Aims. Metal and ceramic humeral head
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) using trabecular metal (TM)-backed glenoid implants has been introduced with the aim to increase implant survival. Only short-term reports on the outcomes of TM-RTSA have been published to date. We aim to present the seven-year survival of TM-backed glenoid implants along with minimum five-year clinical and radiological outcomes. All consecutive elective RTSAs performed at a single centre between November 2008 and October 2014 were reviewed. Patients who had primary TM-RTSA for rotator cuff arthropathy and osteoarthritis with deficient cuff were included. A total of 190 shoulders in 168 patients (41 male, 127 female) were identified for inclusion at a mean of 7.27 years (SD 1.4) from surgery. The primary outcome was survival of the implant with all-cause revision and aseptic glenoid loosening as endpoints. Secondary outcomes were clinical, radiological, and patient-related outcomes with a five-year minimum follow-up.Aims
Methods
Few studies have compared survivorship of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with hemiarthroplasty (HA). This observational study compared survivorship of TSA with HA while controlling for important covariables and accounting for death as a competing risk. All patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty in Ontario, Canada between April 2002 and March 2012 were identified using population-based health administrative data. We used the Fine–Gray sub-distribution hazard model to measure the association of arthroplasty type with time to revision surgery (accounting for death as a competing risk) controlling for age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, income quintile, diagnosis, and surgeon factors.Aims
Patients and Methods
We assessed the long-term (more than ten-year) outcomes of the
Kudo type-5 elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
(RA). We reviewed 41 elbows (Larsen Grade IV, n = 21; Grade V, n =
20) in 31 patients with RA who had undergone a Kudo type-5 total
elbow arthroplasty (TEA) between 1994 and 2003, and had been followed
up for more than ten years. The humeral component was cementless
and the all-polyethylene ulnar component cemented in every patient. Clinical
outcome was assessed using the Mayo elbow performance score. We
calculated the revision rate and evaluated potential risk factors
for revision. The duration of follow-up was a mean 141 months (120
to 203).Aims
Materials and Methods
Osteoarthritis results in changes in the dimensions
of the glenoid. This study aimed to assess the size and radius of curvature
of arthritic glenoids. A total of 145 CT scans were analysed, performed
as part of routine pre-operative assessment before total shoulder
replacement in 91 women and 54 men. Only patients with primary osteoarthritis and
a concentric glenoid were included in the study. The CT scans underwent
three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and were analysed using dedicated
computer software. The measurements consisted of maximum superoinferior height,
anteroposterior width and a best-fit sphere radius of curvature
of the glenoid. The mean height was 40.2 mm ( With current shoulder replacement systems using a unique backside
radius of curvature for the glenoid component, there is a risk of
undertaking excessive reaming to adapt the bone to the component
resulting in sacrifice of subchondral bone or under-reaming and
instability of the component due to a ’rocking horse‘ phenomenon. Cite this article:
