Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 17 - 17
1 Oct 2019
Snuggs J Thorpe A Partridge S Chiverton N Cole A Michael A Sammon C Le Maitre C
Full Access

Purpose of study and background

We have previously reported the development of injectable hydrogels for potential disc regeneration (NPgel) or bone formation which could be utilized in spinal fusion (Bgel). As there are multiple sources of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), this study investigated the incorporation of patient matched hMSCs derived from adipose tissue (AD) and bone marrow (BM) to determine their ability to differentiate within both hydrogel systems under different culture conditions.

Methods and Results

Human fat pad and bone marrow derived MSCs were isolated from femoral heads of patients undergoing hip replacement surgery for osteoarthritis with informed consent. MSCs were encapsulated into either NPgel or Bgel and cultured for up to 6 weeks in 5% (NPgel) or 21% (Bgel) O2. Histology and immunohistochemistry was utilized to determine phenotype. Both fat and bone marrow derived MSCs, were able to differentiate into both cell lineages. NPgel culture conditions increased expression of matrix components such as collagen II and aggrecan and NP phenotypic markers FOXF1 and PAX1, whereas Bgel induced expression of collagen I and osteopontin, indicative of osteogenic differentiation.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 2 | Pages 124 - 130
1 Feb 2018
Coric D Bullard DE Patel VV Ryaby JT Atkinson BL He D Guyer RD

Objectives

Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation was evaluated after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures in a randomized, controlled clinical study performed for United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. PEMF significantly increased fusion rates at six months, but 12-month fusion outcomes for subjects at elevated risk for pseudoarthrosis were not thoroughly reported. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effect of PEMF treatment on subjects at increased risk for pseudoarthrosis after ACDF procedures.

Methods

Two evaluations were performed that compared fusion rates between PEMF stimulation and a historical control (160 subjects) from the FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) study: a post hoc (PH) analysis of high-risk subjects from the FDA study (PH PEMF); and a multicentre, open-label (OL) study consisting of 274 subjects treated with PEMF (OL PEMF). Fisher’s exact test and multivariate logistic regression was used to compare fusion rates between PEMF-treated subjects and historical controls.