We report on the 5 year results of a randomized study comparing TKR performed using conventional instrumentation versus electromagnetic computer-assisted surgery. This study analysed patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 5 years utilising the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Short Form 36 score and range of motion (ROM). Of the 200 patients enrolled 125 completed 5 year follow up, 62 in the navigated group and 63 in the conventional group. There were 28 deceased patients, 29 withdrawals and 16 lost to follow-up. There was improvement in clinical function in most PROMs from 1-5 year follow up across both groups. OKS improved from a mean of 26.6 (12–55) to 35.1 (5–48). AKSS increased from 75.3 (0–100) to 78.4 (−10–100), SF36 from 58.9 (2.5–100) to 53.2 (0–100). ROM improved by an average 7 degrees from 110 degrees to 117 degrees (80–135). There was no statistically significant difference in PROMs between the groups at 5 years. Patients undergoing revision surgery were identified from the dataset and global PACS. There were no revisions within 5 years in the navigated group and 3 revisions in the conventional group, two for infection and one for mid-flexion instability, giving an all cause revision rate of 3.06% at 5 years for this group. There appears to be no significant advantage in clinical function for patients undergoing TKR for OA of the knee with electromagnetic navigation when compared to conventional techniques. There may be an advantage in reducing early revision rates using this technology

Introduction. The prosthetic impingement occurs if the range of motion of the hip exceeds implant mobility or in case of component malorientation. This retrieval study was designed to assess the frequency and the risk factors of this phenomenon. Material and Methods. The frequency and the severity of the impingement were calculated from a continuous series of 311 cups retrievals collected between 1989 and 2004 by a single surgeon. The reason for retrieval was loosening (131 cases), infection (43 cases), instability (56 cases), osteolysis (28 cases), unexplained pain (48 cases) and prosthetic impingent (5 cases all with hard bearings). The notching at the cup rim was assessed twice by two examiners with optic magnification. The risk factors were analyzed from clinical charts by univariate and cox multihazard. Results. Among the 311 cups explants, the frequency of impingement was 59.2% (it was severe in 11%, the notching exceeding 3 millimeters). The impingement was the reason for removal in only 1.6%, meaning that it was mainly unexpected (98.4 percent). The impingement was more frequent when revisions were performed because of instability (notching 80%), when the sum of hip motion exceeded 200 degrees (sum of motion in the 6 degrees of freedom of the hip) (notching 66%). The other risk factors were: use of heads with skirts, liner with an elevated rim, and head-neck ratio below 2, younger age at surgery. The multivariate analysis identified only two independent factors: 1) the use of skirted heads (Odd ratio 3.2 (1.2–15.3)), 2) and revision because of instability (Odd ratio 4.2 (1.1–16.2)). In contrast different classical factors were not correlated with impingement on retrieval: cup inclination, the duration before retrieval, the indication for primary prosthetic replacement. Discussion and Conclusion. This study underlines the impingement is common when assessing cup retrievals (over 50 percent). One should be aware of impingement when performing hip replacement in patients having a high range of motion. This situation may require prostheses with a high head-neck ratio, as well as use of computer-assisted surgery. One should avoid liners with elevated rim as well as heads with skirts to prevent dislocation, particularly when other risk factors are detected