Introduction. Patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) often tell us that they put extra load on the joints of the opposite leg as they walk. Multiple joint OA is common and has previously been related to gait changes due to hip OA (Shakoor et al 2002). The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with medial compartment knee OA have abnormal biomechanics of the unaffected knee and both hips during normal level gait. Methods. Twenty patients (11 male, 9 female), with severe medial compartment knee OA and no other joint pain were recruited. The control group comprised 20 adults without musculoskeletal pain. Patients were reviewed, x-rays were examined and WOMAC and Oxford knee scores were completed. A 12 camera Vicon (Vicon, Oxford) system was used to collect kinematic data (100Hz) on level walking and the ground reaction force was recorded using three AMTI force plates (1000Hz). Surface electrodes were placed over medial and lateral quadriceps and hamstrings bilaterally to record EMG data (1000Hz). Kinematics and kinetics were calculated using the Vicon ‘plug-in-gait’ model. A co-contraction index was calculated for the EMG signals on each side of the knee, representing the magnitude of the combined readings relative to their maximum contraction during the gait cycle. Statistical comparisons were performed using t-tests with Bonferroni's correction for two variables and ANOVA for more than two variables (SPSS v16). Results. The mean age of the patients was 69 (SD 8.8). Mean gait speed was 0.95m/s (study group) and 1.44m/s (control group). Peak adduction moments for the OA group [OA Knee; Unaffected Knee; Ipsilateral Hip; Contralateral Hip; in Nm/Kg(±95% CI)] were: 0.55(0.06); 0.47(0.06); 0.73(0.09); 0.73(0.08). Control values for peak moments were 0.64 (0.06) for the knee and 0.81(0.07) at the hip. Mid-stance adduction moments for the OA group (listed as before) were: 0.44(0.08); 0.33(0.06); 0.64(0.06); 0.61(0.08). Control values for mid-stance moments were 0.14(0.03) and 0.40(0.04). [OA group vs. Controls: p=NS for peak moments at all 4 joints; p<0.01 for mid-stance moments at all joints]. Co-contraction indices for hamstrings and quads, [OA knee medial; and lateral; unaffected knee medial; and lateral; control medial; and lateral; 0<X. Discussion. Although the affected subjects all had only single joint OA, abnormal moments were present in the hips and knees of both legs during normal level gait, despite the reduced gait speed of the OA cohort. Abnormal hamstring and quadriceps co-contraction occurs bilaterally in patient with single joint OA. Increased trunk sway is a recognised compensation in knee OA and may be the cause of the abnormal hip and contra-lateral knee loading found in this study. Further investigation is warranted and may lead to improvements in the long term outcome for these patients. Acknowledgement. The study was funded by the North Wales NHS Trust

In total knee replacement (TKR), neutral mechanical alignment (NMA) is targeted in prosthetic component implantation. A novel implantation approach, referred to as kinematic alignment (KA), has been recently proposed (Eckhoff et al. 2005). This is based on the pre-arthritic lower limb alignment which is reconstructed using suitable image-based techniques, and is claimed to allow better soft-tissue balance (Eckhoff et al. 2005) and restoration of physiological joint function. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) introduced in TKR to execute personalized prosthesis component implantation are used for KA. The aim of this study was to report knee kinematics and electromyography (EMG) for a number lower limb muscles from two TKR patient groups, i.e. operated according to NMA via conventional instrumentation, or according to KA via PSI. 20 patients affected by primary gonarthrosis were implanted with a cruciate-retaining fixed-bearing prosthesis with patella resurfacing (Triathlon® by Stryker®, Kalamazoo, MI-USA). 17 of these patients, i.e. 11 operated targeting NMA (group A) via convention instrumentation and 6 targeting KA (group B) via PSI (ShapeMatch® by Stryker®, Kalamazoo, MI-USA), were assessed clinically using the International Knee Society Scoring (IKSS) System and biomechanically at 6-month follow-up. Knee kinematics during stair-climbing, chair-rising and extension-against-gravity was analysed by means of 3D video-fluoroscopy (CAT® Medical System, Monterotondo, Italy) synchronized with 4-channel EMG analysis (EMG Mate, Cometa®, Milan, Italy) of the main knee ad/abductor and flexor/extensor muscles. Knee joint motion was calculated in terms of flex/extension (FE), ad/abduction (AA), and internal/external rotation (IE), together with axial rotation of condyle contact point line (CLR). Postoperative knee and functional IKSS scores in group A were 78±20 and 80±23, worse than in group B, respectively 91±12 and 90±15. Knee motion patterns were much more consistent over patients in group B than A. In both groups, normal ranges were found for FE, IE and AA, the latter being generally smaller than 3°. Average IE ranges in the three motor tasks were respectively 8.2°±3.2°, 10.1°±3.9° and 7.9°±4.0° in group A, and 6.6°±4.0°, 10.5°±2.5° and 11.0°±3.9° in group B. Relevant CLRs were 8.2°±3.2°, 10.2°±3.7° and 8.8°±5.3° in group A, and 7.3°±3.5°, 12.6°±2.6° and 12.5°±4.2° in group B. EMG analysis revealed prolonged activation of the medial/lateral vasti muscles in group A. Such muscle co-contraction was not generally observed in all patients in group B, this perhaps proving more stability in the knee replaced following the KA approach. These results reveal that KA results in better function than NMA in TKR. Though small differences were observed between groups, the higher data consistency and the less prolonged muscle activations detected using KA support indirectly the claim of a more natural knee soft tissue balance. References

Summary. This study describes the use of a quasi-static, 6DOF knee loading simulator using cadaveric specimens. Muscle force profiles yield repeatable results. Intra-articular pressure and contact area are dependent on loading condition and ACL integrity. Introduction. Abnormal contact mechanics of the tibiofemoral joint is believed to influence the development and progression of joint derangements. As such, understanding the factors that regulate joint stability may provide insight into the underlying injury mechanisms. Muscle action is believed to be the most important factor since it is the only dynamic regulator of joint stability. Furthermore, abnormal muscle control has been experimentally linked to the development of OA [Herzog, 2007] and in vivo ACL strain [Fleming, 2001]. However, the individual contributions to knee joint contact mechanics remain unclear. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of individual muscle contributions on the tibiofemoral contact mechanics using an in-vitro experimental protocol. Methodology. Contact mechanics of 6 fresh frozen cadaver knee specimens were evaluated using the UofO Oxford knee loading device. Various combinations of quadriceps-hamstring co-contraction ratios were applied to the knee while it was “suspended” between the hip and foot components of the device. Loads of six muscle groups were computed using a hill-type musculoskeletal model [Buchanan, 2004]. Simulated ground reaction forces were also applied to the knee to represent force profiles of weight acceptance during gait as it has been shown to produce peak knee joint force in the gait cycle [Shelburne et al., 2006]. For respective medial and lateral joint compartments, the mean contact area (MC-CA and LC-CA), mean contact pressure (MC-CP and LC-CP), peak pressure (MC-PP and LC-PP), and centre of force displacement (MC-COFD and LC-COFD) were determined using a 4011 piezoelectric sensor form Tekscan (Tekscan Inc. Boston, MA). Additionally, the ACL was resected and measurements were repeated. Pearson correlations (r) examined the reliability of measurements as well as the effect an ACL transection on articular loads. Results. Positive correlations were computed for the following: COFD with intact ACL (r=0.99), COFD with resected ACL (r=0.82), MC-COFD pre vs. post ACL- resection (0.91). Furthermore, preliminary results indicated a positive correlation between MC-CA and ACL integrity (r=0.97). Discussion. The repeatability of the measured dependant variables validates the use of the knee-loading device. Interestingly, contact mechanics are more variable post ACL resection for a given muscle loading condition, indicating a decrease in knee joint stability. Also, the COFD is dependent on the different ratios of muscle loads applied to the knee, which demonstrates the importance of muscle action to the modulation of contact forces

Summary Statement. Using a weight-bearing force control task, age-related changes in muscle action were observed in osteoarthritic subjects, however, greater activation of rectus femoris and medial hamstring muscles in the OA group compared to control indicates greater cocontraction and varied stabilisation strategies. Introduction. Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most debilitating condition among older adults. OA is thought to be mechanically driven by altering the stabilising integrity of the joint. The main contributor to knee joint stability is that of muscular contraction. In cases where the history of a traumatic knee joint injury is not a causal factor, a change in muscle function, resulting in reduced strength and force control in believed to induce OA development and progression. Since age is also a determining factor of OA, the purpose of this study was to investigate the muscle activation patterns of young healthy adults (YC), older healthy adults (OC), and adults with OA during a standing isometric force control task. Patients & Methods. A force matching protocol was used to evaluate muscle activation patterns of 41 YC (23.1±1.9 years of age) 18 OC (59.7±5.14 years), and 19 OA (63.5±8.1 years). Subjects stood with their leg of interest fixed to a force platform and modulated ground reaction forces while exposing equal body weight to each leg. Surface electromyography (EMG) of 8 muscles that cross the knee joint, kinetics and kinematics were recorded while subjects generated 30% of their maximal force in 12 different directions, corresponding to various combinations of medial-lateral-anterior-posterior ground reaction forces. Processed EMG was normalised to previously recorded maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and ensemble averaged into group means for each loading direction. Muscle activation patterns were displayed in EMG polar plots and were quantified with symmetry analyses, mean activation levels (X. EMG. ), directions (Φ), and specificity indices (SI). Group differences were tested with independent T-tests at the p<0.05 level. Results. Muscle activation patterns were similar between groups (i.e. symmetry and Φ). However, X. EMG. of 7 muscles was significantly greater in both the OA and OC groups compared to YC. OA group also demonstrated significantly greater X. EMG. in the rectus femoris and tensor fascia lata as well as lower SI in semitendinosus hamstrings compared to OC. Discussion/Conclusion. Our results indicate that regardless of loading direction, both OC and OA groups have greater levels of muscle co-contraction than YC. This is suggested to be an adaptive response to age-related changes in muscle strength and force control. Since individuals with OA have reduced muscle strength and force control compared to age-matched controls, our results suggest that the OA group's greater, less specific activation of knee joint muscles relative to the OC is this “stiffening” response adapted by the OA group, however, to an extent that may expose the joint to detrimental loading conditions, contributing to the progression of OA. Further investigation regarding age-related neuromuscular changes and their influence on joint loading conditions and development of OA is warranted