Aim. Our study aimed to analyze 1) the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and infection in diabetic patients with and without Charcot foot (CF), 2) the characteristics of PAD in these 2 groups, 3) the prognosis of patients with CF and PAD and/or infection. Method. We retrospectively reviewed the medical and radiological records of 172 hospitalized patients in our diabetic foot unit between 2010 and 2014. These patients were identified using the ICD-9-CM. The CF group and the diabetic foot (DF) group included 56 and 116 patients, respectively. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0.01. A p <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results. In the CF group, the prevalence of PAD and infection reached 66.1% and 67.9%, respectively. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) were neuroischemic, infected or both in 69.5%, 80% and 57.7% of cases, respectively. No significant difference was found with the DF group. PAD in the CF group affected the infrapopliteal arteries alone more often (59.4% vs 26.7%, p 0.005) and neuroischemic DFUs needed less often revascularization (34.4% vs 78.7%, p <0.001). Endovascular revascularization was feasible in 77.8% of cases in the CF group, without significant difference with the DF group. Independent predictors of PAD in CF were DFUs (OR 24.5, CI 1.8–334.4, p 0.016) and coronary artery disease (OR 17.1, CI 1.7–167.4, p 0.016). Both patients' survival and limb salvage were not affected by PAD, neuroischemic DFUs and infected neuroischemic DFUs in the CF group. Conclusions. In agreement with current literature, our study showed that infection is often associated with DFUs, both in DF and CF. However, our study demonstrated that beside infection, PAD is associated with CF more often than previously thought. As a consequence, DFUs in CF are most often neuroischemic. However, our study did not show worse outcomes in patients with CF and PAD or neuroischemic DFUs. This probably results from a less severe PAD in CF, a high rate of successful revascularization as well as a low rate of deaths and major amputations in our study. In conclusion, clinicians should no longer consider the CF as a purely neuropathic foot, especially in the presence of a DFU. Moreover, PAD in CF should be evaluated systematically before any surgical procedure as recommended in DF

Aim. The aim of this work was to evaluate, via foot and ankle TC scans, the outcomes of the use of a bone substitute (CERAMENT|™G) and the growth of native bone in the treatment of osteomyelitis (OM) of the diabetic foot. Method. In nine patients from July 2014 to December 2016 we used a Calcium Sulphate Hemihydrate + Hydroxyapatite + Gentamicin Sulfate (CSH + HA + GS) compound to fill resected bone voids following surgical intervention in OM diabetic foot cases. Of these nine patients, three were female and six were male and their ages were between 49 and 72 years. Four patients had hindfoot involvement and underwent partial calcanectomy. Two patients presented a rocker-bottom Charcot foot pattern III according to Sanders and Frykberg's classification and were treated with esostectomy of the symptomatic bony prominence of the midfoot. One patient presented OM of the 3°, 4° and 5° metatarsal bones. One patient underwent partial resection of the midfoot and hindfoot with arthrodesis stabilised by an internal-external hybrid fixator. One patient with a Charcot foot pattern IV-V underwent partial talectomy and calcanectomy with arthrodesis stabilised by an internal-external hybrid fixator. In all these patients - after removal of the infected bone - we applied 10 to 20 ml CSH + HA + GS filling the residual spaces with the aim of stabilising the remaining bone fragments. The uniqueness of this product is that it induces native bone growth, while the synthetic bone disappears and antibiotic is released into the surrounding tissues. In March 2018, the above nine patients underwent foot and ankle TC scans to evaluate bone growth. Results. The first four patients showed new bone formation in the calcaneus. Two patients with previous midfoot destruction showed chaotic but stable bone formation. The patient with metatarsal OM showed partial bone healing with residual pseudoarthrosis. Both the two patients who underwent arthrodesis with hybrid fixators showed a plantigrade and stable foot even though a heel wound is still present in one of the patients. All patients except this one are now wearing suitable shoes as post-operative wounds have healed. The patient still with the heel wound is walking with an aircast brace. Conclusion. The TC scans have shown new bone formation sufficient to stabilise the foot and allow ambulation. In particular, very good results come from the filling of the calcaneus, probably due to the anatomy of the bone itself

Introduction. Charcot Arthropathy related foot and ankle deformities are a serious challenge. Surgical treatment of these deformities is now well established. The traditional surgical method of extensive surgical exposure, excision of bone, acute correction and internal fixation is not always appropriate in presence of active ulceration, deep infection and poor bone quality. Minimally invasive osteotomies and gradual correction of deformities with a circular frame are proving helpful in minimizing complications. We present our experience with the use of Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) in 10 patients with recurrent ulceration and deformity. Materials and Methods. Our indication for the treatment with TSF is recurrent or intractable ulceration with or without active bone infection or a history of infection in a deformed foot and/or ankle. There are 2 female and 8 male patients in this cohort. We used a long bone module for ankle and hindfoot deformities (3 patients) and a forefoot 6×6 butt frame (7 patients) for midfoot deformities. An osteotomy through midfoot was performed in all chronic stable midfoot deformity cases and a calcaneal osteotomy and gradual correction through ankle in when hindfoot and ankle deformities co-existed. Results. Our outcome measures are a complete healing of ulcer and infection without recurrence, clinically plantigrade foot and ability to wear regular shoes or diabetic footwear. We achieved this outcome in 9 out of 10 patients. Successful patients remain ulcer free at minimum 7 and maximum 14 years follow up. Complications included eight episodes of pin infection that responded to oral antibiotics only and two pin breakages. Conclusions. Our results confirm that Taylor Spatial Frame treatment is a good alternative to traditional surgery in high-risk complex Charcot neuroarthropathy foot and ankle deformities

Aim. Since July 2013 our group has been using an antibiotic bone substitute, composed of calcium sulphate, hydroxyapatite and gentamicin sulphate (CSH + HA + GS), in the treatment of osteomyelitis (OM) in diabetic foot. The aim of this work was to evaluate the mid-term efficacy of this treatment regime on outcomes. A favourable outcome in diabetic foot includes no recurrence of OM, healed soft tissues and the ability to weight-bear. Method. To date we have used the CSH + HA + GS bone substitute in 24 diabetic patients with OM. In this study we reviewed patients treated from July 2013 to December 2014, in which we used CSH + HA + GS to treat OM of the forefoot, midfoot and hind foot, and evaluated how many patients are able to walk and fully weight-bear at present. We identified 11 pts treated during this time period; 1 with bilateral 1. St. metatarsal-head OM due to plantar ulcers, 5 with midfoot OM secondary to Charcot deformities and ulcers, 5 with hind foot OM due to pressure ulcers or Charcot deformity. We continuously monitored the patients for recurrence of OM, ulcers and soft tissue inflammation in our outpatient department. Results. Of the 11 patients, two died during follow up (both patients had calcaneal ulcers; one died in the 1. st. month and one in the 2. nd. month after treatment, both due to cardiovascular disease). For the remaining nine patients, we had an average of 25 (17–33) months follow-up. One patient did not heal, presenting with a persistent mid-foot lesion in a Charcot foot. Another patient with bilateral forefoot ulcers had a plantar ulcer recurrence under the left 1. st. metatarsal foot, 19 months after bone substitute application and primary healing. This patient is still weight-bearing on the right foot, as are the remaining 6 patients. In 7 patients (1 with bilateral forefoot, 4 with mid-foot and 3 with hind foot OM) no recurrence of OM or ulcers was observed. Conclusions. This study suggests that a CSH + HA + GS bone substitute can be used to treat diabetic foot OM. Our mid-term results show good clinical outcomes in terms of ulcer healing, no recurrence of OM and weight-bearing

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of Ilizarov frame fixation and total contact casting on the complications of Charcot arthropathy. The diabetic charcot foot or ankle is a potentially limb threatening disorder. This progressive disorder is characterised by osteopenia, bone fragmentation and joint subluxation. The risk of significant deformity and osteomyelitis lead to high rates of amputation in these patients. We analysed patients with acute charcot arthropathy attending the Rowley Bristow Unit between 2008 and 2012. We assessed 48 patients with a mean age of 59 years. Mean follow up was 24 months. 12 patients were managed with Ilizarov frame fixation and 36 using total contact casting. The duration of management was determined using serial infrared temperature monitoring to ensure the temperature of the limb normalised before patients were deemed safe to remove their immobilisation. The mean duration of Iliazarov frame fixation was 6.2 months and 5.3 months duration for total contact casting. In the Ilizarov group pin site infections were common and treated with a short course of antibiotics. In total one patient required below knee amputation following Ilizarov frame fixation. No patients suffered with osteomyelitis. We feel that prompt management of acute charcot arthropathy with either total contact casting where appropriate or Ilizarov frame fixation can reduce serious complications of this disorder

Introduction. Hind foot Charcot deformity is a disastrous complication of diabetic neuropathy and can lead to instability, ulceration and major amputation. The treatment of these patients is controversial. Internal stabilization and/or external fixation have demonstrated variable results of limb salvage and some authorities thus advise patients to undergo elective major amputation. However, we report a series of 9 diabetic patients with severe hind foot deformity complicated by ulceration in 5/9, who underwent acute corrective internal fixation with successful correction of deformity, healing of ulceration in 4/5 patients and limb salvage in all cases. Methods. We treated 9 diabetic patients attending a multidisciplinary diabetic/orthopaedic foot clinic with progressive severe Charcot hind foot deformity despite treatment with total contact casting, 5 with predominant varus deformity and 2 with valgus deformity and 2 with unstable ankle joints. Five patients had developed secondary ulceration. All patients underwent corrective hind foot fusion with tibiotalo-calcaneal arthrodesis using a retrograde intra-medullary nail fixation and screws and bone grafting. One patient also with fixed plano-valgus deformity of the foot underwent a corrective mid-foot reconstruction. Results. Patients were followed up closely in the diabetic /orthopaedic multidisciplinary foot clinic and were treated with total contact casting. (Mean follow up time was 15.6 ±6.9months) In all patients the deformity was corrected with successful realignment to achieve a plantigrade foot. Healing of the secondary ulcers was achieved in 4/5casesand limb salvage was achieved in all cases. Three patients underwent further surgical procedure to promote bone fusion. One patient required removal of a significantly displaced fixation screw. In another patient with previously existing heel ulceration, the fixation device was removed due to progressive ulceration. However, by then, the patient had achieved fibrous union and stability of the hind foot. Two patients had postoperative wound infections which that were treated with initially intravenous antibiotic therapy and then negative pressure wound therapy. Conclusion. In conclusion, internal fixation for severe hind foot deformity together with close follow up in a multidisciplinary diabetic/orthopaedic foot clinic can be successful in diabetic patients with advanced Charcot osteoarthropathy and secondary ulceration