During total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a tourniquet is often used intraoperatively. There are proposed benefits of tourniquet use including shorter duration of surgery, improved surgical field visualization and increased cement penetration which may improve implant longevity. However, there are also cited side effects that include increased post-operative pain, slowed recovery, skin bruising, neurovascular injury and quadriceps weakness. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated no differences in implant longevity, however they are limited by short follow-up and small sample sizes. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rates of revision surgery among patients undergoing cemented TKA with or without an intraoperative tourniquet and to understand the causes and risk factors for failure.

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high-volume arthroplasty centre from January 1999 to December 2010. Patients who underwent surgery without the use of a tourniquet and those who had a tourniquet inflated for the entirety of the case were included. The causes and timing of revision surgery were recorded and cross referenced with the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database to reduce the loss to follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed with the use of Kaplan-Meier curves to determine overall survival rates at final follow-up. A Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to evaluate independent predictors of revision surgery.

Data from 3939 cases of primary cemented TKA were available for analysis. There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used for the duration of the surgery and 1663 (42%) cases in which a tourniquet was not utilized. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years (range 0 days - 22.8 years) when censored by death or revision surgery. There were 150 recorded revisions in the entire cohort, with periprosthetic joint infection (n=50) and aseptic loosening (n=41) being the most common causes for revision. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the tourniquetless group was 93.8% at final follow-up while the cumulative survival at final follow-up for the tourniquet group was 96.9% at final follow-up. Tourniquetless surgery was an independent predictor for all-cause revision with an HR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.1, 2.1, p=0.011). Younger age and male sex were also independent factors for all cause revision.

The results of the current study demonstrate higher all-cause revision rates with tourniquetless surgery in a large cohort of patients undergoing primary cemented TKA. The available literature consists of short-term trials and registry data, which have inherent limitations. Potential causes for increased revision rates in the tourniquetless group include reduced cement penetration, increased intraoperative blood loss and longer surgical. The results of the current study should be taken into consideration, alongside the known risks and benefits of tourniquet use, when considering intraoperative tourniquet use in cemented TKA.

Introduction

Current clinical practice in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is largely based on metal on polyethylene bearing couples. A potential adverse effect of the stiff metal femoral component is stress shielding, leading to loss of bone stock, periprosthetic bone fractures and eventually aseptic loosening of the component. The use of a polymer femoral component may address this problem. However, a more flexible material may also have consequences for the fixation of the femoral component. Concerns are raised about its expected potential to introduce local stress peaks on the interface.

The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of using a polyether-etherketone (PEEK-Optima®) femoral component on the cement-implant interface. We analyzed the interface stress distribution occurring during normal gait, and compared this to results of a standard CoCr component.

There is no question that at some point many TKAs will be cementless-the question is when. The advantages of cementless TKA include a shorter operative time, no need for a tourniquet, more suitability for MIS, no concern for cement extrusion, and the history of THA. The concerns for cementless TKA include the history to date with cementless TKA (tibia and metal-backed patella), variable bony substrate, surgical cut precision, cost, revision concerns, and the patella (for patella component resurfacers). Cemented total knee arthroplasty remains the gold standard and has proven to provide durable results in most patients. The early experience with cementless tibial fixation was problematic due to tibial micromotion leading to pain and loosening. Screw fixed tibial components had additional problems as portals for polyethylene debris leading to tibial osteolysis. Moreover, metal-backed patellar components were associated with a high failure rate and most surgeons began to cement all three components. Renewed interest in cementless tibial fixation is driven in part by newer materials felt to be more suitable for ingrowth and by the perceived benefit of minimally invasive surgery. One of the concerns in limited exposure total knee arthroplasty is the difficulty in preventing the extravasation of cement posteriorly. If there is evidence-based data that quad sparing non-patella everting and limited incision length facilitates rehabilitation and does not jeopardise outcome, cementless tibial fixation will be a more attractive option in some patients. An additional concern is that the tibial surface is frequently quite variable in terms of the strength of the cancellous bone. Bone cement stabilises those differences and provides a homogeneous platform for load bearing through the tibial component

Objective. A study was performed in a tertiary health care centre to evaluate outcomes of arthroplasty in Indian Population. Various factors which may affect knee flexion after surgery were also evaluated. Methods. 82 patients with 60 unilateral & 22 bilateral total knee arthroplasties were included in the study. Assessment was done as per knee society knee score and function score. A simple functional questionaire including ability to squat, ability to sit cross leg, kneel while prayers, ability to use Indian toilet was filled and patients were rated accordingly as fair, good and excellent. Results. Average improvement in knee score was from 22.88 to 91.23 and function score from 16.26 to 73.59. Average range of motion improved from 80.4 to 125 degrees. Preoperative range of motion predicted final range of motion. There was significant improvement in flexion contracture (Mean 15.3 to 1.19). There was trend of increase in range of motion with time with no further gain reported after 1 year. Age, Sex, diagnosis, BMI, tibio- femoral angle did not of affect the final outcome. A Comparison was made between total condylar prosthesis & posterior stabilized prosthesis with no significant differences of outcomes between the two. 65% were rated excellent, 30% rated good & 5% fair as per functional questionaire given to the patients. Conclusion. Cemented total knee Arthroplasty provides pain relief, correction of deformity & restoration of function in inflammatory and degenerative arthritis. There is need to develop new functional scoring system for Indian population as knee society function score does not correspond to routine functional milestones of daily living achieved after total knee arthroplasty in Indian population

INTRODUCTION. Cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely accepted treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. During this procedure, the surgeon targets proper alignment of the leg and balanced flexion/extension gaps. However, the cement layer may impact the placement of the component, leading to changes in the mechanical alignment and gap size. The goal of the study was to assess the impact of cement layer on the tibial mechanical alignment and joint gap during cemented TKA. MATERIAL. Computer-assisted TKAs (ExactechGPS®, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR) were performed by two fellowship trained orthorpaedic surgeons on five fresh-frozen non-arthritic pelvis-to-ankle cadaver legs. All the surgeries used a cemented cruciate retaining system (Optetrak Logic CR, Exactech, Gainesville, FL). After the bony resection, the proximal tibial resection plane was acquired by manually pressing an instrumented checker onto the resected tibial surface (resection plane). Once the prosthesis was implanted through standard cementing techniques, the top surface of the implanted tibial component was probed and recorded using an instrumented probe. A best fit plane was then calculated from the probed points and offset by the thickness of the prosthesis, representing the bottom plane of the component (component plane). The deviation of component alignment caused by the cement layer was calculated as the coronal and sagittal projection of the three-dimensional angle between the resection plane and the component plane. The deviation of the component height, reflecting a change in the joint gap, was assessed as the distance between the two planes calculated at the lowest points on the medial and lateral compartments of the proximal tibial surface. Statistical significance was defined as p≤0.05. RESULTS. The differences in alignment and component height between the tibial component placement and the ideal placement based on the bony resection are presented in Table 1. The magnitude of deviation in alignment was 1.2±0.9° for varus/valgus and 1.7±0.7° for posterior slope, with a tendency towards valgus (−0.2±1.6°) and reduced posterior slope (0.6±1.9°). The lateral compartment (2.4±0.9mm) had a generally higher increase in the height of the component compared to the medial compartment (1.0±0.9mm), the difference was close to being statistically significant (p=0.055). DISCUSSION. The finding of this study demonstrated that standard cement fixation during TKA may potentially influence the alignment and position of the tibial component. The formed cement layer generally results in elevated height, slightly more varus tibial alignment (overall limb valgus alignment) and less posterior slope in the implanted component. The results on the alignment are comparable to a previous study by Catani et al. [1]. More than 2°/2mm of deviation was found in the sagittal alignment (2 out of 5 knees), and medial (1 out of 5 knees) and lateral (3 out of 5 knees) component height, which may clinically impact the joint gap [2]. The varus/valgus alignment deviation found was clinically acceptable (≤3°). However when combined with other surgical variables, the accumulated impact on the alignment may warrant more investigation