Periprosthetic joint infection represents a devastating complication after total elbow arthroplasty. Several measures can be implemented before, during, and after surgery to decrease infection rates, which exceed 5%. Debridement with antibiotics and implant retention has been reported to be successful in less than one-third of acute infections, but still plays a role. For elbows with well-fixed implants, staged retention seems to be equally successful as the more commonly performed two-stage reimplantation, both with a success rate of 70% to 80%. Permanent resection or even amputation are occasionally considered. Not uncommonly, a second-stage reimplantation requires complex reconstruction of the skeleton with allografts, and the extensor mechanism may also be deficient. Further developments are needed to improve our management of infection after elbow arthroplasty. Cite this article:
A number of methods have been described to remove a well-fixed humeral implant as part of revision shoulder arthroplasty. These include the use of cortical windows and humeral osteotomies. The router bit extraction technique uses a high-speed router bit to disrupt the bone-implant interface. The implant is then struck in a retrograde fashion with a square-tip impactor and mallet. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and frequency of the different techniques needed for the removal of a well-fixed humeral stem in revision shoulder arthroplasty. Between 2010 and 2018, 288 revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures requiring removal of a well-fixed humeral component were carried out at a tertiary referral centre by a single surgeon. The patient demographics, indications for surgery, and method of extraction were collected.Aims
Patients and Methods
To determine the incidence and timing of post-operative fevers
following shoulder arthroplasty and the resulting investigations
performed. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing
shoulder arthroplasty over a nine-year period. The charts of all
patients with a post-operative fever (≥ 38.6°C) were reviewed and
the results of all investigations were analysed.Aims
Patients and Methods
The primary aim of this retrospective study was to identify the
incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) following elective and
trauma elbow arthroplasty. The secondary aim was to determine clinical
outcomes with respect to the formation of heterotopic ossification. A total of 55 total elbow arthroplasties (TEAs) (52 patients)
performed between June 2007 and December 2015 were eligible for
inclusion in the study (29 TEAs for primary elective arthroplasty
and 26 TEAs for trauma). At review, 15 patients (17 total elbow
arthroplasties) had died from unrelated causes. There were 14 men
and 38 women with a mean age of 70 years (42 to 90). The median
clinical follow-up was 3.6 years (1.2 to 6) and the median radiological follow-up
was 3.1 years (0.5 to 7.5).Aim
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and
radiological outcomes of a consecutive cohort of patients aged >
70 years with a displaced fracture of the olecranon, which was treated
non-operatively with early mobilisation. We identified 28 such patients
(27 women) with a mean age of 82 years (71 to 91). The elbow was
initially immobilised in an above elbow cast in 90° of flexion of
the elbow for a mean of five days. The cast was then replaced by
a sling. Active mobilisation was encouraged as tolerated. No formal
rehabilitation was undertaken. At a mean follow-up of 16 months
(12 to 26), the mean ranges of flexion and extension were 140° and
15° respectively. On a visual analogue scale of 1 (no pain) to 10,
the mean pain score was 1 (0 to 8). Of the original 28 patients
22 developed nonunion, but no patients required surgical treatment. We conclude that non-operative functional treatment of displaced
olecranon fractures in the elderly gives good results and a high
rate of satisfaction. Cite this article:
