Introduction

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the most common surgery performed for complications of bipolar arthroplasty. The present study evaluated the functional results and complications associated with this surgery.

Gunshot-induced fractures of the proximal femur typically present with severe comminution and bone loss. These fractures may also be associated with local damage to soft tissue, neurovascular structures and injuries to abdominal organs. The aim was to evaluate the outcomes of civilian gunshot injuries to the proximal femur at a major trauma center in South Africa. A retrospective review of all patients who sustained gunshot-induced proximal femur fractures between January 2014 and December 2017 was performed. Patients with gunshot injuries involving the hip joint, neck of femur or pertrochanteric fractures were included. Patient demographics, clinical- treatment and outcome data were collected. Results are reported as appropriate given the distribution of continuous data or as frequencies and counts. Our study included 78 patients who sustained 79 gunshot-induced proximal femur fractures. The mean age of patients was 31 ± 112, and the majority of patients were male (93.6%). Pertrochantenteric fractures were the most common injuries encountered (73.4%). Treatment included cephalomedullary nail (60.8%), arthrotomy and internal fixation (16.4%) and interfragmentary fixation with cannulated screws (6%). One case of complete neck of femur fracture had fixation failure, which required conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The overall union rate was 69.6%, and 6.3% of patients developed a fracture-related infection in cases who completed follow-up. The study shows an acceptable union rate when managing these fractures and a low risk of infection. As challenging as they are, individual approaches for each fracture and managing each fracture according to their merits yield acceptable outcomes

BACKGROUND. The most common salvage of a failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is to remove both the femoral and acetabular resurfacing components and perform a total hip replacement. The other choices are to perform an acetabular or femoral only revision. A one or two piece acetabular component or a polyethylene bipolar femoral component that matches the retained metal resurfacing acetabular component is used. The considerations in favor of performing a one component resurfacing revision are maintaining the natural femoral head size, limiting the surgical effort for the patient and surgeon, and bone conservation. There are often favorable cost considerations with single component revision surgery. The reasons for femoral component revision are femoral neck fracture, femoral component loosening and an adverse reaction to metal wear debris. Performing a femoral component only revision requires a well fixed and well oriented acetabular component. Acetabular revision is most often performed for an adverse reaction to metal wear debris or loosening. METHODS. 81 acetabular revisions and 46 femoral revisions were evaluated 4 to 14 years after surgery. 83% of patients had their initial surgery at outside institutions. The mean age was 46 and 65% of patients were women. A two piece titanium backed polyethylene component was used in 44 patients and a one or two piece metal component was used in 37. A dual mobility femoral prosthesis mated to a retained metal acetabular component was used for the femoral revisions and no conversions to a metal-on-metal total hip replacement were performed. We selected polyethylene acetabular components for patients with adverse reactions to metal wear debris if their femoral component was less than 48 mm or if there was no matching metal acetabular component available for their femoral component. We used dual mobility components for femoral loosening, femoral neck fractures and adverse reactions to metal wear debris in patients with well-fixed and well oriented metal acetabular components. Dual mobility components were also used if there are any concerns about the femoral component or in some older patients. We performed one component revisions rather than conversion to total hip replacement on 88% of patients presenting with failed resurfacing prostheses. RESULTS. There were no failures with polyethylene acetabular components. There were two failures due to ongoing adverse metal reactions in patients receiving metal revision acetabular components. There was one failure with a dual mobility prosthesis due to accelerated polyethylene wear from undetected edge loading on a retained worn metal acetabular component. There were two infections and one patient with continued pain. There were no dislocations. The average Harris Hip Score was 94. The UCLA activity score was 6 or greater for all but 4 patients. There were 6 revisions to total hip replacement. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 94%. 95% of patients rated their outcome as excellent or good. CONCLUSIONS. Failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses can be successfully revised without conversion to total hip replacement in most instances. A detailed knowledge of matching prostheses is necessary. Polyethylene prostheses for the acetabular or femoral reconstruction are often needed

Patients with longstanding hip fusion are predisposed to symptomatic degenerative changes of the lumbar spine, ipsilateral knee and contralateral hip. In such patients, conversion of hip arthrodesis to hip replacement can provide relief of such symptoms. However, this is a technically demanding procedure associated with higher complication and failure rates than routine total hip replacement. The aim of this study was to determine the early functional results and complications in patients undergoing hip fusion conversion to total hip replacement, performed or supervised by a single surgeon, using a standardised approach and uncemented implants. We hypothesised that a satisfactory functional improvement can be achieved in following conversion of hip fusion to hip replacement. Eighteen hip fusions were converted to total hip replacements. A constrained acetabular liner was used in 3 hips. Mean follow up was 5 years (2 to 15 years). Two (11%) hips failed, requiring revision surgery and two patients (11%) had injury to the peroneal nerve. Heterotopic ossification developed in 7 (39%) hips, in one case resulting in joint ankylosis. No hips dislocated. Conversion of hip fusion to hip replacement carries an increased risk of heterotopic ossification and neurological injury. We advise prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification. When there is concern about hip stability we suggest that the use of a constrained acetabular liner is considered. Despite the potential for complications, this procedure had a high success rate and was effective in restoring hip function

Proximal femur fractures are increasing in prevalence, with femoral neck (FN) and intertrochanteric (IT) fractures representing the majority of these injuries. The salvage procedure for failed open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is often a conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The use of THA for failed ORIF improves pain and function, however the procedure is more challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who have undergone THA after ORIF. This retrospective case-control study compared patients who underwent THA after failed ORIF to a matched cohort undergoing primary THA for non-traumatic osteoarthritis. From 2004 to 2014, 40 patients were identified. The matched cohort was matched for date of operation, age, gender, and type of implant. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected and statistical analysis was performed. The cohort of patients with a salvage THA included 18 male and 22 female patients with a mean age of 73 years and mean follow up of 3.1 years. Those with failed fixation included 12 IT fractures and 28 FN fractures. The mean time between ORIF and THA was 2.1 years for IT fractures and 8.5 years for FN fractures (p=0.03). The failed fixation group had longer procedures, greater drop in hemoglobin, and greater blood transfusion rate (p<0.05). There was one revision and one dislocation in the failed fixation group with no revisions or dislocations in the primary THA group. Length of admission, medical complications, and functional outcome as assessed with a standardised hip score and were found not to be statistically different between the groups. Salvage THA for failed initial fixation of proximal femur fractures yields comparable clinical results to primary THA with an increased operative time, blood loss, and blood transfusion rate

Introduction. Magnetic resonance imaging with intraarticular contrast (arthro-MRI) and radial cuts is the gold standard to quantify labral and chondral lesions in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement. To date, no study exists that has evaluated these findings as potential predictors of outcome for the long term follow-up after surgical treatment of FAI. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to detect potential predictors for failure after surgical hip dislocation for FAI based on specific preoperative arthro-MRI of the hip at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Methods. Retrospective case series of 97 hips (75 patients) undergoing surgical hip dislocation for FAI between July 2001 and March 2003. Minimum follow-up was 10 years. Twelve radiographic factors were preoperatively evaluated on specific arthro-MRIs with radial cuts of the hips. Patients were then evaluated clinically and radiographically at latest follow-up (mean followup of 11 years, range 10–13 years). The following endpoints were chosen: conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), radiographic evidence of progression of osteoarthritis (OA), and/or a Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score of less than 15 indicating a poor clinical result. Univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analysis were performed with these endpoints as failures. Results. Hips with failure at 10-year follow up after surgical hip dislocation where more likely to show typical signs like decentration of the femoral head (52.9% compared to 17% in hips with good long term outcome; p = 0.007) in preoperative arthro-MRI evaluation. The strongest arthro-MRI based predictors of failure at the 10 year follow-up were a ‘double fond’ (hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval, 3.4 [3.2–3.7], p = 0.001), decentration of the femoral head (3.0 [2.8–3.3], p = 0.004) and posterior-inferior femoral osteophytes (3.3 [3.1–3.6], p = 0.002). Conclusions. Factors like double fond, decentration of the femoral head and postero-inferior femoral osteophytes in preoperative arthro-MRI predict inferior long term outcome after surgical hip dislocation for FAI. Therefore we recommend preoperative evaluation with arthro-MRI in addition to conventional radiography

Introduction & Objective. Labral refixation has established as a standard in open or arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The rationale for this refixation is to maintain the important suction seal in the hip. To date, only few short-term results are available which indicate a superior result in FAI hips with labral refixation compared to labral resection. Scientific evidence of a beneficial effect of labral refixation in the long-term follow-up is lacking. Aim of this study was to evaluate if labral refixation can improve the cumulative 10-year survivorship in hips undergoing surgical hip dislocation for FAI compared to labral resection. Methods. We performed a retrospective comparative study of 59 patients treated with surgical hip dislocation for symptomatic FAI between December 1998 and January 2003. We analyzed two matched groups: The ‘resection’ group consisted of 25 hips that were treated consistently by excision of the damaged labrum. The ‘refixation’ group consisted of 34 hips that were treated with labral reattachment. Correction of the osseous deformity (rim trimming/femoral osteochondroplasty) did not differ between the two groups. We then evaluated the clinical (Merle d'Aubigné score) and radiographical results (according to Tönnis) at a follow-up of ten years. We calculated a cumulative Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve with the following factors as endpoints: conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis progression, or a poor clinical result (defined as Merle d'Aubigné score of less than 15). The two curves were compared using the Log-rank test. Results. Hips with labral refixation had a significantly higher survivorship (78%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 64–92%) at ten years compared to labral resection (46%, 95% CI 26–66, p=0.008). 7 (20.6%) patients in the refixation group reached an endpoint: 2 with THA; 5 with a poor clinical result, and 5 with progression of OA. 15 (60.0%) patients in the resection group reached an endpoint: 3 with THA; 12 with a poor clinical result, and 4 with progression of OA. Conclusion. This is the first study proving that labral refixation leads to significantly better results in patients 10 years after open surgical hip dislocation for FAI. It seems advisable to preserve the labrum in this patient population whenever possible

Introduction. Acetabular retroversion is an accepted cause of Pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement. There is increasing evidence that acetabular retroversion is rather a rotational abnormality of the pelvis than an overgrowth of the acetabular wall or even a dysplasia of the posterior wall. Initially, patients with a retroverted acetabulum were treated with an open rim trimming through a surgical hip dislocation (SHD) based on the early understanding of the pathomorphology. Theoretically, the reduction of the anterior wall can decrease the already small joint contact area in retroverted hips to a critical size. Based on the most recent literature, anteverting periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) seems to be the more appropriate surgical treatment. With this technique, the anterior impingement conflict can be treated efficiently without compromising the joint contact area. However, it is unknown whether this theoretical advantage in turn results in better mid term results of treatment. Objectives. We asked if anteverting PAO results in better clinical and radiographical mid term results compared to rim trimming through a surgical hip dislocation. Methods. We performed a retrospective comparative study based on 257 hips (221 patients) with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Acetabular retroversion was defined by a cross-over sign, a posterior wall sign, and a positive ischial spine sign. We then formed two matched groups consisting of 73 hips undergoing open acetabular rim trimming and 54 hips with an anteverting periacetabular osteotomy. Patients with incomplete radiographic documentation, previous surgery, and hip dysplasia (LCE < 20°) were excluded. Some patients were excluded due to a matching process (Fig. 1). Patients were generally followed clinically and radiographically after two, five and ten years. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using the following endpoints: a low clinical score, radiographic progression of osteoarthritis, and/or the conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The Log Rank Score was used to compare the two survivorship curves. Results. Patients undergoing anteverting PAO for acetabular retroversion had a significantly increased survivorship (82%, 95% confidence interval, 72–91%) at seven years in comparison to open surgical rim trimming (63%, 95%CI, 49–76%, p<0.0001). The two survivorship curves are comparable for the first four years with a substantial drop for the rim trimming group after year five (Fig. 2). Conclusion. This study proofs for the first time that the theoretical advantages of anteverting periacetabular osteotomy in hips with symptomatic acetabular retroversion results in an increased survivorship at mid term follow-up in comparison to open rim trimming. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Introduction. Torsional deformities of the femur have been recognized as a cause of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip pain. High femoral antetorsion can result in decreased external rotation and a posterior FAI, which is typically located extraarticular between the ischium and trochanter minor. Femoral osteotomies allow to correct torsional deformities to eliminate FAI. So far the mid-term clinical and radiographic results in patients undergoing femoral osteotomies for correction of torsional deformities have not been investigated. Objectives. Therefore, we asked if patients undergoing femoral osteotomies for torsional deformities of the femur have (1) decreased hip pain and improved function and (2) subsequent surgeries and complications?. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 21 hips (18 patients) who underwent femoral osteotomies for correction of torsional deformities between April 2005 and October 2014. Twenty hips with excessive femoral antetorsion (47.7° ± 8.6°, range 32° – 65°) had a derotational femoral osteotomy. One hip with decreased femoral antetorsion of 11° underwent rotational femoral osteotomy. Previous surgery were performed in 43% of the hips including hip arthroscopy (5 hips), acetabular osteotomy (2 hips), open reduction for high dislocation (2 hips), surgical hip dislocation (2 hips) and varus intertrochanteric osteotomy (1 hip). In 10 hips a concomitant offset correction and in 5 hips a concomitant periacetabular osteotomy were performed. The mean followup was 3.6 ± 2.3 (1 – 10) years. One patient (one hip) died from a cause unrelated to surgery at the 2 year follow-up. We used the anterior and posterior impingement test to evaluate pain. Function was assessed using the Merle d'Aubigné Postel score, WOMAC, UCLA activity score and Harris hip score. Results. The incidence of a positive anterior impingement test decreased from preoperatively 85% to 29% at latest follow-up (p<0.001). The incidence of a positive posterior impingement test decreased from preoperatively 90% to 5% at latest follow-up (p<0.001). The mean Merle d'Aubigné Postel score increased from 13 ± 2 (11 – 16) to 16 ± 1 (13 – 17) at latest followup (p<0.0001). For the WOMAC, UCLA and Harris hip score no preoperative values existed but at latest followup they all showed fair to good values with a mean WOMAC score of 14 ± 15 (1 – 50), UCLA score of 6 ± 1 (3 – 8) and Harris hip score of 77 ± 13 (47 – 96). Subsequent surgeries included hardware removal in 14 hips (66%) and hip arthroscopy with offset creation in 1 hip. Complications occurred in 5 hips (24%) all graded Grade III according to Sink and included conversion to total hip arthroplasty in 1 hip, reosteosynthesis due to pseudarthrosis in 3 hips and hip arthroscopy for adhesiolysis in 3 hips. Conclusion. Femoral osteotomies for the treatment of torsional deformities of the femur result in decreased pain and improved function in patients with FAI. However, these procedures are associated with a complication rate of 24% which is mainly due to pseudarthrosis and intraarticular adhesions in patients with concomitant offset correction

Purpose. Proximal femoral osteotomy is an attractive joint preservation procedure for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cause of failure of proximal femoral osteotomy in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Patients and Methods. Between 2008 and 2014, proximal femoral osteotomy was performed by one surgeon in 13 symptomatic hips. Ten trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomies (anterior: 7, posterior: 3) and 3 intertrochanteric curved varus osteotomy were performed. Of the patients, 9 were male and 1 was female, with a mean age at surgery of 36.9 years (range, 25–55 years). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 38 months (range, 12–72 months). Three patients (4 hips) had steroid-induced osteonecrosis, and 7 (9 hips) had alcohol-associated osteonecrosis. At 6 postoperative weeks, partial weight bearing was permitted with the assistance of 2 crutches. At more than 6 postoperative months, full weight bearing was permitted. Patients who had the potential to achieve acetabular coverage of more than one-third of the intact articular surface on preoperative hip radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were considered suitable for this operation. A clinical evaluation using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system and a radiologic evaluation were performed. Clinical failure was defined as conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) or progression to head collapse and osteoarthritis. The 13 hips were divided into two groups, namely the failure and success groups. Results. The mean preoperative JOA score was 59 points. The score in the success group (7 hips) improved to 89 points at the time of final follow-up. In the failure group (6 hips), 5 hips were converted to THA because of progression to secondary collapse or osteoarthritis in a mean postoperative period of 35 months (range, 24–51 months). After converting to THA, good clinical and radiographic results were achieved, except in 1 patient who had incomprehensible severe pain around the affected hip. Advanced osteoarthritis was observed in 1 hip awaiting THA. Various factors cause failure of proximal femoral osteotomy, such as difficulty in controlling the underlying disease with less than 10 mg of steroid (Fig. 1), overuse of the affected hip within 6 postoperative months without the physician's consent, vascular occlusion after total necrosis of the femoral head as a result of damage to the nutritional vessel during or after the operation, and incorrect judgement of the indication of the operation and the extent of the intact load-bearing area. Conclusion. We think that full weight bearing should be permitted postoperatively only after more than 6 months, and heavy work and sport, only after more than 1 year. Efforts should be made to improve surgeons' skill in proximal femoral osteotomy and accurate judgement of imaging data. For steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head, proximal femoral osteotomy is an acceptable procedure for relieving pain if the underlying disease can be controlled with not more than 5 mg of steroid

We present a prospective two-year follow-up study of 1038 hip arthroscopies performed at a high volume tertiary referral centre for hip preservation. We feel that this manuscript is both pertinent and timely due to the advances in the field of hip preservation. We used four validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores along with the visual analog scale (VAS) and patient satisfaction scores to assess preoperative and postoperative outcomes in all patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. We divided the entire cohort into patients undergoing primary and revision hip arthroscopies. We found a statistically significant improvement from preoperative to two-year postoperative PRO scores in the two subgroups. We also found a significant difference in the PRO scores at three months, one year, and two years postoperatively between the primary and revision subgroups. The revision subgroup had inferior VAS and patient satisfaction compared to the primary subgroup, however these results were not significant. The conversion to total hip arthroplasty/hip resurfacing (THA/HR) was 5.6% and 11.2% in the primary and revision subgroups, respectively. This resulted in a relative risk of 2.0 for conversion to THA/HR in the revision subgroup. We had a complication rate of 5.3 (only 0.5% of which were considered major) which was similar to that reported in the literature for hip arthroscopy. The primary purpose was to perform a survival analysis in a large mixed cohort of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy at a high volume tertiary referral centre for hip preservation with minimum two-year follow-up. The secondary purpose was to compare clinical outcomes of primary versus revision hip arthroscopy. From February 2008 to June 2012, data were prospectively collected on all patients undergoing primary or revision hip arthroscopy. Patients were assessed pre- and post-operatively with modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), and Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscales (HOS-SSS). Pain was estimated on the visual analog scale (VAS). Patient satisfaction was measured on a scale from 0 to 10. There were a total of 1155 arthroscopies performed, including 1040 primary arthroscopies (926 patients) and 115 revision arthroscopies (106 patients). Of these, 931 primary arthroscopies (89.5%) in 824 patients (89.0%) and 107 revision arthroscopies (93.0%) in 97 patients (91.5%), were available for follow-up and included in our study. The mean change in patient reported outcome (PRO) scores at two-year follow-up in the primary subgroup was 17.4 for mHHS, 19.7 for HOS-ADL, 23.8 for HOS-SSS, 21.3 for NAHS, and −3.0 for VAS. The mean change in PRO scores at two-year follow-up in the revision subgroup was 13.4, 10.9, 16.1, 15.4, and −2.7, respectively. All scores improved significantly compared to pre-operatively (p<0.001). PRO scores were higher at all time points for the primary subgroup compared to the revision subgroup (p<0.05). Satisfaction was 7.7 and 7.2 for primary and revision subgroups, respectively. Of 931 primary arthroscopies, 52 (5.6%) underwent THA/HR. Of 107 revision arthroscopies, 12 (11.2%) underwent THA/HR. The relative risk of a THA/HR was 2.0 after revision procedures compared to primary procedures. The overall complication rate was 5.3%. Hip arthroscopy showed significant improvement in all PRO, VAS, and satisfaction scores at two years postoperatively. Primary arthroscopy patients showed greater PRO scores and a trend towards greater VAS compared to the revision subgroup. The relative risk of a THA/HR was 2.0 after revision procedures compared to primary procedures