To investigate and compare the biomechanical characteristics of Bipedicular versus Unipedicular Vertebroplasty in cadaveric vertebra. Cadaveric single level vertebra were used to evaluate Bipedicular versus Unipedicular Vertebroplasty as an intervention for vertebral compression fractures. Cadaveric vertebra were assigned to two arms: Arm A simulated a wedge fracture followed by bipedicular cement augmentation; Arm B simulated a wedge fracture followed by unipedicular cement augmentation. Micro-CT imaging was performed to assess vertebral dimension, cement fill volumes and bone mineral density. All augmented specimens were then compressed under a static eccentric flexion load to failure. Pre and post augmentation failure load and stiffness were used to compare the two groups. Results suggest, when compared with actual failure strength, that the product of bone mineral density and endplate surface area gave a good prediction of failure strength for specimens in both arms. The mean cement volume fill of augmented vertebral bodies was 22.8% ± 7.21%. The bipedicular group showed a reduction in stiffness but an increase in post augmentation failure load of 1.09. The unipedicular group also showed a reduction in stiffness but showed a much greater increase in post augmentation failure load of 1.68. Preliminary data from this study suggests there is a significant reduction in stiffness following both bipedicular and unipedicular vertebroplasty. There is a significant increase in failure load post augmentation in the unipedicular group

Background. We have previously reported an injectable hydrogel (NPgel), which could deliver patients own stem cells, via small bore needles, decreasing damage to the annulus fibrosus. NPgel drives differentiation to NP cells and can inhibit the degenerate niche. However, clinical success of NPgel is dependent on the capacity to inject NPgel into naturally degenerate human discs, restore mechanical function to the IVD, prevent extrusion during loading and induce regeneration. This study assessed injectability of NPgel into human IVD, influence on mechanical properties, regeneration ability in an ex vivo culture system and retention under failure testing. Methodology. Cadaveric human discs were used to calculate disc height and to determine Youngs Modulus during simulated walking pre and post injection of NPgel, extrusion testing performed. Whole human IVDs were injected with NPgel +/− human BMPCs and maintained in culture under physiological loading regime for 4 weeks. Pre and post culture MRI imaging and in line biomechanical characteristics determined. Histology and immunochemistry performed for anabolic and catabolic factors. Results. NPgel injection significantly increased disc height and Youngs modulus with no extrusion observed during failure testing. T1ρ intensity was increased during culture in those injected with NPgel +/− cells compared to non-injected discs, and biomechanical restoration. Histological analysis has demonstrated excellent tissue attachment to the injected gel, and cellular migration into acellular gel systems. With increased matrix production and decreased catabolic factor expression. Conclusion. These results provide essential proof of concept data supporting the use of NPgel as an injectable therapy for disc regeneration. Conflict of interest: C Le Maitre & C Sammon are inventors on the hydrogel discussed. Funding: This work was funded by MRC and Versus Arthritis

Aims

To report the development of the technique for minimally invasive lumbar decompression using robotic-assisted navigation.

Aims

Anchorage of pedicle screw rod instrumentation in the elderly spine with poor bone quality remains challenging. Our study aims to evaluate how the screw bone anchorage is affected by screw design, bone quality, loading conditions, and cementing techniques.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether it would be feasible to use oblique lumbar interbody fixation for patients with degenerative lumbar disease who required a fusion but did not have a spondylolisthesis.

A series of CT digital images from 60 patients with abdominal disease were reconstructed in three dimensions (3D) using Mimics v10.01: a digital cylinder was superimposed on the reconstructed image to simulate the position of an interbody screw. The optimal entry point of the screw and measurements of its trajectory were recorded. Next, 26 cadaveric specimens were subjected to oblique lumbar interbody fixation on the basis of the measurements derived from the imaging studies. These were then compared with measurements derived directly from the cadaveric vertebrae.

Our study suggested that it is easy to insert the screws for L1/2, L2/3 and L3/4 fixation: there was no significant difference in measurements between those of the 3-D digital images and the cadaveric specimens. For L4/5 fixation, part of L5 inferior articular process had to be removed to achieve the optimal trajectory of the screw. For L5/S1 fixation, the screw heads were blocked by iliac bone: consequently, the interior oblique angle of the cadaveric specimens was less than that seen in the 3D digital images.

We suggest that CT scans should be carried out pre-operatively if this procedure is to be adopted in clinical practice. This will assist in determining the feasibility of the procedure and will provide accurate information to assist introduction of the screws.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:977–82.