP) offers an automated method to extract data from unstructured free text fields for arthroplasty registry participation. Our objective was to investigate how accurately NLP can be used to extract structured clinical data from unstructured clinical notes when compared with manual data extraction. Methods. A group of 1,000 randomly selected clinical and hospital notes from eight different surgeons were collected for patients undergoing primary arthroplasty between 2012 and 2018. In all, 19 preoperative, 17 operative, and two postoperative variables of interest were manually extracted from these notes. A NLP algorithm was created to automatically extract these variables from a training sample of these notes, and the algorithm was tested on a random test sample of notes. Performance of the NLP algorithm was measured in Statistical Analysis System (SAS) by calculating the accuracy of the variables collected, the ability of the algorithm to collect the correct information when it was indeed in the note (sensitivity), and the ability of the algorithm to not collect a certain data element when it was not in the note (specificity). Results. The NLP algorithm performed well at extracting variables from unstructured data in our random test dataset (accuracy = 96.3%, sensitivity = 95.2%, and specificity = 97.4%). It performed better at extracting data that were in a structured, templated format such as range of movement (ROM) (accuracy = 98%) and implant brand (accuracy = 98%) than data that were entered with variation depending on the author of the note such as the presence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) (accuracy = 90%). Conclusion. The NLP algorithm used in this study was able to identify a subset of variables from randomly selected unstructured notes in arthroplasty with an accuracy above 90%. For some variables, such as objective exam data, the accuracy was very high. Our findings suggest that automated algorithms using NLP can help orthopaedic practices retrospectively collect information for registries and quality improvement (QI) efforts. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):99–104

Introduction. The results of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) vary with data from the UK national Joint Registry being less favourable than that from the Australian registry. The senior author started using a fully cementless THA in 2005 and we aimed to gauge the performance of the implants based on their revision data. Patients and methods. Between August 2005 and March 2015, 4,802 primary THA (4,309 patients) were performed with a cementless Corail. ®. stem and a cementless Pinnacle. ®. cup. There were 2,086 (43.4%) males and 2,716 (56.6%) females with a median age of 70 years (IQR 13, Range 16–95). There were a number of changes to the surgical technique with respect to the Corail. ®. stem during the ten-year period, which we have categorised as phase 1 and phase 2. We compared the data in the two phases. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained patient information database. Results. A total of 80 (1.67%) revisions have been performed to date (median follow-up 65.9 months, IQR 46.8, Range 0 to 121), which is equivalent to a cumulative revision risk of 2.5% at ten years. Revision rate was not significantly different in those less than 70 years old (1.63%) compared to those greater than or equal to 70 years old (1.76%, P=0.81). The leading causes of revision were instability (n=22, 0.46%), infection (n=20, 0.42%) and aseptic loosening of the stem (n=15, 0.31%). More collarless stems than collared stems have been revised. Phase 2 changes in surgical technique resulted in cessation of collarless stem use, a small but significant increase in mean stem size, and a paradoxical decrease in iatrogenic femoral fracture. Conclusions. The overall revision rates of the Corail. ®. stem and Pinnacle. ®. cup in this series are comparable to the best performing THA in equivalent registry data. Instability was the leading cause of revision but these data did not identify a causative factor. The changes in infection rate in this series are possibly influenced by changes in local antibiotic prophylaxis policy. There is a learning curve for the cementless stem as seen here by a reduction in revisions for aseptic loosening and iatrogenic femoral fracture during the ten-year period. We believe that collared stems, avoidance of undersizing and surgical technique focusing on primary stability are the key aspects

Due to limitations of existing pharmacological therapies for the management of chronic pain in osteoarthritis (OA), surgical interventions remain a major component of current standard of care, with total joint replacements (TJRs) considered for people who have not responded adequately to conservative treatment. This study aimed to quantify the economic burden of moderate-to-severe chronic pain in patients with OA in England prior to TJR. A retrospective, longitudinal cohort design was employed using Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD primary care data linked to Hospital Episode Statistics secondary care data in England. Patients (age ≥18 years) with an existing OA diagnosis of any anatomical site (Read/ICD-10) were indexed (Dec-2009 to Nov-2017) on a moderate-to-severe pain event (which included TJR) occurring within an episode of chronic pain. 5-year TJR rates from indexing were assessed via Kaplan-Meier estimates. All-cause healthcare resource utilisation and direct medical costs were evaluated in the 1–12 and 13–24 months prior to the first TJR experienced after index. Statistical significance was assessed via paired t-tests. The study cohort comprised 5,931 eligible patients (57.9% aged ≥65 years, 59.2% female). 2,176 (36.7%) underwent TJR (knee: 54.4%; hip: 42.8%; other: 2.8%). The 5-year TJR rate was 45.4% (knee: 24.3%; hip: 17.5%; other: 6.8%). Patients experienced more general practitioner consultations in 1–12 months pre-TJR compared with 13–24 months pre-TJR (means: 12.13 vs. 9.61; p<0.0001), more outpatient visits (6.68 vs. 3.77; p<0.0001), more hospitalisations (0.74 vs. 0.62; p=0.0032), and more emergency department visits (0.29 vs. 0.25, p=0.0190). Total time (days) spent as an inpatient was higher in 1–12 months pre-TJR (1.86 vs. 1.07; p<0.0001). Mean total per-patient cost pre-TJR increased from £1,771 (13–24 months) to £2,621 (1–12 months) (p<0.0001). Resource-use and costs incurred were substantially greater in the 12 months immediately prior to TJR, compared with 13–24 months prior. Reasons for increased healthcare and economic burden in the pre-TJR period deserve further exploration as potential targets for efforts to improve patient experience and efficiency of care

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess medium-term improvements following total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to evaluate what effect different preoperative Oxford Hip Score (OHS) thresholds for treatment may have on patients’ access to THA and outcomes.

Current estimates of periprosthetic fracture risk associated with femoral implants is mostly limited to revision only estimates and does not accurately represent stem performance. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of surgically treated post-operative periprosthetic femoral fracture (POPFF) more accurately associated with frequently used femoral implants used for total hip arthroplasty (THA).

A cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA in England between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. Periprosthetic fractures were identified from prospectively collected revision records and national procedure coding records. Survival modelling was used to estimate POPFF incidence rates, adjusting for potential confounders. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients over 70 years, with non-osteoarthritic indications, and neck of femur fracture.

POPFF occurred in 0.6% (5100/809,832) of cases during a median (IQR) follow up of 6.5 (3.9 to 9.6) years. The majority of POPFF were treated with fixation after implantation of a cemented stem. Adjusted patient time incidence rates (PTIR) for POPFF varied by stem design, regardless of cement fixation. Cemented composite beam stems (CB stems) demonstrated the lowest risk of POPFF. Collared cementless stems had an equivalent or lower rate of POPFF versus the current gold standard polished taper slip cemented stem.

POPFF account for a quarter of all revisions following primary THA. Cemented CB stems are associated with the lowest POPFF risk. Stem design is strongly associated with POPFF risk, regardless of the presence of cement. Surgeons, policymakers, and patients should consider these findings when recommending femoral implants in those most at risk of POPFF.

Ceramic on ceramic (CoC) bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are commonly used but concerns exist regarding ceramic fracture. This study aims to report the risk of revision for fracture of modern CoC bearings and identify factors that might influence this risk, using data from the National Joint Registry. We analysed data on 111,681 primary CoC THA's and 182 linked revisions for bearing fracture recorded in the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR). We used implant codes to identify ceramic bearing composition and generated Kaplan-Meier estimates for implant survivorship. Logistic regression analyses were performed for implant size and patient specific variables to determine any associated risks for revision. 99.8% of bearings were CeramTec Biolox® products. Revisions for fracture were linked to 7 of 79,442 (0.009%) Biolox® Delta heads, 38 of 31,982 (0.119%) Biolox® Forte heads, 101 of 80,170 (0.126%) Biolox® Delta liners and 35 of 31,258 (0.112%) Biolox® Forte liners. Regression analysis of implant size revealed smaller heads had significantly higher odds of fracture (χ2=68.0, p<0.0001). The highest fracture risk were observed in the 28mm Biolox® Forte subgroup (0.382%). There were no fractures in the 40mm head group for either ceramic type. Liner thickness was not predictive of fracture (p=0.67). BMI was independently associated with revision for both head fractures (OR 1.09 per unit increase, p=0.031) and liner fractures (OR 1.06 per unit increase, p=0.006). We report the largest registry study of CoC bearing fractures to date. Modern CoC bearing fractures are rare events. Fourth generation ceramic heads are around 10 times less likely to fracture than third generation heads, but liner fracture risk remains similar between these generations

Total hip replacements (THRs) provide pain relief and improved function to thousands of patients suffering from end-stage osteoarthritis, every year. Over 800 different THR constructs were implanted in the UK in 2017. To ensure reliable implants are used, a NICE revision benchmark of 5% after 10 years exists. Given the 10-year cumulative mortality of patients under 55 years of age receiving THRs is only 5% and that a recent study suggests 25-year THR survival of 58%, we aim to produce revision estimates out to 30 years that may guide future long-term benchmarks. The local database of the Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre (PEOC), Exeter, holds data on over 20,000 patients with nearly 30-years follow-up with contemporary prostheses. A previous study suggests that the results of this centre are generalisable if comparisons restricted to the same prostheses. Via flexible parametric survival analysis, we created an algorithm using this database, for revision of any part of the construct for any reason, controlling for age and gender. This algorithm was applied to 664,761 patients in the NJR who have undergone THR, producing a revision prediction for patients with the same prostheses as those used at this centre. Using our algorithm, the 10-year predicted revision rate of THRs in the NJR was 2.2% (95% CI 1.8, 2.7) based on a 68-year-old female patient; well below the current NICE benchmark. Our predictions were validated by comparison to the maximum observed survival in the NJR (14.2 years) using restricted mean survival time (P=0.32). Our predicted cumulative revision estimate after 30 years is 6.5% (95% CI 4.5, 9.4). The low observed and predicted revision rate with the prosthesis combinations studied, suggest current benchmarks may be lowered and new ones introduced at 15 and 20 years to encourage the use of prostheses with high survival

Introduction. THR is one of the most frequently performed operations nationally. A large number of prostheses are available, and the procedure is therefore associated with variation in practice and outcomes. NICE guidelines aim to standardise best practice, and are informed by separate, independent bodies, such as the NJR and ODEP, which monitor data about the implants used and their performance. This study aims to determine whether clinical practice and component use has changed since the publication of NJR data. Methods. NJR reports from 2006–2014 were analysed, with record made of the different prostheses used in THR, noting ODEP ratings of components used. Analysis was also performed by component type (i.e. cemented and cementless stems and cups), and combinations of components, according to their frequency of use in a given year. The Kruksal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis. Results. Analysis revealed that the number of components used with an A ODEP rating has increased from 2006–2014. However, there was no significant change (p=0.37) in the use of these components when expressed as a percentage of total procedures performed. Use of ODEP B, C and unclassified prostheses does not appear to have declined. During the period of study there has been a 9% rise in the number of implant combinations used, and a 37.9% rise in the number of implant combinations used fewer than 10 times annually, though these procedures now account for a lower percentage of the total performed annually. Discussion. Our analysis demonstrates that there has been limited change in practice since the publication of NJR data. A large variety of implants and products persist without evidence of long-term success. Furthermore, many components are used infrequently, raising concerns that surgeons may be less familiar with their nuances. There is a significant risk of higher costs due to increased primary expenditure and complications leading to avoidable, early revision. Conclusion. We conclude that NJR data publication does not directly influence clinical practice