Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 25 - 25
7 Aug 2024
Nüesch A Kanelis E Alexopoulos L Williams F Geris L Gantenbein B Lacey M Breakwell L Maitre CL
Full Access

Introduction. Multiple studies have identified Cutibacterium acnes (C.acnes) and other microbes in intervertebral disc tissue using 16S DNA Sequencing and microbial cultures. However, it remains unclear whether these bacteria are native to the discs or result from perioperative contamination. Our study aimed to detect Gram-positive bacteria in non-herniated human disc samples and explore correlations with Toll-like receptors (TLR) 2, TLR4, NLRP3, and Gasdermin D. Methods. Immunohistochemical staining was conducted on 75 human IVD samples for Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus, C.acnes, TLR2, TLR4, NLRP3, and Gasdermin D. Cell detection and classification were performed using QuPath. NP cells were treated with Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and Peptidoglycan (PGN) in monolayer and alginate beads for up to 72 hours, followed by secretome analysis using Luminex. Statistical analysis included Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn's multiple comparison test, and Pearson correlation. Results. Immunohistochemical staining revealed Gram-positive bacteria exclusively within cells, with C. acnes positivity ranging from 5–99% and correlating with patient age (r=0.41, p= 0.007). TLR2 positivity ranged from 5–99% and TLR4 from 3–72%, showing a strong correlation (r= 0.62, p= 1.5e-006). Females with mid-degenerative grades exhibited significantly decreased TLR2 expression compared to those without degeneration signs. Treatment with LPS and PGN increased catabolic cyto- and chemokines associated with IVD degeneration. Conclusion. In conclusion, this study confirms Gram-positive bacteria presence in non-herniated human disc samples and highlights their role in triggering a catabolic response in disc cells. No conflicts of interest.  . Sources of funding. This project is part of the Disc4All Training network to advance integrated computational simulations in translational medicine, applies to intervertebral disc degeneration and funded by Horizon 2020 (H2020-MSCA-ITN-ETN-2020 GA: 955735)


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 5 | Pages 621 - 624
1 May 2019
Pumberger M Bürger J Strube P Akgün D Putzier M

Aims. During revision procedures for aseptic reasons, there remains a suspicion that failure may have been the result of an undetected subclinical infection. However, there is little evidence available in the literature about unexpected positive results in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery. The aims of our study were to estimate the prevalence of unexpected positive culture using sonication and to evaluate clinical characteristics of these patients. Patients and Methods. All patients who underwent a revision surgery after instrumented spinal surgery at our institution between July 2014 and August 2016 with spinal implants submitted for sonication were retrospectively analyzed. Only revisions presumed as aseptic are included in the study. During the study period, 204 spinal revisions were performed for diagnoses other than infection. In 38 cases, sonication cultures were not obtained, leaving a study cohort of 166 cases. The mean age of the cohort was 61.5 years (. sd. 20.4) and there were 104 female patients. Results. Sonication cultures were positive in 75 cases (45.2%). Hardware failure was the most common indication for revision surgery and revealed a positive sonication culture in 26/75 cases (35%) followed by adjacent segment disease (ASD) in 23/75 cases (30%). Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis were the most commonly isolated microorganisms, observed in 45% and 31% of cases, respectively. C. acnes was isolated in 65.2% of cases when the indication for revision surgery was ASD. Conclusion. Infection must always be considered as a possibility in the setting of spinal revision surgery, especially in the case of hardware failure, regardless of the lack of clinical signs. Sonication should be routinely used to isolate microorganisms adherent to implants. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:621–624


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 7 | Pages 899 - 903
1 Jul 2020
Bürger J Palmowski Y Strube P Perka C Putzier M Pumberger M

Aims

To evaluate the histopathological examination of peri-implant tissue samples as a technique in the diagnosis of postoperative spinal implant infection (PSII).

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis. Patients who underwent revision spinal surgery at our institution were recruited for this study. PSII was diagnosed by clinical signs, histopathology, and microbiological examination of intraoperatively collected samples. Histopathology was defined as the gold standard. The sensitivity for histopathology was calculated. A total of 47 patients with PSII and at least one microbiological and histopathological sample were included in the study.