Complications are an inevitable part of orthopaedic surgery, how one defines complications can have an impact on the ability to learn from them. A group of general surgeons headed by Clavien and Dindo et al.1 have previously published their classification system for surgical complications based on the type of therapy required to correct the complication. Our aim was to evaluate a modification of this classification system and its use over a 12-month period at our institution via our departmental audits, our hypothesis being that this would direct appropriate discussion around our complications and hence learning and institutional change. A modified Clavien-Dindo Classification was prospectively applied to all complications recorded in the Orthopaedic departmental quarterly audits at our institution for a 12-month period (4 audits). The audit discussion was recorded and analysed and compared with the quarterly complication audits for the preceding 12-month period. The modified Clavien-Dindo classification for surgical complications was applicable and reproducible to Orthopaedic complications in our level 1 trauma centre. It is a transparent system, objective in its interpretation and avoids the tendency to down-grade serious complications. It was easy to apply and directed discussion appropriately at our quarterly audit meetings on complications where there was a preventable outcome or important learning point. In particular modifications to VTE and Death classes allowed the unit to focus discussion on cases where complication was preventable or unexpected. The modified Clavien-Dindo classification system is an easy to use and reproducible classification system for Orthopaedic complications in our unit it directed audit discussion towards cases where complications were preventable or had a learning point

There is currently no standardised complication grading classification routinely used for paediatric orthopaedic surgical procedures. The Clavien-Dindo classification used in general surgery was modified and validated in 2011 by Sink et al. and has been used regularly to classify complications following hip preservation surgery. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate Sink et al.'s modification of the Clavien-Dindo classification system for grading complications following surgical interventions of the upper and lower extremities and spine in paediatric orthopaedic patients. Sink et al.'s modification of the Clavien-Dindo classification system was further modified for paediatric orthopaedic procedures. The modified grading scheme was based on the treatment required to treat the complication and the long term morbidity of the complication. Grade I complications do not require deviation from standard treatment. Grade II complications deviate from the normal post-operative course and require outpatient treatment. Grade III complications require investigations, re-admission or re-operation. Grade IV complications are limb or life threatening or have a potential for permanent disability (IVa: with no long term disability and IVb: with long-term disability). Grade V complications result in death. Forty-five complication scenarios were developed. Seven paediatric orthopaedic surgeons were trained to use the modified system and they each graded the scenarios on two occasions. The scenarios were presented in a different random order each time they were graded. Fleiss' and Cohen's k statistics were performed to test for inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities, respectively. The overall Fleiss' k value for inter-rater reliability was 0.772 (95% CI, 0.744–0.799). The weighted k was 0.765 (95% CI, 0.703–0.826) for Grade I, 0.692 (95% CI, 0.630–0.753) for Grade II, 0.733 (95% CI, 0.671–0.795) for Grade III, 0.657(95% CI, 0.595–0.719) for Grade IVa, 0.769 (95% CI, 0.707–0.83) for Grade IVb and 1.000 for Grade V (p value <0.001). The Cohen's k value for intra-rater reliability was 0.918 (95% CI, 0.887–0.947). These tests show that the adapted classification system has high inter- and intra-rater reliabilities for grading complications following paediatric orthopaedic surgery. Given the high intra- and inter-rater reliability and simplicity of this system, adoption of this grading scheme as a standard of reporting complications in paediatric orthopaedic surgery could be considered. Since the evaluation of surgical outcomes should include the ability to reliably grade surgical complications, this reproducible, reliable system to assess paediatric surgical complications will be a valuable tool for improving surgical practices and patient outcomes

Abstract. Aim. With resumption of elective spine surgery services following the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a multi-centre BASS collaborative study to examine the clinical outcomes of surgeries. Methods. Prospective data was collected from eight spinal centres in the first month of operating following restoration of elective spine surgery following the first wave. Primary outcomes measures were the 30-day mortality rate and postoperative Covid-19 infection rate. Secondary outcomes analysed were the surgical, medical adverse events and length of inpatient stay. Results. 257 patients (128 Male) with an age range of 2–88 years formed the study cohort. The average workload from each unit was 32(range 16–101) with 118 procedures (46%) done as category 3 prioritisation level (Procedures performed in < 3 month). 87% of patients were low-medium “risk stratification” category. 195 patients (75.8%) isolated for two weeks preoperatively and all but four patients had COVID-19 negative test prior to surgery. None of the patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection nor was any mortality related to COVID-19 in the 30 day follow up period, with 25 patients having been tested for symptoms. 32 patients (12%) developed a total of 34 complications with 19/34 being grade 1–2 Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Median LOS 5.2 days and 78.4 % patients stayed less than a week. Conclusions. As per our study safe and effective planned spinal surgical services can be restored avoiding viral transmission, with adherence to national guidelines and COVID-secure pathways tailored according to the resources of the individual spinal units