Controversy remains whether the contralateral hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical (p < 0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse. Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation. Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. . Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with unilateral fixation. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1428–34

Aim. To inform a working group of UK paediatric surgeons (the UK SCFE Study Group) convened to design pertinent trials in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), three centres (Bristol, Newcastle and Barts and The London) reviewed the demographics and management of children with SCFE presenting between 2007 and 2012. Method. At all contributing centres with digital PACS records for a minimum of 5 years, a search for the following terms was made of PACS reports: slipped capital femoral epiphysis, slipped upper femoral epiphysis, SCFE and SUFE. From the results, radiographs and electronically stored clinic letters were assessed to confirm the diagnosis and ascertain age at presentation, incidence of bilaterality, chronicity, stability (Loder criteria), management and complications. Results. A total of 134 SCFEs presented between 2007 and 2012 to the three units. The mean age at presentation was 12.8 yrs (range 6–16 yrs). There were 91 males and 43 females. The left hip was nearly twice as commonly involved compared to the right, with bilateral presentation in 26.5% of patients. The most common mode of presentation was acute-on-chronic. Stable slips were over twice as common as unstable. The most common intervention was percutaneous pinning in situ. Open reduction, osteotomy and stabilisation were required in 21% of cases. The most common complications were osteonecrosis (n=17), screw migration/penetration (n=9), leg length discrepancy (n=9) and symptomatic secondary cam with femoroacetabular impingement (n=7). Conclusion. This three-centre UK study gives insight into the demographics and contemporary management of SCFE, acts as a guide to larger audits of current practice throughout the UK and informs the subject and content of potential future randomised clinical trials

The aim of this study was to determine whether an osteoplasty of the femoral neck performed at the same time as an intertrochanteric Imhäuser osteotomy led to an improved functional outcome or increased morbidity. A total of 20 hips in 19 patients (12 left, 8 right, 13 male, 6 female), who underwent an Imhäuser intertrochanteric osteotomy following a slipped capital femoral epiphysis were assessed over an eight-year period. A total of 13 hips in 13 patients had an osteoplasty of the femoral neck at the same time. The remaining six patients (seven hips) had intertrochanteric osteotomy alone. The mean age was 15.3 years (13 to 20) with a mean follow-up of 57.8 months (15 to 117); 19 of the slips were severe (Southwick grade III) and one was moderate (grade II), with a mean slip angle of 65.3° (50° to 80°); 17 of the slips were stable and three unstable at initial presentation. The mean Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS) in patients who underwent osteoplasty was 91.7 (76.3 to 100) and the mean NAHS in patients who did not undergo osteoplasty was 76.6 (41.3 to 100) (p = 0.056). Two patients required a subsequent arthroplasty and neither of these patients had an osteoplasty. No hips developed osteonecrosis or chondrolysis, and there was no increase in complications related to the osteoplasty. We recommend that for patients with a slipped upper femoral epiphysis undergoing an intertrochanteric osteotomy, the addition of an osteoplasty of the femoral neck should be considered.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1119–23.

At our institution surgical correction of symptomatic flat foot deformities in children has been guided by a paradigm in which radiographs and pedobarography are used in the assessment of outcome following treatment. Retrospective review of children with symptomatic flat feet who had undergone surgical correction was performed to assess the outcome and establish the relationship between the static alignment and the dynamic loading of the foot.

A total of 17 children (21 feet) were assessed before and after correction of soft-tissue contractures and lateral column lengthening, using standardised radiological and pedobarographic techniques for which normative data were available.

We found significantly improved static segmental alignment of the foot, significantly improved mediolateral dimension foot loading, and worsened fore-aft foot loading, following surgical treatment. Only four significant associations were found between radiological measures of static segmental alignment and dynamic loading of the foot.

Weakness of the plantar flexors of the ankle was a common post-operative finding. Surgeons should be judicious in the magnitude of lengthening of the plantar flexors that is undertaken and use techniques that minimise subsequent weakening of this muscle group.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:706–13.