Aims. High-quality clinical research in children’s orthopaedic surgery has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. This study used a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for clinical trials in children’s orthopaedics. Methods. A modified Delphi technique was used, which involved an initial scoping survey, a two-round Delphi process and an expert panel formed of members of the British Society of Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery. The survey was conducted amongst orthopaedic surgeons treating children in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Results. A total of 86 clinicians contributed to both rounds of the Delphi process, scoring priorities from one (low priority) to five (high priority). Elective topics were ranked higher than those relating to trauma, with the top ten elective research questions scoring higher than the top question for trauma. Ten elective, and five trauma research priorities were identified, with the three highest ranked questions relating to the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (mean score 4.6/ 5), Perthes’ disease (4.5) and bone infection (4.5). Conclusion. This consensus-based research agenda will guide surgeons, academics and funders to improve the evidence in children’s orthopaedic surgery and encourage the development of multicentre clinical trials. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:680–4

Aims

A national screening programme has existed in the UK for the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) since 1969. However, every aspect of screening and treatment remains controversial. Screening programmes throughout the world vary enormously, and in the UK there is significant variation in screening practice and treatment pathways. We report the results of an attempt by the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) to identify a nationwide consensus for the management of DDH in order to unify treatment and suggest an approach for screening.

Purpose:. To examine the feasibility of surgical outcome measures for a children's orthopaedic surgeon when compared with other specialties. Methods & Results:. Details of procedure codes for 2726 inpatient episodes were used to examine the distribution of procedures and the breadth of diagnoses dealt with by a variety of orthopaedic sub-specialists. The author's practice included 199 surgical cases and was compared with two arthroplasty surgeons (n=971); a spinal surgeon (n=256); a foot and ankle surgeon (n=341) and an upper limb surgeon (n=393). Arthroplasty surgeons can report 50% of their outcomes as primary knee or hip replacements the index procedure for the author is metalwork removal (14.5%). My upper limb colleague could be judged on 25% of his cases (carpal tunnel decompression) and my spinal surgical colleague on 20% of his cases (primary posterior decompression of spinal cord). Only my foot and ankle colleague compared in terms of diversity with 9% of his cases consisting of first metatarsal osteotomy and the next 9% consisting of 1st MTPJ arthrodesis. The proportion of multiple procedures also varies between sub-specialists with 66% of my cases being multiple compared with 38% for the arthroplasty surgeons and 42% for the upper limb surgeons. Foot and ankle has a high rate of multiple procedures (62%) and the spinal surgeons code different procedures at each level in the spine giving the high rates of multiple procedures. Conclusion:. Outcome measures in children's orthopaedics seem problematic owing to the diverse nature of the practice and the confusion resulting from multiple procedures contributing to the outcome in 60% of cases. Either we are treated like physicians who do not have surgical outcomes to report or some goal based measure is adopted. Level of evidence: III