Introduction. Despite the rising popularity of 1st carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthrodesis as one of the surgical options for basilar thumb arthritis, the available literature on this is poor. This study aims to investigate post-operative pinch and grip strength following 1st CMCJ arthrodesis, at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Complication rates, range of motion and patient reported scores were also evaluated. Methods. A retrospective cohort (2012–2020) was used, which included patients who had arthrodesis performed by the Hands surgeons at Counties Manukau DHB. In a 15 minute visit, we took the measurements using our standard dynamometer and pinch gauge, and collected three questionnaires [QuickDASH, PRWHE, PEM]. For analysis, we compared our results to the preoperative measures, contralateral hand, and to a previous study on a similar cohort looking at thumb strength following trapeziectomy. Results. 42 arthrodesis were performed, and 24 were available for follow-up. The average follow-up time was 77 months and the average age was 51 years old. Overall, we found a statistically significant improvement in thumb strength following surgery. Mean preoperative grip strength was 21.4kg and 32.5kg postoperatively (= +11kg). Preoperative pinch strength was 5.5kg and 7kg postoperatively (= +1.5kg). These results were significantly higher compared to the trapeziectomy cohort. We also found an improvement in 1st CMCJ ROM post-operatively. 7 complications were reported (29.1%). 4 were metalware-related and 3 were non-union. QuickDASH score significantly improved from a median of 42.95 to 12.5 while PRWHE from 67.5 to 14.5. Overall patient satisfaction was 87.4%. Conclusion. 1st CMCJ arthrodesis leads to an improvement in thumb function, pain and range of movement and results in high patient satisfaction, and therefore should be recommended for younger patients who need a pain-free and strong thumb

Introduction. There are conflicting reports about the efficacy of injection to the thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) for osteoarthritis (OA). The accuracy of joint injection without radiological control is unclear. We investigated the accuracy of blind injection and recorded their immediate and short term efficacy. Materials/Methods. We injected 25 consecutive patients between March 2010-January 2011. The CMCJ was palpated, manually distracted and a 23 gauze needle introduced blindly. Image intensifier was then used to visualize and redirect needle if necessary. Radio-opaque dye was injected to confirm intra-articular placement. We recorded patient demographics, number of attempts required for correct needle placement, pre and 10 minutes post-injection visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and Nelson Score (NS)before and six weeks after injection. NS is a validated thumb CMCJ specific patient administered questionnaire. Results. Mean age was 60 (range 46–90). M:F ratio was 23:2. CMC J OA ranged from grade 2–4.1. st. attempt was successful in 6 cases. Mean attempts required for accurate injection was 3 (range 0–4). Mean pain pre- injection VAS was 7 (range 4–10), 10 minutes following injection 0.5 (range 0–4) and at 6 weeks 5 (range 3–10). Mean pre-operative NS was 29.6 (range 14–65) and at 6 weeks 32.4 (range 14–55). The difference was not statistically significant (paired t test, p=0.24). Conclusion. Our results suggest that blind injection of thumb CMCJ may not be accurate. Accuracy can be improved by X-ray guided injection. The procedure afforded excellent immediate pain relief but was not effective over six weeks follow up

Introduction. The first carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is the second most common joint of the hand affected by degenerative osteoarthritis (OA). 1. Laxity of ligamentous stabilizers that attach the first metacarpal bone (MC1) and the trapezium bone (TZ), notably the volar anterior oblique ligament (AOL), has been associated with cartilage wear, joint space narrowing, osteophyte formation, and dorsal-radial CMC subluxation. 2. In addition, the proximal-volar end of the MC1 has a bony prominence known as the palmar lip (PL) that adds conformity to this double-saddle joint, and is thought to be a supplemental dorsal stabilizer. Currently, no study has looked at the changes to the 3D shape and relative positions of these structures with OA. Methods. CT scans of patients with clinically diagnosed CMC OA (n=11, mean age 73 [60–97], 8 females) and CT scans of ‘normal’ patients with no documented history of CMC OA (n=11, mean age 37 [20–51], 6 females) were obtained with the hand in a prone position. 3D reconstructions of the MC1 and TZ bones were created, and each assigned a coordinate system. 3. The long axis of the MC1 and the proximal-distal axis of the TZ were established, and the location where they intersected the CMC articular surface was defined as their articular center points, X and O, respectively (Figure 1). Using the TZ as a fixed reference, we calculated the relative position of X in the dorsal-ventral and radial-ulnar directions. A two sample t-test was performed to compare the normal and OA groups. In addition, the distal position of the PL relative to X was recorded. Results. The dorsal position of the MC1 relative to the TZ was significantly greater (p=0.002) in the OA group compared with the normal group, with mean dorsal positions of 7.1 and 3.2mm, respectively (Figure 2). The distal position of the PL relative to X was also significantly greater (p=0.001) in the OA group when compared with the normal group, with mean positions of 5.8 and 1.9mm, respectively (Figure 3). Discussion. Dorsal migration of the MC1 in the OA group would suggest a compromised AOL, known to be elongated or absent intraoperatively. Without a sufficient AOL, the PL was positioned more distally in the OA group, as the load on the PL during extension activities could possibly exceed cartilage strength resulting in subchondral bone remodeling and further joint degeneration. We did not observe radial migration of the MC1 bone possibly due to the presence of bony osteophytes that can reduce abduction-adduction function in OA patients. 4. The relationship discovered between OA and changes to bone morphology and relative bone positions of the CMC joint may provide further insight into the natural progression of this disease

Background

The current treatment options available for Trapezio-metacarpal arthritis are injection, splint and ultimately surgery. The injections are predominantly done by General practitioners and no data is available to specialist.

Thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthritis is a common and debilitating condition. The mainstay of surgical management is Trapeziectomy. Concerns about possible functional implications of collapse of the metacarpal into the arthroplasty space as well as the potential for scaphometacarpal led to the development of techniques to try and prevent this. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there were any significant differences in the long-term outcomes of patients who participated in a randomized trial of trapeziectomy alone compared with trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Sixty-five patients participated in our original trial, the 1 year findings of which were published in 2007. These patients were invited for a follow-up visit at a mean of 17 years (range 15–20) postoperatively. Twenty-eight patients attended, who had 34 operations, 14 trapeziectomy alone and 20 with LRTI. Patients were asked to complete a visual analogue scale (VAS) for satisfaction with the outcome of their procedure, rated on a scale from 0 (most dissatisfied) to 100 (most satisfied). They also completed the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH) at their appointment. They underwent a functional assessment with a hand therapist and had a radiograph of the thumb. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of satisfaction with surgery or functional outcomes, with most measurements showing minimal or no differences in means between the two groups. There was no difference in the space between the metacarpal and scaphoid on radiograph. Radial abduction was the only parameter that was significantly greater in the patients with simple trapeziectomy (median 79°) compared with trapeziectomy with LRTI (median 71°) (p = 0.04). Even at 17 years there is no significant benefit of LRTI over trapeziectomy alone for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis

The comparison between surgical outcomes of trapeziectomy versus trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction (LRTI) is well documented in the literature. We could not find any literature comparing these two procedures from a ‘patient-based outcome scoring’ perspective. The Patient Outcomes Of Surgery (POS) hand/arm questionnaire was used in order to assess the outcomes of 33 patients (23 Trapeziectomy and 10 LRTI). All surgery was carried out by the same hand surgeon. A telephone questionnaire was performed on each patient. The mean time post surgery was 15 months (range 1 to 27) and 20 months (range 7 to 30) for the Trapeziectomy and LRTI group respectively. There was statistically significant improvement in both groups for symptoms, physical activities and psychological functioning/cosmetic appearance. The Trapeziectomy alone group scored higher in all groups though this did not show statistical significance. There were statistically significant higher rates of complications in the LRTI group. LRTI surgery increased the tourniquet time by 28 minutes on average. Patient overall satisfaction was higher (85/100) in the trapeziectomy alone group than that of the LRTI group (75/100). Both trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with LRTI offer a reliably way of treating arthritis of the carpometacarpal joint. In our study, Trapeziectomy alone resulted in better overall patient satisfaction with lower complication rates and reduced operating time

The carpometacarpal joint of the thumb is one of the most common locations of degenerative arthritis. Surgical options include trapezio-metacarpal fusion, replacement or resection arthroplasty with or without interposition. We report the medium term results of a Modified Thompson's suspensionplasty. The radial half of the APL tendon was looped around the FCR tendon to create the suspension. The remainder of the tendon is then used for interposition. We carried out a retrospective review of 50 patients (67 hands) who underwent this procedure from January 1999 to December 2005. There were 41 female (52 hands) and 9 male (15 hands). The average age at the time of surgery was 62 years (range 41 years – 79 years). The average follow up was 5.33 years (1-9 yrs). 22 patients also had a concurrent second procedure to the same thumb and a further three had a third procedure. The average PRWHE score was 25 (0 – 80) and the average DASH score was 40 (24 – 100). There were eight complications which included four persistent radial sided wrist pain. Two of these underwent tenotomy of FCR, whilst two responded to conservative measures. Two patients had symptoms related to scapho-trapezoid arthritis, which responded to an injection. One patient had superficial infection which settled with oral antibiotics, whilst another patient had early chronic regional pain syndrome. Overall the satisfaction rate was 90% with 48 patients (96%) willing to undergo the same procedure again. We conclude that the modified Thompson's suspensionplasty gives excellent medium term results

The Mathys. ¯. finger joint replacement system offers a novel fixation method into the proximal and distal medullary canals and a semi-constrained articulation. This comprises a separable, form-fit joint with a distal/proximal play of 0.7 mm, a lateral excursion of 10°, and rotation of up to 6°. This has theoretical advantages of increased radio-ulnar stability, preventing ulnar drift in patients with rheumatoid disease, and enhanced osseointegration offering implant longevity. In our unit, however, high failure rates were noted, prompting a review of cases to quantify our suspicions. Case notes of all patients who underwent finger joint replacement using the Mathys. ¯. implant between 1999 and 2005 were retrieved. Twenty-two devices were implanted by a single surgeon during this period. Four were in finger proximal interphalangeal joints, 17 in finger metacarpophalangeal joints and one in a thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ). Indications for joint replacement included sixteen for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and five for post-traumatic joint problems. The only thumb CMCJ was replaced for primary osteoarthritis. Patients were reviewed regularly and implant performance assessed critically along with survival of the implant to revision, infection or death of the patient. Mean follow up was 30 months. Sixteen implants failed including the only thumb CMCJ. Modes of failure were rotation (11), poor range of motion (two), infection (two) and dislocation (the CMCJ). Similar ball and socket designs for uncemented thumb CMCJ replacement, such as the Ledoux prosthesis, have previously shown poor survival and have been withdrawn from the market. Of the finger implants in RA patients (n=16), 12 implants failed of which ten were due to rotation. Time to failure ranged from two to 48 months (mean 15 months). The authors do not recommend the use of this implant, especially in cases of rheumatoid arthritis