Background. Recent articles in the medical press highlight the potential dangers of Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES). CES has the highest rates of litigation due to its long-term neurological impairment, which can lead to devastating outcome on patients. The aim of this study was to assess health care professionals knowledge with regards to the urinary symptoms of CES and the timeframe in which treatment should be offered. Objectives. To assess health care professionals knowledge with regards to urinary symptoms of CES and when treatment should be offered. Design. A 4-part questionnaire established profession and number of cases seen per week. The participant was asked to rank 15 urinary symptoms, 7 of these symptoms were not related to CES. The participants were asked the ideal time to surgical intervention for Complete CES and Incomplete CES. Setting. Primary and Secondary Care. Participants. 60 questionnaires were complete. Participants had to successfully complete the first three parts of the questionnaire (n = 44). Any who failed to complete section four were excluded from analysis from that part only (n = 41). Interventions. Nil. Outcome measures. As design. Results. A total of 44 questionnaires were analysed. Both doctors and physiotherapists ranked the CES symptoms on average significantly higher than then the non-CES symptoms. The physiotherapists rated the CES symptoms significantly higher than the doctors (P = 0.05) and on average rated the non-CES symptoms significantly lower than doctors (P < 0.05). 87.8% thought that complete CES should be treated < 24 hours and 9.76% thought that complete CES should be treated from 24-48 hours. 46.34% thought that CESI should be treated < 24 hours and 43.9% thought that CESI should be treated from 24-48 hours. Conclusion. These results demonstrate that physiotherapists are better than Doctors at identifying the urinary symptoms in CES. The majority of health care professional who took part in this study stated that they would offer surgical intervention for both Complete and Incomplete CES within 24 hours. The gap in knowledge highlights the need for education to all medical professionals in the symptoms of CES and also the timing of treatment

Background. Back pain is a common orthopaedic problem which results in hospital admissions in severe cases. The aim of our study was to identify the reasons for back pain admissions and role of further investigations in the treatment of severe back pain. Methods. We collected data prospectively for all admissions between January and March 2011. Demographic details were recorded along with the reasons for admissions, time of admission, further investigations and treatment offered. Results. Total admissions were 850 and 58 (6.8%) had severe back pain.13 patients (22%) had fractures (Group-A); 16 patients (27%) did not require MRI scan (Group-B); 27 patients (50%) needed MRI scan of the lumbosacral spine (Group-C). The mean age of Group-A was 67 years (15–93). 3 were male and 10 females. 10 patients had lumbar and 3 had thoracic spine fractures. The mean age of Group-B was 59 years (32–87). 8 were male and 8 females. The mean age of Group-C was 47 years (23–79). 9 were male and 18 females. The mean hospital stay for Group-C was 5days (0–29). 16 patients (59%) were referred by GP, 5(18%) by emergency department and 3(11%) by physiotherapist. 9(43%) were admitted for pain control, 8(38%) with suspected Cauda Equina syndrome and 2(9%) for further investigations. 20 patients (83%) were admitted during the day, 3(12%) in the evening and 1(4%) during the night. No patient had Cauda equina syndrome on clinical and radiological examination. 12 patients(44%) had nerve root compression on the MRI scan and 7(58%) were offered surgery. Conclusions. Patients were older in group-A with a mean age of 67 years. 27% did not require MRI scan. 67% females admitted with back pain required an MRI scan. No patient had Cauda Equina Syndrome. 55% patients had no nerve root compression. MRI scan was performed to reassure the patients and clinicians with negative results in the presence of severe back pain and unclear neurological signs. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. None

Spinal nerve roots often sustain compression injuries. We used a Wistar rat model of the cauda equina syndrome to investigate such injuries. Rapid transient compression of the cauda equina was produced using a balloon catheter. The results were assessed by daily neurological examination and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recording before surgery and ten weeks after decompression. Compression of the spinal nerves induced changes in the SEP which persisted for up to ten weeks after decompression, but it had no effect on the final neurological outcome. Our study shows the importance of early surgical decompression for cauda equina syndrome

Introduction. Cauda equina syndrome represents the constellation of symptoms and signs resulting from compression of lumbosacral nerve routes. Combined with subjective neurological findings, a reduction in anal tone is an important sign deeming further imaging necessary. Our main objective was to investigate the validity of DRE for assessment of anal tone. Method. 75 doctors completed a questionnaire documenting their grade, speciality and experience in performing DRE. A model anus, using a pressure transducer surrounding an artificial canal, was assembled and calibrated. Participants performed 4 DREs on the model and predicted tone as ‘reduced’ or ‘normal’ (35 and 60 mmHg respectively), followed by a ‘squeeze’ test. 30 healthcare assistants (HCAs) with no training in DRE partook as a control group. Results. In each attempt 60%, 61%, 63% and 72% of doctors correctly identified the anal tone respectively (average accuracy 64%). HCAs had an identical average accuracy of 64%. 100% of participants correctly felt the squeeze test. For doctors no correlation was found between confidence in assessing anal tone using DRE and a correct result. 71% had received previous training in DRE with 64% of these taught how to assess anal tone. Conclusion. The results demonstrate that accuracy in assessing anal tone using DRE is limited with overall correctness of 64%. Poor correlation exists between perceived level of skill and study result. Doctors were not significantly more able than HCAs to detect correct tone. Therefore, DRE for the assessment of anal tone is not a wholly accurate tool. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained. This work was presented at BritSpine