Background. It is unclear which form of anaesthesia is the most favourable in primary total hip replacement (THR) surgery. A recently published systematic review of modern anaesthesia techniques in primary THR surgery (Macfarlane 2009) was not able to show any convincing benefit of regional or general anaesthesia. One retrospective study that examined anaesthesia and leg length (Sathappan 2008), found an increased incidence of leg length difference > 5 mm in those patients who were operated with regional anaesthesia. Our department used a mini invasive approach in supine as standard procedure in THR. The type of anaesthesia that is chosen is up to the individual anaesthetist. Purpose. We wanted to see if there was any correlation between type of anaesthesia and leg length, total time spent in theatre and recovery room, postoperative hospital stay, blood loss or operating time in primary THR surgery with a mini invasive approach in supine. Materials and Methods. Our study was a retrospective study of 170 primary THR patients. All patients received an uncemented Corail stem and a cemented Marathon cup. Patients with abnormal anatomy, BMI > 46, simultaneous removal of internal fixation or incomplete data were excluded in the analysis. Radiograpic leg length was measured using the inter teardrop line and the lesser trochanter. Results. 99 patients were operated on with spinal anaesthesia and 71 with total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA). There were 65% women in both groups. Average age was 74 years (32–95) in the spinal anaesthesia group and 67 years (38–93) in the TIVA group. We found no significant difference in the average operating time (spinal 65 min, TIVA 64 min), drop in haemoglobin to the first postoperative day (spinal 16%, TIVA 16%), postoperative hospital stay (Spinal 1.4 days, TIVA 1.4) or in transfusion rate (spinal 1%, TIVA 1.4%). We found a significant difference in the proportion of patients with a leg length difference of more than 7 mm (Spinal 22%, TIVA 6%, p = 0.02) and the average total time spent in theatre and post-operative department (spinal 325 min, TIVA 293 min, p < 001). Discussion. The study is retrospective and is therefore fettered by the limitations inherent in such a study. Our study seems to confirm the earlier findings that the type of anaesthesia can affect leg length in primary THR. It is speculated that spinal anaesthesia has a more unpredictable effect on muscular tension which could explain this

National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines state that cemented stems with an Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) rating of > 3B should be used for hemiarthroplasty when treating an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. These recommendations are based on studies in which most, if not all stems, did not hold such a rating.

This case-control study compared the outcome of hemiarthroplasty using a cemented (Exeter) or uncemented (Corail) femoral stem. These are the two prostheses most commonly used in hip arthroplasty in the UK.

Data were obtained from two centres; most patients had undergone hemiarthroplasty using a cemented Exeter stem (n = 292/412). Patients were matched for all factors that have been shown to influence mortality after an intracapsular fracture of the neck of the femur. Outcome measures included: complications, re-operations and mortality rates at two, seven, 30 and 365 days post-operatively. Comparable outcomes for the two stems were seen.

There were more intra-operative complications in the uncemented group (13% vs 0%), but the cemented group had a greater mortality in the early post-operative period (n = 6). There was no overall difference in the rate of re-operation (5%) or death (365 days: 26%) between the two groups at any time post-operatively.

This study therefore supports the use of both cemented and uncemented stems of proven design, with an ODEP rating of 10A, in patients with an intracapsular fracture of the neck of the femur.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:94–9.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines from 2011 recommend the use of cemented hemi-arthroplasty for appropriate patients with an intracapsular hip fracture. In our institution all patients who were admitted with an intracapsular hip fracture and were suitable for a hemi-arthroplasty between April 2010 and July 2012 received an uncemented prosthesis according to our established departmental routine practice. A retrospective analysis of outcome was performed to establish whether the continued use of an uncemented stem was justified. Patient, surgical and outcome data were collected on the National Hip Fracture database. A total of 306 patients received a Cathcart modular head on a Corail uncemented stem as a hemi-arthroplasty. The mean age of the patients was 83.3 years (sd 7.56; 46.6 to 94) and 216 (70.6%) were women. The mortality rate at 30 days was 5.8%. A total of 46.5% of patients returned to their own home by 30 days, which increased to 73.2% by 120 days. The implant used as a hemi-arthroplasty for intracapsular hip fracture provided satisfactory results, with a good rate of return to pre-injury place of residence and an acceptable mortality rate. Surgery should be performed by those who are familiar with the design of the stem and understand what is required for successful implantation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1538–43.

Aims

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are devastating complications that are associated with functional limitations and increased overall mortality. Although cementless implants have been associated with an increased risk of PFF, the precise contribution of implant geometry and design on the risk of both intra-operative and post-operative PFF remains poorly investigated. A systematic review was performed to aggregate all of the PFF literature with specific attention to the femoral implant used.

Using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, 8639 cemented and 2477 uncemented primary hemiarthroplasties for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in patients aged > 70 years were included in a prospective observational study. A total of 218 re-operations were performed after cemented and 128 after uncemented procedures. Survival of the hemiarthroplasties was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard rate ratios (HRR) for revision were calculated using Cox regression analyses. At five years the implant survival was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97 to 97) for cemented and 91% (95% CI 87 to 94) for uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Uncemented hemiarthroplasties had a 2.1 times increased risk of revision compared with cemented prostheses (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.6, p < 0.001). The increased risk was mainly caused by revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (HRR = 17), aseptic loosening (HRR = 17), haematoma formation (HRR = 5.3), superficial infection (HRR = 4.6) and dislocation (HRR = 1.8). More intra-operative complications, including intra-operative death, were reported for the cemented hemiarthroplasties. However, in a time-dependent analysis, the HRR for re-operation in both groups increased as follow-up increased.

This study showed that the risk for revision was higher for uncemented than for cemented hemiarthroplasties.