Aims. The aim of this study was to determine whether early surgical treatment results in better neurological recovery 12 months after injury than late surgical treatment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Methods. Patients with tSCI requiring surgical spinal decompression presenting to 17 centres in Europe were recruited. Depending on the timing of decompression, patients were divided into early (≤ 12 hours after injury) and late (> 12 hours and < 14 days after injury) groups. The American Spinal Injury Association neurological (ASIA) examination was performed at baseline (after injury but before decompression) and at 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change in Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS) from baseline to 12 months. Results. The final analyses comprised 159 patients in the early and 135 in the late group. Patients in the early group had significantly more severe neurological impairment before surgical treatment. For unadjusted complete-case analysis, mean change in LEMS was 15.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.1 to 19.0) in the early and 11.3 (95% CI 8.3 to 14.3) in the late group, with a mean between-group difference of 4.3 (95% CI -0.3 to 8.8). Using multiply imputed data adjusting for baseline LEMS, baseline ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), and propensity score, the mean between-group difference in the change in LEMS decreased to 2.2 (95% CI -1.5 to 5.9). Conclusion. Compared to late surgical decompression, early surgical decompression following acute tSCI did not result in statistically significant or clinically meaningful neurological improvements 12 months after injury. These results, however, do not impact the well-established need for acute, non-surgical tSCI management. This is the first study to highlight that a combination of baseline imbalances, ceiling effects, and loss to follow-up rates may yield an overestimate of the effect of early surgical decompression in unadjusted analyses, which underpins the importance of adjusted statistical analyses in acute tSCI research. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(4):400–411

The Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) is a valid and reliable tool, designed to measure physical deformity as perceived by patients with idiopathic scoliosis. It is unclear whether the type of treatment in patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis affects the patients' perception of cosmesis gain. We studied 40 patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis treated with posterior spinal fusion with (20) and without thoracoplasty (20) aiming to assess correlation of improvement in radiological parameters to subjective cosmesis gain. Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis treated with posterior spinal fusion with thoracoplasty (20) and without thoracoplasty (20) filled out Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) forms with their perception of deformity before and after operation at the clinic follow-up. The WRVAS forms include seven aspects of the deformity i.e. spinal deformity, rib prominence, lumbar prominence, thoracic deformity, trunk imbalance, shoulder asymmetry and scapular asymmetry. Each aspect is shown with five figures of increasing severity of the deformity and scored from minimum (1) to maximum (5). Results are presented as the sum of the seven questions. The lowest possible score for the total is 7, while the highest possible total score is 35. The curve magnitude was divided into 5 subgroups as 30 and under, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60 and 70 and over. Floor and ceiling effects were analysed as percentage of cases with minimum and maximum scores. Our study confirmed that following posterior scoliosis surgery with and without thoracoplasty, there was significant improvement in perceived appearance. Overall spinal deformity and thoracic deformity correction were comparable in two groups. However, improvement in rib hump prominence, flank prominence, restoration of truncal, shoulder and scapular symmetry were much better rated by the patients with PSF and thoracoplasty group using Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale