Introduction. We studied free (= local powder) tobramycin and doxycycline, and controlled release (= local lipid bilayer) doxycycline formulations in a rat model representing a generic joint infection. We . hypothesized. that evidence of infection (quantitative colony forming units (CFU), qualitative SEM, histopathology) (1a) would be reduced with local vs. systemic antibiotic, (1b) any antibiotic would be superior to control (2) there would be a difference among antibiotics, and (3) antibiotic would not be detectable in serum at 4-week euthanasia. Methods. Study groups. included infected and non-infected (1) control, (2) systemic ceftriaxone (daily), (3) local tobramycin, (4) local doxycycline and (5) controlled release doxycycline. With IACUC approval, (10 rats/group; power =0.8), 50-μl, 10×4 CFU Staphylococcus aureus, slowly injecting into distal femoral medullary canal, reliably created joint infection. Antibiotic formulation was introduced locally into cavity and joint, pin was inserted, and tissues closed. After 4-weeks, serum, pin, bone and synovium were obtained. CFU/ml of bone and synovium were quantified using macrotiter method. SEM imaged biofilm on surface of pin, histopathology identified tissue response, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry measured plasma antibiotic. Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA compared groups. Results. Groups receiving antibiotic reported lower CFU/ml in synovium compared with control (no treatment) group (1b), but there was no difference between systemic, free or controlled antibiotics (1a). Different results with different antibiotics were shown, with free tobramycin reducing CFU/ml to a greater extent than free doxycycline in the synovium (2) (p<0.05). Antibiotic in plasma was nondetectable all groups (3). SEM revealed some biofilm on pin in all groups. . Limitations. include inoculation method, single observation period, administration of only one bacterial and antibiotic dose, and not including pairing local and systemic antibiotic. Conclusion. There was no difference in infection reduction nor detectable antibiotic in serum for any antibiotic formulation, but CFU's in synovium differed based on antibiotic formulation. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Pelvic discontinuity with associated bone loss is a complex challenge in acetabular revision surgery. Reconstruction using ilio-ischial cages combined with trabecular metal acetabular components and morsellised bone (the component-cage technique) is a relatively new method of treatment.

We reviewed a consecutive series of 26 cases of acetabular revision reconstructions in 24 patients with pelvic discontinuity who had been treated by the component-cage technique. The mean follow-up was 44.6 months (24 to 68). Failure was defined as migration of a component of > 5 mm.

In 23 hips (88.5%) there was no clinical or radiological evidence of loosening at the last follow-up. The mean Harris hip score improved significantly from 46.6 points (29.5 to 68.5) to 76.6 points (55.5 to 92.0) at two years (p < 0.001). In three hips (11.5%) the construct had migrated at one year after operation. The complications included two dislocations, one infection and one partial palsy of the peroneal nerve.

Our findings indicate that treatment of pelvic discontinuity using the component-cage construct is a reliable option.

Revision arthroplasty after infection can often be complicated by both extensive bone loss and a relatively high rate of re-infection. Using allograft to address the bone loss in such patients is controversial because of the perceived risk of bacterial infection from the use of avascular graft material. We describe 12 two-stage revisions for infection in which segmental allografts were loaded with antibiotics using iontophoresis, a technique using an electrical potential to drive ionised antibiotics into cortical bone.

Iontophoresis produced high levels of antibiotic in the allograft, which eluted into the surrounding tissues. We postulate that this offers protection from infection in the high-risk peri-operative period. None of the 12 patients who had two-stage revision with iontophoresed allografts had further infection after a mean period of 47 months (14 to 78).

We compared the safety and outcome of one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty with those of a two-stage procedure during different admissions in a prospective, randomised controlled trial in an Asian population. Of 168 patients included in the study, 83 had a single- and 85 a two-stage procedure. Most of the patients (59.9%) suffered from inflammatory arthritis.

The intra-operative complications, early systemic complications, the operating time, positioning of the components, the functional score, restoration of limb length and survival rates at 96 months were similar in the two groups. The total estimated blood loss was significantly lower in patients undergoing a one-stage procedure than in patients who had a two-stage procedure, but the transfusion requirements were significantly higher in the former group (p = 0.001). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the one-stage group, 7.25 days (sd 1.30; 5 to 20) compared with 10 days (sd 1.65; 8 to 24) in the two-stage group (p = 0.023). We believe that a one-stage procedure is safe and appropriate in our population.