Aims. The aim of this study was to determine whether closed suction drain (CSD) use influences recovery of quadriceps strength and to examine the effects of drain use on secondary outcomes: quadriceps activation, intra-articular effusion, bioelectrical measure of swelling, range of movement (ROM), pain, and wound healing complications. Patients and Methods. A total of 29 patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized blinded study. Patients were randomized to receive a CSD in one limb while the contralateral limb had the use of a subcutaneous drain (SCDRN) without the use of suction (‘sham drain’). Isometric quadriceps strength was collected as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes consisted of quadriceps activation, intra-articular effusion measured via ultrasound, lower limb swelling measured with bioelectrical impendence and limb girth, knee ROM, and pain. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at day two, two and six weeks, and three months. Differences between limbs were determined using paired Student’s t-tests or Wilcoxon’s signed-rank tests. Results. No significant differences were identified between limbs prior to surgery for the primary or secondary outcomes. No significant differences in quadriceps strength were seen between CSD and SCDRN limbs at postoperative day two (p = 0.09), two weeks (primary endpoint) (p = 0.7), six weeks (p = 0.3), or three months (p = 0.5). The secondary outcome of knee extension ROM was significantly greater in the CSD limb compared with the SCDRN (p = 0.01) at two weeks following surgery, but this difference was absent at all other intervals. Secondary outcomes of quadriceps activation, intra-articular effusion, lower limb swelling, and pain were not found to differ significantly at any timepoint following surgery. Conclusion. The use of CSD during TKA did not influence quadriceps strength, quadriceps activation, intra-articular effusion, lower limb swelling, ROM, or pain. These results have limited drain use by the authors in primary uncomplicated TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B (7 Supple C):84–90

Introduction. Closed suction intraarticular drain (CSD) use after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been studied with regards to wound healing and range of motion, however, no data exist on how CSD use impacts knee joint effusion and quadriceps strength. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether CSD use influences recovery of quadriceps strength. Secondary outcomes examined effects of CSD on intraarticular effusion, lower limb swelling, knee range of motion (ROM), pain and wound healing complications. Methods. Twenty-nine patients undergoing same-day bilateral TKA were enrolled in a prospective, randomized blinded study. Subjects were randomized to receive a CSD on one lower extremity while the contralateral limb had the use of a subcutaneous drain (SCDRN) without the use of suction. Isometric quadriceps strength was collected as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes consisted of quadriceps muscle activation, intraarticular effusion measured via ultrasound, lower extremity swelling measured with bioelectrical impendence, lower extremity girth, ROM, and pain. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at day 2, 2 and 6 weeks and 3 months. Differences in limbs were determined using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results. No significant differences were identified between limbs prior to surgery for the primary or secondary outcomes. No significant differences in quadriceps strength were seen between CSD and SCDRN limbs at postoperative day 2 (p = 0.09), two weeks (p=0.7), six weeks (p=0.3), or three months (p=0.5). Secondary outcomes, of quadriceps activation battery, intraarticular effusion, lower extremity swelling, ROM, and pain were not found to significantly differ at any time point following surgery. Conclusion. The use of CSD during TKA did not influence quadriceps strength, quadriceps activation, intraarticular effusion, bioelectrical measure of swelling, ROM, or pain. The results of this study have limited drain use by the authors in primary uncomplicated TKA

Drainage of the surgical wound following major surgical procedures is advocated to avoid haematoma formation. Recently the need for of wound drainage in joint arthroplasty has been questioned. The aim of this prospective randomised study is to determine the benefits of a postoperative closed-suction drain after UKR.

In a prospective randomised trial we evaluated the use of a postoperative closed-suction drain in unicompartmental knee replacement. Seventy-eight patients were divided into two groups: one without a postoperative closed-suction drain (Group A) and one with a drain (Group B). Both groups were matched for age, sex, and pre-operative haemoglobin.

In group A we observed a lower day one post-operative analgesic requirement, smaller knee circumference 3 days postoperatively and less local wound complications. No deep infections occurred in either group during the follow-up period. Drain usage in UKR resulted in no significant advantage in postoperative pain, range of motion, and hospital stay. Post-operative drainage does however increase the cost of the procedure both in labour and equipment expenditure.

We conclude that avoiding postoperative closed-suction drainage in UKR does not influence the final outcome.

Introduction: Drainage of the surgical wound following major surgical procedures is advocated to avoid haematoma formation. Recently the need for of wound drainage in joint arthroplasty has been questioned. The aim of this prospective randomised study is to determine the benefits of a postoperative closed-suction drain after UKR.

Material and Methods: In a prospective randomised trial we evaluated the use of a postoperative closed-suction drain in unicompartmental knee replacement. Seventy-eight patients were divided into two groups: one without a postoperative closed-suction drain (Group A) and one with a drain (Group B). Both groups were matched for age, sex, and pre-operative haemoglobin.

Results: In group A we observed a lower day one postoperative analgesic requirement, smaller knee circumference 3 days postoperatively and less local wound complications. No deep infections occurred in either group during the follow-up period. Drain usage in UKR resulted in no significant advantage in postoperative pain, range of motion, and hospital stay. Post-operative drainage does however increase the cost of the procedure both in labour and equipment expenditure.

Conclusions: We conclude that avoiding postoperative closed-suction drainage in UKR does not influence the final outcome.

There is no firm published evidence to support the use of closed suction drains. Over 20 years ago, large studies by the Public Health Laboratory Service and the National Research Council found that drains were risk factors for wound infection. A prospective randomised study of the use of closed suction drains after surgery for fractured neck of femur in 70 patients failed to show that drains improved wound healing. Drained cases had more complications

Introduction: Primary total hip replacement remains one of the commonest orthopaedic procedures performed. It is yet to be clearly demonstrated whether use of a postoperative drain is of benefit in these procedures. Methods: We carried out a prospective randomised study comparing the use of autologous reinfusion drains, closed suction drains or no drain to determine their influence on allogenic blood transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay and infection rates. Stratification was carried out for confounding factors. Results: 153 patients were recruited into the study and randomised to one of the three closely matched groups. There was no significant difference between the mean intra-operative blood loss or post-operative haemaglo-bin levels between the 3 groups. 42% of the suction drain group required post-operative transfusion as compared to 17% of the reinfusion drain group and 12% of the group with no drains. This difference was highly significant (P=0.02) Mean time for the wound to become dry was 3 days, 3.9 days and 4 days in the no drain, re-transfusion drain and suction drain groups respectively. This difference was statistically significant (P=0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean length of inpatient stay. Discussion: This study demonstrates a significantly higher transfusion rate with closed suction drains compared to reinfusion drains or no drains. With the drive to reduce hospital stay our study supports the considered use of no drain or a reinfusion drain

Introduction. There is no established evidence to support the use of drains after total knee replacement; however 94% of orthopaedic surgeons in UK routinely use closed suction drains. Haematomas can form with or without using drains, presence of which in addition may provide portal for infection and may increase blood loss. Blood group and save is routinely performed for every patient undergoing total knee replacement, however actual cross match and transfusion is needed for a small percentage of patients. Aim. To compare the requirement for blood transfusion after total knee replacement with and without the use of closed suction drains and the cost analysis of performing routine blood group and save pre-operatively. Materials and Methods. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the data over the last 2 years (2008–2009). Patients were divided into 2 groups (drains versus no drains). 11 surgeons preferred drains and 2 did not use drains. We also compared the results of one particular surgeon who used drains for patients operated in the years 2006 and 2007 and did not use drains in the years 2008 and 2009. Results. 1564 knee replacements were performed by 13 surgeons. 8.1% patients (n=128) received blood transfusion post operatively. In the drainage group (n=1451), 8% patients (n=117) received transfusion. In the non-drainage group (n=113), 9.7% patients (n=11) received transfusion. Comparing the results of one particular surgeon (2006–2007), 5.7% patients (n=5) received transfusion (total n=87 with the use of drains) while 5.3% patients (n=3) operated by the same surgeon (2008–2009) had blood transfusion (total n=56 without using drains). As only 8.1% patients received blood transfusion, the blood samples for the remaining 91.9% patients remained unused. A single group and save sample currently costs £30.30. This suggests we could potentially save £21,750 per year by selectively performing group and save. Conclusion. There was no statistically significant difference in blood transfusion requirement in the two groups. In the current financially driven society, we can cut the costs significantly by selectively performing group and save and post operatively, if blood transfusion is indicated clinically, it can be arranged within safe time limit even in the absence of a pre-arranged sample

Background. Routine closed suction drainage and postoperative laboratory studies have long been tenets of most TJA protocols. However, recent literature has called into question whether either is necessary with modern outpatient TJA clinical pathways. Methods. Demographic, cost, and readmission data for 2,605 primary unilateral TJA cases was collected retrospectively and analyzed prior to and after a protocol change where routine closed suction drains and postoperative laboratory tests were eliminated. This protocol change was designed to treat all primary TJA like outpatients regardless of their admission status. Drain usage changed from routine to selective based on hemostasis. Lab studies changed from routine to selective for patients on warfarin for VTE prophylaxis (INR), with ASA 4 or 5 status (BMP), and with a hematocrit < 27% in the recovery room after THA (CBC). Results. Drain utilization decreased by 50% and postoperative labs decreased by 70%. Drain and lab test cost per patient decreased from $74.62 before to $19.91 after the change, while charges per patient decreased from $625.23 before to $77.15 after. The 30 and 90-day readmission rates decreased with no readmissions occurring before or after the change that could have been prevented by using a drain or obtaining labs. Conclusion. Selective elimination of routine closed suction drainage and postoperative laboratory studies as part of an outpatient TJA protocol is safe and provides cost savings for inpatient primary TJA. Per 100 cases, this change could decrease institution costs by $5,500 and patient charges by $55,000 without decreasing quality or safety

Total knee replacement is a standard procedure for the end-staged knee joints. The main concerns at the perioperative period are infection prophylaxis, pain control, and blood loss management. Several interventions are designed to decrease the blood loss during and after the operation of total knee arthroplasty. In the recent meta-analysis showed that early tourniquet release of the tourniquet for hemostasis increased the total measured blood loss with primary TKR about 228.7 ml. So, Intra-operative blood loss for hemostasis can be saved by not to release the tourniquet after implants fixation, irrigation, closure of the wound and the application of compression dressing. Our study showed that most of the post-operative blood loss was collected during the first few postoperative hours: 37% in the first 2 hours and 55% in the first 4 hours and 82.1% in the first 24 hours. So, clamping the drainage for the first 4 postoperative hours would reduce blood loss after TKA (518 v.s. 843 mL). The fall in hemoglobin and Hct are also of significant difference (1.64 vs. 2.09 for Hb; 5.18 vs.7.69 for Hct). Appropriate clamping for an optimal time may be the most economical and simple, and the benefits of clamping also appear to outweigh its potential risks. NO DRAIN at all is able to reduce the post-operative blood loss. Our study showed that the decrease of postoperative hemoglobin was significantly less than that in no-drain group (1.45±0.72 vs 1.8±0.91). Shorter hospital stay was achieved in the no-drain group (8.3 ± 2.6 vs 10.7±3.2 days). All patients achieved good range of motion (flexion: 0 to >90 degree)by the five days after operation and no prosthetic infection was noted during follow-up. Thus, the routine use of closed suction drains for elective minimal-invasive total knee arthroplasty is not recommended

Background: There remains no clear guidance from the British Orthopaedic Association regarding the use of closed suction drains after primary total knee replacement (TKR). Previous studies suggest no benefit in their use and no significant difference between the type of drain used. Aims: To assess whether allogenic transfusion requirements are altered by the use of closed suction drainage and to establish if drains reduce post-operative complications and length of stay in hospital. Materials and Methods: 60 patients undergoing TKR in Eastbourne between December 2008 and June 2009 were evaluated pre- and post-operatively. The population was divided into those with no drain, a Redivac drain (fluid discarded) and a re-transfusion drain (fluid filtered and transfused into the patient). Results: 23 patients had Redivac drains and 5 (22%) required an allogenic blood transfusion. 37 patients had no drain and 2 (5%) required allogenic blood. For the 14 re-transfusion drain patients none received allogenic blood. There was no significant difference in the length of stay across all 3 groups (p=> 0.25). There was a significantly higher incidence of wound ooze and cellulitis in patients with no drain (50%; p=< 0.01). This is in comparison to the other two groups where only 30% of patients with a Redivac drain and 7% of patients with a re-transfusion drain experienced these complications. There was no significant difference in the average haemoglobin drop between the 3 groups (p=> 0.1). Conclusions: The results suggest a benefit in using drains to reduce the risk of post-operative wound ooze and cellulitis after TKR. Re-transfusion drains also appear to reduce the requirement for allogenic blood transfusion in the post-operative period

Introduction and Aims: Decreasing blood loss during total hip replacement (THR) remains a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. This study investigated the effects of the antifibrinolytics aprotinin and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) against placebo on blood loss during primary total hip replacement. Their safety and mechanism of action was also investigated. Method: Forty-five patients undergoing primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty were randomised to receive an infusion of either aprotinin, EACA, or placebo. Intra- and post-operative blood loss was measured, as was the rate of blood transfusion and changes in haemoglobin concentration. Clinical examination and duplex ultrasound was used in all patients to detect thrombotic events. All patients were assessed clinically six weeks post-op to detect adverse events. Platelet function was assessed using P-selectin, Platelet-monocyte aggregates (PMA) and factor V/Va levels. D-dimer activity was recorded as an indicator of fibrinolysis. Non-parametric statistical analysis was employed in the interpretation of results. Results: There was no difference in demographics or pre-operative platelet function between the groups with the exception of the EACA group which had a lower pre-operative haemoglobin concentration. Intra-operative blood loss was significantly lower in the aprotinin group compared to placebo (p=0.01), similarly there was also a reduction in intra-operative blood loss in the EACA group but this did not reach statistical significance. Post-operative bleeding from closed suction drains was markedly reduced for both aprotinin (60%, p=< 0.01) and EACA (53%, p=< 0.001) compared to placebo. Markedly less haemoglobin was lost in drains in both antifibrinolytic groups, with aprotinin showing a 77% (p=< 0.0001) and EACA a 73% reduction (p=< 0.001) in post-operative haemoglobin loss. Despite this, no difference in the rate of blood transfusion was observed between groups. Total hip arthroplasty surgery led to the activation of platelets as evidenced by P-selectin, PMA and factor V/Va levels. However, platelet function was not affected by either aprotinin or EACA. Both antifibrinolytics showed a similar increase in D-dimer levels indicating a similar efficacy in inhibiting fibrinbolysis. There were no DVTs, PEs or infections recorded in the study, and no increase in adverse events was seen with the use of antifibrinolytics. Conclusion: Infusion of either aprotinin or EACA reduces blood loss after primary THA. Both agents are equally effective and have a favourable safety profile. The two drugs inhibit fibrinolysis in a similar fashion, and this action appears to be independent of platelets

Introduction: Blood conservation has rapidly moved into political and medical agendas. The ongoing shortage of blood in blood banks and the discovery of vCJD pose a threat to UK blood supply with ever rising costs. The use of blood conservation techniques is increasingly being used in surgery to help reduce the need for homologous blood. We studied the use of Autologous blood transfusion drains (Bellovac ABT) in lower limb arthroplasty compared with standard closed suction drains. We studied 123 lower limb arthroplasty (61 TKR & 62 THR) to see if there was a significant reduction in the need for homologous blood transfusion when using re-transfusion drains and its cost effectiveness. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 123 patients undergone lower limb arthroplasty from March 2002 to Dec 2004 under one surgeon using the same technique for TKR and THR. 61 TKR (30 ABT drains v 31 standard drain) and 62 THR (30 ABT drains v 32 standard drain). Data was collected on sex, age, pre & post op Hb, volumes drained, volumes re-transfused and the number of homologous blood transfusions. Results: 30 THR with ABT drains: 14 male, 16 female, mean age 68.7, mean pre op Hb 13.67, mean post op Hb 10.55,mean volume re-transfused 324ml, mean volume drained 466ml. 7 patients(23%) required additional homologous blood transfusion. 32 THR with standard drains: 14 male, 18 female, mean age 68.4, mean pre op Hb 12.96, mean post op Hb 9.36, mean volume drained 579.5ml. 24 patients (75%) required homologous blood transfusion. 30 TKR with ABT drains: 14 male, 16 female, mean age 69.8, mean pre-op Hb13.4, mean post-op Hb 11.03, mean volume re-transfused 415ml, mean volume drained 580ml. 4 patients (13%) required additional homologous blood transfusion. 31 TKR with Standard drains: 13 male, 18 female. Mean age72.1, mean pre-op Hb13.33, mean post-op Hb10.4, mean volume drained 711.5ml. 14 patients (45%) required homologous blood transfusion. No re-transfusion complications occurred in the ABT group. 2 patients requiring homologous blood had increasing pyrexia and transfusion hence stopped. Discussion: 11 out of 60 patients (18%) using ABT drains required additional homologous blood compared with 38 out of 63 patients (60%) requiring homologous blood using standard drains. Pvalue< 0.001. We show a stastically significant reduction in the need for homologous blood transfusion using an autologous blood re-transfusion drain. One unit of blood costs approximately £120 the ABT drain less than half of this amount, there is a significant cost saving in using autologous blood re-transfusion drains. We conclude that using Autologous blood Re-transfusion drains is safe, cost effective and reduces the need for homologous blood transfusion. If drains are to be used then Re-transfusion drains should be used

Aims

Closed suction subfascial drainage is widely used after instrumented posterior spinal fusion in patients with a spinal deformity. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of this wound drainage on the outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This was a further analysis of a randomized, multicentre clinical trial reporting on patients after posterior spinal fusion using segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. In this study the incidence of deep surgical site infection (SSI) and chronic postoperative pain at two years’ follow-up are reported.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether, after correction of an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), leaving out the subfascial drain gives results that are no worse than using a drain in terms of total blood loss, drop in haemoglobin level, and opioid consumption.

A seventy-five-year-old female patient presented with pain and deformity of her left leg of three days duration. Hybrid THRA has been done 11 years ago at her left hip for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Massive osteolysis and pathologic fracture were observed on plain radiograph (Fig. 1). Revision THRA using an allograft prosthesis composite (APC) was planned for solution of extensive bone loss of the proximal femur. Surgical exposure was performed through extended trochanteric osteotomy with the patient supine. Step-cut osteotomy was done at the remained proximal part of host femur to make match with the distal part of APC. Meticulous removal of granulation tissues and remaining cement was done. As Acetabular cup was stable, 60 mm sized high-walled polyethylene liner was exchanged. Calcar reconstruction prosthesis was cemented into a proximal femoral allograft measuring 15 cm and cement at the vicinity of the step-cut osteotomy was removed for later bony union at interface. After solid fixation of APC with cement, the distal half of APC was cemented with the host femur. Step-cut osteotomy was wired and autogenous bone grafts from the greater trochanter were added at the interface. Leg length and stability were rechecked using a standard necked 28 mm metal head and reduction was done stably. Greater trochanter was fixed over the trimmed proximal allograft with multiple wiring and paper-thin host femur was enveloped around the femoral allograft using absorbable sutures. Following insertion of the closed suction drainage drains, closure was done as routine fashion and healing of the wound was uneventful (Fig. 2). An abduction brace was applied post operatively for a period of four weeks. Crutch walking with partial weight bearing was started at four weeks and crutch protection was applied for a period of six months. Incorporation of allograft with the host bone was observed on two-year follow-up radiographs. At seven-year follow-up, the patient walks well with a mild limp, and Harris score is 90. We report on a seven-year follow-up case of revision THRA with APC with references (Fig. 3)

Aims

Musculoskeletal infection is a devastating complication in both trauma and elective orthopaedic surgeries that can result in significant morbidity. Aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and complications of local antibiotic impregnated dissolvable synthetic calcium sulphate beads (Stimulan Rapid Cure) in the hands of different surgeons from multiple centres in surgically managed bone and joint infections.

We prospectively randomised 78 patients into two groups, ‘drains’ or ‘no drains’ to assess the effectiveness of suction drains in reducing haematoma and effusion in the joint and its effect on wound healing after total knee replacement. Ultrasound was used to measure the formation of haematoma and effusion on the fourth post-operative day. This was a semi-quantitative assessment of volume estimation. There was no difference in the mean effusion between the groups (5.91 mm in the drain group versus 6.08 mm in the no-drain, p = 0.82). The mean amount of haematoma in the no-drain group was greater (11.07 mm versus 8.41 mm, p = 0.03). However, this was not clinically significant judged by the lack of difference in the mean reduction in the post-operative haemoglobin between the groups (drain group 3.4 g/dl; no-drain group 3.0 g/dl, p = 0.38). There were no cases of wound infection or problems with wound healing at six weeks in any patient.

Our findings indicate that drains do not reduce joint effusion but do reduce haematoma formation. They have no effect on wound healing.

The December 2014 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Sports and total hips; topical tranexamic acid and blood conservation in hip replacement; blind spots and biases in hip research; no recurrence in cam lesions at two years; to drain or not to drain?; sonication and diagnosis of implant associated infection; and biomarkers and periprosthetic infection