Objectives. For patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) who progress to needing total joint arthroplasty it is important to understand the morphology of the femur when planning for and undertaking the surgery, as the surgery is often technically more challenging in patients with DDH on both the femoral and acetabular parts of the procedure. 1. The largest number of male DDH patients with degenerative joint disease previously assessed in a morphological study was 12. 2. In this computed tomography (CT) based morphological study we aimed to assess whether there were any differences in femoral morphology between male and female patients with developmental dysplasia undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a cohort of 49 male patients, matched to 49 female patients. Methods. This was a retrospective study of the pre-operative CT scans of all male patients with DDH who underwent THA at two hospitals in Japan between 2006–2017. Propensity score matching was used to match these patients with female patients in our database who had undergone THA during the same period, resulting in 49 male and 49 female patients being matched on age and Crowe classification. The femoral length, anteversion, neck-shaft angle, offset, canal-calcar ratio, canal flare index, lateral centre-edge angle, alpha angle and pelvic incidence were measured for each patient on their pre-operative CT scans. Results. Significant differences were found in femoral anteversion with a mean male anteversion of 22 ˚ (±14.2), compared to 30˚ (±15.5), in females (p=0.02, Confidence Interval (C.I.) 1.6 to 14.9, Figure 1), offset, with a mean male offset of 31 mm (±6.2), compared to 29 mm (±6.1) in females, (p=0.04, C.I: 0.2 to 4.8), and femoral length with a mean femoral length of 434 mm in males (±22.2), compared to 407 mm in females (±23.9), (p<0.001, C.I: 19.2 to 34.3, Figure 2). No significant differences between male and female patients were found for the other measurements. Discussion. This was the first study of this size assessing femoral morphology in male patients with DDH undergoing THA. Significant differences were found between male and female patients in femoral anteversion, length and offset. This should be taken into account when planning and performing THA in these patients. Based on the findings from this study, a more anteverted femoral neck can be expected at the time of surgery in a female patient with DDH undergoing total hip arthroplasty, compared to a male patient

Introduction. The aim of the study was to whether the bone grafting techniques used affected the long term stability of the acetabular implant. Methods. 41 patients treated with a cemented total hip replacement with pre-operative protrusio or central acetabular defects at surgery were identified. The severity of initial protrusio was determined on plain AP pelvis radiographs by measuring the distance of the medial acetabular wall from the ilio-ischial line. The post-operative and last follow-up x-rays were reviewed, the thickness of the medial wall and the centre-edge angle of the cup was measured. Results. The most common indication was osteoarthritis (34 patients, 83%). The mean age at surgery was 64 years (range = 39-89 years) and 30 patients (73%) were determined to have an incompetent medial wall at surgery. The mean follow-up was 6.5 years (range = 1-22 years). The mean penetration of the medial wall was 6.5mm (range 1-18mm) with a CE angle of 69°. There were significant improvements in the medial wall thickness to a mean of 16mm, with a mean CE angle of 50° (p<0.0001) post-operatively. This was maintained in the long term with no significant difference at final follow-up of either medial wall thickness (p=0.31) or CE angle (p=0.71). The medial wall showed radiographic signs of remodelling at final x-ray in 88% of patients. Conclusion. Bone grafting to the acetabulum is a satisfactory method of treatment for protrusio and central defects in the long term, without significant movement of the acetabular components

Pre-existing hip pathology such as femoroacetabular impingement is believed by some, to have a direct causal relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. The strength of this relationship remains unknown. We investigate the prevalence of abnormal bone morphology in the symptomatic hip on the pre-operative anteroposterior pelvic radiograph of consecutive patients undergoing hip resurfacing. Rotated radiographs were excluded. One hundred patients, of mean age 53.5 years were included (range 33.4–71.4 years, 32% female). We examined the films for evidence of a cam-type impingement lesion (alpha angle >50.5°, a pistol grip, Pitt's pits, a medial hook, an os acetabuli and rim ossification), signs of acetabular retroversion or a pincer-type impingement lesion (crossover sign, posterior wall sign, ischial sign, coxa profunda, protrusio, coxa vara, Tonnis angle < 5°), and hip dysplasia (a Tonnis acetabular angle >14° and a lateral centre-edge angle of Wiberg <20°). Pre-existing radiographic signs of pathology were present in a large proportion of hips with low grade (Tonnis grade 1–2) arthritis. There is a group of patients who presented with more advanced osteoarthritis in which we suspect abnormal bone morphology to be a causative factor but, for example, neck osteophytes obscure the diagnosis of a primary cam lesion. Our findings corroborate those of Harris and Ganz. Impingement is radiographically detectable in a large proportion of patients who present with early arthritis of the hip, and therefore we agree that it is a likely pre-cursor for osteoarthritis. Treatments directed at reducing hip impingement may stifle the progression of osteoarthritis

With the growing number of individuals with asymptomatic cam-type deformities, elevated alpha angles alone do not always explain clinical signs of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Differences in additional anatomical parameters may affect hip joint mechanics, altering the pathomechanical process resulting in symptomatic FAI. The purpose was to examine the association between anatomical hip joint parameters and kinematics and kinetics variables, during level walking. Fifty participants (m = 46, f = 4; age = 34 ± 7 years; BMI = 26 ± 4 kg/m²) underwent CT imaging and were diagnosed as either: symptomatic (15), if they showed a cam deformity and clinical signs; asymptomatic (19), if they showed a cam deformity, but no clinical signs; or control (16), if they showed no cam deformity and no clinical signs. Each participant's CT data was measured for: axial and radial alpha angles, femoral head-neck offset, femoral neck-shaft angle, medial proximal femoral angle, femoral torsion, acetabular version, and centre-edge angle. Participants performed level walking trials, which were recorded using a ten-camera motion capture system (Vicon MX-13, Oxford, UK) and two force plates (Bertec FP4060–08, Columbus, OH, USA). Peak sagittal and frontal hip joint angles, range of motion, and moments were calculated using a custom programming script (MATLAB R2015b, Natick, MA, USA). A one-way, between groups ANOVA examined differences among kinematics and kinetics variables (α = 0.05), using statistics software (IBM SPSS v.23, Armonk, NY, USA); while a stepwise multiple regression analysis examined associations between anatomical parameters and kinematics and kinetics variables. No significant differences in kinematics were observed between groups. The symptomatic group demonstrated lower peak hip abduction moments (0.12 ± 0.08 Nm/kg) than the control group (0.22 ± 0.10 Nm/kg, p = 0.01). Sagittal hip range of motion showed a moderate, negative correlation with radial alpha angle (r = −0.33, p = 0.02), while peak hip abduction moment correlated with femoral neck-shaft angle (r = 0.36, p = 0.009) and negatively with femoral torsion (r = −0.36, p = 0.009). With peak hip abduction moment in the stepwise regression analysis, femoral torsion accounted for a variance of 13.3% (F(1, 48) = 7.38; p = 0.009), while together with femoral neck-shaft angle accounted for a total variance of 20.4% (R² change = 0.07, F(2, 47) = 6.01; p = 0.047). Although elevated radial alpha angles may have limited sagittal range of motion, the cam deformity parameters did not affect joint moments. Femoral neck-shaft angle and femoral torsion were significantly associated with peak hip abduction moment, suggesting that the insertion location of the abductor affects muscle's length and its resultant force vector. A varus neck angle, combined with severe femoral torsion, may ultimately influence muscle moment arms and hip mechanics in individuals with cam FAI

The management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) requiring open reduction between 12 and 18 months of age is controversial. We compare the outcome of medial approach open reduction (MAOR) versus delayed anterior open reduction with Salter osteotomy in such patients. 17 consecutive patients who underwent MAOR aged 12–20 months were reviewed (mean follow-up of 40 months, range 6–74). This group was compared to 15 controls who underwent anterior reduction and Salter osteotomy aged 18–23 months (mean follow-up of 44 months, range 14–134). 13 of the 17 (76%) MAOR patients required subsequent Salter osteotomy at a mean of 22 months post-reduction, with a further 2 patients under follow-up being likely to require one. Acetabular index improved from 42 (32–50, SD − 5.5) to 16 (7–24, SD − 4.5) in the MOAR group after Salter osteotomy compared to an improvement of 40 (30–53, SD − 6) to 13 (4–24, SD − 5) in the control group (p>0.05). Acetabular index at last follow-up was within normal limits in 15 of 17 (88%) MAOR patients. All patients in the control group had acetabular indices (or centre-edge angles of Wiberg) within the normal range. There was 1 subluxation (7%) in the control group. There were 6 cases (33%) of post-operative avascular necrosis (5 Kalamchi & MacEwen Grade I, 1 Grade 2) in the MAOR group and 6 (40%) in the control group (5 Grade 1, 1 Grade 4). All of the MAOR patients had good or excellent clinical results according to McKay's criteria, compared to 14 out of 15 (93%) controls. This study suggests that MAOR or delayed open reduction and Salter osteotomy is a reasonable treatment for children with DDH presenting between the ages of 12 and 18 months. However, the majority of MAORs are likely to require a subsequent Salter osteotomy

Background. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective treatment method for early or mild osteoarthritis caused by developmental dysplasia of the hip. Since the procedure is performed from late eighties of the past century it is still a very demanding procedure performed only by high skilled surgeons in high volume orthopaedic centres. The idea was to develop a custom-made surgical tool to improve the accuracy of the two osteotomies of the iliac bone and help us to avoid inadvertent intraarticular osteotomy of the acetabulum. Methods. Firstly CT scans of pelvises of two cadavers were performed. The DICOM format files were up-loaded into EBS software (Ekliptik d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia), application for preoperative planning, constructing and designing different templates, where the three-dimensional (3D) model of each pelvis was created. On the virtual pelvis models the PAO lines on each of four acetabuls were placed and virtual PAOs were performed [Fig. 1]. For the execution of the two iliac bone osteotomies the osteotome or saw guiding jigs were virtually created and exported in STL format in ProJet 3500 HDPlus printer which created custom made jigs made from VisiJet Crystal biocompatible plastic material (3D systems, Rock Hill, South Carolina, USA) for each of the four acetabula. The next step was the surgery on aforementioned cadavers. Extended Smith-Petrson approach was performed on each of four cadaveric hips and Bernese PAOs were performed using custom-made jigs. After performing the acetabular correction the cadavers were carefully dissected to study any possible posterior column damage or damage of the acetabular wall. None of them were damaged and the osteotomies were performed according to the virtual plan. Next step was the real procedure on 47-years old female patient with bilateral acetabular dysplasia. The procedure was executed on right side using the extended Smith-Peterson approach. Preoperatively native X-ray of both hips and the CT scan of pelvis were performed. According the CT scan (DICOM format) the virtual 3D model of the pelvis was created and virtual osteotomy lines were decided and production of the appropriate jig was manufactured in the same manner as for the cadavers [Fig. 2]. Preoperative and postoperative centre-edge (CE) angles were measured. Results. Preoperatively the patient had a Tönnis grade I osteoarthritis of the right hip. The preoperative CE angle was 19.1° and the postoperative CE angle is 36.7° [Fig. 3] which indicates good improvement in coverage of the femoral head. Patient had an uneventful postoperative course, with no neuro-vascular damage. The intraoperative blood loss was 250 ml and the patient was discharged from hospital on seventh postoperative day, walking with crutches loading 15 kg. Conclusion. Custom-made jig for iliac bone osteotomy in PAO procedures is a helpful tool, which improves accuracy of the osteotomy lines, safety of the patient and considerably reduces surgical time. We are planning to create also jigs for screw placement and the device to verify intraoperatively the level of PAO correction