We biomechanically investigated whether the standard dynamic hip screw (DHS) or the DHS blade achieves better fixation in bone with regard to resistance to pushout, pullout and torsional stability. The experiments were undertaken in an artificial bone substrate in the form of polyurethane foam blocks with predefined mechanical properties. Pushout tests were also repeated in cadaveric femoral heads. The results showed that the DHS blade outperformed the DHS with regard to the two most important characteristics of implant fixation, namely resistance to pushout and rotational stability. We concluded that the DHS blade was the superior implant in this study

Introduction. Four parts inter trochanteric fracture of femur are commonest in elderly people. DHS fixation is gold standard treatment of such fractures. Various Complications of DHS implant are reported in the literature. However, Hip Instability: Subluxation and Dislocation is very rare. We report, five cases of Hip instability following DHS fixation surgery. Materials and Methods. This is a retrospective study conducted at ACPM Medical College, Dhule. We found only five cases that developed hip instability after DHS fixation since 1997. Available clinical notes and X-rays of these patients were studied to get the relevant information. Results and Observations. Three patients were male, two female, four had right sided fracture and one had left sided. Three had instability after six weeks and remaining two developed dislocation after eight months which were associated with infection. 1 patient refused further investigations & treatment, 2 other died with due course of time 1 lost to follow-up and one patient with deep infection underwent excision arthroplasty. We could only speculate cause for dislocation / subluxation on the basis of clinical examination, X-ray, Investigations and review of literature. In these cases it appeared that the factors responsible for instability could be mechanical factors and pyogenic infection. Review of literature and possible aetiological factors, investigations and various aspects of management of such cases are discussed. Conclusions. Mechanical factors such as intra-operative femoral head rotation, avulsion of greater trochanter, excessive medialisation, valgus reduction, excessive collapse, soft tissue injury, and infection are contributing factors for hip instability

Unstable intertrochanteric fractures may be treated by several types of implants, most frequently by dynamic sliding hip screw or some form of intramedullary implant. Intramedullary implants began to be used in cases with an expectation of further improvement of osteosynthesis stability. A need to determine the advantages of single implants for selected types of fractures in randomized trials was defined. In addition to biomechanical principles, bone quality is considered, together with increasing possibilities in recent years of further improving density measurements, especially qCT with respect to local specificity. A series of 86 patients (24 men, 62 women, average age 77,6 years) was operated on from September 6, 2005 to June 30, 2009 for unstable intertrochanteric fracture (31 A2.1, A2.2, A2.3), either by DHS of PFN osteosynthesis after randomization. A CT examination of both hip joints in a predefined manner was performed before surgery. Using special software the relative density of the central spherical part of the femoral head 2 and 3 centimetres in diameter was determined. After fracture healing, the dynamization of the neck screw of both implants and the reduction of vertical distance between the tip of the neck screw and subchondral bone of the femoral head were determined. In addition to evaluation of osteosynthesis stability and osteosyntheis failure, clinical parameters such as surgical time, blood loss and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups of patients. Survival of patients was evaluated with respect to April 21, 2010. In the patient series, 4 failures of DHS osteosynthesis (cut out) and 2 failures of PFN osteosynthesis (cut out) were noted. Sliding of the DHS was on average 11,9 mm, and was significantly higher in comparison to dynamization of the PFN neck screw, which was 6,9 mm (p=0,005). When comparing the vertical distance between the tip of the neck screw and subchondral bone of the femoral head immediately after surgery and after fracture healing the average reduction of the vertical distance was 1,6 mm in DHS osteosynthesis and 0,8 mm in PFN osteosynthesis. The difference was statistically significant (p=0,025). PFN seems to provide a more stable fixation, based on the measurements. The number of failed DHS osteosyntheses is higher in comparison to the number of failed PFN osteosyntheses but the difference is not statistically significant. The influence of femoral head density on osteosynthesis failure could not be determined due to a low number of failed osteosyntheses in both patient groups. At the same time, after statistical analysis, influence of the relative femoral head density on vertical distance reduction between the screw tip and femoral head subchondral bone in healed fractures was not proven. Statistically, average length of surgical time, length of hospital stay, mean blood loss and survival did not differ significantly between the two patient groups

Introduction. The sliding hip screw is the implant of choice for the operative treatment of stable trochanteric femur fractures. Surgeons have been using widely the four-hole side plate DHS (Dynamic Hip screw) with four bicortical screws, which allows adequate weight bearing after operation. However, there is lacking of scientific studies that support the use of such long plate and we question ourselves if we can accomplish the same results with the use of a smaller plate. The objective of this study is to compare the results accomplished with a four-hole and a two-hole DHS side plate in the treatment of transtrochanteric fractures. Material and Methods. This study included 140 patients (43 male and 97 female) that had stable transtrochanteric fractures between 1/01/2005 and 31/12/2008 and were submitted to osteossynthesis with DHS side-plate. 32 (22.9%) were treated with a two-hole DHS (group DHS2) and 108 (77.1%) with four-hole. The fractures were evaluated according to the AO/OTA classification and Evans for stability. The fracture reduction was assessed according to Sernbo criteria and was recorded also patient demographics, fracture patterns and fixation, comorbilities, mortality rate, capacity of ambulation and complications. Results. The patients had in medium 77.74 ± 49.52 years and 18 months of follow-up (range 6–36 months). Both groups had similar patient demographics. The etiology of the fracture was fall in 120 (85.7%) and 20 (14.3%) from traffic accident, 10 (7.1%) were patological. 15 (10.7%) died during hospital stay: 13 (12.0%) in DHS4 group and 2 (6.3%) in DHS2. In terms of capacity of ambulation in the group DHS2 15.6% didn't ambulate and 25% had walking aid; in the group DHS4 20.4% didn't ambulate and 29.7% had walking aid. Concerning fracture reduction there was varus (<125°) in 9.4% of DHS2 group and 9.3% in DHS4. Also in the group DHS4 there were 15 (13.9%) complications: 3 cut-out, 3 device failure, 8 infections and 1 pseudarthrosis. In the group DHS2 there were 4 (12.5%) complications: 1 cut-out, 2 infections and 1 device failure. 121 (28 group DHS2 and 93 group DHS4) fractures healed without complications in anatomical position with good function of the hip joint. Discussion. We found no significant differences between the two groups regarding reduction or percentage of complications. However we could observe that in the group DHS2 there was a lesser rate of mortality during hospital stay and a higher capacity of ambulation without walking aid. So the fixation of stable transtrochanteric fractures with a two-hole DHS side-plate is safe, less invasive, less surgical time and less blood loss than a four-hole. As our study reveled in these stable fractures there is lacking of benefit with the use of a larger slide-plate, the two-hole is adequate and its use should be increasing in our clinical practice

The aim of the present study was to compare the amount of blood loss between Gamma nail and DHS operative procedures in treating fractures N.O.F. Material and Method: thirty patients 81 years of age (average), suffering from N.O.F. fracture were divided in two groups, depending on sex, age, weight and type of fracture, in such way that for every patient operated using one procedure there was a similar one treated with the other one (pairing). The admission and discharge Ht, the blood unites needed for the whole patients hospitalization time were compared. Statistically T-test, Pearson chi square – Fisher exact test were used. Results: The average age for the Gamma nail group and DHS group were 82 yrs (sd=11,5) and 81,3 (sd=10,6), the admission Ht 36,9% (sd=4,0) and 36,72% (3,27) and the discharge Ht. was 33,2% (sd=2) and 34,9% (sd=2.9) respectively. For the first group (Gamma nail) 2.3 (sd=1.1) units of blood were used, compared to 2.4 (sd=0.7) for the second one (DHS). There was no statistical difference concerning the age and the population sample, the admission and discharge Ht, and the blood units needed between these two groups. Conclusion: There is no difference concerning blood loss between Gamma nail and DHS in treating fractures N.O.F

Purpose: Numerous implants used in repairing a trochanteric fracture of the hip are currently available. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the complications and results of the percutaneous compression plate (PCCP), a relatively new device versus the conventional dynamic hip screw (DHS). Materials and Methods: Between 2001–2003, 110 consecutive patients with trochanteric fractures were treated in our department. Fifty-five fractures were stabilized using the PCCP and 55 fractures were treated with the DHS. Results were analyzed according to fracture pattern, type of implant, quality of fracture reduction and position of implant. Function was assessed on the basis of pain, walking aids and walking capability. Results: Forty-seven (85%) of 55 hips treated with PCCP healed without additional treatment and complications. Forty-three (78%) treated with DHS healed without additional treatment and complications. Complications among 8 patients (15%) of the PCCP group were: deep vein thrombosis, cardiac complication, chest infection and pressure sores. Complications among 12 patients (22%) of the DHS group were: implant failure (7%), deep wound infection, deep vein thrombosis and pressure sores. Conclusions: Use of the PCCP implant provides similar and occasionally better results compared to those obtained with the conventional DHS device. The most outstanding advantage of the PCCP device was no implant failure or implant cut out

Dynamic Hip Screw fixation for intertrochanteric fracture of femur is one of the most common operations in the trauma list of any DGH. The operation is commonly performed by the registrar or senior house officer as it is considered to be a relatively simple procedure. However the reality is slightly different as we audit our results of DHS fixation over a period of 2 years from May 2002 to August 2004. Out of 184 DHS fixation done during the abovementioned period, we identified 18 (10%) failures within 2–8 weeks postoperative period. We reviewed the pre-operative and post-operative X-rays to identify the possible reasons for failure. The reasons were inappropriate indication for DHS – 3 cases, inadequate fracture reduction – 6 cases, inappropriate implant placement −12 cases. 3 cases (16%) of failure had to be treated conservatively due to poor medical condition, 7 cases (39%) had the implant removed or revised and some type of arthroplasty was done in rest 8 cases (45%). Of the 15 cases treated operatively 12 had satisfactory outcome in terms of pain relief and movement and the rest 3 had residual pain, inadequate restoration of mobility affecting the quality of life. All patients had significant morbidity (prolonged hospital stay, depression) due to the failure of fixation and further operative procedures. Therefore we think appropriate guidance by experienced personnel is necessary for correct indication and meticulous operative technique

Hip fractures are a major challenge and impose high demand on orthopaedic services. DHS has been proved to be a gold standard method of treatment in uncomplicated extracapsular fractures. The introduction of Intramedullary devices has provided us with a wider choice of construct. Since there was conflicting literature evidence comparing the outcomes of DHS and IMHS, we set out to analyse the same in our practice. Forty patients in each group operated in the year 2000, comparable in fracture pattern, age and sex distribution were studied. The operating time, fluoroscopic exposure, blood loss, complications (Intra-op, Post-op and Deaths), duration of hospital stay and the discharge destinations were studied from the clinical notes and Hospital information system. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS for all the available data. Statistically, the DHS has a lesser duration of surgery, lower fluoroscopic exposure and lesser duration of hospital stay. However, clinically it appears that the IMHS is fraught with more complications

Introduction: Hip fractures affects more than 65,000 people in the UK each year and this number is increasing. The standard treatment is insertion of either a dynamic hip screw or hemiarthroplasty depending on fracture configuration. Because of their advanced age, associated co-morbid factors as well as having had an implant inserted, hip fracture patients are at increased risk of developing post-operative wound infections. The infection rate for hip fracture surgery is quoted at 0.6 – 3.6%. 1. . Methods: We carried out a retrospective study of the readmission rate due to wound infection following treatment of their fractured neck of femur. 20 patients (16 females and 4 males) were identified over a 24 month period out of a total 1786 femoral neck fractures treated (1.1%). Results: 11 patients re-admitted with a wound infection had had a hemiarthroplasty fixation, 9 following insertion of a DHS. 7 patients (0.4%) had a superficial wound infection (3 hemi, 4 DHS) and 13 (0.7%) a deep wound infection (8 hemi, 5 DHS). Treatment for the superficial wound infections included 6 patients requiring IV antibiotics and 1 requiring washout and resuturing of the wound. Treatment of deep wound infections included 6 who had a Girdlestone procedure, 2 had wound washout, debridement and 2 who had removal of DHS. All received IV antibiotics. 2 patients were deemed unfit for surgery and received IV antibiotics only. 3 patients with a deep wound infection (23%) died (2 deemed unfit for surgery, and 1 Girdlestone) during their admission. 85% of the readmissions had an ASA score of three or over. We looked at the length of operation time and found that 15 took less than 45 minutes, 4 took between 45 and 60 minutes and one took over 60 minutes. Three of the operations which took over 45 minutes developed deep infections. Conclusion: Fractured neck of femur accounts for a large proportion of fracture admissions. Accepted methods of treatment carry significant infection rates. Superficial wound infections can in the majority be treated with IV antibiotics. Deep wound infections carry a significant mortality rate. Operating time should be within 45 minutes where possible to reduce the risk of deep infection. Post-operative wound infections are associated with an ASA grade of 3 or greater

Introduction:- We reviewed 69 patients with subcapital fracture neck of femur treated with two hole plate DHS and parallel de-rotation screw into the cranial part of the femoral head between January 2000 to January 2005. Methods:- Patients were selected for fixation by having Garden 1 to 4 fractures, being younger, more active and mobile. Reduction was classified as “good” when residual angulation in the lateral projection was less than 15 degrees, no varus angulation and good alignment in the calcar area. Screw position was considered “good” when there was less than 10 degrees deviation in the direction of screws, screw threads not bridging the fracture site, screw tips less than 5mm from subchondral bone and no signs of intra-articular penetration. The fracture was considered healed when bridging of trabecular bone was present. Patients were reviewed until they were pain free at rest or on walking and had radiological healing of fracture. Results:- 13 had Garden 3 & 4, 46 had Garden 1 & 2 and 10 had impacted fractures. Sixty eight patients had operation within 24 hours in the next available trauma list. Average age at operation was 70 years (range 21– 89) and hospitals stay 13 days (range 2–52). Good reduction was achieved in 61 patients, 54 of these had good screw position, 8 patients (11%) had combination of poor reduction and poor screw position; five of them had loss of fixation within 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively, one each had segmental collapse and avascular necrosis between 12 to 24 months of operation. Conclusion:- Their was no re-displacement, non-union, avascular necrosis or segmental collapse when fractures were well reduced and had good screw position. Two hole plate DHS and a parallel de-rotation screw has high rate of fracture union. We recommend its use for treatment of subcapital femoral neck fractures

Aims: Our purpose was to determine if DHS fixed with hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated AO/ASIF screws improves fixation and clinical outcomes in osteoporotic trochanteric fracture patients. Methods: 120 osteoporotic patients with trochanteric fractures were randomized to receive 135° 4-hole DHS fixed with either standard lag and cortical stainless-steel AO/ASIF screws (Group A) or HA-coated lag and cortical stainless-steel AO/ASIF screws (Group B). Inclusion criteria were: female; age ≥65 years; AO type A1 or A2; and BMD lower than -2.5 T score. Results: Tip Apex Distance (TAD) was 22±4mm in Group A and 23±5mm in Group B (ns). In Group A there were 4 cut-out cases and none in Group B (p< 0.05, β=0.8). Post-op (ns) and 6 month (p=0.008) femoral neck-shaft angle was 134±5° and 129±7° (Group A) and 134±7° and 133±7° (Group B). At 6 months, Harris Hip Score was 63±22 (Group A) and 71±18 (Group B) (p=0.02). Conclusions: HA-coated AO/ASIF screws prevent fracture varization and lag screw cutout, thus improving clinical outcomes in osteoporotic trochanteric fracture patients

Introduction. The objective of this study was to determine if a synthetic bone substitute would provide results similar to bone from osteoporotic femoral heads during in vitro testing with orthopaedic implants. If the synthetic material could produce results similar to those of the osteoporotic bone, it could reduce or eliminate the need for testing of implants on bone. Methods. Pushout studies were performed with the dynamic hip screw (DHS) and the DHS Blade in both cadaveric femoral heads and artificial bone substitutes in the form of polyurethane foam blocks of different density. The pushout studies were performed as a means of comparing the force displacement curves produced by each implant within each material. Results. The results demonstrated that test material with a density of 0.16 g/cm. 3. (block A) produced qualitatively similar force displacement curves for the DHS and qualitatively and quantitatively similar force displacement curves for the DHS Blade, whereas the test material with a density of 0.08 g/cm. 3. (block B) did not produce results that were predictive of those recorded within the osteoporotic cadaveric femoral heads. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that synthetic material with a density of 0.16 g/cm. 3. can provide a good substitute for cadaveric osteoporotic femoral heads in the testing of implants. However we do recognise that no synthetic material can be considered as a definitive substitute for bone, therefore studies performed with artificial bone substrates may need to be validated by further testing with a small bone sample in order to produce conclusive results

Although the importance of lateral femoral wall integrity is increasingly being recognised in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture, little attention has been put on the development of a secondary post-operative fracture of the lateral wall. Patients with post-operative fractures of the lateral wall were reported to have high rates of re-operation and complication. To date, no predictors of post-operative lateral wall fracture have been reported. In this study, we investigated the reliability of lateral wall thickness as a predictor of lateral wall fracture after dynamic hip screw (DHS) implantation. A total of 208 patients with AO/OTA 31-A1 and -A2 classified intertrochanteric fractures who received internal fixation with a DHS between January 2003 and May 2012 were reviewed. There were 103 men and 150 women with a mean age at operation of 78 years (33 to 94). The mean follow-up was 23 months (6 to 83). The right side was affected in 97 patients and the left side in 111. Clinical information including age, gender, side, fracture classification, tip–apex distance, follow-up time, lateral wall thickness and outcome were recorded and used in the statistical analysis. Fracture classification and lateral wall thickness significantly contributed to post-operative lateral wall fracture (both p < 0.001). The lateral wall thickness threshold value for risk of developing a secondary lateral wall fracture was found to be 20.5 mm. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the risk factors of post-operative lateral wall fracture in intertrochanteric fracture. We found that lateral wall thickness was a reliable predictor of post-operative lateral wall fracture and conclude that intertrochanteric fractures with a lateral wall thickness < 20.5 mm should not be treated with DHS alone. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1134–8

The principle of the sliding hip screw is to provide a controlled collapse at the fracture site. It is during the screw insertion that clockwise rotational torque is imparted to the head and neck

In right-sided fractures the screw causes the head fragment to rotate clockwise leading to apposition or flexed position of the fracture site. In Left sided fractures the clockwise rotation leads to the head and neck fragment into extension of the fracture site leading to a potentially unstable construct.

All intertrochanteric fractures treated over a 12-month period were assessed. 75 fractures were included in the study. The fractures were classified according to Tronzo’s classification (Grades I & II – stable; Grades III & IV – unstable). Intraoperative and postoperative films were assessed for rotational abnormalities in the form of an anterior spike of the proximal fragment in left-sided fractures and a flexed position of reduction in right-sided fractures.

There were 39 Left sided fractures and 36 Right sided fractures.

A rotational abnormality was seen in 11 Left sided fractures compared with none on the right side. All 11 abnormalities were seen in Grade III and IV fractures (2 and 9 respectively). Analysis of results using the Chi-Square test revealed a significant difference (p < 0.001). 3 out the 11 fractures with rotational anterior spike had an implant cut out which needed revision surgery.

Compared to stable fractures, the accuracy of reduction determines the final stability in unstable fractures. In these fractures the rotational torque imparted to the proximal head and neck fragment can cause loss of reduction leading to potential failures of fixation. This appears to be greater in left sided fractures where the rotational torque causes the anterior spike which when not butressed inferiorly and medially can lead to a state where the implant cannot control the shear forces at the fracture site. This can then lead to failure of fixation.

In right-sided fractures the rotational torque often causes compression of the head and neck fragment into the distal fragment with the creation of an infero- medial butress.

The methods of overcoming this problem are with modifications in the technique. Untwisting the last few threads of the screw after insertion could reduce the anterior spike. The application of digital pressure along the anterior neck or the application of a reduction clamp at screw insertion provides counter rotation.

The results of this study confirm that the problem of torque at the fracture site is not of considerable importance in stable fractures but is significantly so in unstable left sided fractures. This results in a greater predisposition for potential failure of fixation

Objectives

Fractures of the proximal femur are a common clinical problem, and a number of orthopaedic devices are available for the treatment of such fractures. The objective of this study was to assess the rotational stability, a common failure predictor, of three different rotational control design philosophies: a screw, a helical blade and a deployable crucifix.

Aims. To evaluate if, for orthopaedic trainees, additional cadaveric simulation training or standard training alone yields superior radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. Methods. This was a preliminary, pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled trial in nine secondary and tertiary NHS hospitals in England. Researchers were blinded to group allocation. Overall, 40 trainees in the West Midlands were eligible: 33 agreed to take part and were randomized, five withdrew after randomization, 13 were allocated cadaveric training, and 15 were allocated standard training. The intervention was an additional two-day cadaveric simulation course. The control group received standard on-the-job training. Primary outcome was implant position on the postoperative radiograph: tip-apex distance (mm) (DHS) and leg length discrepancy (mm) (hemiarthroplasty). Secondary clinical outcomes were procedure time, length of hospital stay, acute postoperative complication rate, and 12-month mortality. Procedure-specific secondary outcomes were intraoperative radiation dose (for DHS) and postoperative blood transfusion requirement (hemiarthroplasty). Results. Eight female (29%) and 20 male trainees (71%), mean age 29.4 years, performed 317 DHS operations and 243 hemiarthroplasties during ten months of follow-up. Primary analysis was a random effect model with surgeon-level fixed effects of patient condition, patient age, and surgeon experience, with a random intercept for surgeon. Under the intention-to-treat principle, for hemiarthroplasty there was better implant position in favour of cadaveric training, measured by leg length discrepancy ≤ 10 mm (odds ratio (OR) 4.08 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 14.22); p = 0.027). There were significantly fewer postoperative blood transfusions required in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty by cadaveric-trained compared to standard-trained surgeons (OR 6.00 (95% CI 1.83 to 19.69); p = 0.003). For DHS, there was no significant between-group difference in implant position as measured by tip-apex distance ≤ 25 mm (OR 6.47 (95% CI 0.97 to 43.05); p = 0.053). No between-group differences were observed for any secondary clinical outcomes. Conclusion. Trainees randomized to additional cadaveric training performed hip fracture fixation with better implant positioning and fewer postoperative blood transfusions in hemiarthroplasty. This effect, which was previously unknown, may be a consequence of the intervention. Further study is required. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):602–611

The incidence of hip fractures in the elderly is increasing. Minimally displaced and un-displaced hip fractures can be treated with either internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty. The aim was identifying the revision rate of internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty in patients 60 years or older with Garden I or II hip fractures and to identify risk factors associated with each method. A retrospective analysis was conducted from 2 Major Trauma Centres and 9 Trauma Units between 01/01/2015 and 31/12/2020. Patients managed conservatively, treated with a total hip replacement and missing data were excluded from the study. 1273 patients were included of which 26.2% (n=334) had cannulated hip fixation (CHF), 19.4% (n=247) had a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and 54.7% (n=692) had a hemiarthroplasty. 66 patients in total (5.2%) required revision surgery. The revision rates for CHF, DHS and hemiarthroplasty were 14.4%, 4%, 1.2% (p<0.001) respectively. Failed fixation was the most common reason for revision with the incidence increasing by 7-fold in the CHF group [45.8% (n=23) vs. 33.3% (n=3) in DHS; p<0.01]. The risk factors identified for CHF revision were age >80 (p<0.05), female gender (p<0.05) and smoking (p<0.05). The average length of hospital stay was decreased when using CHF compared to DHS and hemiarthroplasty (12.6 days vs 14.9 days vs 18.1 days respectively, p<0.001) and the 1 year mortality rate for CHF, DHS and hemiarthroplasty was 2.5%, 2% and 9% respectively. Fixation methods for Garden I and II hip fractures in elderly patients are associated with a higher revision rate than hemiarthroplasty. CHF has the highest revision rate at 14.4% followed by DHS and hemiarthroplasty. Female patients, patients over the age of 80 and patients with poor bone quality are considered high risk for fixation failure with CHF. When considering a fixation method in such patients, DHS is more robust than a screw construct, followed by hemiarthroplasty

Aims. To develop a core outcome set of measurements from postoperative radiographs that can be used to assess technical skill in performing dynamic hip screw (DHS) and hemiarthroplasty, and to validate these against Van der Vleuten’s criteria for effective assessment. Methods. A Delphi exercise was undertaken at a regional major trauma centre to identify candidate measurement items. The feasibility of taking these measurements was tested by two of the authors (HKJ, GTRP). Validity and reliability were examined using the radiographs of operations performed by orthopaedic resident participants (n = 28) of a multicentre randomized controlled educational trial (ISRCTN20431944). Trainees were divided into novice and intermediate groups, defined as having performed < ten or ≥ ten cases each for DHS and hemiarthroplasty at baseline. The procedure-based assessment (PBA) global rating score was assumed as the gold standard assessment for the purposes of concurrent validity. Intra- and inter-rater reliability testing were performed on a random subset of 25 cases. Results. In total, 327 DHS and 248 hemiarthroplasty procedures were performed by 28 postgraduate year (PGY) 3 to 5 orthopaedic trainees during the 2014 to 2015 surgical training year at nine NHS hospitals in the West Midlands, UK. Overall, 109 PBAs were completed for DHS and 80 for hemiarthroplasty. Expert consensus identified four ‘final product analysis’ (FPA) radiological parameters of technical success for DHS: tip-apex distance (TAD); lag screw position in the femoral head; flushness of the plate against the lateral femoral cortex; and eight-cortex hold of the plate screws. Three parameters were identified for hemiarthroplasty: leg length discrepancy; femoral stem alignment; and femoral offset. Face validity, content validity, and feasibility were excellent. For all measurements, performance was better in the intermediate compared with the novice group, and this was statistically significant for TAD (p < 0.001) and femoral stem alignment (p = 0.023). Concurrent validity was poor when measured against global PBA score. This may be explained by the fact that they are measuring difference facets of competence. Intra-and inter-rater reliability were excellent for TAD, moderate for lag screw position (DHS), and moderate for leg length discrepancy (hemiarthroplasty). Use of a large multicentre dataset suggests good generalizability of the results to other settings. Assessment using FPA was time- and cost-effective compared with PBA. Conclusion. Final product analysis using post-implantation radiographs to measure technical skill in hip fracture surgery is feasible, valid, reliable, and cost-effective. It can complement traditional workplace-based assessment for measuring performance in the real-world operating room . It may have particular utility in competency-based training frameworks and for assessing skill transfer from the simulated to live operating theatre. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:594–604

The aim of this study is to analyse the radiological outcomes and predictors of avascular necrosis following 2-hole DHS in Garden I and II neck of femur fractures in patients more than 60 years with a minimum follow up of one year. We retrospectively reviewed 51 consecutive patients aged more than 60 years who underwent DHS fixation for Garden I and II fractures. Demographics, fracture classification, time to surgery, pre-operative AMTS, preoperative posterior tilt angle, quality of reduction, pre and post-operative haemoglobin(hb), creatinine and comorbidities were analysed for correlation with AVN using Chi-Square test, Independent Sample and paired t test. There were 40 (78.4%) females and the mean age of the cohort was 77 years. 28 and 23 were Garden I and II NOF fractures respectively. Union was observed in all our patients except one(kappa =1). 12/51(23.5%) developed AVN of the femoral head. Statistically significant higher incidence of AVN was noted in patients with a pre-op tilt angle > 200 (p = 0.006). The mean drop in Hb was higher in patients who developed AVN (21.5 g/L) versus the non-AVN group (15.9 g/L) (p = 0.001). There was no difference in AVN rates with respect to laterality, mean time to surgery, pre-op AMTS and Charlson comorbidity index. 4/52 (7.6%) had re-operations (one hardware prominence, two conversions to arthroplasty, one fixation failure during the immediate post-op period). The 30-day and one year mortality rates were 1.9 % and 11.7 % respectively. 2-hole DHS fixation in undisplaced NOF fractures has excellent union rates. A pre-operative posterior tilt angle of >200 and a greater difference in pre and post operative haemoglobin were found to correlate positively with the progression to AVN . No correlation was observed between AVN and time to surgery, laterality, quality of reduction and comorbidities

Background. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is the most frequently used implant in management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. There is a known statistical relationship between a tip-apex distance (TAD) >25mm and higher rate of implant failure. Our aim was to analyse all DHS procedures performed in our trust from seventeen months and compare their TAD values to the acceptable standard of ≤25mm. Methods. All patients undergoing DHS between April 2020-August 2021 were identified from our theatre system. Additionally, those presenting to hospital with implant failures were included. Patient demographics, date of surgery, fracture classification (AO) and date/mode of failure were recorded. Intraoperative fluoroscopy images were reviewed to calculate TAD, screw location and neck shaft angles by two independent observers. Results. 215 patients were identified, five of which were excluded due to inadequate fluoroscopy. Failure was seen in 3.3% of the cohort (n=7), of which 71.4% had an unacceptable TAD. In total, 21 patients (10%) had TAD >25mm, of whom 12 had superiorly and 15 had posteriorly placed screws. There were no failures in patients with a TAD of <20mm whereas a TAD >30mm had 50% failure rate. Conclusion. This audit reinforces the importance of aiming for a low TAD (preferably <20mm) intraoperatively. It is also desirable to avoid superiorly and significantly posteriorly placed screws. Implications. Complex hip revision surgery in the elderly bears substantial financial implications to the NHS and, more importantly, causes prolonged morbidity to the patient. Adhering to established standards will ensure reduced implant failure and best patient care