Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 50
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 13 - 13
4 Jun 2024
McFall J Koc T Morcos Z Sawyer M Welling A
Full Access

Background. Procedural sedation (PS) requires two suitably qualified clinicians and a dedicated monitored bed space. We present the results of intra-articular haematoma blocks (IAHB), using local anaesthetic, for the manipulation of closed ankle fracture dislocations and compared resource use with PS. Methods. Patients received intra-articular ankle haematoma blocks for displaced ankle fractures requiring manipulation between October 2020 to April 2021. The technique used 10ml of 1% lignocaine injected anteromedially into the tibiotalar joint. Pain scores (VAS), time from first x-ray to reduction, and acceptability of reduction were recorded. A comparison was made by retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone PS for manipulation of an ankle fracture over the six month period March – August 2020. Results. During the periods assessed, 25 patients received an IAHB and 28 received PS for ankle fractures requiring manipulation (mean age 57.8yr vs 55.1yr). Time from first x-ray to manipulation was 65.9 min (IAHB) vs 82.9 min (PS) (p = 0.087). In the IAHB group mean pain scores pre, during and post manipulation were 6.1, 4.7 and 2.0 respectively (‘pre’ to ‘during’ p < 0.05; ‘pre’ to ‘post’ p < 0.01). In the IAHB group, 23 (92%) had a satisfactory reduction without need of PS or general anaesthetic. In the PS group 23 (82%) had a satisfactory reduction. There was no significant difference in the number of unsatisfactory first attempt reductions between the groups. There were no cases of deep infection post operatively in either group. Conclusion. Intra-articular haematoma block of the ankle appears to be an efficacious, safe and inexpensive means of providing analgesia for manipulation of displaced ankle fractures. Advantages of this method include avoiding the risks of procedural sedation, removing the requirement of designated clinical space and need for qualified clinicians to give sedation, and the ability to re-manipulate under the same block


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXII | Pages 34 - 34
1 May 2012
Russell D Pillai A Anderson K Kumar C
Full Access

Regional anaesthetic for foot surgery has been discussed as a method of post operative analgesia. Ankle block as the sole anaesthetic for foot surgery has not been extensively reviewed in the literature. Aim. To describe our experience of forefoot surgery under ankle block. Methods. 71 consecutive forefoot procedures (65 patients) were carried out under ankle block. A mixture of 10ml 2% Lidocaine with 10ml 0.5 % Bupivacine was administered to the superficial peroneal, deep peroneal, sural and saphenous nerves. Ankle tourniquet was employed in all procedures. Patients were contacted post operatively and completed a standardised questionnaire including an incremented pain assessment ranging from 0-10 (0 no pain, 10 severe pain). Results. 61 female and 4 male patients were contacted (age range 33-67y). Procedures included 48 first metatarsal osteotomies, 15 cheilectomies, 2 first MTP joint replacements, and 6 fusions. 17 patients (26 %) reported some discomfort during the block procedure (average pain score 1.2). No patients reported any pain during their operation(s). 14 patients (22%) required supplementation of the block. Average pain score at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours following surgery were 0.66, 2.9, 2.4 and 1.3 respectively. All patients were discharged home and walking on the same day. None complained of nausea or required parentral analgesia. There were no readmissions. Each patient confirmed they would have surgery under regional block rather than general anaesthesia and would recommend this technique to family and friends. Discussion. There are many advantages in being able to perform these small procedures under regional anaesthesia. Our initial observational study suggests forefoot surgery under ankle block alone may be safe and effective. Anaesthesia obtained permits the majority of forefoot procedures and provides lasting post-operative analgesia. Combined with intra-operative sedation, use of ankle tourniquet and same day discharge it has very high patient acceptance and satisfaction


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 22 - 22
16 May 2024
Drake B Blundell M Gibson B Kingman A Kakwani R Townshend D
Full Access

Introduction. Day Case Surgery (defined as same day discharge) is a priority within the National Health Service and has been shown to provide beneficial outcomes for patients and hospitals. We report our experience developing a Day Case Programme for Total Ankle Replacement (TAR). Methods. Prior to the introduction of a Day Case Programme, average length of stay following TAR in our unit was 3.5 days. Stakeholders were consulted about ways in which same day discharge could be facilitated. Patients' post-operative pain charts were reviewed prior to the introduction of this programme. Inclusion criteria included non-complex surgery (anticipated tourniquet < 2hrs), friend or relative support and pre-operative walking-aid assessment. An enhanced recovery protocol included long-acting popliteal block and dexamethasone. Patients were discharged with opiate analgesia and written pain instructions. Patients were asked to complete a pain and satisfaction questionnaire. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were recorded. Results. From September 2017 to April 2019 21 of 70 patients underwent TAR as a Day Case. Mean age was 67 years (43-85 years). Complications included two delayed wound healings and one representation on day three with urinary retention. No patients reported post-operative nausea or vomiting, 60% did not use Oramorph at home. Average Visual Analogue Score for pain was 23/100 on day one and 21/100 day three post-operatively. There was no significant difference in pre-operative or overall change in MOXFQ, VAS or EQ5D PROMS. Conclusions. Early results suggest that Day Case Total Ankle Replacements are safe. Appropriate patient selection is necessary. Day Case Surgery relies on support and communication between multiple teams to organise and run effectively


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXII | Pages 67 - 67
1 May 2012
Loveday D Geary N
Full Access

Introduction. Medial column insufficiency in patients with painful acquired flatfoot can be difficult to appreciate. The reverse Coleman block test (as described and published by Mr E Wood in 2009) is used in this study to predict medial column instability. Methods. Patients who underwent a procedure for medial column insufficiency with use of the reverse Coleman block test pre-operatively were investigated. Weight bearing radiographs were used to determine the joints in the medial column contributing to the deformity and also to estimate the angle which the first ray must be depressed to re-establish hindfoot neutrality. The reverse Coleman block test corrects a mobile valgus heel to a neutral position by placing a block, of appropriate height, under the first metatarsal head. With the heel in neutral and the relative forefoot supination compensated the foot returns to a neutral anatomic position. Gender, age, complications and radiological outcomes were investigated. Results. Over the last three years 25 medial column procedures were performed for painful insufficiency on 17 females and five males by the senior author. Three patients underwent staged bilateral procedures. The average age was 62 years old. Three feet had been on operated on the medial column previously. The pre-operative weight bearing lateral radiographs showed instability in the medial column greater than 5° in 12 cases. With the reverse Coleman block test instability was seen in 25 cases and the deformity increased from an average of 7° (range 0° to 25°) to 14° (range 5° to 30°). Post-operative weight bearing radiographs, with fusion of the unstable joint, the average medial column alignment was 1° (range -10° to 10°). Three patients developed superficial infections requiring oral antibiotics for treatment. One patient had a non-requiring revision surgery. Discussion. The reverse Coleman block test revealed instability in 13 out of 27 cases not seen with simple weight bearing lateral radiographs. The test also on average doubled the size of any deformity seen. This aided pre-operative planning to predict the scale of deformity correction required. Conclusion. The reverse Coleman block test is a useful test to determine medial column insufficiency and assist with pre-operative planning


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 4, Issue 12 | Pages 957 - 963
18 Dec 2023
van den Heuvel S Penning D Sanders F van Veen R Sosef N van Dijkman B Schepers T

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to present the mid-term follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) which compared the functional outcome following routine removal (RR) to the outcome following on-demand removal (ODR) of the syndesmotic screw (SS).

Methods

All patients included in the ‘ROutine vs on DEmand removal Of the syndesmotic screw’ (RODEO) trial received the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Out of the 152 patients, 109 (71.7%) completed the mid-term follow-up questionnaire and were included in this study (53 treated with RR and 56 with ODR). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 43.0 to 56.0) since the initial surgical treatment of the acute syndesmotic injury. The primary outcome of this study consisted of the OMAS scores of the two groups.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1093 - 1099
1 Oct 2024
Ferreira GF Lewis TL Fernandes TD Pedroso JP Arliani GG Ray R Patriarcha VA Filho MV

Aims

A local injection may be used as an early option in the treatment of Morton’s neuroma, and can be performed using various medications. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of injections of hyaluronic acid compared with corticosteroid in the treatment of this condition.

Methods

A total of 91 patients were assessed for this trial, of whom 45 were subsequently included and randomized into two groups. One patient was lost to follow-up, leaving 22 patients (24 feet) in each group. The patients in the hyaluronic acid group were treated with three ultrasound-guided injections (one per week) of hyaluronic acid (Osteonil Plus). Those in the corticosteroid group were treated with three ultrasound-guided injections (also one per week) of triamcinolone (Triancil). The patients were evaluated before treatment and at one, three, six, and 12 months after treatment. The primary outcome measure was the visual analogue scale for pain (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and complications.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 9 | Pages 949 - 956
1 Sep 2024
Matthews PA Scammell BE Coughlin TA Nightingale J Ollivere BJ

Aims

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of two different postoperative management approaches following surgical fixation of ankle fractures: traditional cast immobilization versus the Early Motion and Directed Exercise (EMADE) programme.

Methods

A total of 157 patients aged 18 years or older who underwent successful open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Weber B (AO44B) ankle fractures were recruited to this randomized controlled trial. At two weeks post-surgical fixation, participants were randomized to either light-weight cast-immobilization or the EMADE programme, consisting of progressive home exercises and weekly advice and education. Both groups were restricted to non-weightbearing until six weeks post-surgery. The primary outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) questionnaire at 12 weeks post-surgery, with secondary measures at two, six, 24, and 52 weeks. Exploratory cost-effectiveness analyses were also performed.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 23 - 23
1 Nov 2016
Johnson-Lynn S Cooney A Ferguson D Bunn D Gray W Coorsh J Kakwani R Townshend D
Full Access

Platelet rich plasma has been advocated for the treatment of plantar fasciitis but there are few good quality clinical trials to support its use. We report a pilot double blind randomised controlled trial of platelet rich plasma versus normal saline. Methods. Patients with more than 6 months of MRI proven plantar fasciitis who had failed conservative management were invited to participate in this study. Patients were block randomised to either platelet rich plasma injection (intervention) or equivalent volume of normal saline (control). The techniques used for the injection and rehabilitation were standardised for both groups. The patient and independent assessor were blinded. Visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) and painDETECT were recorded pre-op and at 6 months. Results. Twenty-eight patients (19 females, mean age 50 years) were recruited, with 14 randomised to each arm. At 6 month follow-up, 8 patients (28.6%) were lost to follow-up. There was a significant change in VAS score from baseline to follow-up in both intervention (mean change 37.2, p = 0.008) and control (mean change 42.2, p = 0.003) groups. However there was no difference between the arms in terms of the change in VAS score from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.183). There was no correlation between pre-op PainDETECT score and change in VAS. Conclusion. This pilot study has failed to show a significant benefit of platelet rich plasma compared to saline injection, although both treatments have shown a significant improvement in symptoms. This may be due to the needling effect of injections. A larger study is required to demonstrate a meaningful change. Loss to follow in this patient group should be considered


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1709 - 1716
1 Nov 2021
Sanders FRK Birnie MF Dingemans SA van den Bekerom MPJ Parkkinen M van Veen RN Goslings JC Schepers T

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate whether on-demand removal (ODR) is noninferior to routine removal (RR) of syndesmotic screws regarding functional outcome.

Methods

Adult patients (aged above 17 years) with traumatic syndesmotic injury, surgically treated within 14 days of trauma using one or two syndesmotic screws, were eligible (n = 490) for inclusion in this randomized controlled noninferiority trial. A total of 197 patients were randomized for either ODR (retaining the syndesmotic screw unless there were complaints warranting removal) or RR (screw removed at eight to 12 weeks after syndesmotic fixation), of whom 152 completed the study. The primary outcome was functional outcome at 12 months after screw placement, measured by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS).


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1611 - 1618
1 Oct 2021
Kavarthapu V Budair B

Aims

In our unit, we adopt a two-stage surgical reconstruction approach using internal fixation for the management of infected Charcot foot deformity. We evaluate our experience with this functional limb salvage method.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients with infected Charcot foot deformity who underwent two-stage reconstruction with internal fixation between July 2011 and November 2019, with a minimum of 12 months’ follow-up.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 7 | Pages 503 - 508
8 Jul 2021
Callaghan CJ McKinley JC

Aims

Arthroplasty has become increasingly popular to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. Iatrogenic posterior neurovascular and tendinous injury have been described from saw cuts. However, it is hypothesized that posterior ankle structures could be damaged by inserting tibial guide pins too deeply and be a potential cause of residual hindfoot pain.

Methods

The preparation steps for ankle arthroplasty were performed using the Infinity total ankle system in five right-sided cadaveric ankles. All tibial guide pins were intentionally inserted past the posterior tibial cortex for assessment. All posterior ankles were subsequently dissected, with the primary endpoint being the presence of direct contact between the structure and pin.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 16 - 16
1 Dec 2015
Shivji F Weston S Addison T Erskine R Milner S
Full Access

Purpose. Ankle and hindfoot surgery is associated with severe post-operative pain, leading to a reliance on opiate analgesia and its side effects, longer hospital stays, and patient dissatisfaction. Popliteal sciatic nerve blockade has the potential to resolve these issues. We present our experience with using a continuous local anaesthetic nerve block delivered by an elastomeric pump in patients undergoing major foot and ankle surgery. Methods. All patients undergoing major ankle or hindfoot surgery during a one-year period under a single surgeon were eligible for a continuous popliteal block. An ultrasound-guided popliteal nerve catheter was inserted immediately before surgery and a bolus of bupivacaine infiltrated. Using a 250ml elastomeric pump, a continuous infusion was started immediately post operatively and terminated 48 hours later. Prospective data including post-operative analgesia, nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of stay (LOS), pain scores, and patient satisfaction were recorded daily for 48 hours post operatively. Results. Eighty-one patients (53 male, 28 female) with a mean age 60 years (24–84 years) were included. 66 patients received spinal anaesthesia with 15 having general anaesthetics. There were no complications associated with the nerve catheters. At day 1 post op, 49 (60%) patients reported having no or mild pain. 68 (84%) patients had no PONV. 27 (33%) patients did not require any opiate analgesia during their post op period. Average LOS for all patients was 54 hours, with 41 (51%) discharged within 48 hours. 74 (91%) reported good or excellent pain management in the post operative period. Conclusions. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blockade is a safe and effective method for controlling post-operative pain, reducing opiate-induced side effects, and optimising length of stay. Patient-reported outcomes support its use in major ankle and hindfoot surgery. Furthermore, reduced costs from early discharge in combination with a daycase tariff uplift can bring significant financial savings


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 6 | Pages 1127 - 1132
1 Jun 2021
Gray J Welck M Cullen NP Singh D

Aims

To assess the characteristic clinical features, management, and outcome of patients who present to orthopaedic surgeons with functional dystonia affecting the foot and ankle.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective search of our records from 2000 to 2019 of patients seen in our adult tertiary referral foot and ankle unit with a diagnosis of functional dystonia.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 4 | Pages 696 - 703
1 Apr 2021
Clough TM Ring J

Aims

We report the medium-term outcomes of a consecutive series of 118 Zenith total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) from a single, non-designer centre.

Methods

Between December 2010 and May 2016, 118 consecutive Zenith prostheses were implanted in 114 patients. Demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data were collected. The endpoint of the study was failure of the implant requiring revision of one or all of the components. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the rate of failure calculated for each year.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 7 - 7
1 Sep 2012
Dudkiewicz I Burg A Tytiun Y Velkes S Heller S
Full Access

Background. Forefoot surgery is often performed under regional anaesthesia (ankle block) in awake patients, using tourniquet or esmarch bandage to obtain bloodless field. The purpose of this study was to examine the value and need for local tourniquet pain control using local subcutaneous analgesic mixture in patients undergoing forefoot surgery under regional anaesthesia. We prospectively randomized 56 patients who underwent forefoot surgery under ankle block to receive subcutaneous local anaesthetic mixture under the tourniquet. We checked for local tourniquet pain score (VAS 0–100) and skin condition during and after the procedure. Results. Tourniquet was quite tolerable in both groups, with an average VAS score of 7–21. No difference was observed between groups throughout most of the procedure. No correlation between VAS scores and procedure length or patient's age or gender. Conclusion. Ankle tourniquet is well tolerated by patients without need for local anaesthetics


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 30 - 30
1 Jan 2014
Jagodzinski N Parsons A Parsons S
Full Access

Introduction:. In a consecutive series of 71 arthroscopic subtalar arthrodeses performed between 2004 and 2011, 14 also involved arthroscopic decortication of the talonavicular joint (double arthrodesis) and 4 the subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints (triple arthrodeses). Methods:. We examined complications, union rates in all 18 patients and clinical outcomes in 16 for whom this was the sole procedure. Results:. Mean age was 62 (45–78). Two talonavicular joints failed to unite and a third patient suffered a diabetic Charcot midfoot neuro-arthropathy. These patients' outcomes were classified as poor. Two patients underwent planned major ankle or midfoot surgery in addition to arthroscopic double arthrodeses. These joints united but these patients were not included in the clinical review to avoid confounding outcomes. Mean follow-up for the remaining 13 patients was 4.4 (1.75–7.5) years. There were no immediate perioperative complications. All 4 patients with triple fusions united with good or excellent outcomes. The nine patients receiving double arthrodesis united with 8 good or excellent outcomes. The remaining patient reported good deformity correction and stability but disappointing pain relief, (classification poor). Conclusions:. Double and triple arthrodeses remain valid salvage options for painful arthrosis and severe deformity. Preservation of the calcaneocuboid joint permits a relative lateral column lengthening when correcting planovalgus deformity. Arthroscopic surgery offers preservation and protection of soft tissues and reduces wound tension. The sinus tarsi approach permits good visualisation and decortication of the triple joints and rotatory correction of deformity. This technique is not appropriate when there is extensive bone loss requiring block bone grafting. Early complications are reduced and late complications such as non-union and arthrosis of adjacent joints seem similar to those reported in studies on open arthrodeses


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 3 | Pages 150 - 163
1 Mar 2021
Flett L Adamson J Barron E Brealey S Corbacho B Costa ML Gedney G Giotakis N Hewitt C Hugill-Jones J Hukins D Keding A McDaid C Mitchell A Northgraves M O'Carroll G Parker A Scantlebury A Stobbart L Torgerson D Turner E Welch C Sharma H

Aims

A pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 334 adult patients diagnosed with a closed type C pilon fracture will be conducted. Internal locking plate fixation will be compared with external frame fixation. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Disability Rating Index (a patient self-reported assessment of physical disability) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, three, six, and 24 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), the five-level EuroQol five-dimenison score (EQ-5D-5L), complications (including bone healing), resource use, work impact, and patient treatment preference. The acceptability of the treatments and study design to patients and health care professionals will be explored through qualitative methods.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 34 - 34
1 Jan 2014
Refaie R Chong M Murty A Reed M
Full Access

Introduction:. Symptomatic treatment of ankle osteoarthritis (OA) with corticosteroid injections is well established. Hyaluronic acid is also reported as an effective symptomatic treatment for ankle OA but these two treatments have not been compared directly. Methods:. A prospective randomised controlled trial in patients with symptomatic ankle osteoarthritis. Twenty patients per group were required based on a significance level of 0.05, and a drop out rate of 5%. Patients were blindly allocated to the treatment or control group. Injections were carried out by the clinician in the outpatient department. Treatment group received Ostenil 20 mg and control group received Depomedrone 40 mg (both as single injections). The treatment arm was allocated by computer generated block randomization to match treatment allocation with grade of arthritis. The primary outcome measure was the change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score at 6 months. Secondary outcome was the change in AOFAS score at 6 months. Research ethics committee approval was obtained. Results:. A total of 42 patients were recruited of which 38 completed the study. Male recruits predominated (79%; 33 recruits). More than 70% had radiographic OA of grade 3 or more. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in VAS at weeks 3, 6, and 3 months over baseline, but the Ostenil group faired better at 6 months follow-up. (difference in VAS scores of 3.5 Ostenil VAS − 4; Steroid VAS − 7.5; Mann Whitney test (p<=0.05). There was no statistical difference in AOFAS scores between both groups at baseline and follow-up (p=0.48, Mann Whitney test). No complications noted. 30% of patients have had their surgical procedures delayed for 6 month post injection. Conclusion:. The Ostenil group revealed similar clinical efficacy to steroid group, however the benefits provided by Ostenil lasted longer. Ostenil provided sufficient mid-term pain-relief whilst patient awaits further definitive intervention


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 28 - 28
1 Sep 2012
Marsland D Dray A Little N Solan M
Full Access

The saphenous nerve is classically described as innervating skin of the medial foot to the first MTP joint and thus is at risk in surgery to the medial ankle and foot. However, it has previously been demonstrated that the dorsomedial branch of the superficial peroneal nerve consistently supplies the dorsomedial forefoot, and therefore previous descriptions of the saphenous nerve maybe erroneous. We undertook a cadaveric study to assess the presence and variability of this nerve. 21 cadaveric feet were dissected from a level 5 cm above the medial malleolus, and distally to the termination of the saphenous nerve. In 16 specimens (76%), a saphenous nerve was present, of which 14 were anterior to the saphenous vein. Two of 16 nerves terminated above the medial malleolus. Therefore, only 14 of 21 specimens (66%) had a saphenous nerve present at the level of the medial malleolus. In seven of these 14 specimens (50%), the nerve terminally branched before the level of the tip of the malleolus. The mean distance reached in the foot was 46mm. Only two nerves reached the forefoot, at 97mm and 110 mm from the ankle joint respectively. At the ankle, the mean distance of the nerve from the tibialis anterior tendon was 9mm, and the saphenous vein 1.2mm. Discussion. Our study shows that the course of the saphenous nerve is highly variable, and when present usually terminates within 40mm of the ankle. Only 10% reach the first MTP joint. These findings are inconsistent with standard surgical text descriptions. The saphenous nerve is at risk in distal tibial screw placement and arthroscopy portal placement, and should be included in local anaesthetic ankle blocks in forefoot surgery, as a small proportion of nerves supply sensation to the medial forefoot


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 27 - 27
1 Sep 2012
Cove R Guerin S Stephens M
Full Access

Method. A questionnaire was given to delegates at the British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS) annual scientific meeting 3rd–5th November 2010. A total of 75 questionnaires were included within the analysis. The questionnaire asked delegates for their most commonly performed procedure for a variety of common foot and ankle conditions. Results. Which procedure do you most commonly perform?. Hallux valgus mild;. Chevron 60.0%. Scarf 28.0%. Hallux Valgus Moderate;. Scarf 85.3%. Chevron 12.0%. Hallux Valgus Severe;. Scarf 65.3%. Basal Osteotomy 29.3%. 1st MTPJ OA Fusion;. crossed screws 54.7%. Plate 26.7%. Lesser toe Metatarsalgia;. Weil 48.6%. BRT 22.8%. Hammer second toe;. PIPJ Fusion 62.7%. Oxford Procedure 15%. Tib Post stage 1;. Debridement 60.0%. Conservative 24.0%. Tib Post stage 2;. FDL Transfer 76.0%. Calc. osteotomy 78.7%. Achilles tendon rupture. Open Repair 61.5%. Percutaneous 13.8%. In delegates' normal practice they would fuse an osteoarthritic ankle 90% and perform a Total Ankle replacement 10% of the time. The method of fusion is split 50/50 between arthroscopic and open. Regarding the anaesthetic used for forefoot surgery most are using GA + Regional Block (mean 60%) only occasionally using regional anaesthesia alone (mean 8%). Only 12.3% of delegates have tried minimally invasive [forefoot] surgery (MIS), 17.3% of delegates think they will do more MIS in the future. The practice of British orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons is broadly in line with an evidence-based approach. Knowledge of current practice may help trainees make sense of the myriad foot and ankle operations described in the literature