An increasing number of hip prostheses are inserted without bone cement. Experimental research has shown that hydroxyapatite (HA) coated implants are strongly fixated in the bone, which is believed to reduce the likelihood of prosthetic loosening. However, in recent years, there has been much debate about the role of HA particles in third-body polyethylene (PE) wear and formerly we have shown the revision rate to be high among older-design HA coated cups. We hypothesized increased PE wear-rate using HA coated acetabular components in comparison with non-HA coated components (control group).Background
Purpose
Will Hydroxyapatite hip (HA) arthroplasty associated with ceramic bearings produce uncomplicated function in younger, active patients’ The incidence of aseptic loosening, dislocation and broken implants has been particularly investigated. Debris disease from plastic debris contributes to aseptic loosening. Hard-Hard bearings should obviate this problem. Metal-metal will release ions which might be deleterious. Experience with metal-metal resurfacing has high lighted problems including pseudo-tumours. Ceramic bearings may fracture but otherwise appear free of complications. This is a study extending over 19 years of 626 HA hip arthroplasties with ceramic bearings. Annual review using Harris Hip Score to assess pain and function and X-rays to check osseointegration has been performed. Alumina ceramic was inserted in 467 hips. The newer Zirconia Toughened Alumina (ZTA) has been inserted in 169 hips. There are 118 hips still under review at 10 or more years.Aims
Methods
Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty
(THA) are devastating complications that are associated with functional
limitations and increased overall mortality. Although cementless
implants have been associated with an increased risk of PFF, the
precise contribution of implant geometry and design on the risk
of both intra-operative and post-operative PFF remains poorly investigated.
A systematic review was performed to aggregate all of the PFF literature
with specific attention to the femoral implant used. A systematic search strategy of several journal databases and
recent proceedings from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
was performed. Clinical articles were included for analysis if sufficient
implant description was provided. All articles were reviewed by
two reviewers. A review of fundamental investigations of implant
load-to-failure was performed, with the intent of identifying similar
conclusions from the clinical and fundamental literature.Aims
Patients and Methods
