Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive and debilitating condition that is estimated to account for over 80% of the osteoarthritis burden. In cases of end-stage osteoarthritis, surgical intervention is the desired option, however, less severe cases may warrant the use of nonoperative modalities. Knee
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating and progressive condition that accounts for over 80% of the total osteoarthritis burden. Surgical intervention is the suitable option in end-stage osteoarthritis, however, in cases of less severe disease, it may be warranted to use non-operative methods. Knee
The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in The United States is approximately 40 million cases, and this number is expected to rise to 60 million by the year 2020. Multiple non-operative treatment options are available for patients, including bracing.
There are a number of different non-operative management options for patients with a painful knee secondary to osteoarthritis (OA). In 2013 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons developed an evidence-based clinical practice guideline addressing treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Strength of recommendations were designated as strong, moderate and inconclusive. Strong recommendations included: self-management program, NSAIDs or tramadol and no acupuncture, no glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate and no hyaluronic acid. The “No” recommendations for hyaluronic acid and glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate were quite controversial because orthopaedic surgeons argued that some of their patients benefited from these treatments. Moderate strength recommendations included weight loss, lateral wedge insoles and needle lavage. The evidence-based data was inconclusive with respect to valgus force unloading brace, manual physical therapy, acetaminophen, opioids and pain patches. The effectiveness of corticosteroid and platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections were also inconclusive. Unloader
Valgus knee unloader
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent disease that has a debilitating role in every day function and activity. In 2002, the indirect cost of OA was 5 billion dollars, secondary to absenteeism and loss of productivity. There are multiple management options available for OA, with surgery usually being a last resort. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides a long-lasting treatment option with excellent results. However, a high proportion of patients still express dissatisfaction following surgery, possibly due to a combination of pain, continued limitation of function, and high expectations. The use of bracing provides a non-operative treatment option as well as a useful therapy adjunct in patients who undergo TKA. Bracing may aid in rehabilitation prior to TKA as well as postoperatively, and it also plays a beneficial role in problematic situations, such as patients who have undergone revision surgery or who have extensor mechanism problems. They are thought to aid in gait ‘retraining’, quadriceps muscle strengthening, improving joint alignment, and increasing stability of the joint. Although the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons remains inconclusive on the role of bracing, multiple studies have highlighted that they may be of benefit. The use of valgus bracing has been shown to provide short-term treatment for activity, bracing for uni-compartmental OA has shown an improvement in outcome measures, and the use of an unloader brace has led to improved general physical health and function outcomes, as measured by the SF-12 and WOMAC, respectively.
Introduction. Mode of non-operative management of thoracolumbar spine fracture continues to remain controversial with the most common modality hinging on bracing. TLSO is the device with a relative extension locked position, and many authors suggest they may have a role in the healing process, diminishing the load transferred via the anterior column, limiting segmental motion, and helping in pain control. However, several studies have shown prolonged use of brace may lead to skin breakdown, diminished pulmonary capacity, weakness of paraspinal musculature with no difference in pain and functional outcomes between patients treated with or without brace. Aims. To identify number of spinal
Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints,
Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints,
Joint load correlates with knee OA incidence, symptoms, radiographic, morphologic and biological changes. Available load modifying therapies are clinically effective but have drawbacks. The KineSpringTM (Moximed Inc), an investigational device, is designed to reduce compartment loads while avoiding the limitations of current treatments. We compare load reductions of
Introduction. Although surgical remedies tend to be the long-term solutions for patients with osteoarthritis (OA), many alternatives exist that offer the potential to slow progression, alleviate pain, and/or restore function. One such option is the unloader OA knee brace. The objective of this study was to assess the in vivo medial joint space narrowing with and without the brace during weight-bearing portion of gait. Methods. Twenty subjects were evaluated after being clinically assessed by a single surgeon to be bone-on-bone on the medial side. In vivo gait kinematics were collected using a validated 3D-to-2D fluoroscopic registration technique (Figure 1). Subjects were asked to first walk on a treadmill without a brace (Figure 2), and then, after a qualified technician fit a properly sized brace to each subject, they were asked to walk again (Figure 3). In vivo fluoroscopic images were captured and registered at heel-strike (HS) and mid stance (MS) for both scenarios. CT scans were used to acquire the patient-specific bone models that were used in the registration process. Results. All twenty subjects experienced a positive increase in medial joint space and verbally stated their knee pain lessened while wearing the brace. The average medial joint space change was 1.7±0.8 mm (3.1 max, 0.3 min) at HS and 1.6±0.8 mm (3.7 max, 0.4 min) at MS (Figure 4). Five patients experienced more than 2.5 mm of medial joint space change when wearing the unloader brace, indicating substantial effectiveness of the brace. Conclusion. While previous unloader brace studies have focused on outcome scores and patient satisfaction to analyze brace effectiveness, this study quantifiably demonstrated improvement in joint space narrowing due to the unloader brace. These results suggest that unloader
Traditionally, arthritis is a disease which generally affects the elderly population. However, the incidence in young patients is well described and is increasing with the ever-growing obese population. Currently, the non-surgical treatment of osteoarthritis consists of corticosteroid injections, hyaluronic acid injections, weight loss, physical therapy, bracing, orthotics, narcotics, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). Oral medications (NSAIDS, tramadol, and opioids) can provide effective pain relief. Improvement with NSAIDs has been reported to be 20% relative to baseline, with better improvements seen with selective cox-2 inhibitors, which also have reduced gastrointestinal and renal toxicity. Additionally, the recent AAOS guidelines strongly recommend using NSAIDs or tramadol for pain relief. Although narcotics are effective analgesics, their use in young arthritic patients can potentially predispose individuals to future opioid dependency, and thus should be used sparingly. The primary purpose of physical therapy is to improve range of motion, strengthen muscles, and improve proprioception. Currently, the AAOS strongly recommends that patients undergo self-management programs, strengthening, low-impact aerobic exercises, and neuromuscular education. Similarly, they moderately recommended that patients with a BMI ≥ 25 undergo weight loss for symptomatic arthritis. Bracing options consist of the following: off-loader
Introduction. Dislocation is one of the most common complications following total hip arthroplasty. The literature suggests a frequency of 1–3% for primary total hip replacement (THR) and 7–10% for revision procedures. No definitive treatment algorithm exists for their management, with some surgeons attempting to constrain hip motion with casting or bracing initially. The evidence for this practice is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the current practice for managing THR dislocation within our unit, and to determine the effectiveness of abduction bracing. Method. A retrospective case-note analysis was performed on all patients admitted with a dislocated THR between 01/01/08 and 31/12/10. Patients were categorised into three groups: first time dislocators, recurrent dislocators, or dislocation occurring following revision surgery. The following data was collected; time from original surgery, closed or open reduction, surgical approach, prescription of abduction brace post-operatively, and the number of subsequent dislocations. Any patients who underwent open reduction were excluded from the study. Results. A total of 45 patients were included in the study. Of the first time dislocators, 75% treated with abduction brace re-dislocated, and 26% of patients treated without bracing re-dislocated. In the recurrent group 63% had been braced after their initial dislocation. Conclusion. Based on this study the benefit of abduction
There are several case reports or small series of stress tibial fracture around the OA knees in literature. Our study goes on 10 tibial stress fracture in 9 patients. All of the fractures have been distal to proximal tibial methaphysis. 8 of them have been in mid shaft or proximal of mid tibia, only 2 had fractures in distal half of tibia 8 were manage by
Background. Infected total knee arthroplasties present in a variety of different clinical settings. With severe local compromise and draining sinus tract around the knee, after adequate debridement, the resultant patellectomy with need for free muscle transfer and split thickness skin graft for closure, usually results in loss of quadriceps function. This necessitates the need for drop lock brace. No good mechanisms are available for reconstruction of large anterior defects in total infected total knees where this occurs. Questions. Can proximal placement of the knee joint with longer tibial segments aid in closure in patients with large anterior skin defects, and can this placement aid in quadriceps reconstruction to alleviate the need for drop lock
Abduction
Introduction. The pathogenesis of primary knee osteoarthritis is due to excess mechanical loading of the articular cartilage. Previous studies have assessed the impact of muscle forces on tibiofemoral kinematics and force distribution. A cadaveric study was performed to evaluate the effect of altering the moment arm of the iliotibial band (ITB) on knee biomechanics. Method. A robotic system consisting of a 6-DOF manipulator capable of measuring forces on the medial and lateral condyle of a cadaveric knee at various flexion angles and muscle forces was utilized [1]. The system measured the compartment forces at flexion angles between 0° and 30° under 3 simulated loading conditions (300N quadriceps, 100N hamstrings and: i. 0N ITB; ii. 50N ITB; iii. 100N ITB). Eight fresh frozen human cadaver knee specimens (4 males, 4 females); age range 36 – 50 years; weight range 49 – 90 kg; height range 154 – 190 cm were used in the study. The ITB and associated lateral soft tissue structures were laterally displaced from the lateral femoral condyle by fixing a metal implant (like in Figure 1) to the distal lateral femur. Mechanical loads on the medial and lateral compartments (with and without the implant) were measured using piezoelectric pressure sensors. Results. For each specimen, lateral displacement of the ITB due to the implant was measured (15 – 20 mm). The % average unloading of the medial compartment for all the specimens ranged from 34% – 65% (Figure 2). Also observed was a concomitant increase in lateral compartment load. Medial unloading was even observed with no ITB force (0N) which indicates a role for other lateral structures attached to the ITB in unloading the medial compartment [2]. In addition, under these non-weight bearing conditions, on average, there was an increase in valgus tibial angulation through the flexion range. Discussion. Increasing mechanical leverage of muscles across a joint is accomplished in nature through sesamoid bones (e.g., patella) which increase the muscle moment arm. By increasing the moment arm of the ITB and lateral soft tissue structures by lateralizing these structures, our model demonstrates a 34–65% unloading of the medial compartment. Studies of knee
A prospective cohort study was undertaken to assess the success of Ossur Unloader knee brace as non-operative management of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. We recruited 12 volunteers (14 knees, mean age 63) with isolated medial compartment arthritis. They were clinically assessed, demographic data and Oxford knee scores were collected before the use of the
Knee mechanics - Knee forces during ADL and sports activities in TKA patients. Background. Tibiofemoral forces are important in the design and clinical outcomes of TKA. Knee forces and kinematics have been estimated using computer models or traditionally have been measured under laboratory conditions. Although this approach is useful for quantitative measurements and experimental studies, the extrapolation of results to clinical conditions may not always be valid. We therefore developed a tibial tray combining force transducers and a telemetry system to directly measure tibiofemoral compressive forces in vivo. Methods. Tibial forces were measured for activities of daily living, athletic and recreational activities, and with orthotics and
Joint load reduction is effective for alleviating OA pain. Treatment options for joint unloading include
