Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_31 | Pages 49 - 49
1 Aug 2013
O'Flaherty E Bell S McKay D Wellington B Hart A Hems T
Full Access

To collate and present epidemiological data collected by Scottish National Brachial Injury Service over the past decade. The Brachial Plexus Injury Service is based at the Victoria Infirmary, Glasgow and has been a designated National Service since 2004. It provides an integrated multidisciplinary service for traumatic brachial plexus injury and plexus tumours. The Service maintains an active archive recording details of all clinical referrals and procedures conducted by the Service over the past decade. The data presented here was derived from analysis of this database and information contained in the National Brachial Plexus Injury Service Annual Report 2010/11 & 2011/12. Data shows that there has been a steady rate in the number of referrals to the Service, particularly since 2004, with an average of 50 cases referred per annum. Of these, approximately 25% required formal surgical exploration for traumatic injury and a further 10% required surgery for brachial plexus tumour removal. The vast majority of referred cases are treated non-operatively, with appropriate support from specialist physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Referrals to the Service appear well distributed from around Scotland. However, data from 2011 shows that Greater Glasgow & Clyde is the greatest individual source of referrals and subsequent hospital admissions for surgical treatment. The commonest mechanism of brachial plexus injury appears to be secondary to falls and motorcycle RTA. Using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score, improved functional outcomes have been demonstrated consistently in patients who have undergone surgery for brachial plexus injuries within the Service. Over the past decade, the Brachial Plexus Injury Service has had a steady patient referral record from across the Scotland, particularly Glasgow. Data indicates that there is an on-going clinical need for provision of the service with improved outcomes and reduced functional disability in patients treated by the service. It is envisaged that data from the Service will also act as a useful planning model for the provision of UK national services in the future


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 13 - 13
17 Nov 2023
Armstrong R McKeever T McLelland C Hamilton D
Full Access

Abstract. Objective. There is no specific framework for the clinical management of sports related brachial plexus injuries. Necessarily, rehabilitation is based on injury presentation and clinical diagnostics but it is unclear what the underlying evidence base to inform rehabilitative management. Methods. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We applied the PEO criteria to inform our search strategy to find articles that reported the rehabilitative management of brachial plexus injuries sustained while playing contact sports. An electronic search of Medline, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science from inception to 3rd November 2022 was conducted. MESH terms and Boolean operators were employed. We applied an English language restriction but no other filters. Manual searches of Google Scholar and citation searching of included manuscripts were also completed. All study types were considered for inclusion provided they were published as peer-reviewed primary research articles and contained relevant information. Two investigators independently carried out the searches, screened by title, abstract and full text. Two researchers independently extracted the data from included articles. Data was cross-checked by a third researcher to ensure consistency. To assess internal validity and risk of bias, the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools were utilised. Results. The search generated 88 articles. Following removal of duplicates, 43 papers were evaluated against the eligibility criteria. Nine were eligible for full text review, with the majority of exclusions being expert opinion articles. Eight case reports were included. One article reported three individuals, resulting in data for ten athletes. The mean age was 19.8 years (±4.09). Injuries occurred in five American football players, two wrestlers, two rugby players, and a basketball player. No two studies applied the same diagnostic terminology and the severity of injury varied widely. Burning pain and altered sensation was the most commonly reported symptom, alongside motor weakness in the upper limb. Clinical presentation and management differed by injury pattern. Traction injuries caused biceps motor weakness and atrophy of the deltoid region, whereas compression injuries led to rotator cuff weakness. In all cases treatment was separated into acute and rehabilitative management phases, however the time frames related to these differed. Acute interventions varied but essentially entailed soft tissue inflammation management. Rehabilitation approaches variously included strengthening of shoulder complex and cervical musculature. Return-to-play criteria was opaque. The methodological quality of the case reports was acceptable. Four met all nine of the JBI evaluation criteria, and a further three met at least 75% of items. Conclusion(s). There is a distinct lack of evidence supporting rehabilitation management of sports related brachial plexus injury. Through systematic review we found only eight reports, representing ten individual case studies. No trials, cohort studies, or even retrospective registry-based studies are available to inform clinical management, which, necessarily, is driven by expert opinion and application of basic rehabilitation principles. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_31 | Pages 66 - 66
1 Aug 2013
Bell S Brown M Hems T
Full Access

Current knowledge regarding upper limb myotomes is based on historic papers. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical exploration with intraoperative nerve stimulation now allow accurate identification of nerve root injuries in the brachial plexus. The aim of this study is to identify the myotome values of the upper limb associated with defined supraclvicular brachial plexus injuries. 57 patients with partial supraclavicular brachial plexus injuries were identified from the Scottish brachial plexus database. The average age was 28 years and most injuries secondary to motor cycle accidents or stabbings. The operative and MRI findings for each patient were checked to establish the root injuries and the muscle powers of the upper limb documented. The main patterns of injuries identified involved (C5,6), (C5,6,7), (C5,6,7,8) and (C8, T1). C5, 6 injuries were associated with loss of shoulder abduction, external rotation and elbow flexion. In 30% of the 16 cases showed some biceps action from the C7 root. C5,6,7 injuries showed a similar pattern of weakness with the additional loss of flexor carpi radialis and weakness but not total paralysis of triceps in 85% of cases. C5,6,7,8 injuries were characterised by loss of pectoralis major, lattisimus dorsi, triceps, wrist extension, finger extension and as well as weakness of the ulnar intrinsic muscles. We identified weakness of the flexor digitorum profundus to the ulnar sided digits in 83% of cases. T1 has a major input to innervation of flexors of the radial digits and thumb, as well as intrinsics. This is the largest study of myotome values in patients with surgically or radiologically confirmed injuries in the literature and presents information for general orthopaedic surgeons dealing with trauma patients for the differentiation of different patterns of brachial plexus injuries. In addition we have identified new anatomical relationships not previously described in upper limb myotomes


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 121 - 121
1 Nov 2021
Salhab M Cowling P
Full Access

Introduction and Objective. Postoperative pain control in shoulder surgery is challenging even in arthroscopic procedures. Acute postoperative pain can last up to 48hrs despite using multimodal analgesia. Different techniques have been used to control acute pain following shoulder surgery. The most common technique currently used in shoulder surgery at the elective orthopaedic centre in Leeds is a combination of general anaesthetic (GA) and interscalene block (ISB). ISB maybe very effective, however, carries many risks and potential side effects such as brachial plexus injury and paralysis of the vagus and laryngeal recurrent nerves as well as cervical sympathetic nerve and pneumothorax. ISB can also be associated with higher incidence of neurological deficit compared to other peripheral nerve blocks; up to 14% at 10 days in some cases. As such we decided to examine the use of ISB for achieving pain control in our elective unit. Materials and Methods. A prospective consecutive series of 217 patients undergoing shoulder surgery were studied. These were grouped into 10 groups. All procedures were arthroscopic apart from shoulder arthroplasty procedures such as hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder replacements (TSRs). The choice of regional anaesthesia was ISB with GA as standard practice. Visual analogue scores (VAS) at 0hrs, 1hr, 2hrs, 4hrs and 6hrs; and total opiates intake were recorded. A one-way single factor ANOVA was used as preferred statistical analytical method to determine whether there is a difference in VAS scores and total opiates intake amongst the groups. Postoperative analgesics were used for pain relief, although these were not standardised. Results. In total shoulder replacement group, although the RSR group used more morphine on average compared to the ASR group (Mean morphine intake 6.5mg vs 3mg), this was not statistically significant (F<Fcrit; p value= 0.19). When comparing all the arthroplasty groups, the difference in mean morphine intake was also statistically not significant (F<Fcrit; p value=0.24). However, when comparing all 10 groups’ morphine intake there was a statistically significant difference amongst these groups (F>F crit; p value=0.03). Interestingly, there was a statistically significant difference in VAS at 0hrs (F>Fcrit p value=0.01); 1hrs (F>Fcrit; p value=0.00), and at 6hrs (F>Fcrit; p value=0.02) when comparing all 10 groups. Conclusions. ISB is an effective technique in achieving pain control in shoulder surgery; however, there are still variations in analgesic needs amongst groups and the use of alternative techniques should be thus explored. A future prospective study looking at acute pain for a longer period of time after shoulder surgery would explore the effectiveness of ISB in achieving pain control consistent with rehabilitation requirements


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1150 - 1150
1 Aug 2013
Ross A Birch R

We welcome letters to the Editor concerning articles that have recently been published. Such letters will be subject to the usual stages of selection and editing; where appropriate the authors of the original article will be offered the opportunity to reply.