Aims. Optimal exposure through the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) conducted on a regular operating theatre table is achieved with a standardized capsular releasing sequence in which the anterior capsule can be preserved or resected. We hypothesized that clinical outcomes and implant positioning would not be different in case a capsular sparing (CS) technique would be compared to capsular resection (CR). Methods. In this prospective trial, 219 hips in 190 patients were randomized to either the CS (n = 104) or CR (n = 115) cohort. In the CS cohort, a medial based anterior flap was created and sutured back in place at the end of the procedure. The anterior capsule was resected in the CR cohort. Primary outcome was defined as the difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after one year. PROMs (Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and Short Form 36 Item Health Survey (SF-36)) were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Radiological parameters were analyzed to assess implant positioning and implant ingrowth. Adverse events were monitored. Results. At one year, there was no difference in HSS (p = 0.728), HOOS (Activity Daily Life, p = 0.347; Pain, p = 0.982; Quality of Life, p = 0.653; Sport, p = 0.994; Symptom, p = 0.459), or SF-36 (p = 0.338). Acetabular component inclination (p = 0.276) and anteversion (p = 0.392) as well as femoral component alignment (p = 0.351) were similar in both groups. There were no dislocations, readmissions, or reoperations in either group. The incidence of psoas tendinitis was six cases in the CS cohort (6%) and six cases in the CR cohort (5%) (p = 0.631). Conclusion. No clinical differences were found between resection or preservation of the anterior capsule when performing a primary THA through the DAA on a regular theatre table. In case of limited visibility during the learning curve, it might be advisable to resect a part of the anterior capsule. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):321–328

INTRODUCTION. The capsular releasing sequence is crucial to safely conduct the Direct Anterior Approach for THA on a regular OR table. The release of the anterior capsule is the first step of the releasing sequence and allows for optimal exposure. This can be done by either resecting a part of the anterior capsule or by preserving it. Our zero hypothesis was that clinical outcomes would not be different between both techniques. MATERIALS & METHODS. 190 Patients operated between November 2017 and May 2018, met the inclusion criteria and were randomly allocated in a double blinded study to either the capsular resection (CR)(N=99) or capsular preservation (CP)(N=91) cohort. The same cementless implant was used in all cases. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) were collected pre- and post-operatively at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year. Adverse events were recorded. Outcomes were compared with the Mann-Withney U test and a significance level of p<0,05. RESULTS. Both cohorts had significant improvements of all PROMS post-operatively. There was no significant difference in HSS, HOOS or SF-36 between both cohorts (p>0,05). The incidence of peri-articular muscle soreness and transient tenderness in the groin was 7.5% of patients in the CR cohort and in 9.3% in the CP cohort, at 6 weeks to 3 months post-operatively (p>0.05). At one year, 80% of patients had a forgotten hip (p>0.05). There were no dislocations, readmissions or reoperations in both groups. Acetabular and femoral component position was similar in both groups (p>0,05). CONCLUSION. No clinical differences were found between resection or preservation of the anterior capsule when performing a primary THA through the anterior approach on a regular OR table. During the learning curve, it might be advisable to resect a part of the capsule in order to optimize the acetabular exposure, without compromising the clinical outcomes

Aims

It is not known whether preservation of the capsule of the hip positively affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach (DAA-THA). A recent randomized controlled trial found no clinically significant difference at one year postoperatively. This study aimed to determine whether preservation of the anterolateral capsule and anatomical closure improve the outcome and revision rate, when compared with resection of the anterolateral capsule, at two years postoperatively.

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of proximal and distal chevron osteotomy in patients with moderate hallux valgus.

We retrospectively reviewed 34 proximal chevron osteotomies without lateral release (PCO group) and 33 distal chevron osteotomies (DCO group) performed sequentially by a single surgeon. There were no differences between the groups with regard to age, length of follow-up, demographic or radiological parameters. The clinical results were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scoring system and the radiological results were compared between the groups.

At a mean follow-up of 14.6 months (14 to 32) there were no significant differences in the mean AOFAS scores between the DCO and PCO groups (93.9 (82 to 100) and 91.8 (77 to 100), respectively; p = 0.176). The mean hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle and sesamoid position were the same in both groups. The metatarsal declination angle decreased significantly in the PCO group (p = 0.005) and the mean shortening of the first metatarsal was significantly greater in the DCO group (p < 0.001).

We conclude that the clinical and radiological outcome after a DCO is comparable with that after a PCO; longer follow-up would be needed to assess the risk of avascular necrosis.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:649–56.