Introduction:. The Best Practice Tariff (BPT) for hip fractures was introduced in April 2010 to promote a number of quality markers, including surgery within 36 hours. We conducted an audit to see whether the introduction of the BPT has had an inadvertent adverse effect on delay to fixation of unstable ankle fractures. Method:. We compared the delay to surgery for 50 consecutive patients with unstable ankle fractures in the 2009 financial year with another 50 patients treated in the 2011 financial year, ie one year after the introduction of the BPT. There were no other changes in service in our department in this period. All radiographs were reviewed and classified using the Lauge-Hansen system by 2 surgeons. Excel was used for data analysis using unpaired T-Test and chi-squared test to assess significance. Results:. 2 patients with pilon fractures were excluded from each group. Demographics and fracture pattern between the remaining 48 patients in each group were similar. The mean delay to surgery before BPT was 2.2 days compared with 3.8 days after its introduction (p = 0.01). 7 patients waited more than 5 days for surgery before BPT compared with 17 patients after its introduction (p < 0.001). There was 1 manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) before BPT and 8 MUAs in 7 patients after its introduction (p < 0.001). Conclusion:. There is a significant association between the introduction of BPT for hip fractures and an increase in the delay to surgery for patients with unstable ankle fractures by an average of 1.6 days. More patients waited more than 5 days for surgery and there were more MUAs. We postulate that in a resource-limited NHS, prioritizing one patient group inevitably disadvantages others. Orthopaedic trauma services must adapt to national guidance to ensure all patients are treated in a timely fashion

Aims. Diabetic foot care is a significant burden on the NHS in England. We have conducted a nationwide survey to determine the current participation of orthopaedic surgeons in diabetic foot care in England. Methods. A questionnaire was sent to all 136 NHS trusts audited in the 2018 National Diabetic Foot Audit (NDFA). The questionnaire asked about the structure of diabetic foot care services. Results. Overall, 123 trusts responded, of which 117 admitted patients with diabetic foot disease and 113 had an orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon. A total of 90 trusts (77%) stated that the admission involved medicine, with 53 (45%) of these admissions being exclusively under medicine, and 37 (32%) as joint admissions. Of the joint admissions, 16 (14%) were combined with vascular and 12(10%) with orthopaedic surgery. Admission is solely under vascular surgery in 12 trusts (10%) and orthopaedic surgery in 7 (6%). Diabetic foot abscesses were drained by orthopaedic surgeons in 61 trusts (52%) and vascular surgeons in 47 (40%). Conclusion. Orthopaedic surgeons make a significant contribution to both acute and elective diabetic foot care currently in the UK. This contribution is likely to increase with the movement of vascular surgery to a hub and spoke model, and measures should be put in place to increase the team based approach to the diabetic foot, for example with the introduction of a best practice tariff. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):618–622