Aim. Arthroscopic interventions have revolutionized the treatment of joint pathologies. The appropriate diagnostics and treatment are required for infections after ligament reconstructions using non-resorbable material such as tendon grafts, anchors, and sutures, prone to biofilm formation. The infection rate is around 1% for knee and shoulder, while up to 4% for Achilles tendon reconstructions. Despite high number of these procedures worldwide, there is limited evidence about the best treatment protocol. Our study aimed to provide a general protocol for the treatment of small implants for soft tissue reconstruction. Method. Between 2019 and 2023, we treated 48 infections of ligament, meniscus, and tendon reconstructions out of 7291 related procedures performed in the same time period. Early infection (<30 days) were treated with an arthroscopic debridement and implant retention (DAIR), except Achilles tendons had open DAIR, while those with delayed or chronic infection (>30 days) were treated with extensive debridement and lavage combined with one-stage exchange (OSE) or implant removal. During surgery, at least 5 microbiological s and samples for histopathology were obtained. The removed material was sonicated. After surgery, all patients were one week on iv. antibiotics, followed by oral antibiofilm antibiotics for 6 weeks including rifampicin and/or a quinolone. All patients were followed for at least 1 year. Failure was defined as the need for additional revision surgery after finished iv. antibiotic treatment. Results. Among 48 patients, 38 were early and 10 were late acute or chronic infections. The incidence of infection for our cohort was 0.7%. We observed 27 infections after ligament reconstruction of the knee, 15 of the shoulder, 5 of the ankle, and 1 infection of the elbow joint. 40 patients were treated with DAIR, 5 with OSE, and 3 with implant removal. We had 11 C. acnes, 10 S. aureus, 6 S. epidermidis, 2 P. aeruginosa, 2 S. lugdunensis, 10 mixed flora, and 3 culture-negative infections. 12 patients received antibiotics before surgery, and all culture-negative infections were related to this subgroup. We observed 2 failures, both in a combination of proximal tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction of the knee joint. The success rate of our protocol was 96%. Conclusions. Prompt surgical treatment followed by 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment cured 96% of infections of small implants after reconstruction procedures of knee, shoulder, and ankle joints. Our study is the first to provide a treatment protocol for infections of small implants after ligament reconstruction procedures

Aims. The microbiological detection of microorganisms plays a crucial role in the diagnosis as well as in the targeted systemic and local antibiotic therapy of periprosthetic infections (PJI). Despite extensive efforts to improve the sensitivity of current culture methods, the rate of culture-negative infections is approximately 10–20% of all PJI. This study investigates an preanalytical algorithm (culture collection and direct processing in the OR) to potentially increasing culture yield in patients with PJI. Methods. Patients undergoing staged revision arthroplasty for PJI in our hospital between October 2021 and 2022 were included in this prospective pilot study. Intraoperatively twenty tissue samples were collected and distributed among 4 groups. Tissue samples were prepared according to standard without medium and in thioglycolate medium at 3 different temperatures (room temperature, 4°C, 37° for 24h before transport to microbiology) directly in the OR. The removed implants were sonicated. Cultures were investigated on days 1, 3, 7, 12, 14 for possible growth. All grown organism, the number of positive samples and the time to positivity were recorded and compared. Results. 71 patients were included (age, gender). Compared to the standard procedure the thioglycolate broth at 37°C was significantly more often culture-negative (p=0.031). No significant differences in the frequency of culture-negative samples were detected in the other groups. 8.4% (6/71) patients were culture negative in the standard culture but positive in the thioglycolate samples. In contrast, 7% (5/71) were culture negative in the thioglycolate samples but had bacterial detection in the standard approach. In 4.7% (3/63) of the patients, only the sonication showed growth, whereas 25.4% (16/63) had no growth in sonication fluid but in one of the cultures. For S. caprae, there was a significantly different distribution (p=0.026) with more frequent detection in the group with thioglycolate at 37°C. The standard procedure (p=0.005) and sonication (p=0.023) showed a shorter time to positivity of the culture compared to the thioglycolate approach at 4°C. Conclusions. No general differences could be shown between the standard preparation and the thioglycolate preparation; in particular, storage at different temperatures does not seem to result in any difference. For individual cases (8% in this study), bacterial growth was detected in the thioglycolate group that would have been culture-negative otherwise. There might be organism dependent differences in growth in different media

Aims. The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection can be difficult due to the high rate of culture-negative infections. The aim of this study was to assess the use of next-generation sequencing for detecting organisms in synovial fluid. Materials and Methods. In this prospective, single-blinded study, 86 anonymized samples of synovial fluid were obtained from patients undergoing aspiration of the hip or knee as part of the investigation of a periprosthetic infection. A panel of synovial fluid tests, including levels of C-reactive protein, human neutrophil elastase, total neutrophil count, alpha-defensin, and culture were performed prior to next-generation sequencing. Results. Of these 86 samples, 30 were alpha-defensin-positive and culture-positive (Group I), 24 were alpha-defensin-positive and culture-negative (Group II) and 32 were alpha-defensin-negative and culture-negative (Group III). Next-generation sequencing was concordant with 25 results for Group I. In four of these, it detected antibiotic resistant bacteria whereas culture did not. In another four samples with relatively low levels of inflammatory biomarkers, culture was positive but next-generation sequencing was negative. A total of ten samples had a positive next-generation sequencing result and a negative culture. In five of these, alpha-defensin was positive and the levels of inflammatory markers were high. In the other five, alpha-defensin was negative and the levels of inflammatory markers were low. While next-generation sequencing detected several organisms in each sample, in most samples with a higher probability of infection, there was a predominant organism present, while in those presumed not to be infected, many organisms were identified with no predominant organism. Conclusion. Pathogens causing periprosthetic infection in both culture-positive and culture-negative samples of synovial fluid could be identified by next-generation sequencing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:127–33

Aims. To identify the most common infecting organisms associated with deep infection and infected non-union of the tibia, as well as the rate of ‘culture-negative’ infections, at a tertiary referral trauma centre dealing with military and civilian trauma. Method. Between 2008 and 2010 all patients with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of implant-related infection or infected non-union of the tibia were identified retrospectively from a database and their records analysed. After a period of at least 10–14 days without antibiotics, all patients underwent surgical debridement in which ‘clean’ samples were went for microbiological analysis. Skeletal stablity was achieved with a circular frame and intravenous antibiotics were started pending culture and sensitivity results. Results. There were 31 patients; 28 male, 3 female. Mean age 41yrs. 21 patients (68%) had sustained open fractures. In 11 patients, tissue cultures were negative. In the remainder, 8 patients cultured one organism, 6 two organisms, 2 three organisms, and 2 four organisms. Only those with open fractures grew more than 2 organisms. A total of 15 different infecting organisms (all of which were bacteria) were identified. The most common organisms isolated were Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Bacillus and Enterobacter cloacae. There were 3 cases of MRSA infection, all in open fractures. The most frequently used antibiotics for definitive therapy were ciprofloxacin, rifampicin and vancomycin. Conclusions. The majority of patients had sustained open fractures. Patient with open fractures were more likely to have polymicrobial infections. There was a high rate of culture-negative infections, particularly in the closed fracture group. Meticulous sampling and processing of microbiology samples is essential to minimise the number of culture-negative infections. Laboratory techniques such as polymerase chain reaction may help improve culture yields

Aim. While 16S rRNA PCR - Sanger sequencing has paved the way for the diagnosis of culture-negative bacterial infections, it does not provide the composition of polymicrobial infections. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Nanopore-based 16S rRNA metagenomic approach using partial-length amplification of the gene, and to explore its feasibility and suitability as a routine diagnostic tool for bone and joint infections (BJI) in a clinical laboratory. Method. Sixty-two clinical samples from patients with BJI were sequenced on MinION* using the in-house partial amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. BJI were defined based on the ICM Philly 2018 and EBJIS 2021 criteria. Among the 62 samples, 16 (26%) were culture-positive, including 6 polymicrobial infections, and 46 (74%) were culture-negative from mono- and polymicrobial infections based on Sanger-sequencing. Contamination, background noise definition, bacterial identification, and time-effectiveness issues were addressed. Results. Results were obtained within one day. Setting a threshold at 1% of total reads overcame the background noise issue and eased interpretation of clinical samples. The partial 16S rRNA metagenomics approach had a greater sensitivity compared both to the culture method and the Sanger sequencing. All the 16 culture-positive samples were confirmed with the metagenomic sequencing. Bacterial DNA was detected in 32 culture-negative samples (70%), with pathogens consistent with BJI. The 14 Nanopore negative samples included 7 negative results confirmed after implementation of other molecular techniques and 7 false-negative MinION results: 3 Kingella kingae infections detected after targeted-PCR only, 2 Staphylococcus aureus infections and 2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections sterile on agar plate media and detected only after implementation of blood culture media, advocating for the very low inoculum. Conclusions. The results discriminated polymicrobial samples, and gave accurate bacterial identifications compared to Sanger-based results. They confirmed that Nanopore technology is user-friendly as well as cost- and time-effective. They also indicated that 16S rRNA targeted metagenomics is a suitable approach to be implemented for routine diagnosis of culture-negative samples in clinical laboratories. * Oxford Nanopore Technologies

Aim. Spinal implant-associated infections (SIAI) require combined surgical and antimicrobial treatment and prolonged hospital stay. We evaluated the clinical, laboratory, microbiological and radiological characteristics and treatment approaches in patients with SIAI. Method. Consecutive adult patients with SIAI treated between 2015 and 2017 were prosepctively included. SIAI was defined by: (i) significant microbial growth from intraoperative tissue or sonication fluid, (ii) intraoperative purulence, secondary wound dehiscence or implant on view, (iii) radiographic evidence of infection and fever (>38°C) without other recognized cause, increasing back pain or neurologic impairment, (iv) peri-implant tissue inflammation in histopathology. Results. A total of 60 patients were included, median age was 66 years (range, 28–91 years), 29 (48%) were males. The most common reason for spinal stabilization was spinal canal stenosis in 20 patients (33%) followed by vertebral degenerative disease in 14 (23%). 31 patients (52%) had one or more previous spine surgeries (range, 1–4 interventions). The anatomic site of spinal instrumentation was lumbar/sacral in 26 (43%), cervical in 23 patients (38%), thoracic in 11 (18%). The median number of fused segments was 5 (range, 1–14). Clinical manifestations included wound healing disturbance in 41 patients (68%), increasing back pain in 15 (25%), neurologic impairment in 12 patients (20%) and fever in 14 (23%). Serum CRP was abnormal (>10mg/l) in 46/59 patients (78%). Most (n=54) infections were postsurgical, 5 were hematogenous and 1 was contiguous. Imaging showed epidural, intraspinal or paravertebral abscess in 21/42 patients (50%), implant failure in 9 (21%) and implant loosening in 3 cases (7%). Monomicrobial infection was observed in 41 (68%), polymicrobial in 16 (27%) patients and culture-negative infection in 3 episodes (5%). Predominant causative pathogens were S. aureus (n=19), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=18) and gram-negative rods (n=16). Surgery was performed in all patients including debridement and implant retention in 39 patients (65%), partial implant exchange in 10 (17%) and complete exchange in 11 (18%). Antimicrobial treatment included biofilm-active substances in 52 patients (87%). The median duration of antimicrobial therapy was 11,7 weeks (range, 6–12 weeks). 14 patients (23%) recieved suppressive therapy for a median duration of 9 months (range 3–12 months). Conclusions. Most SIAI were seen in lumbar/sacral segments and wound healing disturbance and increasing back pain were the most common manifestations. In 95% the causative pathogen was isolated, predominantly staphylococci. In half of the episodes, abscesses were present. All patients underwent surgery and biofilm-active antibiotics were administered in 87%

Aims

Gram-negative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been poorly studied despite its rapidly increasing incidence. Treatment with one-stage revision using intra-articular (IA) infusion of antibiotics may offer a reasonable alternative with a distinct advantage of providing a means of delivering the drug in high concentrations. Carbapenems are regarded as the last line of defense against severe Gram-negative or polymicrobial infection. This study presents the results of one-stage revision using intra-articular carbapenem infusion for treating Gram-negative PJI, and analyzes the characteristics of bacteria distribution and drug sensitivity.

Aims

This aim of this study was to analyze the detection rate of rare pathogens in bone and joint infections (BJIs) using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and the impact of mNGS on clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with culture-negative limb osteomyelitis patients.

Aims

The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) when adequate methods of culture are used, and to evaluate the outcome in patients who were treated with antibiotics for a culture-negative PJI compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains an extremely challenging complication. We have focused on this issue more over the last decade than previously, but there are still many unanswered questions. We now have a workable definition that everyone should align to, but we need to continue to focus on identifying the organisms involved. Surgical strategies are evolving and care is becoming more patient-centred. There are some good studies under way. There are, however, still numerous problems to resolve, and the challenge of PJI remains a major one for the orthopaedic community. This annotation provides some up-to-date thoughts about where we are, and the way forward. There is still scope for plenty of research in this area.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1193–1195.

Periprosthetic joint infection represents a devastating complication after total elbow arthroplasty. Several measures can be implemented before, during, and after surgery to decrease infection rates, which exceed 5%. Debridement with antibiotics and implant retention has been reported to be successful in less than one-third of acute infections, but still plays a role. For elbows with well-fixed implants, staged retention seems to be equally successful as the more commonly performed two-stage reimplantation, both with a success rate of 70% to 80%. Permanent resection or even amputation are occasionally considered. Not uncommonly, a second-stage reimplantation requires complex reconstruction of the skeleton with allografts, and the extensor mechanism may also be deficient. Further developments are needed to improve our management of infection after elbow arthroplasty.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(11):1321–1326.

Aims

Fungal periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are rare, but their diagnosis and treatment are highly challenging. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with fungal PJIs treated with two-stage exchange knee arthroplasty combined with prolonged antifungal therapy.

Aims

Despite numerous studies focusing on periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), there are no robust data on the risk factors and timing of metachronous infections. Metachronous PJIs are PJIs that can arise in the same or other artificial joints after a period of time, in patients who have previously had PJI.

Aims

This study aimed to assess the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with combined intravenous (IV) and topical antibiotic therapy in patients undergoing treatment for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), utilizing the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria for classification.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal deep tissue specimen sample number for histopathological analysis in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).