Aim. One of the most severe complications of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Nowadays, the use of antibiotic-loaded cement for prevention of infection is still controversial. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the use of an antibiotic-loaded cement to reduce the infection rate in primary total knee arthroplasty. Method. Prospective randomized study, with 2893 cemented total knee arthroplasties performed between 2005 and 2010 in our institution. Two different groups were formed depending on which bone cement was used, without antibiotic (the control group) or loaded with erythromycin and colistin (the study group). All patients received the same systemic prophylactic antibiotics. The patients were followed for a minimum of twelve months. The rate of infection was analyzed according to the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Results. In 1452 patients the prosthetic components were fixed using bone cement without antibiotic and in 1441 patients bone cement loaded with erythromycin and colistin was used. There were no differences between both groups in terms of demographic data (age, sex and BMI), either in operating time (p>0,05). The rate of infection was similar in both groups, being 2,0% (n=29) in the control group and 1,7% in the study group (p=0,58) at 8,7 years (SD 5,1) of follow up. In terms of prosthetic revision due to any cause (infected or aseptic), there wasn't differences between groups, performing a total of 61 revision arthroplasties in control group and 68 in study group (p>0,05). Moreover, we analyzed the erythromycin resistance rate, being no differences between both groups (p=0.6). Conclusions. The use of erythromycin and colistin-loaded bone cement in total knee arthroplasty did not lead to a decrease in the rate of infection when systemic prophylactic antibiotics were used, a finding that suggests that its use would not be indicated in the general population

Aim. The current treatment concepts of acute and chronic osteomyelitis are associated with unsolved challenges and problems, underlining the need for ongoing medical research. The invention and prevalence of an absorbable, gentamicin-loaded ceramic bone graft, that is well injectable for orthopedic trauma and bone infections, enlarges the treatment scope regarding the rise of posttraumatic deep bony infections. This substance can be used either for infection, dead-space, or reconstruction management. The bone cement, eluting antibiotics continuously to the surrounding tissue, outperforms the intravenous antibiotic therapy and enhances the local concentration levels efficiently. This study aims to evaluate the power and practicability of bone cement in several locations of bony infections. Method. The occurrence of posttraumatic infections with acute or chronic osteomyelitis increases in trauma surgery along with progression of high impact injuries and consecutively high incidence of e.g. open fractures. We present a case-series of 33 patients (18w/15m; 56,8±19,4 years) with posttraumatic osteomyelitis at different anatomic sites, who were treated in our level I trauma center. All of these patients received antibiotic eluting bone cement (Cerement® G) for infection and reconstruction management. Results. With admission to our trauma-center all patients with obvious or suspected osteomyelitis undergo an interdisciplinary pre-work up, including thorough clinical examination and different measures of diagnostic imaging, ultimately leading to the definition of an individual treatment plan. We diagnosed 33 bone infections anatomically allocated to the proximal and distal femur (12x), the pelvis (2x), distal tibia (3x), tibial diaphysis (10x), the ankle joint (4x) and calcaneus (2x). According to Cierny-Mader we diagnosed grade I (6), II (7), III (13) and IV (7). These 33 patients were treated (1) with surgical debridement, (2) with Cerament G, (3) bone stabilisation (including nail osteosynthesis, arthrodesis nails, plates, or external ring fixation), (4) optionally VAC-conditioning, and (5) optionally soft tissue closure with local or free flaps. The overall number of surgery was 2.9±2.26. We observed very good clinical, functional and radiological results by using bone cement augmented with gentamicin. The overall recurrence rate of infection is low (12%, 4/33). “White fluid” secretion was observed in six cases. Conclusions. Current concepts for treatment of osteomyelitis include radical surgical debridement and additional antibiotic therapy. It could be demonstrated that the usage of an antibiotic biocement with osteoconductive characteristics enlarges the success rate in septic bone surgery. The treatment concepts, however, remain complex, time consuming, require a high patient compliance, and are highly individually

Aim. The current treatment concepts of acute and chronic osteitis are associated with unsolved challenges and problems, underlining the need for ongoing medical research. The invention and prevalence of an absorbable, gentamicin-loaded ceramic bone graft, that is well injectable for orthopedic trauma and bone infections, enlarges the treatment scope regarding the rise of posttraumatic deep bone infections. This substance can be used either for infection, dead-space, or reconstruction management. The bone cement, eluting antibiotics continuously to the surrounding tissue, outperforms the intravenous antibiotic therapy and enhances the local concentration levels efficiently. This study aims to evaluate the power and practicability of bone cement in several locations of bone infections. Method. The occurrence of posttraumatic infections with acute or chronic osteitis increases in trauma surgery along with progression of high impact injuries and consecutively high incidence of e.g. open fractures. We present a case-series of 10 patients with posttraumatic osteitis at different anatomic sites, who were treated in our level I trauma center. All of these patients received antibiotic eluting bone cement* for infection and reconstruction management. Results. With admission to our trauma-center all patients with obvious or suspected osteitis undergo an inter-disciplinary pre-work up, including thorough clinical examination and different measures of diagnostic imaging, ultimately leading to the definition of an individual treatment plan. We diagnosed 10 bone infections anatomically allocated to the proximal (2x) and distal femur (3x), distal tibia (3x), tibial diaphysis (1x) and the ankle joint (1x). These ten patients were treated (1) with surgical debridement, (2) with an antibiotic eluting bone cement*, (3) bone stabilisation (including nail osteosynthesis, arthrodesis nails, plates, or external ring fixation), (4) optionally VAC-conditioning, and (5) optionally soft tissue closure with local or free flaps. We observed very good clinical, functional and radiological results by using bone cement augmented with gentamicin. The overall treatment failure rate is low, throughout, all patients showed no signs of acute recurrence of infection. Pain and immobility decreased continuously with time. “White fluid” secretion was observed in one case. Conclusion. Current concepts for treatment of osteitis include radical surgical debridement and additional antibiotic therapy. It could be demonstrated that the usage of an antibiotic biocement with osteoconductive characteristics enlarges the success rate in septic bone surgery. The treatment concepts, however, remain complex, time consuming, require a high patient compliance, and are highly individually. *Cerement® G

The use of antibiotic-loaded cement has become a well-accepted method to develop high local antibiotic concentrations in orthopedic surgery. A new surgical technique has been established in our department in order to further increase the local antibiotic concentration, when implanting a prosthesis during revision surgery. By additional superficial vancomycin coating of the bone cement, high local antibiotic concentrations are generated. They should reach inhibiting and bactericidal concentrations of the respective pathogen during the first days after surgery. The aim of this study was to state the safety of this method by analyzing postoperative serum and drain vancomycin concentrations. Attention was focused on possible systemic side effects. To determine nephrotoxicity, creatinine levels were also measured. In total 32 revision operations (hip n=10, knee n=22) with additional superficial vancomycin coating were performed between 05/2013 and 04/2015. Procedures with removal of the prosthesis following temporary spacer implantation were excluded. In nine cases a one-stage procedure was performed, while in the others an arthroplasty or arthrodesis was performed after temporary spacer explantation. Vancomycin powder (2 grams) was added superficially to the surface of the bone cement and pressed onto manually before curing. Postoperative Vancomycin levels were measured in serum and the drain on day 1 to 5 or until the drain has been removed. In total 90 blood serum samples and 100 drain fluid samples were obtained. The highest median vancomycin level from the drain was documented on postoperative day 1 with a value of 555.3 μg/mL (range 66.1 – 1081.8), continually decreasing until postoperative day 4. The highest value was documented on the second postoperative day with 2170.0 μg/mL. On the first postoperative day, a median serum vancomycin level of 3.35 μg/mL was present (range <2.0 – 8.5), while from postoperative day 2 to 5 a median level less than 2.0 μg/mL (range <2.0 – 7.2) was documented. Anaphylactic reaction, red man syndrome or fever and chills were not observed after the surgical procedure. Furthermore, no subjective hearing loss was reported. Only in one case, a creatinine increase of 0.5 mg/dL from baseline value was detected. In this case the patient suffered preoperatively from a chronic kidney insufficiency. In total two reinfections occurred, one after explanting a spacer with subsequent hip total endoprosthesis, the other one after a one-stage hip revision. Superficial Vancomycin Coating of bone cement in orthopedic revision surgery represents a safe method to increase local inhibiting vancomycin concentrations