Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become the most common type of shoulder arthroplasty used in the UK, and a better understanding of the outcomes after revision of a failed RSA is needed. The aim of this study was to review the current evidence systematically to determine patient-reported outcome measures and the rates of re-revision and complications for patients undergoing revision of a RSA. MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched. Studies involving adult patients who underwent revision of a primary RSA for any indication were included. Those who underwent a RSA for failure of a total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty were excluded. Pre- and postoperative shoulder scores were evaluated in a random effects meta-analysis to determine the mean difference. The rates of re-revision and complications were also calculated.Aims
Methods
Inherent disadvantages of reverse shoulder arthroplasty
designs based on the Grammont concept have raised a renewed interest
in less-medialised designs and techniques. The aim of this study
was to evaluate the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)
with the fully-constrained, less-medialised, Bayley–Walker prosthesis performed
for the treatment of rotator-cuff-deficient shoulders with glenohumeral
arthritis. A total of 97 arthroplasties in 92 patients (53 women
and 44 men, mean age 67 years (standard deviation ( The Bayley–Walker prosthesis provides reliable pain relief and
reasonable functional improvement for patients with symptomatic
cuff-deficient shoulders. Compared with other designs of RSA, it
offers a modest improvement in forward elevation, but restores external
rotation to some extent and prevents scapular notching. A longer
follow-up is required to assess the survival of the prosthesis and
the clinical performance over time. Cite this article:
