Gavril Ilizarov advocated a fine wire tension of between 900N and 1200N for circular frame construction. Wire tension can be achieved via a tensioning device or ‘Russian tensioning’ (a fixed wire lengthening around a bolt). There is limited information on the latter technique. This study explored the tensions achieved via Russian tensioning and reports the impact of a second wire on construct tension. A single 160mm stainless-steel ring was constructed, then 1.8mm stainless steel wires were secured using a Russian fixation bolt and Russian tensioned with a 2nd bolt. The angle subtended by tensioning using the 2nd bolt was measured using a goniometer. Angles of 45°, 70° and 90° were repeated in triplicates, with wire tension measured using a calibrated tensiometer. A second, orthogonal wire was added and tensioned to the same angle. Tensions of both wires were remeasured and recorded. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare mean tensions. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant. Tensioning at all angles was insufficient to achieve the target range of 900–1200N (range 99–110N). A second, orthogonal wire changed frame dynamics such that a 90° angle resulted in both wires achieving adequate tension (mean 1143N, SD 307N). Increases were significant across all tensioning angles (p=<0.002) however only biomechanically relevant for 90°. Russian tensioning is insufficient with a single wire, however the addition of an orthogonal wire increases tension in both wires, reaching the target range at 90° deflection. Further study using wire tensioners is warranted, and also the impact of non-orthogonal wire constructs.
This article is a systematic review of the published
literature about the biomechanics, functional outcome and complications
of intramedullary nailing of fractures of the distal radius. We searched the Medline and EMBASE databases and included all
studies which reported the outcome of intramedullary (IM) nailing
of fractures of the distal radius. Data about functional outcome,
range of movement (ROM), strength and complications, were extracted.
The studies included were appraised independently by both authors
using a validated quality assessment scale for non-controlled studies
and the CONSORT statement for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The search strategy revealed 785 studies, of which 16 were included
for full paper review. These included three biomechanical studies,
eight case series and five randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The biomechanical studies concluded that IM nails were at least
as strong as locking plates. The clinical studies reported that
IM nailing gave a comparable ROM, functional outcome and grip strength
to other fixation techniques. However, the mean complication rate of intramedullary nailing
was 17.6% (0% to 50%). This is higher than the rates reported in
contemporary studies for volar plating. It raises concerns about
the role of intramedullary nailing, particularly when comparative
studies have failed to show that it has any major advantage over
other techniques. Further adequately powered RCTs comparing the
technique to both volar plating and percutaneous wire fixation are needed. Cite this article:
