Increasing health care costs, limited resources and increased demand makes cost-effective and cost-efficient delivery of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) management paramount. Rising implant costs in deformity surgery have prompted justification of high implant density. The objective of this study was to analyse the costs of thoracoscopic scoliosis surgery, comparing initial learning curve costs with those of the established technique and to the costs involved in posterior instrumented fusion from the literature.

189 consecutive cases from April 2000 to July 2011 were assessed with a minimum of 2 years follow-up using a prospective database covering perioperative factors, clinical and radiological outcomes, complications and patient-reported outcomes. The patients were divided into three groups to allow comparison; 1. A learning curve cohort, 2. An intermediate cohort and 3. A third cohort using our established technique. Hospital finance records and implant manufacturer figures were corrected to 2013 costs. A literature review of AIS management costs and implant density in similar curve types was performed.

The mean pre-op Cobb angle was 53°(95%CI 0.4) and was corrected postop to mean 22.9°(CI 0.4). The overall complication rate was 20.6%, primarily in the first cohort, with a rate of 5.6% in the third cohort. The average total costs were $46,732, operating room costs of $10,301 (22.0%) and ICU costs of $4620 (9.8%). The mean number of screws placed was 7.1 (CI 0.04) with a single rod used for each case giving average implant costs of $14,004 (29.9%). Comparison of the three groups revealed higher implant costs as the technique evolved to that in use today, from $13,049 in Group 1 to $14577 in Group 3 (P<0.001). Conversely operating room costs reduced from $10,621 in Group 1 to $7573 (P<0.001) in Group 3. ICU stay was reduced from an average of 1.2 to 0 days. In-patient stay was significantly (P=0.006) lower in Groups 2 and 3 (5.4 days) than Group 1 (5.9 days).

Our thoracoscopic anterior scoliosis correction has evolved to include an increase in levels fused and reduction in complication rate. Implant costs have risen, however, there has been a concurrent decrease in those costs generated by operating room use, ICU and in-patient stay with increasing experience. Literature review of equivalent curve types treated posteriorly shows similar perioperative factors but higher implant density, 69–83% compared to the 50% in this study. Thoracoscopic Scoliosis surgery presents a low density, reliable, efficient and effective option for selected curves.

Purpose and background

To explore the cost-utility of implementing stratified care for low back pain (LBP) in general practice, compared with usual care, within patient risk subgroups (low, medium and high risk of persistent disabling pain determined by the STarT Back tool).

Introduction. With the use of each pedicle screw for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), there is an increase in instrumentation-related costs, operative time, risk of neural injury, and overall health-care expenses. As such, alternate level screw strategy (ALSS) has been reported as a potential alternative to contiguous multilevel screw strategy (CMSS). Moreover, studies have shown the importance in accounting for the flexibility of the curve based on the fulcrum bending radiograph when assessing postoperative curve correction. Therefore, this study addressed a radiographic and cost analysis comparing CMSS with ALSS for the treatment of thoracic AIS with titanium screws and rod application. Methods. 77 patients with AIS underwent surgery (range 6–15 levels). 35 patients received CMSS, which was characterised as bilateral screw fixation at every level. 42 patients underwent ALSS, which entailed bilateral screw fixation at alternate levels. Titanium rods were used in all cases. Preoperative and postoperative posteroanterior and fulcrum bending radiographic Cobb angles were obtained for all patients. The fulcrum flexibility and the fulcrum bending correction index (FBCI) were assessed. Cost analysis was also done. Results. We recorded a statistically significant difference between screw strategy-type to that of preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles, and postoperative curve correction (p<0·05). No statistically significant difference was noted between screw strategy-type and fulcrum flexibility (CMSS mean 66·9%; ALSS mean 62·7%; p>0·05). The mean FBCIs of the CMSS and ALSS were 126·1% and 122·1%, respectively, and did not differ significantly (p=0·734). Compared with CMSS, ALSS was associated with pedicle screw cost reductions of up to 46·2%. Conclusions. This study is the first to show that irrespective of curve rigidity, ALSS with fewer pedicle screws can achieve comparable FBCI as CMSS. We attribute this finding to the relatively flexible titanium rods used in this study. Thus, ALSS is as effective as CMSS in terms of coronal curve correction, and it has the added benefits of reducing operative time and neurological complication risk. Furthermore, it offers the possibility of better kyphosis restoration compared with the lordosing effect of CMSS

Aims

The escalating demand for medical resources to address spinal diseases as society ages is an issue that requires careful evaluation. However, few studies have examined trends in spinal surgery, especially unscheduled hospitalizations or surgeries performed after hours, through large databases. Our study aimed to determine national trends in the number of spine surgeries in Japan. We also aimed to identify trends in after-hours surgeries and unscheduled hospitalizations and their impact on complications and costs.

Aim:. The introduction of novel systems for correction of scoliosis should be subject to critical analysis and based on patient benefit. Methods:. Retrospective analysis of prospective data from a single surgeon consecutive series of Lenke 1 type curves. The two cohorts compared K2M and AOUSS2. Pre and Post operation Cobb angle, flexibility, absolute correction rate, implant related correction, levels fused, implant density, implant cost and cost per Cobb improvement analysis were collected. Results:. A total of 26 patients were analysed, 13 in each group. Both groups were similar in pre-operative parameters. The mean age was 14.62 and 14.23 respectively. The mean pre-operation Cobb angle was 71 (96–53) K2M and 70 (85–56) AOUSS2 bending to 45 in each. The flexibility was similar as was the correction in both. Post op Cobb 28 (42–16) K2M and Cobb 28 (44–16) AOUSS2. The implant density and number of screws used was similar. The average cost per construct was £6554 for K2M and £6140 AOUSS2. Discussion:. Using these simple and immediate outcome measures and a grossly simplified cost analysis there was a cost difference of £5382 with no measurable clinical advantage or disadvantage in curves of similar flexibility. The cost per case is determined by implant density and curve flexibility. In the least complex of scoliosis cases there needs to be evidence of benefit to justify the increased resource allocation in a health care system that is not fiscally driven. Conflict Of Interest Statement: No conflict of interest

To compare the effect of intraoperative red cell salvage on blood transfusion and cost in patients undergoing idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Retrospective. 37 patients (36 females, 1 male) underwent scoliosis surgery from February 2007 to October 2008. Intraoperative red cell salvage (Group 1) was used. They were compared with 28 patients (23 females, 5 males) operated from January 2005 to December 2006 without the use of cell salvage (Group 2). 36 patients in group 1 had posterior surgery and 1 had anterior surgery. In Group 2, 20 patients had posterior surgery, 7 anterior and 1 patient had anterior and posterior surgery. Both groups were comparable for age, number of levels fused, preoperative haemoglobin and haematocrit values. Amount of perioperative blood transfusion, costs. 14 patients (50%) in group 2 had blood transfusion whereas only 6 (16%) were transfused blood in group 1. Average blood loss in group 1 was 1076 mls (range 315-3000) and 1626mls (419-4275) in group 2. An average of 2 units of packed red blood cells per patient was processed by the cell salvage system. Postoperative haemoglobin, haematocrit and hospital stay were comparable in both groups. Cost analysis shows the use of cell salvage is cost beneficial by £116.60 per case. The use of red blood cell salvage reduces the amount of blood transfusion and is cost beneficial

Background. Stratifying patients with Low Back Pain (LBP) using the STarT Back Tool and delivering targeted treatment has demonstrated efficacy in individual physiotherapy settings. Physiotherapy interventions for LBP patients are often delivered in groups. This study aimed to explore the sustainability and cost effectiveness of a group stratified intervention in primary care. Methods. This non-randomised controlled trial compared a novel group stratified intervention to a historical non-stratified group control. Patients from 30 GP practices in Waterford Primary Care were stratified and offered a matched targeted group intervention. The historical control received a generic group intervention. The primary outcome measure was disability (RMDQ) at 12 weeks. A cost effectiveness analysis was also undertaken. Analysis was by intention to treat. Ethical approval was obtained. Results. 251 patients in the new stratified intervention and 332 in the historical control were included. Overall adjusted mean changes in the RMDQ scores were higher in the stratified intervention than in the control arm [p=0.028]. Exploring the risk groups individually the high-risk (HR) stratified group demonstrated better outcome over the controls (p=0.031)]. The medium risk (MR) stratified intervention demonstrated equally good outcomes (p=0.125), and low risk (LR) stratified patients, despite less intervention did as well as the historical controls [p=0.993]. With respect to cost effectiveness, the high risk intervention delivered a larger reduction in disability per unit time and proved equally cost effective as the medium risk intervention (HR €44.50 v MR €45.43). Conclusion. Group stratified care provides both a clinically effective and cost effective model of care for LBP patients. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Source of Funding: Funded by an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer Healthcare Ireland

To determine the cost-effectiveness of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement (LTDR) with circumferential spinal fusion surgery. Cost utility analysis. We prospectively reviewed a cohort of 32 consecutive patients who underwent LTDR between 2004 and 2008 with a mean follow-up for 3.75 years. Identical data was compared to a similar group of patients (n=37) who underwent fusion in our institution. Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scale, quality of life (SF-36) and NHS resource use. Cost-effectiveness was measured by the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. QALY gains were estimated from SF-36 data using standard algorithms. There was no significant intergroup difference in the ODI, VAS and SF-36 pre and post-op. Both treatments produced statistically significant and equivalent improvements in mean health state utility at the 24-month follow-up (0.078 for LTDR, 0.087 for fusion). Costs were significantly lower with LTDR than with fusion due to a shorter mean procedure time (193.6 vs 377.4 minutes) and shorter length of stay (5.8 vs 7 days). The mean cost difference was £2,878 per patient. At 2 years, the cost per QALY gain of the lower-cost option (LTDR) was £48,892 although the cost effectiveness ratio would fall to below £30,000 if it is assumed that the patient benefits of LTDR last for at least 4 years. Both treatments led to significant improvements in patient outcomes which were sustained for at least 24 months. Costs were lower with LTDR which is effective and a more cost-effective alternative

Aims

Chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease is sometimes treated with fusion. We compared the outcome of three different fusion techniques in the Swedish Spine Register: noninstrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), instrumented posterolateral fusion (IPLF), and interbody fusion (IBF).

Aims

There is little information about the optimum number of implants to be used in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Swedish spine register was undertaken to discover whether more implants per operated vertebra (implant density) leads to a better outcome in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. The hypothesis was that implant density is not associated with patient-reported outcomes, the correction of the curve or the rate of reoperation.

This is a prospective randomised study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of uni- and bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A total of 44 patients were randomised to undergo either uni- or bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty. Self-reported clinical assessment using the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability questionnaire and a visual analogue score for pain was undertaken pre-operatively, and at three and twelve months post-operatively. The vertebral height and kyphotic angle were measured from pre- and post-operative radiographs. Total operating time and the incidence of cement leakage was recorded for each group.

Both uni- and bipedicular kyphoplasty groups showed significant within-group improvements in all clinical outcomes at three months and twelve months after surgery. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in all clinical and radiological outcomes. Operating time was longer in the bipedicular group (p < 0.001). The incidence of cement leakage was not significantly different in the two groups (p = 0.09).

A unipedicular technique yielded similar clinical and radiological outcomes as bipedicular balloon kyphoplasty, while reducing the length of the operation. We therefore encourage the use of a unipedicular approach as the preferred surgical technique for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:401–6.