The Olympia femoral stem is a stainless steel, anatomically shaped, polished and three-dimensionally tapered implant designed for use in cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term survivorship, radiographic outcome, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the Olympia stem.

Between May 2003 and December 2005, 239 patients (264 THAs) underwent a THA with an Olympia stem in our institution. PROMs were assessed using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) score and patient satisfaction at mean 10-years following THA. Patient records and radiographs were then reviewed at a mean of 16.5 years (SD 0.7, 15.3 to 17.8) following THA to identify occurrence of complications or revision surgery for any cause.

Mean patient age at surgery was 68.0 years (SD 10.9, 31–93 years). There were 156 women (65%, 176 THAs). Osteoarthritis was the indication for THA in 204 patients (85%). Stem survivorship at 10 years was 99.2% (95 % confidence interval [CI], 97.9%-100%) and at 15 years was 97.5% (94.6%–100%). The 15-year stem survival for aseptic loosening was 100%. Only one occurrence of peri-prosthetic fracture was identified, with no episodes of dislocation found. At a mean of 10 (SD 0.8, 8.7 –11.3) years follow-up, mean OHS was 39 (SD 10.3, range 7 – 48) and 94% of patients reported being very satisfied or satisfied.

The Olympia stem demonstrated excellent 10-year PROMs, very high rates of stem survivorship and negligible peri-prosthetic fracture and dislocation rate at final follow-up beyond 15 years.

INTRODUCTION. Management of neglected residually displaced acetabular fractures is a big challenge. ORIF is often doomed to failure so a primary total hip replacement is usually kept in mind as a method of choice. However THR is a technically difficult and results are quiet unpredictable. OBJECTIVE. To present our experience with THR in maltreated grossly displaced acetabular fractures and to discuss operative technique and prognostic factors in that complicated surgery. MATERIAL. THR was applied in 14 patients (11 males and 3 females, mean age 51 years) with at least three-months old and significantly displaced acetabular fractures. In 12 cases preceding treatment was conservative, and in 2 it was operative. Fracture nonunion was recognized in 5 cases, old hip dislocation in 4 and protusion in 3. Large interfragmentary gaps and local bone defect were detected in almost all cases. METHOD. THR was performed 3–31 months after injury. Extensile iliofemoral or Y-shaped approach with trochanteric osteothomy was used in most cases. Depending of particular situation a variety of techniques were applied to provide adequate bone stock for the cup, such as an approximate ORIF, periacetabular osteotomy, structural or morcelised bone grafting. Reinforcement ring was used in 6 cases. The cup fixation was cemented in 12 procedures and uncemented in 2. Cemented stem was introduced in 10 cases and uncemented in 4. Preoperative selective embolisation of superior gluteal artery was carried out in 1 patient. RESULTS. The operative duration was 3–7 hours and blood loss was 850–2200 ml. The only intraoperative accidentwas jatrogenic lesion of superior gluteal artery required embolisation. The follow up was a 16–94 months. Average postoperative Harris Hip Score was 78, compared with 54 before surgery (P<0.01). There was 2 aceptic and 1 septic loosenings with subsequent revisions (21.4%). In 2 cases sight asymptomatic migration of the cap was noted. DISCUSSION. The most difficult but most important stage of operation is a creating of sufficiently stable bone stock for the acetabular cap, impeded by by fragment displacement, nonunion or prolonged hip dislocation. If nonuion the achievement of bone healing is essential. Any instability should be overcomed by stable osteosynthesis. The gaps should be filled by ORIF or bone grafting. We consider cemented fixation possibly with reinforcement ring as a most secure way to provide strong cup anchorage. Uncemented pess-fit cup may be used in cases with lesser initial displacement. In spite of all late results are considerable worse than in conventional hip replacement. CONCLUSION. THR after neglected acetabular fractures is a challenging and demanding procedure. Successful outcome may be only expected if a solid bone stock is made using various surgical techniques

Aims

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) following hip arthroplasty are complex injuries. This study evaluates patient demographic characteristics, management, outcomes, and risk factors associated with PPF subtypes over a decade.

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe variation in hip fracture treatment in Norway expressed as adherence to international and national evidence-based treatment guidelines, to study factors influencing deviation from guidelines, and to analyze consequences of non-adherence.

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiological outcomes in patients with a displaced fracture of the hip who were treated with a cemented or a cementless femoral stem.

National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines state that cemented stems with an Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) rating of > 3B should be used for hemiarthroplasty when treating an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. These recommendations are based on studies in which most, if not all stems, did not hold such a rating.

This case-control study compared the outcome of hemiarthroplasty using a cemented (Exeter) or uncemented (Corail) femoral stem. These are the two prostheses most commonly used in hip arthroplasty in the UK.

Data were obtained from two centres; most patients had undergone hemiarthroplasty using a cemented Exeter stem (n = 292/412). Patients were matched for all factors that have been shown to influence mortality after an intracapsular fracture of the neck of the femur. Outcome measures included: complications, re-operations and mortality rates at two, seven, 30 and 365 days post-operatively. Comparable outcomes for the two stems were seen.

There were more intra-operative complications in the uncemented group (13% vs 0%), but the cemented group had a greater mortality in the early post-operative period (n = 6). There was no overall difference in the rate of re-operation (5%) or death (365 days: 26%) between the two groups at any time post-operatively.

This study therefore supports the use of both cemented and uncemented stems of proven design, with an ODEP rating of 10A, in patients with an intracapsular fracture of the neck of the femur.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:94–9.

Aims

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are devastating complications that are associated with functional limitations and increased overall mortality. Although cementless implants have been associated with an increased risk of PFF, the precise contribution of implant geometry and design on the risk of both intra-operative and post-operative PFF remains poorly investigated. A systematic review was performed to aggregate all of the PFF literature with specific attention to the femoral implant used.