Introduction. Surface wear of polyethylene is still considered a long-term risk factor for clinical success, particularly as life expectancy and activity levels increase. Computational models have been used extensively for preclinical wear prediction and optimization of total knee replacements (TKR). In most cases, the input wear parameters (wear factors and coefficients) to the computational models have been experimentally measured under average contact stresses to simulate standard activities. These wear studies are not therefore applicable for more adverse conditions that could lead to edge loading and high stress conditions, including higher levels of activities and severe loading conditions. The current study investigated the multidirectional pin-on-plate wear performance of moderately cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) under high applied nominal contact stress, to be used as inputs to a computational model investigating adverse high stress conditions. Materials/Methods. Moderately cross-linked UHMWPE (GUR_1020,5Mrad gamma irradiation) pins were tested against cobalt–chrome alloy (CoCr) plates in a multidirectional pin-on-plate wear simulator. The CoCr metallic plates were polished to an average surface roughness of 0.01μm. The pin rotation and the plate reciprocation of ±30º and 28mm were in phase, having a common frequency of 1Hz, and resulted in a multidirectional motion at the pin-plate contact surface in a flat-on-flat configuration. Six different pin diameter and applied load combinations were tested, resulting in applied nominal contact stresses from 4 to 80[MPa](Fig.1). Each set was run for 1million cycles in 25% bovine serum as a lubricant. The volumetric wear was calculated from the weight loss measurements using a density 0.93mg/mm. 3. for the UHMWPE material. The wear factor and wear coefficient were calculated as (volumetric wear/(load x sliding distance)) and (volumetric wear/(contact area x sliding distance)) respectively[1]. Statistical analysis of the data was performed in ANOVA and significance was taken at p<0.05. Results. Changing the load from 80 to 216[N] (5mm_pins) and from 212 to 283[N] (3mm_pins), increased the volumetric wear from 1.38±0.12 to 1.66±0.07 and from 0.8±0.12 to 1.03±0.05[mm. 3. ] respectively (mean±95% confidence interval (CI), n=6). However, under the same load of 216N, changing the pin diameter from 5 to 3 [mm] decreased the volumetric wear from 1.66±0.07 to 0.86±0.02[mm. 3. ] (mean±95% CI, n=6) (Fig.1). For stress levels from 4 to 30[MPa] the wear factor significantly decreased from 3.06±0.27 to 0.67±0.11×10. −7. mm. 3. /N.m] (mean±95%CI, n=6, p<0.001). Any further increase in the stress level (up to 80MPa) did not affect the measured wear factor (ANOVA, p=0.44) (Fig.2-a). In contrast, the measured wear coefficient increased from 1.25±0.11 to 4.88±0.14×10. −9. ] (mean±95% CI, n=6, p<0.001) while increasing the stress from 4 to 80[MPa](Fig.2-b). Discussion. For the same level of motion at the contact surfaces, the two main parameters that significantly contributed to the volumetric wear were the applied load and contact area. The measured wear parameters were significantly dependent on the applied nominal contact stress. Future work will consider different motions at the contact surfaces with different degrees of cross-shear. Conclusion. The stress level significantly affected the wear performance of moderately cross-linked UHMWPE in this pin-on-plate configuration. Computational simulations of TKR should therefore account for these effects when considering adverse high stress conditions

Nanotechnology is the study, production and controlled manipulation of materials with a grain size < 100 nm. At this level, the laws of classical mechanics fall away and those of quantum mechanics take over, resulting in unique behaviour of matter in terms of melting point, conductivity and reactivity. Additionally, and likely more significant, as grain size decreases, the ratio of surface area to volume drastically increases, allowing for greater interaction between implants and the surrounding cellular environment. This favourable increase in surface area plays an important role in mesenchymal cell differentiation and ultimately bone–implant interactions.

Basic science and translational research have revealed important potential applications for nanotechnology in orthopaedic surgery, particularly with regard to improving the interaction between implants and host bone. Nanophase materials more closely match the architecture of native trabecular bone, thereby greatly improving the osseo-integration of orthopaedic implants. Nanophase-coated prostheses can also reduce bacterial adhesion more than conventionally surfaced prostheses. Nanophase selenium has shown great promise when used for tumour reconstructions, as has nanophase silver in the management of traumatic wounds. Nanophase silver may significantly improve healing of peripheral nerve injuries, and nanophase gold has powerful anti-inflammatory effects on tendon inflammation.

Considerable advances must be made in our understanding of the potential health risks of production, implantation and wear patterns of nanophase devices before they are approved for clinical use. Their potential, however, is considerable, and is likely to benefit us all in the future.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B: 569–73.

Peri-prosthetic osteolysis and subsequent aseptic loosening is the most common reason for revising total hip replacements. Wear particles originating from the prosthetic components interact with multiple cell types in the peri-prosthetic region resulting in an inflammatory process that ultimately leads to peri-prosthetic bone loss. These cells include macrophages, osteoclasts, osteoblasts and fibroblasts. The majority of research in peri-prosthetic osteolysis has concentrated on the role played by osteoclasts and macrophages. The purpose of this review is to assess the role of the osteoblast in peri-prosthetic osteolysis.

In peri-prosthetic osteolysis, wear particles may affect osteoblasts and contribute to the osteolytic process by two mechanisms. First, particles and metallic ions have been shown to inhibit the osteoblast in terms of its ability to secrete mineralised bone matrix, by reducing calcium deposition, alkaline phosphatase activity and its ability to proliferate. Secondly, particles and metallic ions have been shown to stimulate osteoblasts to produce pro inflammatory mediators in vitro. In vivo, these mediators have the potential to attract pro-inflammatory cells to the peri-prosthetic area and stimulate osteoclasts to absorb bone. Further research is needed to fully define the role of the osteoblast in peri-prosthetic osteolysis and to explore its potential role as a therapeutic target in this condition.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1021–5.