Aims. This study describes the variation in the annual volumes of revision hip arthroplasty (RHA) undertaken by consultant surgeons nationally, and the rate of accrual of RHA and corresponding primary hip arthroplasty (PHA) volume for new consultants entering practice. Methods. National Joint Registry (NJR) data for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man were received for 84,816 RHAs and 818,979 PHAs recorded between April 2011 and December 2019. RHA data comprised all revision procedures, including first-time revisions of PHA and any subsequent re-revisions recorded in public and private healthcare organizations. Annual procedure volumes undertaken by the responsible consultant surgeon in the 12 months prior to every index procedure were determined. We identified a cohort of ‘new’ HA consultants who commenced practice from 2012 and describe their rate of accrual of PHA and RHA experience. Results. The median annual consultant RHA volume, averaged across all cases, was 21 (interquartile range (IQR) 11 to 34; range 0 to 181). Of 1,695 consultants submitting RHA cases within the study period, the top 20% of surgeons by annual volume performed 74.2% of total RHA case volume. More than half of all consultants who had ever undertaken a RHA maintained an annual volume of just one or fewer RHA, however, collectively contributed less than 3% of the total RHA case volume. Consultant PHA and RHA volumes were positively correlated. Lower-volume surgeons were more likely to undertake RHA for urgent indications (such as infection) as a proportion of their practice, and to do so on weekends and public holidays. Conclusion. The majority of RHAs were undertaken by higher-volume surgeons. There was considerable variation in RHA volumes by indication, day of the week, and between consultants nationally. The rate of accrual of RHA experience by new consultants is low, and has important implications for establishing an experienced RHA consultant workforce. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(10):1060–1069

Aims. This study evaluates the association between consultant and hospital volume and the risk of re-revision and 90-day mortality following first-time revision of primary hip arthroplasty for aseptic loosening. Methods. We conducted a cohort study of first-time, single-stage revision hip arthroplasties (RHAs) performed for aseptic loosening and recorded in the National Joint Registry (NJR) data for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man between 2003 and 2019. Patient identifiers were used to link records to national mortality data, and to NJR data to identify subsequent re-revision procedures. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with restricted cubic splines were used to define associations between volume and outcome. Results. Among 12,961 RHAs there were 513 re-revisions within two years, and 95 deaths within 90 days of surgery. The risk of re-revision was highest for a consultant’s first RHA (hazard ratio (HR) 1.56 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.12)) and remained significantly elevated for their first 24 cases (HR 1.26 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.58)). Annual consultant volumes of five/year were associated with an almost 30% greater risk of re-revision (HR 1.28 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.64)) and 80% greater risk of 90-day mortality (HR 1.81 (95% CI 1.02 to 3.21)) compared to volumes of 20/year. RHAs performed at hospitals which had cumulatively undertaken fewer than 167 RHAs were at up to 70% greater risk of re-revision (HR 1.70 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.59)), and those having undertaken fewer than 307 RHAs were at up to three times greater risk of 90-day mortality (HR 3.05 (95% CI 1.19 to 7.82)). Conclusion. This study found a significantly higher risk of re-revision and early postoperative mortality following first-time single-stage RHA for aseptic loosening when performed by lower-volume consultants and at lower-volume institutions, supporting the move towards the centralization of such cases towards higher-volume units and surgeons. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(10):1050–1058

Introduction. We present the first 12 consecutive patients, undergoing elective paediatric limb reconstruction with an external fixator, for the 12-month period October 2020-October 2021. This is a single surgeon series for a newly appointed Consultant with limited previous experience. Arrangements were made for mentoring by a senior surgeon recently retired from the NHS but still active in private practice. Materials and Methods. The average age of patients was 10.5years at the time of frame application (5—15 years). Four frames in three patients were for Blount's; two for sequelae of NF1; two for posteromedial tibial bow with shortening, two for fibula hemimelia; one congenital short femur, one for sequelae of neonatal sepsis and one for bone loss following tumour resection. Results. We present early outcomes and complications for this challenging cohort. Two frames were revision frames, and a further two had had previous frame treatment. Where shortening was a primary component of the deformity (six cases) the mean lengthening required was 5cm (4–6cm). Conclusions. The benefits of this arrangement include enabling newly appointed Consultants to take on complex cases from the start of appointment, dealing with enormous waiting pressures and minimising complications. The BOA reported this year that 25% of the over 45 consultant workforce intend to retire within three years. In this context, a renewed focus is needed on succession planning, proleptic appointments, and novel schemes to retain experienced surgeons within complex NHS practice: we present a successful example of this strategy

Purpose. To highlight the cardiovascular responses of a trainee and supervising consultant while performing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and to demonstrate the impact that supervision has on both their responses. Methods. A third year orthopaedic trainee and his consultant underwent non-invasive, continuous cardiac monitoring while performing three primary TKAs. The consultant performed one TKA with the trainee assisting. The trainee then performed two TKAs as primary surgeon. The consultant supervised one TKA scrubbed and the other un-scrubbed. A third person noted the timing of each distinct intra-operative step. A significant peak was defined as an increase in heart rate (HR) of >10%. Results. Trainee. Significant peaks were only observed when acting as primary surgeon. Peaks occurred during patient positioning, approach, femoral cut, tibial cut, component trial, soft tissue balancing and cementation. Maximum HR was observed during cementation. Scrubbed supervision reduced the magnitude of these peaks and of the maximum HR. Consultant. Significant peaks were only observed when supervising the trainee. Timing of these peaks and the maximum HR coincided with those of the trainee. Both were of the higher magnitude when supervising un-scrubbed. Conclusion. Significant peaks in HR illustrate the cardiovascular impact of performing TKA. This impact is greatest during the seven definitive steps of the procedure that we have highlighted. This cardiovascular impact of performing TKA reduces as the experience of the surgeon increases. Supervision of a less experienced/trainee surgeon performing a TKA also has a cardiovascular impact on the supervising consultant. To reduce this impact on both trainee and consultant we suggest that supervision, when required, is best provided scrubbed rather than un-scrubbed

Introduction. Surgical experience has been shown to improve the clinical outcomes in Total hip arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between Consultants and NCHDs grade surgeons for the Exeter total hip replacement taken from the Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital Joint Register. Methods & Materials. Between 2005 and 2008, 2749 primary total hip replacements were done, 433(15.78%) were Exeter total hip system. 380(86%) out of 433 were included in the study, 227(59%) were females and 154(41%) were males. A consultant was the primary surgeon for 193(51%) patients and an NCHD was the primary surgeon for 187(49%) patients. Mean age, at time of operation was 68 years. Clinical outcome was assessed with WOMAC and SF36 scoring system. Patients were invited to fill in the WOMAC and SF36 questionnaire, pre-operatively, at 6 months and at 2 years after the operation. Radiographs were evaluated for radiolucency with a standardized technique. Results. Mean WOMAC scores for consultant grade surgeons were: 61(pre op), 23.34(6 months post op) and 22.96(at 2 years post op) with standard deviations of 15.61(pre-op), 17.9(at 6 months) and 17.19(at 2 years). Average SF36 scores were 42.40(pre-op), 70.15(at 6 months) and 71.30(at 2 years) with standard deviations of 17.94(pre op), 18.02(6 months) and 22.59(2 years). NCHD grade surgeons had average WOMAC scores: 62.55(pre op), 22.36(6 months) and 25.35(2 years). Average SF36 scores were: 41.1(pre-op), 67.47(6 months) and 66.63(2 years). The difference in the mean WOMAC scores between consultants grade and NCHD grade surgeons were 1.55(pre-op), 0.98(6months) and 2.39(2 years), while the difference between the mean SF36 were 1.3(pre-op), 2.68(6 months) and 4.67(2 years). Student T Test was used to correlate differences between the 2 groups. The difference in outcomes between the 2 groups was not significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. We found out that both groups had similar outcome and survival, with no significant difference when using an Exeter Total Hip Arthroplasty

Aim: To audit the accuracy and efficacy of injections for subacromial impingement administered by our medical staff and specialist role physiotherapist. Methods: 49 patients presenting to the outpatient clinic with subacromial impingement agreed to take part in the study. They were allocated according to date of referral to either the consultant, the physiotherapist or registrar grade for injection via an anterior approach into the subacromial bursa. The therapeutic injection contained a specified volume of radiocontrast as well as depomedrone and lignocaine. Antero-posterior and scapula-Y radiographs were performed immediately after injection. The Constant shoulder score was evaluated before and at six weeks after injection and all radiographs were reviewed by an independent, blinded radiologist recording the position of contrast. Results: Accuracy rates of 67% through an anterior approach were obtained by both the consultant and the physiotherapist. At registrar level 48% accuracy was achieved. Improvement in shoulder score was obtained in 70% of patients with accurate injections, but additionally in 59% of patients with inaccurate injections. Only 7% of cases had contrast confined to the subacromial space; in the remainder, contrast tracked medially around the rotator cuff muscle bellies in 59%, gleno-humeral joint in 20% and within the cuff tendon in 16%. Conclusions: In our practice, the specialist physiotherapist already has an established role in administering therapeutic subacromial injections. Our audit demonstrates acceptable and equal accuracy to the consultant which we feel justifies this particular part of their role. However, at registrar grade the level of accuracy is reduced and most likely reflects inexperience, as over time accuracy improved. Interestingly, shoulder function scores have improved in over half of impingement patients with inaccurate injections which may reflect a generalised ‘field’ effect of steroid on the shoulder

Despite increasing scientific investigation, the best method for preventing post-operative deep-vein thrombosis remains unclear. In the wake of the publication of the Pulmonary Embolism Prevention trial and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) on the prevention of thromboembolism, we felt that it was timely to survey current thromboprophylactic practices. Questionnaires were sent to all consultants on the register of the British Orthopaedic Association. The rate of response was 62%. The survey showed a dramatic change in practice towards the use of chemoprophylaxis since the review by Morris and Mitchell in 1976. We found that there was a greater uniformity of opinion and prescribing practices in Scotland, consistent with the SIGN guidelines, than in the rest of the UK. We argue in favour of the use of such documents which are based on a qualitative review of current scientific literature

Introduction and aims. Low back pain is a common complaint, affecting up to one third of the adult population costing over £1 billion to the NHS each year and £3.5 billion to the UK economy in lost production. The demand for spinal injections is increasing allowing for advanced spinal physiotherapists to perform the procedure. The objective of this study was to investigate outcome following spinal injections performed by consultant spinal surgeon (n=40) and advanced spinal physiotherapists (ASP) (n=40) at our centre. Method and Materials. Data on 80 patients who had received caudal epidural (n=36), nerve root block (n=28) and facet joint injections (n=16) form August 2010 to October 2011 consented to be in the study. 40 patients in each group completed Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) before and 6 weeks after the procedure and patient satisfaction questionnaire investigating their experience and any complications related to the spinal injection retrospectively. The study included 32 males and 48 females. Mean age 57 years, range 21–88. [Consultant group M:17, F:23 mean age: 55, range 21–81. ASP group M:15, F:25 mean age 59, range 22–88]. Measures of patient satisfaction and outcome were obtained; using 2 tailed independent samples t-test with 95% confidence interval, statistical significance was investigated. Results. Data analysis shows that there are no significant differences (p>0.05) in either overall patient satisfaction or outcomes between patients of the surgeon vs physiotherapists. Patients of the surgeon were found to be more satisfied with the procedure itself (p< 0.05). Conclusion. Physiotherapists are able to provide spinal injections with equal efficacy to spinal surgeons, with no reduction in overall patient outcome. Benefits of this scheme include greater number of spinal injections performed. Therefore, reducing the overall waiting times. Further, multi-centre studies on larger populations are required to investigate injection treatment by physiotherapists