Patients with longstanding hip fusion are predisposed to symptomatic degenerative changes of the lumbar spine, ipsilateral knee and contralateral hip. In such patients, conversion of hip arthrodesis to hip replacement can provide relief of such symptoms. However, this is a technically demanding procedure associated with higher complication and failure rates than routine total hip replacement. The aim of this study was to determine the early functional results and complications in patients undergoing hip fusion conversion to total hip replacement, performed or supervised by a single surgeon, using a standardised approach and uncemented implants. We hypothesised that a satisfactory functional improvement can be achieved in following conversion of hip fusion to hip replacement. Eighteen hip fusions were converted to total hip replacements. A constrained acetabular liner was used in 3 hips. Mean follow up was 5 years (2 to 15 years). Two (11%) hips failed, requiring revision surgery and two patients (11%) had injury to the peroneal nerve. Heterotopic ossification developed in 7 (39%) hips, in one case resulting in joint ankylosis. No hips dislocated. Conversion of hip fusion to hip replacement carries an increased risk of heterotopic ossification and neurological injury. We advise prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification. When there is concern about hip stability we suggest that the use of a constrained acetabular liner is considered. Despite the potential for complications, this procedure had a high success rate and was effective in restoring hip function

Introduction. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the most common surgery performed for complications of bipolar arthroplasty. The present study evaluated the functional results and complications associated with this surgery. Patients and Methods. Forty eight hips (48 patients) who had conversion of bipolar arthroplasty to THA between 1998 June and 2013 June, and who were followed-up for more than one year were evaluated. Twenty one hips had conversion surgery to THA using a Fitmore cup with metal-on-metal articulation (28 mm head). Six hips had surgery using the SecurFit cup and three hips, using the Lima LTO cup with ceramic-on-ceramic articulation (28 mm or 32 mm head). Eighteen hips had surgery using a large head metal-on-metal bearing: –MMC (seven hips), ACCIS (six hips) and Magnum (five hips). The average time of follow-up duration was 3.9 years (range, 1.0–11.3). There were 22 men and 26 women between the ages of 28 and 80 years (average, 68.9 years) at the time of conversion surgery. Conversion arthroplasty was performed for acetabular erosion without femoral stem loosening in 19 hips, acetabular cartilage erosion with femoral stem loosening in 13 hips, periprosthetic fracture in 12 hips, and recurrent dislocation in four hips. Results were evaluated using Harris hip score (HHS) and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. The radiographs were analyzed for evidence of acetabular and femoral osteolysis or loosening. The complications were evaluated. Results. The time interval between hemiarthroplasty and conversion total hip prosthesis was 6.7 years on average (range, 5 months to 12 years). Pain was the leading sign in all patients. Average HHS improved from 42 preoperatively (range, 34–67) to 86 (range, 65 – 97) postoperatively. The average total WOMAC score improved from 47 (range, 32–67) to 22 (range, 9–44) postoperatively. All the patients operated for groin pain reported significant improvement in their symptoms. Radiological evaluation showed good bony ingrowth and stability of all the femoral components. None of the acetabular component showed migration, loosening, wear, or osteolysis at last follow-up. Complications occurred in five hips. One dislocation and one recurrent dislocation were encountered in isolated acetabular revision hips; whereas one single dislocation, one recurrent dislocation, and one trochanteric nonunion occurred in the hips with revision of both components. All dislocations were occurred in hips with a femoral head size of 28 mm. Dislocations were managed by closed reduction, and none of the patients required revision for dislocation. Conclusions. Conversion THA after symptomatic bipolar arthroplasty can offer reliable pain relief and functional improvement. The perioperative complications approximate those of revision THAs

Purpose of the study:. To determine the outcomes of cases converted from an external fixator to an internal fixation device in the management of limb reconstructions and deformity corrections. Method:. A retrospective review of 18 patients, that underwent a conversion procedure to internal fixation following long term external fixation use, was done. This comprised 24 limbs. Inclusion criteria: All cases of long term external fixator use converted to internal fixation over a 5 year period. Average external fixation time, pin site care, conversion timing, surgical device used as well as outcome were documented. Results:. The mean treatment time in an external fixator was 185 days (61–370). The reasons for conversion included patient dissatisfaction, pin tract sepsis and a refracture. The conversion procedures included 8 intramedullary nail fixations and 16 plate and screw fixations. An acute conversion was identified as an internal fixation that was done in the same sitting as external fixator removal. A delayed conversion was any internal stabilisation that was done thereafter. In total, the complication rate associated with conversion to internal fixation following long term external fixation was 25%, mainly due to persistent non-union or sepsis. In the 8 conversions to intramedullary nails, 7 were acute: 4 had good outcomes with sepsis free union being achieved. 3 had poorer outcomes with a non-union and 2 amputations being documented. The single delayed nailing achieved union. In the 16 conversions to plate fixation, 13 achieved union. 10 were acute conversions and 3 were delayed. The remaining 3 that developed complications included 2 acute conversions with septic non-unions and a single delayed conversion which resulted in sepsis. Conclusion:. Conversion of an external fixator to an internal fixator in a non-acute reconstructive setting has a 75% success rate. In the acute conversion group (19 cases), plate and screw fixation had a superior outcome. In the delayed conversion group (5 cases), intramedullary fixation was favoured

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the functional outcome, imaging and complications of conversion of hip fusion to uncemented total hip replacement. Method. The study group comprised eighteen patients who had undergone conversion of unilateral hip fusion to total hip replacement between 1996 and 2007. There were five men and 13 women. The diagnosis prior to fusion was traumatic injury in eight patients, developmental dysplasia in three patients, and septic arthritis in seven patients. Four of the patient who had septic arthritis in childhood had spontaneous hips fusion while the other underwent surgical arthrodesis. The mean age at the time of conversion was 53 years (range, 21–77) and the mean time between fusion and conversion to hip replacement was 33 years (range, 11–60). Mean follow up was five years (range 2–15 years). Data was collected by retrospective review of a prospective database. Uncemented acetabular components were used in all cases and uncemented femoral components were used in all but two patients. In three patients with abductor and soft tissue deficiency an intraoperative decision was made to use a constrained acetabular liner. Results. The Harris hip score increased from a mean of 49 pre operatively to 75 at a mean of five years p<0.001. There was poor correlation between patient age, duration of hip fusion and hip scores at six months, 12 months and at final follow-up at a mean of five years. Heterotopic ossification developed in seven of the 18 (39%) patients. It was grade one in four patients, grade two in one patient, grade three in one patient and grade four in one patient. Four complications occurred in four of the 18 (22%) patients. Two patients (11%) had neurological injury in the common peroneal nerve distribution. In one patient heterotopic ossification resulted in joint ankylosis. This patient underwent reoperation to excise the heterotopic ossification 16 months after the initial hip replacement procedure. One patient developed a deep venous thrombosis. There were no hip dislocations. One acetabular component was loose and had migrated at 15 years follow up. Conclusion. Conversion of hip fusion to hip replacement carries an increased risk of heterotopic ossification and neurological injury. We advise prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification. When there is concern about hip stability we suggest that the use of a constrained acetabular liner is considered. Despite the potential for complications, this procedure had a high success rate and was effective in restoring hip function

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to know the peri-operative morbidity, clinical and radiographical outcomes of conversion THA from failed transtrochanter rotational osteotomy (TRO). Patients and methods. From 2003 January to 2009 January, there were 18 hips(18 patients) who underwent conversion THA from TRO for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) (Group I). The mean duration from TRO to conversion THA was 2.6 years. We made a matched control group of 18 primary THA for ONFH (Group II) and we evaluated perioperative morbidity and complications in each group. For the clinical evaluation, we checked Harris hip score (HHS) and WOMAC score. For the radiographical evaluation, we evaluated implant position, stability and osteolysis. Results. There was no significant differences in operation time, blood loss, hospital stay between two groups. In clinical results, there was no significant difference in postoperative HHS (p=0.986), but there was significant difference in postoperative WOMAC score. There was more significant postoperative internal rotation limitation in the Group II (p<0.001). In radiographical evaluation, there was no significant difference between two groups, except the preoperative leg length discrepancy (p=0.015). Conclusion. According to our study, there was no significant difference between conversion THA after TRO and primary THA in terms of perioperative morbidity and radiographical out come. But primary THA showed better postoperative internal rotation and better WOMAC score than conversion THA after previous TRO for ONFH

Purpose. The purpose of the study was to determine the rate of conversion from RSA to THR in a number of Canadian centers performing resurfacings. Method. Retrospective review was undertaken in 12 Canadian Centers to determine the rate of revision and reason for conversion from RSA to THR. Averages and cross-tabulation with Chi-Squared analysis was performed. kaplan Meier survivorship was calculated. Results. A total of 2810 resurfacings were performed up to December 2008. 770 hips had a minimum of 5 year follow-up. The overall survivorship of this group was 97.8%. 80 patients underwent conversion to THR. Five resurfacing systems were used. The reason for failure is reported: 21 were for femoral neck fracture, 25 were for loosening, 9 were for deep infection, 3 foravn, 4 pseudotumors, 2 for impingement, 6 for groin pain and 10 for other reasons. The cumulative conversion rate is 2.8%. The survivorship was significantly different analyzed by gender. The 5 year female survivorship was 95.4% and for males was 97.7%. Surgeon experience proved to be a significant factor in conversion rates. Conclusion. The revision rate to date with this new technology suggests that with increasing experience hip resurfacing arthroplasty remains an acceptable option for the treatment of hip arthritis

Introduction. Reported advantages of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) over total knee replacement (TKR) include better kinematics and less postoperative pain. The reported longevity of UKRs, regardless of design, still does not compare as favourably as that of TKR. Resurfacing-type UKR differ to other UKR in that they result in minimal bone resection. Objectives. The aim of this study was to review our experience with conversion of a resurfacing UKR prosthesis to a TKR. We sought to determine the causes of failure and compare outcomes in terms of functional scores, range of motion and radiographic measures. We also determined the use of graft and prosthetic revision supplements as well as stemmed implants. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 55 patients (Group A), all consecutive, who underwent TKR for a failed UKR from 2003–2008. We chose a cohort of 55 patients (Group B) who had undergone a primary TKR from the same surgeon's database that most closely resembled the study cohort in terms of sex, age and BMI. Results. The most common mode of failure was base-plate subsidence and progression of disease to other compartments. 55% of patients did not have isolated disease at the time of the initial surgery. Interestingly, 42% who had revision due to progression of disease had mult-icompartmental disease at initial UKR but 19 of 24 patients (79%) who had multi-compartmental disease were revised for other reasons other than progression of disease. 3 (5%) of patients required either tibial and/or femoral augments and/or stems. Conclusions. Only 5% required complex revision surgery. Thus, a large proportion of conversions of resurfacing UKR to TKR require non-complex surgery with patients having no significant differences in their radiographic measures nor in their clinical measures to those of primary knee replacements

Converting unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty can be difficult, and specialised techniques are needed. Issues include bone loss, joint-line, sizing, and rotation. Determining the complexity of conversion preoperatively helps predict the need for augmentation, grafting, stems, or constraint. We examined insert thickness, augmentation, stem use, and effect of failure mode on complexity of UKA conversion. Fifty cases (1997–2007) were reviewed: 9 implants (18%) were modular fixed-bearing, 4 (8%) were metal-backed nonmodular fixed-bearing, 8 (16%) were resurfacing onlay, 10 (20%) were all-polyethylene step-cut, and 19 (38%) were mobile bearing designs; 5 knees (10%) failed due to infection, 5 (10%) due to wear and/or instability, 10 (20%) for pain or progression of arthritis, 8 (16%) for tibial fracture or severe subsidence, and 22 (44%) due to loosening of either one or both components. Complexity was evaluated using analysis of variance and chi-squared 2-by-k test (80% power; 95% confidence interval). Insert thickness was no different between implants (P=0.23) or failure modes (P=0.27). Stemmed component use was most frequent with nonmodular components (50%), all-polyethylene step-cut implants (44%), and modular fixed-bearing implants (33%; P=0.40). Stem use was highest in tibial fracture (86%; P=0.002). Augment use was highest among all-polyethylene step-cut implants (all-polyethylene, 56%; metal-backed, 50%; modular fixed-bearing, 33%; P=0.01). Augmentation use was highest in fracture (86%) and infection (67%), with a significant difference noted between failure modes (P=0.003). Failure of nonmodular all-polyethylene step-cut devices was more complex than resurfacing or mobile bearing. Failure mode was predictive of complexity. Reestablishing the joint-line, ligamentous balance, and durable fixation are critical to assuring a primary outcome

Introduction. The aim of the study was to compare and contrast the clinical outcome of conversion of practice of a shoulder surgeon from open to arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Patients and Methods. Comparison of a cohort consecutive series of 24 patients treated by open stabilisation and a prospective consecutive cohort series of 30 patients treated by arthroscopic stabilisation. Clinical outcomes were assessed with Oxford Shoulder Score Instability (OSS-I) and a Patient Satisfaction Survey at a minimum of 1 year follow up. The operation time as well as cost analysis were also evaluated. Results. The average OSS-I for open stabilisation was 39.6 (range 19-48) as compared to 39.8 (range 23-48) with the arthroscopic group and these scores did not show a statistically significant difference. Both cohorts were pleased with the clinical outcome and were happy to recommend the procedure to others. No complications in either group were seen. Operative time and costs were significantly more in the open group, even taking into account initial learning curve of the arthroscopic method. All arthroscopic procedures were performed as day-cases compared to over-night stays for the open group also providing better use of hospital resources and cost savings. Conclusion. After appropriate surgical training, the conversion from open to arthroscopic stabilisation can be performed without affecting clinical outcome or patient satisfaction. This study provides surgeons with confidence to change methods to gain the advantages of the arthroscopic procedure, which included reduced theatre time, day case surgery and earlier return to work and sport

Surface replacement of the hip has become established as an alternative treatment to total hip replacement in the younger, active, male patient. By the very nature of preserving the femoral head and neck, there may be failures due to femoral neck fracture and femoral component loosening. Additionally, revisions of hip resurfacing for acetabular loosening may be necessary. Other scientific papers have described problems that may arise as a result of the metal-on-metal bearing either due to excess metal production or an immunologic-mediated reaction to the metal debris. Grammatopolous et al. describe poor results of revisions of surface replacements due to massive tissue destruction at the time of revision surgery, persistent pain, and swelling. In my experience with hip resurfacing, this complication is extremely rare. In my series of 925 resurfacings with a minimum of 2 year follow up, 12 revisions (1.3%) have been performed. Of these revisions, only 3 (0.3%) were for complications related to the metal-on-metal bearing; 2 for edge-loading and excess metal production, and 1 for metal hypersensitivity. None of the revision cases have had abductor destruction, or nerve/vascular involvement. Reconstruction of the joint was carried out with standard and revision components; post-operative function of these patients has been comparable to that of a primary total hip replacement. With careful monitoring of the post-operative resurfacing patient, problems can be identified early and surface replacement conversion can be performed with excellent results

Introduction

The functional ante-inclination (AI) of the cup after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a key component in the combined sagittal index (CSI) to predict joint stability after THA. To accurately predict AI, we deducted a mathematic algorithm between the radiographic anteversion (RA), radiographic inclincation (RI), pelvic tilting (PT), and AI. The current study aims (1) to validate the mathematic algorithm; (2) to convert the AI limits in the CSI index (standing AI ≤ 45°, sitting AI ≥ 41°) into coronal functional safe zone (CFSZ) and explore the influences of the stand-to-sit pelvic motion (PM) and pelvic incidence (PI) on CFSZ; (3) to locate a universal cup orientation that always fulfill the AI criteria of CSI safe zone for all patients or subgroups of PM(PM ≤ 10°, 10° < PM ≤ 30°, and PM > 30°) and PI (PI≤ 41°, 41°< PI ≤ 62°, and PI >62°), respectively.

Hip fusion used to be a common procedure in children and young adults, but it is now exceedingly rare.

My results of hip fusion takedown more than 20 years ago were quite acceptable. Of 20 cases, 88% achieved more than 90 degrees of flexion and 75% stopped limping by the end of one year. The elderly would revert to limping when tired.

As no simple hips are currently fused, the results of hip fusion takedown in the last 20 years are very much inferior. Of 28 cases, limp is absent in 20%, mild in 12% and severe in 68%. Range of motion is acceptable with 80% eventually achieving more than 90 degrees of flexion.

There are complications, but these are quite manageable. The aseptic loosening rate is small and the longevity is high. Current implants, therefore, can easily handle the hip fusion takedown.

As the incidence of limp is prohibitively high, additional techniques to reinforce the hip abductors either concurrently or more likely as a secondary procedure as suggested by Whiteside should be learned by all those proposing to carry out hip fusion takedown.

One of the arguments in favor of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is the possibility of an easier revision. Especially if UKA is considered as an early intervention allowing bridging until total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is necessary at later age. If indeed primary TKA results can be obtained at time of revision, UKA becomes a real indication to postpone TKA until a later age.

For obtaining primary TKA results, a primary knee should be indicated for the revision. This is possible if the UKA cuts were conservative and within the resection level of a primary TKA. Furthermore bone loss should be contained and either be resected or easily solved with substituting techniques compatible with a primary TKA. Finally, the primary implant utilised should allow a full interchangeability of the tibial and femoral sizes. This allows a lower tibial cut during the revision, often leading to a smaller size but interchangeability avoids downsizing the femur and creating flexion gap instability.

If the UKA to TKA revision asks for stems, bone substitutions, joint line changes and more constraint, the primary result will not be obtained.

Therefore it is important to select a bone preserving UKA system that allows for conservative bone cuts and avoids deep keel preparations.

UKA to TKA with primary components and without gap mismatches or joint line changes leads to excellent outcome.

It has been proposed that a major advantage of surface replacement is that it is easy to revise and that the outcome of such revisions is good. This seems logical as the femoral head can easily be removed, the acetabular component can be cut out and a primary hip replacement can be inserted. Indeed a number of studies have shown good outcome following revision, particularly for femoral neck fracture. When we initially reviewed the results of our revisions we found that the operations were straight forward and the results were good provided the reasons for revision were neck fractures, loosening, infection and causes other than soft tissue reactions. When the reason for revision was soft tissue reaction, otherwise known as pseudotumour, the outcome was unsatisfactory with poor hip scores, and high rates of complications, revisions and recurrences. These were generally a manifestation of the soft tissue damage caused by the pseudotumours. We therefor recommended that early revisions should be considered with soft tissue reaction. By undertaking revisions earlier we have found that the results have improved but there are still cases with poor outcomes.

Achieving a primary outcome with revision UKR is possible but it depends on an understanding of the main failure modes and avoiding the obvious pitfalls. The most common failure mode in the long term is lateral compartment progression at 2.5% at 28 years. The most common failure overall is misdiagnosis of a painful radiolucency leading to unnecessary revision.

There are a number of potential pitfalls:

Do not revise for unexplained pain. 75% of patients will go on to fail because of continuing pain. A distinction must be made to differentiate between a physiological radiolucency (with a narrow lucency accompanied by a sclerotic margin which is normal) and a pathological radiolucency (with a poorly defined lucency without surrounding sclerotic margin which is indicative of loosening and/or infection)

Femoral loosening can present with subtle findings. Flexion/extension views are helpful to diagnose this problem.

Wear can be a problem with fixed bearing in the second decade and can present with subtle findings. Infection can present with contralateral compartment joint space narrowing.

The approach and exposure is usually straightforward and component removal is generally easy. Tibial resection is undertaken referenced from the normal lateral condyle removing 10mm of bone. Femoral preparation is generally straightforward but care must be taken to dial in correct rotation in the absence of the posterior medial condyle which was resected in the first operation. Generally a CR or PS primary implant is used with 2–4mm extra polyethylene thickness than is used in primary case.

Revision for infection and stress fracture led to difficult revisions where revision components are usually required.

The results for Revision UKR approach those of a primary procedure in all cases except revision for unexplained pain, infection and a stress fracture.

Open debridement and Outerbridge and Kashiwagi debridement arthroplasty (OK procedure) are common surgical treatments for elbow arthritis. However, the literature contains little information on the long-term survivorship of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship after elbow debridement techniques until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and revision surgery. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open elbow surgical debridement (open debridement, OK procedure) between 2000 and 2015. Patients were diagnosed with primary elbow osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, or inflammatory arthritis. A total of 320 patients had primary surgery including open debridement (n=142) and OK procedure (n=178), and of these 33 patients required a secondary revision surgery (open debridement, n=14 and OK procedure, n=19). The average follow-up time was 11.5 years (5.5 - 21.5 years). Survivorship was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used assess the likelihood of conversion to total elbow arthroplasty or revision surgery while adjusting for covariates (age, gender, diagnosis). Significance was set p<0.05. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed open debridement was 100.00% at 1 year, 99.25% at 5 years, and 98.49% at 10 years and for OK procedure 100.00% at 1 year, 98.80% at 5 years, 97.97% at 10 years (p=0.87) for conversion to total elbow arthroplasty. There was no difference in survivorship between procedures after adjusting for significant covariates with the cox proportional hazard model. The rate of revision for open debridement and OK procedure was similar at 11.31% rand 11.48% after 10 years respectively. There were higher rates of revision surgery in patients with open debridement (hazard ratio, 4.84 CI 1.29 – 18.17, p = 0.019) compared to OK procedure after adjusting for covariates. We also performed a stratified analysis with radiographic severity as an effect modifier and showed grade 3 arthritis did better with the OK procedure compared to open debridement for survivorship until revision surgery (p=0.05). However, this difference was not found for grade 1 or grade 2 arthritis. This may suggest that performing the OK procedure for more severe grade 3 arthritis could decrease reoperation rates. Further investigations are needed to better understand the indications for each surgical technique. This study is the largest cohort of open debridement and OK procedure with long term follow-up. We showed that open elbow debridement and the OK procedure have excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post traumatic cases. The OK procedure also has lower rates of revision surgery than open debridement, especially with more severe radiographic arthritis

Open debridement and Outerbridge and Kashiwagi debridement arthroplasty (OK procedure) are common surgical treatments for elbow arthritis. However, the literature contains little information on the long-term survivorship of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship after elbow debridement techniques until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and revision surgery. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open elbow surgical debridement (open debridement, OK procedure) between 2000 and 2015. Patients were diagnosed with primary elbow osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, or inflammatory arthritis. A total of 320 patients had primary surgery including open debridement (n=142) and OK procedure (n=178), and of these 33 patients required a secondary revision surgery (open debridement, n=14 and OK procedure, n=19). The average follow-up time was 11.5 years (5.5 - 21.5 years). Survivorship was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used assess the likelihood of conversion to total elbow arthroplasty or revision surgery while adjusting for covariates (age, gender, diagnosis). Significance was set p<0.05. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed open debridement was 100.00% at 1 year, 99.25% at 5 years, and 98.49% at 10 years and for OK procedure 100.00% at 1 year, 98.80% at 5 years, 97.97% at 10 years (p=0.87) for conversion to total elbow arthroplasty. There was no difference in survivorship between procedures after adjusting for significant covariates with the cox proportional hazard model. The rate of revision for open debridement and OK procedure was similar at 11.31% rand 11.48% after 10 years respectively. There were higher rates of revision surgery in patients with open debridement (hazard ratio, 4.84 CI 1.29 - 18.17, p = 0.019) compared to OK procedure after adjusting for covariates. We also performed a stratified analysis with radiographic severity as an effect modifier and showed grade 3 arthritis did better with the OK procedure compared to open debridement for survivorship until revision surgery (p=0.05). However, this difference was not found for grade 1 or grade 2 arthritis. This may suggest that performing the OK procedure for more severe grade 3 arthritis could decrease reoperation rates. Further investigations are needed to better understand the indications for each surgical technique. This study is the largest cohort of open debridement and OK procedure with long term follow-up. We showed that open elbow debridement and the OK procedure have excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post traumatic cases. The OK procedure also has lower rates of revision surgery than open debridement, especially with more severe radiographic arthritis

Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for complications after operative management of ankle fractures. Generally, diabetic sequelae such as neuropathy and nephropathy portend greater risk; however, the degree of risk resulting from these patient factors is poorly defined. We sought to evaluate the effects of the diabetic sequelae of neuropathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) on the risk of complications following operative management of ankle fractures. Using a national claims-based database we analyzed patients who had undergone operative management of an ankle fracture and who remained active in the database for at least two years thereafter. Patients were divided into two cohorts, those with a diagnosis of diabetes and those without. Each cohort was further stratified into five groups: neuropathy, CKD, PVD, multiple sequelae, and no sequelae. The multiple sequelae group included patients with more than one of the three sequelae of interest: CKD, PVD and neuropathy. Postoperative complications were queried for two years following surgery. The main complications of interested were: deep vein thrombosis (DVT), surgical site infection, hospital readmission within 90 days, revision internal fixation, conversion to ankle fusion, and below knee amputation (BKA). We identified 210,069 patients who underwent operative ankle fracture treatment; 174,803 had no history of diabetes, and 35,266 were diabetic. The diabetic cohort was subdivided as follows: 7,506 without identified sequelae, 8,994 neuropathy, 4,961 CKD, 1,498 PVD, and 12,307 with multiple sequelae. Compared to non-diabetics, diabetics without sequelae had significantly higher odds of DVT, infection, readmission, revision internal fixation and conversion to ankle fusion (OR range 1.21 – 1.58, p values range Compared to uncomplicated diabetics, diabetics with neuropathy alone and diabetics with multiple sequelae were found to have significantly higher odds of all complications (OR range 1.18 – 31.94, p values range < 0.001 - 0.034). Diabetics with CKD were found to have significantly higher odds of DVT, readmission, and BKA (OR range 1.34 – 4.28, p values range < 0.001 - 0.002). Finally, diabetics with PVD were found to have significantly higher odds of DVT, readmission, conversion to ankle fusion, and BKA (OR range 1.62 - 9.69, p values range < 0.001 - 0.039). Diabetic patients with sequelae of neuropathy, CKD or PVD generally had higher complication rates than diabetic patients without these diagnoses. Unsurprisingly, diabetic patients with multiple sequalae are at the highest risk of complications and had the highest odds ratios of all complications. While neuropathy is known to be associated with postoperative complications, our analysis demonstrates that CKD represents a significant risk factor for multiple complications following the operative management of ankle fractures and has rarely been discussed in prior studies

Introduction. A subset of patients in cast awaiting fixation of ankle fractures require conversion to delayed external fixation (dEF). We aimed to evaluate the effect of delayed versus planned external fixation (pEF), then identify objective characteristics contributing to need for conversion. Method. We extracted data from our booking system to identify all ankle external fixation procedures between 2010 to 2022. Exclusions included open fractures, the skeletally immature, and pilon or talus fractures. Fractures were classified using the AO/OTA classification, then a matched cohort was identified based on fracture classification. We compared the planned, delayed and matched cohorts for demographics, posterior malleolar fragment (PMF) ratio, and degree of displacement at presentation. Results. We identified 25 pEF, 42 dEF, and 67 matched patients. Ankles with dEF had a 3.8 day longer time to ORIF from presentation than those who had pEF, and had an infection rate of 9.5%, compared to 4% in the pEF group. Two patients in the dEF group required further operative intervention. There were no infections or reoperations required in the pEF or matched groups. The dEF group were more likely to have ≥2 reductions (OR 4.13), a PMF ratio of >0.23 (OR 5.07), and have increased displacement at time of injury on lateral (32% vs 19%) and AP (62% vs 36%) radiographs. Discussion. Our retrospective study highlights the longer time to operation and increased infection rates of patients who do not get timely external fixation. We propose a series of objective parameters that predict failure of cast treatment and guide the surgeon to consider planned external fixation in some ankle

Aim. This study investigated the management and clinical outcomes of patients treated for confirmed fracture-related infection (FRI) at 3 centres, in the UK and the Netherlands between 2015 and 2019. Method. All patients with FRI, confirmed by the FRI Consensus Definition. 1. and treated surgically, were included. Data were collected on patient characteristics, time from injury to FRI surgery, soft tissue reconstruction, type of stabilization and use of local antibiotics. All patients were followed up for at least one year. The rates of eradication of infection and union were assessed. The associations between treatment methods, time from injury and outcomes were determined. Results. 433 FRIs were treated in patients with mean age 49.7 years (range 14–84). FRI affected the tibia in 226(52.2%), femur in 94(21.7%), pelvis in 26(6%), humerus in 20(4.6%) and foot bones in 19(4.4%). Patients were followed up for a mean of 26 months (range 12–72). Overall, eradication of infection was successful in 86.4% of cases and 86% of unhealed infected fractures were healed at final review. 3.3% required amputation. Successful outcome was not dependent on age, or time from injury (recurrence rate 16.5% in FRI treated at 1–10 weeks after injury; 13.1% at 11–52 weeks; 12.1% at >52 weeks: p=0.52). Method of stabilization had a major affect on outcome. Debridement and retention of a stable infected implant (DAIR) had a failure rate of 22.3%, implant exchange (to new internal fixation) 16.7%, conversion to external fixation 7.4%. DAIR was significantly worse than conversion to external fixation (p=0.01). There was no effect of the time from injury on the outcome of DAIR or any other fixation method. The use of a free flap in the tibia improved the success rate from 80.4% to 92.1% (p=0.044). Outcome was adversely affected by use of a split skin graft alone in soft tissue reconstruction (44% failure) (p=0.006). The use of local antibiotics reduced the recurrence rate from 18.3% to 10.3% (p=0.022). Conclusions. This study is the first to consider outcome for all FRIs, at all-time points, with all treatment modalities. Treatment was mostly successful but may be improved with better directed use of free flaps, local antibiotics, and limitation of DAIR. The results suggest that the division of FRIs into categories based on time from injury, may not be helpful with modern treatment