Stable ankle fractures can be successfully treated non-operatively with a below knee plaster cast. In some European centres it is standard practice to administer thromboprophylaxis, in the form of low molecular weight heparin, to these patients in order to reduce the risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of DVT in such patients in the absence of any thromboprophylaxis. We designed a prospective study, which was approved by the local ethics committee. We included 100 consecutive patients with ankle fractures treated in a below knee plaster cast. At the time of plaster removal (6 weeks), patients were examined for signs of DVT. A colour doppler duplex ultrasound scan was then performed by one of the two experienced musculoskeletal ultrasound technicians. We found that 5 patients developed a DVT. Two of these were above knee, involving the superficial femoral vein and popliteal vein respectively. The other three were below knee. None of the patients had any clinical symptoms or signs of DVT. None of the patients developed pulmonary embolism. Of these five patients, four had some predisposing factors for DVT. The annual incidence of DVT in the normal population is about 0.1%. This can increase to about 4.5% by the age of 75. DVT following hip and knee replacement can occur in 40-80% of cases. Routine thromboprophylaxis may be justified in these patients. However, with a low incidence of 5% following ankle fractures treated in a cast, we believe that routine thromboprophylaxis is not justified

Thromboembolic disease (TED) remains as a major concern for orthopaedic surgeons and is a well-known complication of lower extremity joint replacement procedures. While there is voluminous literature on the topic, it is difficult for the average orthopaedic surgeon to keep up with all the advancements in this area as well as the newer pharmacological options for prophylaxis. To address this, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has developed a clinical practice guideline (CPG) in this area to provide treatment recommendations based on the best available evidence. Historically, guidelines for TED prophylaxis have been based largely on randomised controlled trials whose outcome measure was venographically documented deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, many venographically documented DVTs, particularly those distal to the popliteal vein, are of no clinical consequence. Therefore, in the AAOS CPG the systematic review of the literature was focused on those outcomes that have the most clinical relevance: all-cause mortality, symptomatic or fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), proximal DVT, major bleeding and symptomatic DVT rates. Using these as the clinically important endpoints, it is evident that the extant literature is insufficient to provide definitive guidance in this area and to make specific recommendations about optimal pharmacological prophylaxis. Nonetheless, one strong recommendation has emerged from this systematic review: the guideline recommended against routine post-operative duplex ultrasonography screening of patients who undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty. Only one risk factor – previous history of TED – had evidence demonstrating a higher risk beyond the risk from elective hip or knee arthroplasty itself (weak recommendation). There was not sufficient evidence that other potential risk factors increase the risk of TED, likely because of the relatively high background risk of elective hip or knee arthroplasty. In addition, there is very little evidence defining populations at increased risk for bleeding and bleeding-associated complications associated with pharmacological prophylaxis. However, the panel did come to a consensus that patients with known bleeding disorders or active liver disease are at an increased risk for post-operative bleeding. In these circumstances, it is recommended that mechanical compressive devices be the primary modality of prophylaxis as pharmacologic prophylaxis may increase the risk of bleeding. There was a moderate strength recommendation for the superiority of neuraxial anesthesia to limit blood loss even though there is no demonstrable effect on the incidence of TED. Finally, there was a moderate grade recommendation that pharmacologic agents (including aspirin) and/or mechanical compression devices be utilised for the prevention of VTE in patients that are undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty who are not at elevated risk beyond that of the surgery itself for VTE or bleeding. Clearly there is great need for better evidence with appropriately powered studies that examine the most clinically relevant outcomes in TED prophylaxis

After decades of clinical experience and hundreds of studies, the ideal method of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis remains controversial. One of the most widely quoted publications on the subject in recent years has been the guidelines published by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP). The seventh and eighth ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis were published in Chest in 2004 and 2008 respectively. The highest level recommendation (1-A) was reserved for Warfarin at a relatively high dose (target international normalised ratio (INR) of 2–3), Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH), or Fondaparinux for a minimum of 10 days for both total hip and total knee replacement. These agents were recommended for all patients, regardless of their relative risk of bleeding or risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). These recommendations were found to be aggressive by the standards of most orthopaedic surgeons and a number of issues were identified with the methodology and resulting recommendations of the ACCP including: The emphasis on multicentre randomised clinical trials that are enormously expensive and strongly weighted towards pharmaceutical sponsored studies, methodology that prevented inclusion of studies of lower cost, lower tech options such as aspirin or lower dose Warfarin since randomised trials on a large scale are not available due to lack of funding or pharmaceutical company interest in generic low-cost options, lack of consideration of pneumatic compression options such as newly available mobile foot pumps with chips for monitoring compliance, financial conflict of interest of virtually all of the authors of the guidelines and the fundamental problem with utilising asymptomatic DVT as a study endpoint. The concerns with the aggressive nature of these recommendations were confirmed by studies from two academic centres which reported a high incidence of wound and bleeding complications when changing to a 1-A protocol. Recent studies indicate that readmissions following joint replacement are much more likely to be due to wound drainage and bleeding complications than DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE). In response to these concerns, the AAOS released guidelines in 2008 that were updated in 2011. The resulting recommendations represented a dramatic departure from the ACCP guidelines. Clinically crucial endpoints such as PE and death were utilized in the analysis rather than asymptomatic DVT, which was the criteria utilised by the Chest Physicians and the 2011 recommendations also considered symptomatic DVT. The AAOS guidelines consider patient risk category rather than making a uniform recommendation for all patients. Much more discretion is given to surgeons to utilise less aggressive prophylactic strategies including aspirin and foot pumps. In 2012, the ninth edition of the ACCP guidelines was published and many of the concerns previously expressed over prior editions were successfully addressed. Conflict of interest among the authors was much less of an issue, there was more attention placed on symptomatic events and clinically important complications, and a wider scope of literature was considered. The resulting guidelines represented a dramatic departure from previous recommendations. Aspirin and pneumatic compression were elevated to level 1 recommendation status along with potent drug regimens such as injectable drugs (LMWH and Xa inhibitor) as well as the new oral Xa inhibitors and antithrombin agents. When pneumatic compression devices are utilised, the use of a battery powered device capable of recording compliance was recommended. Patient risk status as well as patient preference were also considered. The new ACCP guidelines have successfully addressed many of the concerns previously addressed and are much more in line with the AAOS guidelines. It is anticipated that the federal Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) guidelines for VTE prophylaxis will be released in 2013 and will also embrace the changes recommended by the ACCP. It is further likely that the AAOS and ACCP guidelines are close enough that they may well join forces in the near future and release a single unified document

In his classic monograph entitled Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip, which was published in 1979, John Charnley dedicated a chapter to thromboembolic complications. The overall incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) was approximately 8% and the incidence of death from PE approximately 1%. Surveys of orthopaedic surgeons who undertake total joint replacement conducted by The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS), 30 years later, showed that there was still no consensus as to the best form of prophylaxis with a wide variation of methods being used. In the past 3 years, for the first time there is uniformity in the recommendations of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP). Both groups have reached an agreement that the rate of DVT formation is not the ideal endpoint to use when assessing the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis after joint replacement, as had been done in previous drug trials. Most of these DVTs are asymptomatic and of questionable clinical significance. At least one recent study brings into question the association between the rate of DVT formation and that of subsequent symptomatic events. Both groups also focus on minimizing iatrogenic bleeding complications, which can lead to compromised clinical results, including limited movement and pain in the case of knee replacement and increased risk of infection in both knee and hip replacement. To further complete the uniformity of approach in the United States, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), which administers the Surgical Care Improvement Program (SCIP) that monitors hospital compliance with VTE prophylaxis of hospitalised patients, has also changed their policy. Beginning January 2014, either aspirin or a compression device has been considered as acceptable measures for THR, TKR and hip fracture. The remarkable success reported from many centers with the use of aspirin and/or the use of a mobile compression device in patients without major risk factors, such as a prior history of symptomatic VTE, clearly indicate that aggressive pharmacoprophylaxis is not necessary for the vast majority of patients who undergo joint replacement

Our American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) have come to a consensus that the use of routine prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) is indicated for our patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. The new guidelines acknowledge differences in efficacy of the various agents and the variable risk of VTE among patients. Agents include warfarin, low molecular weight heparin, aspirin, oral Xa inhibitors, and direct thrombin inhibitors. The use of pneumatic compression devices have been found to be effective in decreasing risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as a stand-alone strategy after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and is given a level 1C recommendation by ACCP while the data is less strong for use following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Mechanical devices are not associated with an increased bleeding risk, and address the concerns of some surgeons with regard to post-operative bleeding. The availability of mobile compression devices has expanded the indications for use as a result of portability. While the use of mobile pump technology in DVT prophylaxis adds to the armamentarium of tools available for use in VTE risk mitigation, it does not eliminate the need for pharmacologic prophylaxis. While all arthroplasty patients are at elevated risk of VTE, the highest risk is associated with those having a prior history of DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE), having had prior surgery within the preceding three months, or requiring prolonged immobilization post-operatively for any reason. In these patients, thromboprophylaxis with any of a number of agents will play a valuable role in VTE risk reduction. Additionally, not all patients tolerate the use of the pump device. Those individuals with chronic peripheral arterial disease or arterial ulcers in the legs are also poor candidates for mechanical compression strategies which may exacerbate existing vascular compromise and perfusion of the limb. Assessment of the medical comorbidities of the patient may also stratify them to higher risk where the demonstrated benefits of pharmacologic prophylaxis outweigh the considerations of bleeding associated with their use (such as in the morbidly obese/high BMI patients). Mobile pump technology is a valuable adjunct to our VTE reduction strategies, but do not eliminate the need for pharmacologic agents. The judicious selection of DVT prophylaxis strategies based on the totality of the constellation of orthopaedic and medical factors unique to each patient allows us to make clinical decisions tailored to their needs, their risk of VTE, and their reliability in functioning as an active partner in their own post-operative care

Background. In October 2008, CMS instituted a new “No payment for preventable complications“ programme and has released a list of conditions for which it intends to expand the programme in 2009. Although not reimbursing for preventable complications is justifiable, some of the proposed target conditions are lacking in both adequate diagnostic testing accuracy and preventability. Aims. This study examines the effects of imperfect sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic testing, the prevalence of condition, and the rate of surveillance on the ratio of numbers of DVT/PE diagnosed and those that actually occur. Methods. Given that proximal DVT following orthopaedic surgery are not preventable (incidence 4-10% despite prophylaxis), and that the accepted screening test (duplex ultrasonongraphy) has a sensitivity of 96.5% and specificity of 94%, up to 2.5 times as many DVT will be diagnosed as actually occur. Since the new CMS policy would withhold payment when a complication is identified, hospitals would be encouraged to decrease screening for DVT, which would save them lost reimbursement but would result in an increase in incidence of unrecognised – and therefore untreated – DVT after major orthopaedic surgical procedures. The study examines the likely CMS savings in the United States for implementation of this proposed policy (estimated $300M annually), as well as the potential increase in undiagnosed DVT likely to result from implementation of the policy. The overall goal of this study is to provide information to better enable the reader to draw their own conclusions on whether non-payment for DVT after an orthopaedic procedure is a fiscal policy that makes sense and improves the health and healthcare of Americans

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of intermittent mechanical compression combined with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, against either mechanical compression or pharmacological prophylaxis in preventing deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. A total of six randomised controlled trials, evaluating a total of 1399 patients, were identified. In knee arthroplasty, the rate of DVT was reduced from 18.7% with anticoagulation alone to 3.7% with combined modalities (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, p = 0.03; number needed to treat: seven). There was moderate, albeit non-significant, heterogeneity (I. 2. = 42%). In hip replacement, there was a non-significant reduction in DVT from 8.7% with mechanical compression alone to 7.2% with additional pharmacological prophylaxis (RR 0.84) and a significant reduction in DVT from 9.7% with anticoagulation alone to 0.9% with additional mechanical compression (RR 0.17, p < 0.001; number needed to treat: 12), with no heterogeneity (I. 2. = 0%). The included studies had insufficient power to demonstrate an effect on pulmonary embolism. We conclude that the addition of intermittent mechanical leg compression augments the efficacy of anticoagulation in preventing DVT in patients undergoing both knee and hip replacement. Further research on the role of combined modalities in thromboprophylaxis in joint replacement and in other high-risk situations, such as fracture of the hip, is warranted

Abstract

Venous thromboembolic (VTE) events including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) remain a significant concern following total joint arthroplasty. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines for VTE prophylaxis have focused on the safety of prophylactic regimens, with the primary endpoint being prevention of symptomatic events while avoiding the risks of hematoma, infection, and re-operation associated with aggressive anticoagulation. In 2007, the AAOS clinical practice guideline recommended “risk stratification” of patients for VTE events and bleeding. Unfortunately, there remains limited evidence as to specific factors that should be used during pre-operative risk stratification.

A prior investigation has demonstrated the effectiveness of using a history of VTE events, active cancer, and hypercoagulable state (i.e. Factor V Leiden) as criteria for high-risk patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. In addition, large national database systems have been used to identify risk factors for VTE events. Unfortunately, these investigations emphasise different risk factors and their importance in increasing the risk of VTE events. Thus, criteria to be used for risk stratification of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty remain unclear. What remains clear is that even in healthy patients who are aggressively anticoagulated, a VTE event can still occur.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) should be individualised in order to maximise the efficacy of prophylactic measures while avoiding the adverse events associated with the use of anticoagulants. At our institution, we have developed a scoring model using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, which is validated against our institutional data, to stratify patients into low- and high-risk groups for VTE. Low-risk patients are placed on aspirin 81 mg twice daily for four weeks post-operatively, and high-risk patients are placed on either a Vitamin K antagonist (warfarin), low molecular weight heparin, or other oral anticoagulants for four weeks post-operatively. All patients receive sequential pneumatic compression devices post-operatively, and patients are mobilised with physical therapy on the day of surgery. Patients who have a history of peptic ulcer disease or allergy to aspirin are also considered for other types of anticoagulation following surgery.

Risk Stratification Criteria

Major comorbid risk factors utilised in our risk stratification model include history of hypercoagulability or previous VTE, active cancer or history of non-cutaneous malignancy, history of stroke, and pulmonary hypertension. We consider patients with any of these risk factors at elevated risk of VTE and therefore candidates for formal anticoagulation.

Other minor risk factors include older age, bilateral surgery compared with unilateral, inflammatory bowel disease, varicose veins, obstructive sleep apnea, and history of myocardial infarction, myeloproliferative disorders, and congestive heart failure. Each minor criterion is associated with a score. The cumulative score is compared with a defined threshold and the score that surpasses the threshold indicates that the patient should receive post-operative anticoagulation. To facilitate the use of this scoring system, an iOS mobile application (VTEstimator) has been developed and can be downloaded from the app store.

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), remain one of the most common complications following total joint arthroplasty. Reported rates of symptomatic VTE following THA and TKA range from 0.83% to 15% and 2% to 10%, respectively. Thus, VTE prophylaxis should be routinely administered following total joint arthroplasty. However, while orthopaedic surgeons have considerable flexibility regarding their VTE prophylaxis regimen, it remains unclear which is optimal.

Patients at low risk of VTE may receive excessive anticoagulation and unnecessarily risk further perioperative morbidity (wound complications, bleeding) following total joint arthroplasty. With an evolving health care landscape, emphasis on complications and readmissions, and shorter inpatient hospitalizations, it is imperative that a VTE prophylaxis regimen is simple, effective, easy to monitor, and has high patient compliance. Mobile pneumatic compression devices (MCDs) have been used with greater frequency following total joint arthroplasty, with multiple reports demonstrating their effectiveness in VTE prevention with or without the addition of aspirin for chemical prophylaxis. The use of MCDs allows the avoidance of more aggressive anticoagulation in the majority of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, decreases the incidence of wound complications, and achieves a low overall incidence of symptomatic VTE. Future investigations are necessary to determine the necessity and impact of the addition of aspirin to the use of MCDs for VTE prophylaxis.

Venous thromboembolic events, either deep vein thromboses or pulmonary emboli, are important complications in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile compression device (ActiveCare+S.F.T.®; Medical Compression Systems, Inc., Or Akiva, Israel) with or without aspirin compared with current pharmacology protocols for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective primary unilateral lower extremity joint arthroplasty.

A multicenter registry was established to capture the rate of symptomatic venous thromboemboli following primary lower extremity joint arthroplasty in 3,060 patients from ten sites including knee arthroplasty (1,551) or hip arthroplasty (1,509). All patients were eighteen years of age or older with no known history of venous thromboembolism, coagulation disorder, or solid tumor. Use of the compression device began perioperatively and continued for a minimum of ten days. Patients with symptoms of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism underwent duplex ultrasonography and/or spiral computed tomography. All patients were evaluated at three months postoperatively to document any evidence of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.

Of 3,060 patients, 28 (0.92%) had venous thromboembolism (20 distal deep venous thromboses, 3 proximal deep venous thromboses, and 5 pulmonary emboli). One death occurred with no autopsy performed. Symptomatic venous thromboembolic rates observed in lower extremity joint arthroplasty patients using the mobile compression device were non-inferior (not worse than) at a margin of 1.0% to rates reported for pharmacological prophylaxis, including warfarin, enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran except in the knee arthroplasty group where the mobile compression device fell short of rivaroxaban by 0.06%.

Use of the mobile compression device with or without aspirin for patients undergoing lower extremity joint arthroplasty provide a non-inferior risk for developing venous thromboembolism compared with current pharmacological protocols reported in the literature.

Venous thromboembolic events, either deep vein thromboses or pulmonary emboli, are important complications in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile compression device (ActiveCare+S.F.T.®; Medical Compression Systems, Inc., Or Akiva, Israel) with or without aspirin compared with current pharmacology protocols for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective primary unilateral lower extremity joint arthroplasty.

A multicenter registry was established to capture the rate of symptomatic venous thromboemboli following primary lower extremity joint arthroplasty in 3,060 patients from ten sites including knee arthroplasty (1,551) or hip arthroplasty (1,509). All patients were eighteen years of age or older with no known history of venous thromboembolism, coagulation disorder, or solid tumor. Use of the compression device began peri-operatively and continued for a minimum of ten days. Patients with symptoms of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism underwent duplex ultrasonography and/or spiral computed tomography. All patients were evaluated at three months post-operatively to document any evidence of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.

Of 3,060 patients, twenty-eight (0.92%) had venous thromboembolism (twenty distal deep venous thromboses, three proximal deep venous thromboses, and five pulmonary emboli). One death occurred with no autopsy performed. Symptomatic venous thromboembolic rates observed in lower extremity joint arthroplasty patients using the mobile compression device were non-inferior (not worse than) at a margin of 1.0% to rates reported for pharmacological prophylaxis, including warfarin, enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran except in the knee arthroplasty group where the mobile compression device fell short of rivaroxaban by 0.06%.

Use of the mobile compression device with or without aspirin for patients undergoing lower extremity joint arthroplasty provide a non-inferior risk for developing venous thromboembolism compared with current pharmacological protocols reported in the literature.

Venous thromboembolic events, either deep vein thromboses or pulmonary emboli, are important complications in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile compression device (ActiveCare+S.F.T.®; Medical Compression Systems, Inc., Or Akiva, Israel) with or without aspirin compared with current pharmacology protocols for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective primary unilateral lower extremity joint arthroplasty.

A multicenter registry was established to capture the rate of symptomatic venous thromboemboli following primary lower extremity joint arthroplasty in 3,060 patients from ten sites including knee arthroplasty (1,551) or hip arthroplasty (1,509). All patients were eighteen years of age or older with no known history of venous thromboembolism, coagulation disorder, or solid tumor. Use of the compression device began perioperatively and continued for a minimum of ten days. Patients with symptoms of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism underwent duplex ultrasonography and/or spiral computed tomography. All patients were evaluated at three months postoperatively to document any evidence of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.

Of 3,060 patients, twenty-eight (0.92%) had venous thromboembolism (twenty distal deep venous thromboses, three proximal deep venous thromboses, and five pulmonary emboli). One death occurred with no autopsy performed. Symptomatic venous thromboembolic rates observed in lower extremity joint arthroplasty patients using the mobile compression device were non-inferior (not worse than) at a margin of 1.0% to rates reported for pharmacological prophylaxis, including warfarin, enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran except in the knee arthroplasty group where the mobile compression device fell short of rivaroxaban by 0.06%.

Use of the mobile compression device with or without aspirin for patients undergoing lower extremity joint arthroplasty provides a non-inferior risk for developing venous thromboembolism compared with current pharmacological protocols reported in the literature.

Venous thromboembolic events, either deep vein thromboses or pulmonary emboli, are important complications in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile compression device (ActiveCare+S.F.T.®; Medical Compression Systems, Inc., Or Akiva, Israel) with or without aspirin compared with current pharmacology protocols for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective primary unilateral lower extremity joint arthroplasty.

A multicenter registry was established to capture the rate of symptomatic venous thromboemboli following primary lower extremity joint arthroplasty in 3,060 patients from ten sites including knee arthroplasty (1,551) or hip arthroplasty (1,509). All patients were 18 years of age or older with no known history of venous thromboembolism, coagulation disorder, or solid tumor. Use of the compression device began peri-operatively and continued for a minimum of ten days. Patients with symptoms of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism underwent duplex ultrasonography and/or spiral computed tomography. All patients were evaluated at three months post-operatively to document any evidence of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.

Of 3,060 patients, twenty-eight (0.92%) had venous thromboembolism (20 distal deep venous thromboses, 3 proximal deep venous thromboses, and 5 pulmonary emboli). One death occurred with no autopsy performed. Symptomatic venous thromboembolic rates observed in lower extremity joint arthroplasty patients using the mobile compression device were non-inferior (not worse than) at a margin of 1.0% to rates reported for pharmacological prophylaxis, including warfarin, enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran except in the knee arthroplasty group where the mobile compression device fell short of rivaroxaban by 0.06%.

Use of the mobile compression device with or without aspirin for patients undergoing lower extremity joint arthroplasty provide a non-inferior risk for developing venous thromboembolism compared with current pharmacological protocols reported in the literature.

The use of cannabis is increasingly medically relevant as it is legalized and gains acceptance more broadly. However, the effects of marijuana use on postoperative outcomes following orthopedic surgery have not been well-characterized. This study seeks to illuminate the relationship between marijuana use and the incidence postoperative complications including: DVT, PE, nonunion, and infection following common orthopedic procedures. This study was conducted using a national orthopaedic claims insurance database. We identified all patients undergoing knee arthroscopy, shoulder arthroscopy, operatively managed long bone fractures (humerus, femur, tibia and/or fibula, and radius and/or ulna), and single-level lumbar fusion. The proportion of patients within each surgery cohort who had a diagnostic code for marijuana dependence was assessed. The rates of DVT, PE, and infection within 90 days were assessed for all patients. The rate of nonunion was assessed for the long bone fracture and lumbar fusion cohorts. Univariate analyses of marijuana dependence on all outcomes were performed, followed by a multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for known patient comorbidities. We identified 1,113,944 knee arthroscopy, 747,938 shoulder arthroscopy, 88,891 lumbar fusion, and 37,163 long bone fracture patients. Out of the 1,987,936 patients, 24,404 patients had a diagnostic code for marijuana dependence. Within all four surgical subgroups, the marijuana dependence cohort experienced increased rates of infection, PE, and DVT, as well as increased rates of nonunion in the lumbar fusion and long bone fracture populations. In the multivariate analyses controlling for a variety of patient risk factors including tobacco use, marijuana dependence was identified as an independent risk factor for infection within all four surgical subgroups (Knee: OR 1.85, p < 0.001; Shoulder: OR 1.65, p < 0.001; Spine: OR 1.45, p < 0.001; Long bone: OR 1.28, p < 0.001), and for nonunion in the lumbar fusion (OR 1.38, p < 0.001) and long bone fracture (OR 1.31, p < 0.001) subgroups. Our data suggests that marijuana dependence may be associated with increased rates of infection and nonunion following a variety of orthopaedic procedures. During preoperative evaluation, surgeons may consider marijuana use as a potential risk factor for postoperative complications, especially within the context of marijuana legalization. Future research into this relationship is necessary

Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for complications after operative management of ankle fractures. Generally, diabetic sequelae such as neuropathy and nephropathy portend greater risk; however, the degree of risk resulting from these patient factors is poorly defined. We sought to evaluate the effects of the diabetic sequelae of neuropathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) on the risk of complications following operative management of ankle fractures. Using a national claims-based database we analyzed patients who had undergone operative management of an ankle fracture and who remained active in the database for at least two years thereafter. Patients were divided into two cohorts, those with a diagnosis of diabetes and those without. Each cohort was further stratified into five groups: neuropathy, CKD, PVD, multiple sequelae, and no sequelae. The multiple sequelae group included patients with more than one of the three sequelae of interest: CKD, PVD and neuropathy. Postoperative complications were queried for two years following surgery. The main complications of interested were: deep vein thrombosis (DVT), surgical site infection, hospital readmission within 90 days, revision internal fixation, conversion to ankle fusion, and below knee amputation (BKA). We identified 210,069 patients who underwent operative ankle fracture treatment; 174,803 had no history of diabetes, and 35,266 were diabetic. The diabetic cohort was subdivided as follows: 7,506 without identified sequelae, 8,994 neuropathy, 4,961 CKD, 1,498 PVD, and 12,307 with multiple sequelae. Compared to non-diabetics, diabetics without sequelae had significantly higher odds of DVT, infection, readmission, revision internal fixation and conversion to ankle fusion (OR range 1.21 – 1.58, p values range Compared to uncomplicated diabetics, diabetics with neuropathy alone and diabetics with multiple sequelae were found to have significantly higher odds of all complications (OR range 1.18 – 31.94, p values range < 0.001 - 0.034). Diabetics with CKD were found to have significantly higher odds of DVT, readmission, and BKA (OR range 1.34 – 4.28, p values range < 0.001 - 0.002). Finally, diabetics with PVD were found to have significantly higher odds of DVT, readmission, conversion to ankle fusion, and BKA (OR range 1.62 - 9.69, p values range < 0.001 - 0.039). Diabetic patients with sequelae of neuropathy, CKD or PVD generally had higher complication rates than diabetic patients without these diagnoses. Unsurprisingly, diabetic patients with multiple sequalae are at the highest risk of complications and had the highest odds ratios of all complications. While neuropathy is known to be associated with postoperative complications, our analysis demonstrates that CKD represents a significant risk factor for multiple complications following the operative management of ankle fractures and has rarely been discussed in prior studies

Major orthopaedic fractures are an independent risk factor for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which are significant causes of preventable morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Despite thromboprophylaxis, patients who sustain a pelvic or acetabular fracture (PA) continue to have high rates of VTE (12% incidence). Thrombelastography (TEG) is a whole-blood, point-of-care test which provides an overview of the clotting process. Maximal amplitude (MA), from TEG analysis, is the measure of clot strength and values ≥65mm have been used to quantify hypercoagulability and increased VTE risk. Therefore, the primary aim was to use serial TEG analysis to quantify the duration of hypercoagulability, following surgically treated PA fractures. This is a single centre, prospective cohort study of adult patients 18 years or older with surgically treated PA fractures. Consecutive patients were enrolled from a Level I trauma centre and blood draws were taken over a 3-month follow-up period for serial TEG analysis. Hypercoagulability was defined as MA ≥65mm. Exclusion criteria: bleeding disorders, active malignancy, current therapeutic anticoagulation, burns (>20% of body surface) and currently, or expecting to become pregnant within study timeframe. Serial TEG analysis was performed using a TEG6s hemostasis analyzer (Haemonetics Corp.) upon admission, pre-operatively, on post-operative day (POD) 1, 3, 5, 7 (or until discharged from hospital, whichever comes sooner), then in follow-up at 2-, 4-, 6-weeks and 3-months post-operatively. Patients received standardized thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for 28 days post-operatively. VTE was defined as symptomatic DVT or PE, or asymptomatic proximal DVT, and all participants underwent a screening post-operative lower extremity Doppler ultrasound on POD3. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the association between VTE events and MA values. For the primary outcome measure, the difference between the MA threshold value (≥65mm) and serial MA measures, were compared using one-sided t-tests (α=0.05). Twenty-eight patients (eight females, 29%) with a mean age of 48±18 years were included. Acetabular fractures were sustained by 13 patients (46%), pelvic fractures by 14 patients (50%), and one patient sustained both. On POD1, seven patients (25%) were hypercoagulable, with 21 patients (78%) being hypercoagulable by POD3, and 17 patients (85%) by POD5. The highest average MA values (71.7±3.9mm) occurred on POD7, where eight patients (89%) were hypercoagulable. At 2-weeks post-operatively, 16 patients (94%) were hypercoagulable, and at four weeks, when thromboprophylaxis was discontinued, six patients (40%) remained hypercoagulable. Hypercoagulability persisted for five patients (25%) at 6-weeks and for two patients (10%) by three months. There were six objectively diagnosed VTE events (21.4%), five were symptomatic, with a mean MA value of 69.3mm±4.3mm at the time of diagnosis. Of the VTE events, four occurred in participants with acetabular fractures (three male, 75%) and two in those with pelvic fractures (both males). At 4-weeks post-operatively, when thromboprophylaxis is discontinued, 40% of patients remained hypercoagulable and likely at increased risk for VTE. At 3-months post-operatively, 10% of the cohort continued to be hypercoagulable. Serial TEG analysis warrants further study to help predict VTE risk and to inform clinical recommendations following PA fractures

Surgical management for acute or impending pathologic fractures in metastatic bone disease (MBD) places patients at high-risk for post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE). Due to the combination of malignancy, systemic cancer treatment, and surgical treatment, VTE-risk is increased 7-fold in patients with MBD compared to non-cancer patients undergoing the same procedure. The extent and duration of post-operative hypercoagulability in patients with MBD remains unknown and thromboprophylaxis guidelines were developed for non-cancer patients, limiting their applicability to address the elevated VTE-risk in cancer patients. Thrombelastography (TEG) analysis is a point-of-care test that measures clot formation, stabilization, and lysis in whole blood samples. The TEG parameter, maximal amplitude (MA), indicates clot strength and the threshold of ≥65 mm has been used to define hypercoagulability and predict VTE events in non-cancer patients requiring orthopaedic surgery. Therefore, this study aims to quantify the extent and duration of post-operative hypercoagulability in patients with MBD using serial TEG analysis. Consecutive adults (≥18 years) with MBD who required orthopaedic surgery for acute or impending pathologic fractures were enrolled into this single-centre, prospective cohort study. Serial TEG analysis was performed onsite using a TEG®6s haemostasis analyzer (Haemonetics Corporation, Boston, MA) on whole blood samples collected at seven timepoints: pre-operatively; on post-operative day (POD) 1, 3, and 5; and at 2-, 6-, and 12-weeks post-operatively. Hypercoagulability was defined as MA ≥65 mm. Participants received standardized thromboprophylaxis for four weeks and patient-reported compliance with thromboprophylaxis was recorded. VTE was defined as symptomatic DVT or PE, or asymptomatic proximal DVT, and all participants underwent a screening post-operative lower extremity Doppler ultrasound on POD3. Descriptive statistics were performed and difference between pre-operative MA values of participants with VTE versus no VTE was evaluated using Student's t-test (p≤0.05). Twenty-one participants (10 female; 47.6%) with a mean age of 70 ± 12 years were enrolled. Nine different primary cancers were identified amongst participants, with breast (23.8%), colorectal (19.0%), and lung cancer (14.3%) most frequently reported. Most participants (57.1%) were hypercoagulable pre-operatively, and nearly half remained hypercoagulable at 6- and 12-weeks post-operatively (47.1 and 46.7%, respectively). VTE occurred in 5 patients (23.8%) and mean MA was 68.1 ± 4.6 mm at the time of diagnosis. Mean pre-operative MA values were significantly higher (p=0.02) in patients who experienced VTE (68.9 ± 3.5 mm) compared to those who did not (62.7 ± 6.5 mm). VTE incidence was highest in the first week post-operatively, during which time four VTE events (80%) occurred. The proportion of patients in a hypercoagulable state increased at three consecutive timepoints, beginning on POD3 (85.0%), increasing on POD5 (87.5%), and peaking at 2-weeks post-operatively (88.9%). Current thromboprophylaxis guidelines do not consider cancer-associated risk factors that contribute to increased VTE incidence and prescription duration may be inadequate to address prolonged post-operative hypercoagulability in patients with MBD. The high rate of VTE events observed and sustained hypercoagulable state indicate that thromboprophylaxis may be prematurely terminated while patients remain at high risk for VTE. Therefore, extending thromboprophylaxis duration beyond 4-weeks post-operatively in patients with MBD warrants further investigation

Background. Post-operative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE) remain a serious complication after total joint replacement. Although with modern chemical and mechanical prophylaxis and rapid rehabilitation the rate of symptomatic DVT and PE has reduced, isolation of pre-operative DVT, especially in patients with prior history of DVT remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of pre-operative dopplers as a tool to screen and reduce DVT/PE rate in patients undergoing total joint replacement. Methods. Between January 2014 and December 2014, 211 elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty were identified from our prospective institutional database as two consecutive cohorts (115 cases had pre-operative dopplers and 96 did not). All cases were performed by two adult reconstruction specialists. All primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) were non-cemented and all primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA) were cemented with similar implant and technique. In the first cohort, all cases underwent routine pre-operative doppler screening and in the control cohort, only patients with prior history of DVT or PE underwent pre-operative dopplers. All patients with clinical symptoms of calf pain underwent post-operative dopplers. Patients were followed for a minimum of 3 month post-operatively. All emergency room (ER) visits for role out DVT were identified. No patient was lost to follow. Results. In the cohort with pre-operative dopplers, none of the pre-operative dopplers were positive for DVT, including three patients that had a history of prior DVT. 34 patients in this group (29%) underwent post-operative dopplers, either during the hospital stay or in the ER within 3 month after index surgery. Only one patient (no prior history of DVT) developed symptomatic DVT/PE (0.8%) after total knee arthroplasty. In the control cohort, 3 of which (3%) had symptomatic DVT, one of which had PE (1%) during hospital stay, all after total knee arthroplasty. There was no statistical difference for rate of symptomatic DVT/PE between the two groups (p=0.3). There was no correlation between DVT and age, gender or BMI. Discussion and Conclusions. Utilization of routine pre-operative dopplers for all patients did not lower the rate of symptomatic DVT/PE and are not helpful in early detection and prevention in asymptomatic patients prior to routine total joint replacement. Pre-operative dopplers should be used in selected patients with high risk of DVT