Previously, we conducted a multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without remplissage. The end point for the randomized controlled trial was two years post-operative, providing support for the benefits of remplissage in the short term in reducing recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to compare the medium term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of patients previously randomized to have undergone isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) for the management of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. The rate of recurrent instability and instances of re-operation were examined. The original study was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial with two 1:1 parallel groups with recruitment undertaken between 2011 and 2017. For this medium-term study, participants were reached for a telephone follow-up in 2020 and asked a series of standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation or reoperation that had occurred on their shoulder for which they were randomized. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables. “Failure” was defined as occurrence of a dislocation. “Recurrent instability” was defined as the participant reporting a dislocation or two or more occurences of subluxation greater than one year post-operative. All analyses were undertaken based on intention-to-treat whereby their data was analyzed based on the group to which they were originally allocated. One-hundred and eight participants were randomized of which 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to final follow-up was 49.3 for the NO REMP group and 53.8 for the REMP group. The rates of re-dislocation or failure were 8% (4/52) in the REMP group at an average of 23.8 months post-operative versus 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP at an average of 16.5 months post-operative. The rates of recurrent instability were 10% (5/52) in the REMP group at an average of 24 months post-operative versus 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group at an average of 19.5 months post-operative. Survival curves were significantly different favouring REMP in both scenarios. Arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage is an effective procedure in the treatment of patients with an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%). Patients can expect favourable rates of recurrent instability when compared with isolated Bankart repair at medium term follw-up

Introduction. The Bankart lesion is the most common form of labro-ligamentous injury in patients with traumatic dislocations of the shoulder. Various methods have been described each with its own advantages and disadvantages. We describe 5-year results of arthroscopic Bankart repair using knotless anchors. Patients and Methods. There were 38 patients, with involvement of the dominant arm in 28 patients. Recurrent dislocation was the most common indication in 21 patients, followed by first dislocation in 9 patients and second dislocation in 8 patients. All patients were done under general anesthesia and regional block in beach-chair position. Standard portals were used and repair done using 2.9 mm pushlock knotless anchors (Arthrex®). Patients had sling for 4 weeks and followed by a strict physiotherapy rehab protocol. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks and 3 monthly thereafter. Results. Only one patient had symptoms of recurrent instability, but was not keen on further surgery. Two patients had limitation of external rotation to 10 degrees. The mean Carter-Rowe score was 77.3. 90% of patients were happy to recommend surgery. Conclusion. Arthroscopic Bankart repair appears to produce good mid-term results for patients with shoulder instability

Coracoid fractures during screw insertion and graft osteolysis are serious concerns with standard screw fixation techniques in Latarjet procedure. This study tends to evaluate the outcome of mini open Latarjet using Arthrex mini-plate for coracoids graft fixation. We did retrospective analysis of 30 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart's repair. A low profile wedge plate (Arthrex) with two low profile screws was used for fixation of the coracoid graft. CT analysis was performed at final follow up to see graft union and results were evaluated using American shoulder and elbow score (ASES) and Western Ontario shoulder instability score (WOSIS). Mean follow up time was 24 months. Postoperatively, mean forward elevation was 162.8 degrees and external rotation was 44.6 degrees. All patients returned to their previous occupation. None reported to be having any recurrent subluxation post-surgery. The mean ASES score was 92.5 while the mean WOSIS score was 76.84%. Only one patient had screw backing out from the plate. There was no case of coracoid graft osteolysis. The mini-open Latarjet procedure with graft fixation with Arthrex mini-plate provides satisfactory outcome and stabilization in patients who present with dramatic bone loss and failed soft tissue reconstruction. It not only ensures early rehabilitation but also minimum loss of external rotation. The only drawback is the relatively high cost of the implant

Background:. Individuals with large Hill-Sachs lesions may be prone to failure and reoccurrence following standard arthroscopic Bankart repair. Here, the Remplissage procedure may promote shoulder stability through infraspinatus capsulo-tenodesis directly into the lesion. Little biomechanicaldata about the Remplissage procedure on glenohumeral kinematics, stability, and range of motion (ROM) currently exists. Questions/purposes:. What are the biomechanical effects of Bankart and Remplissage repair for large Hill-Sachs lesions?. Methods:. Six cadaveric shoulders were tested using a custom shoulder testing system. ROM and glenohumeral translation with applied loads in anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) directions were quantified at 0° and 60° gleno-humeral abduction. Six conditions were tested: intact, Bankart lesion, Bankart with 40% Hill-Sachs lesion, Bankart repair, Bankart repair with Remplissage, and Remplissage repair alone. Results:. Humeral external rotation (ER) and total range of motion (TR) increased significantly from intact after the creation of the Bankart lesion at both 0° abduction (ER +27.0°, TR +35.8°, p < 0.05) [Fig 1] and 60° abduction (ER +9.5°, TR +30.7°, p < 0.05) [Fig 2], but did not increase further with the addition of the Hill-Sachs lesion. The Bankart repair restored range of motion to intact values 0° abduction at addition of the Remplissage repair did not significantly alter range of motion from the Bankart repair alone. There were no significant changes in AP or SI translation between Bankart repair with and without Remplissage compared to the intact specimen. Conclusions:. The addition of the Remplissage procedure for treatment of large Hill-Sachs lesions had no statistically significant effect on ROM or translation for treatment for large Hill-Sachs lesions. Clinical Relevance: The Remplissage technique may be a suitable option for engaging Hill-Sachs lesions. Further clinical studies are warranted

Acute Hill-Sachs (HS) reduction represents a potential alternative method to remplissage for the treatment of an engaging HS lesion. The purpose of this study is to biomechanically compare the stabilising effects of a acute HS reduction technique and remplissage in a complex instability model. This was a comparative cadaveric study of 6 shoulders. For the acute HS lesion, a unique model was used to create a 30% defect, compressing the subchondral bone while preserving the articular surface in a more anatomic fashion. In addition, a 15% glenoid defect was made in all specimens. The HS lesion was reduced through a lateral cortical window with a bone tamp, and the subchondral void was filled with Quickset (Arthrex) bone cement to prevent plastic deformation. Five scenarios were tested; intact specimen, bipolar lesion, Bankart repair, remplissage with Bankart repair and HS reduction technique with Bankart repair. Translation, kinematics and dislocation events were recorded. For all 6 specimens no dislocations occurred after either remplissage or the reduction technique. At 90 degrees of abduction and external rotation (ABER), anterior-inferior translation was 11.1 mm (SD 0.9) for the bipolar lesion. This was significantly reduced following both remplissage (5.1±0.7mm; p<0.001) and HS reduction (4.4±0.3mm; p<0.001). For anterior-inferior translation there was no significant difference in translation between the reduction technique and remplissage (p=0.91). At 90 degrees of ABER, the intact specimens average joint stiffness was 7.0±1.0N/mm, which was not significantly different from the remplissage (7.8±0.9 N/mm; p=0.9) and reduction technique (9.1±0.6 N/mm; p=0.50). Compared with an isolated Bankart repair, the average external rotation loss after also performing a remplissage procedure was 4.3±3.5 deg (p=0.65), while average ER loss following HS reduction was 1.1±3.3 deg (p=0.99). There was no significant difference in external rotation between remplissage and the reduction technique (p=0.83). Similar joint stability was conferred following both procedures, though remplissage had 3.2-degree loss of ER in comparison. While not statistically significant, even slight ER loss may be clinically detrimental in overhead athletes. Overall, the acute reduction technique is a more anatomic alternative to the remplissage procedure with similar ability to prevent dislocation in a biomechanical model, making it a viable treatment option for engaging Hill-Sachs lesions

Concepts in glenoid tracking and treatment strategies of glenoid bone loss are well established. Initial observations in our practice in Singapore showed few patients with major bone loss requiring glenoid reconstructions. This led us to investigate the incidence of and the extent of bone loss in our patients with shoulder instability. Our study revealed bony Bankart lesions were seen in 46% of our patients but glenoid bone loss measured only 6–10% of the glenoid surface. In the same study we found that arthroscopic labral repair with capsular plication and Mason-Ellen suturing (Hybrid technique) was sufficient to stabilise patients with bipolar bone defects and minor glenoid bone loss. This led us to develop the concept of minor bone loss and a new algorithm. Our algorithm and strategies to deal with major bone loss will also be discussed, and techniques & outcomes of Arthroscopic Bony Bankart repair, Arthroscopic Glenoid Reconstruction and Arthroscopic Remplissage procedures will be shown

Currently there is no standard quantitative methodology for the description of Hill-Sachs defects (HSD), the size of which is important in planning surgical treatment for patients with anterior shoulder instability. The main purpose was to develop a simple imaging measurement to improve communication regarding HSDs. The secondary goal was to determine, using this new measurement, whether there was a significant difference in the size of HSDs in patients who underwent a Weber osteotomy (more invasive surgical intervention for those failing Bankart repair) compared with patients who underwent clinically successful arthroscopic Bankart repairs (the first surgical intervention for anterior shoulder instability). HSD volume was calculated with newly developed methodology using computed tomography in ten patients who required eleven Weber osteotomies and using magnetic resonance imaging in twenty-two patients who had clinically successful arthroscopic Bankart repairs. Within the Weber cohort, regression analysis was performed to determine correlation between HSD volume and each of height, maximum depth, and width. Student's t-test analysis was used to compare HSD volume between the Weber and Bankart cohorts. In the Weber cohort, there is a statistically significant correlation between the HSD Volume Ratio and the HSD Maximum Depth Ratio (R. 2. =0.83). The t-test comparison of mean HSD Volumes showed statistically significant (p<0.0015) larger HSD's in the Weber cohort than the Bankart cohort. HSD depth is a radiological indicator for HSD volume. This simple measurement may facilitate orthopaedic pre-operative planning for patients with severe recurrent anterior shoulder instability. In this preliminary study, patients who had Weber osteotomies after failed Bankart repairs had statistically significantly larger HSDs than patients with clinically successful Bankart repairs

Purpose. The remplissage procedure may be performed as an adjunct to Bankart repair to address an engaging Hill-Sachs defect. Clinically, it has been reported that the remplissage procedure improves joint stability but that it may also restrict shoulder range of motion. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to examine the effects of the remplissage procedure on shoulder motion and stability. We hypothesized that the remplissage procedure would improve stability and prevent engagement but may have a deleterious effect on motion. Method. Eight cadaveric forequarters were mounted on a custom biomechanical testing apparatus which applied simulated loads independently to the rotator cuff muscles and to the anterior, middle and posterior deltoid. The testing conditions included: intact shoulder, Bankart defect, Bankart repair, 2 Hill-Sachs defects (15%, 30%) with and without remplissage. Joint range of motion and translation were recorded with an optical tracking system. Outcomes measured were internal-external rotation range of motion in adduction and 90 combined abduction, extension range of motion and stability, quantified in terms of joint stiffness and engagement, in abduction. Results. With a 15% Hill-Sachs defect, the remplissage significantly reduced internal-external rotation in adduction (15.111.1, p=0.039), but not in abduction (7.79.0, p=0.380). In a 30% Hill-Sachs defect, the remplissage procedure significantly reduced internal-external rotation in adduction (19.57.8, p=0.001), and in abduction (12.28.6, p=0.03). The remplissage procedure significantly enhanced stability in the 15% Hill-Sachs defect (4.74.0 N/mm, p=0.038), and in the 30% defect (3.93.2 N/mm, P=0.030) compared to the unrepaired defect. All of the unrepaired 30% defects engaged and the remplissage procedure successfully eliminated engagement in each case. However, impingement of the repair on the posterior glenoid with paradoxical posterior pivoting of the humeral head was observed in 50% of the specimens. Conclusion. The remplissage procedure significantly augmented a Bankart repair in 15% and 30% Hill-Sachs defects and, in 30% Hill-Sachs defects, the remplissage successfully prevented engagement of the defect. The remplissage procedure, however, did significantly reduced shoulder internal-external rotation range of motion as reported clinically, and was also found to reduce extension in the two defect groups. During extension the intra-articular soft tissue bumper created by the remplissage procedure was found to impinge on the posterior glenoid rim and cause pivoting, which produced non-physiologic glenohumeral joint distraction. Therefore, the remplissage procedure stabilized the joint to a significantly greater degree than did a Bankart repair alone; however, it also significantly reduced shoulder range of motion

The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the outcome following arthroscopic Bankart repair using two types of suture anchors, absorbable and non-absorbable. Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder, seen between April 2000 and June 2003 in a single unit, were considered for inclusion in the study. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively using a subjective patient related outcome measurement tool (Oxford instability score), a visual analogue scale for pain and instability (VAS Pain and VAS instability) and a quality of life questionnaire (SF-12). The incidence of recurrent instability and the level of sporting ability were recorded. Patients were randomised to undergo surgical repair with either non-absorbable or absorbable anchors. 130 patients were included in the study. 6 patients were lost to follow-up and 124 patients (95%) completed the study. Both types of anchors were highly effective. There were no differences in the rate of recurrence or any of the scores between the two. Four patients in the non-absorbable group and 3 in the absorbable group experienced further episodes of dislocation after a traumatic event. The rate of redislocation in the whole series was therefore, 5.6%. In addition, 4 patients, all of them in the absorbable group (4%) described ongoing symptoms of instability but no true dislocations. 85% of the patients have returned to their previous level of sporting activity. There are no differences in the outcome of Arthroscopic Bankart repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable anchors. Both are highly effective, showing a redislocation rate of 5.6%

Michael Robinson has been a Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom for 10 years. His special interests include the treatment of proximal humeral and clavicle fractures, and shoulder instability. Primary traumatic anterior dislocations of the glenohumeral joint in young adults are common injuries, which are associated with persistent deficits of shoulder function and a high risk of recurrent instability. Although several risk factors have been implicated, a younger age at the time of the primary dislocation, and male gender, are the factors that have been most consistently associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Recent studies have suggested that primary arthroscopic repair of the anteroinferior detachment of the glenoid labrum (Bankart repair) may reduce the risk of subsequent recurrent instability and improve function, when compared with non-operative treatment. However, the unblinded or single-blind design of these studies fails to eliminate the potential for error due to observer or subject bias, and the therapeutic effects of the Bankart repair cannot be distinguished from those of the arthroscopic examination and washout alone. The latter may reduce the rate of subsequent instability, by promoting healing of the labral detachment, or by altering the patient's subsequent level of physical activity and compliance with rehabilitation protocols. A clinical trial conducted recently in our Institution assessed the efficacy of a primary arthroscopic stabilisation after a first-time dislcoation, whilst controlling for the therapeutic effects of the arthroscopic examination and washout alone. We aimed to specifically test the null hypothesis, that an arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) would not produce an improvement in the rate of recurrent instability, functional outcome, range of movement, levels of patient satisfaction or total cost of treatment, when compared with an arthroscopic examination and washout (AWO) alone. The results of this study will be presented, together with an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of primary arthroscopic stabilisation. None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study

Recurrent anterior shoulder instability (RASI) is related to progressive bone loss on the glenoid and on the humeral head. Bone deficit magnitude is a well-recognized predictor of recurrence of instability after an arthroscopic Bankart surgery, but the best way to measure it is unknown. In this study, we want to determine which measurement method is the best predictor of recurrence of instability and function. For 10 years now, all patients undergoing surgery for RASI in 4 centers are included in a prospective study: the LUXE cohort. Patients with a pre-operative CT-scan and a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. ISIS score was used to stratify patients. WOSI and Quick-Dash questionnaires were used to characterise function. Bone defects were assessed using the Clock method, the Glenoid Ratio, the Humeral Ratio, the Glenoid Track method and the angle of engagement in the axial plane. A total of 262 patients are now included in the LUXE study. One hundred and three patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis with a majority of male (79%) and a mean age is 28 years old. The median number of dislocations prior to surgery was 6. Seventy patients had an arthroscopic Bankart repair and 33 patients underwent an open Latarjet procedure. The ISIS score for these groups were of 2.7 and 4.8 respectively (p<0.001). The mean bone defect on the glenoid was of 1h51 with the Clock method (range: 0h-4h48; SD=1h46) and of 9% for the glenoid ratio (0–37%, 10%). On the humeral side, the bone defect was of 1h59 (0h-4h08; 0h49) for the Humeral clock method, 15% (0–36%; 6%) with the ratio method and 71 degrees of external rotation (SD=30 degrees) with the angle of engagement measurement. On the combined evaluations, 53 patients presented an off-track lesion, with mean combined hours of 3h53 (SD= 2h13). The greatest correlation obtained was between the glenoid ratio and the glenoid clock method (r=0.919, p<0.001). Eighteen patients had a recurrence of shoulder dislocation after the initial surgery, leading to a recurrence rate of 23% in arthroscopic surgery versus six percent after a Latarjet (OR= 4.6, p=0.034). No bone defect was correlated to Latarjet failure. For the arthroscopic group, the risk of recurrence was related to a smaller angle of engagement of the Hill-Sachs (p=0.05), a smaller Humeral clock measurement (p=0.034) and a longer follow-up (p=0.006). No glenoid or combined measurements were correlated with arthroscopic procedure failure. Recurrence of dislocation was associated to worst function according to the WOSI (1036 vs 573, p=0.002) and DASH (32 vs 15, p=0.03). Even with lower ISIS score, arthroscopic procedures are still leading to high risk of recurrence in this “all comer” consecutive cohort study AND it is related to humeral side parameters. Recurrence is also affecting daily function and creating higher anxiety related to the shoulder

Hill-Sachs and reverse Hill-Sachs lesions come in different shapes and sizes, and their effect on “glenoid track” can vary. Small Hill-Sachs lesions that do not engage can be successfully treated with a Bankart repair alone done arthroscopically or open. Moderate, engaging, Hill-Sachs lesions can be treated either with the addition of remplissage to an arthroscopic Bankart or by adding the triple blocking effect of the Bristow-Latarjet procedure. Surface replacements vary in size from the small hemi-cap type of procedure to an entire humeral head replacement (HHR). These devices can be used as opposed to allograft replacement when the risk of post-reconstruction arthritis is high with the aforementioned more conventional treatment techniques. When 45% or more of the humeral head is involved with the lesion, or Outerbridge stage III and IV changes prevail, a HHR is preferred. An oval shaped HHR is the author's preference, and the long diameter can be used to provide coverage anteriorly or posteriorly and is particularly useful in large Hill-Sachs lesions associated with epilepsy

This is a case series of a senior surgeon's experience; the purpose being to illustrate the problems encountered when using bio-absorbable anchors for various indications in shoulder surgery. Method. A retrospective analysis of 7 patients' notes, radiology and arthroscopic findings between 2006 and 2010. Results. There were 5 females and 2 males, with an average age of 50 years 3 months. The indications for using these anchors varied; 5 patients had rotator cuff repairs, 1 had a SLAP repair and the other had a Bankart repair. Patients complained of pain (3), a noisy shoulder (2), deformity (1) and symptoms similar to an infection (1). Average time from surgery to symptoms varied, with the shortest time being 3 months and the longest being 4 years 2 months. Some had dramatic MRI changes showing significant lysis around the anchors. Arthroscopic findings included anchor debris in the joint, loose anchors with significant defects and resultant irreversible cartilage damage. Conclusion. We conclude that even though these anchors are widely marketed and used in shoulder surgery, they are not without their problems, which can occur as early as three months post insertion. This has certainly changed our minds regards the use of bio-absorbable anchors in our practice

Introduction. Current work-hour restrictions and cost pressures have highlighted the limitations of apprenticeship-based learning, and led to the development of alternative methods to improve the skills of orthopaedic trainees outside of the clinical environment. These methods include using synthetic bones and simulators in the laboratory setting. Educational theory highlights the importance of context for effective learning, yet full-immersion simulation facilities are prohibitively expensive. This study explored the concept of contextualised training day in trauma & orthopaedics. Methods. Fifteen novice surgeons provided feedback after completing three teaching modules:. 1). OSCE-style Problem-based Learning of Orthopaedic Trauma in the Fracture Clinic Setting, utilising an actor and radiographs to teach history, examination, diagnostic and management skills. 2). The positioning, preparing and draping of a patient, and Examination under anaesthesia (EUA) for arthroscopic knee surgery, utilising an operating table and theatre equipment to teach procedural and examination skills. 3). Simulator based training for diagnostic shoulder and knee arthroscopy; and Bankart repair, utilising arthroscopic stack and synthetic joint models to develop arthroscopic motor skill and procedural knowledge. Findings. The combination of simulated patients and part-task trainers (a simulator that simulates a limited component of a clinical procedure) created a multimodal clinical context. The three novel teaching modules allowed the integration of technical and non-technical skills in low-cost and high-fidelity orthopaedic simulation environments

Aims. To discover how the management of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in the young patient (17-25) has changed, if at all, over the past six years. Methods. The same postal questionnaire was sent in 2002 and 2009 to 164 shoulder surgeons. Questions were asked about initial reduction, investigation undertaken, timing of surgery, preferred stabilisation procedure, period of immobilisation and rehabilitation programme instigated in first-time and recurrent traumatic dislocators. Summary of Results. Response rate - 92% (2009), 83% (2002). The most likely management of a young traumatic shoulder dislocation:. Reduction under sedation in A&E by A&E doctor (80%). Apart from X-ray, no investigations are performed (80%). Immobilisation for 3 weeks, followed by physiotherapy (82%). 68% would consider stabilisation surgery for first time dislocators (especially professional sportsmen) compared to 35% (2002). Of them, nearly 90% would perform an arthroscopic stabilisation vs. 57.5% (2002). For recurrent dislocators:. 75% would consider stabilisation after a second dislocation. 85% would investigate prior to surgery, choice of investigation being MR arthrogram (52%), compared to 50% (2002). 77% would perform arthroscopic stabilisation vs. 18% (2002), commonest procedure-arthroscopic Bankart repair using biodegradable bone anchors (62% 2009 vs. 27% in 2002). Immobilisation for 3 weeks, full range of motion 1-2 months and return to contact sports 6 - 12 months. Conclusion. There has been a remarkable change in practice compared to the previous survey. A significant proportion of Orthopaedic Surgeons would consider stabilisation in young first-time dislocators instead of conservative management. Arthroscopic stabilisation is now the preferred technique compared to open stabilisation whenever possible. Surgeons are using more investigations prior to listing the patient for surgery, namely the MR arthrogram. There is also an increased use of bio-degradable anchors as compared to metallic bone anchors in 2002

Recurrent shoulder instability in those with bony defects is a difficult surgical problem to resolve. Burkhart and De Beer described an unacceptably high recurrence rate for arthroscopic Bankart repair in the presence of an inverted-pear glenoid with or without an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion, with suggestions that an open modified Latarjet procedure should be recommended in such patients. The Congruent-Arc Latarjet is a modification of the Latarjet open bony stabilisation for shoulder instability developed by Burkhart and De Beer. It involves rotation of the coracoid so the curved under-surface lies congruent with the glenoid. At the Royal Derby Hospital, UK, this procedure has been adopted by our four shoulder surgeons, two of whom undertook fellowship training with De Beer, we studied the outcomes of the patients who had undergone the modified Congruent-Arc Latarjet procedure in our department. Fifty-two consecutive patients were identified over a five-year period at the Royal Derby Hospital or Derbyshire Royal Infirmary between 2006 and 2010 inclusive. With the approval of the clinical audit department, the data was collected using theatre records and clinical coding information to identify the patient group. A review of the case notes and local PACS system was undertaken to establish pre and post-operative examination findings, radiology findings regarding Hill-Sachs defects and glenoid bone loss, re-dislocation rates and post-operative function with return to normal activity. The endpoints of this study were aimed at finding out whether patients did return to normal function, were able to continue doing activity that would have provoked dislocation prior to surgery, and how many of the cases re-dislocated. No surgeon consultant had a patient who re-dislocated after this procedure. The follow-up period was from 1 year to 6 years post-operatively. The complications of this procedure were found to be the dislodgement of bone anchors in 2 patients, who required further arthroscopy to remove the suture anchor from the gleno-humeral joint. One patient had prolonged functionally limiting loss of external rotation, which resolved after intensive physiotherapy at 7 months follow up. We will provide graphical representation of the pre and post operative functional scores. We have demonstrated that the Congruent-Arc Latarjet is a reproducible procedure in the hands of surgeons other than the original authors, particularly when comparing our current 0% re-dislocation rate with the published literature, which suggests that 3.9% of patients undergoing this procedure with greater than 25% bone loss of the glenoid or an engaging Hill-Sachs will re-dislocate post-operatively, and this is better than the 6% re-dislocation rate of the standard Bristow-Latarjet procedure

Purpose. The management of moderate to large engaging Hill-Sachs lesions is controversial and surgical options include remplissage, allograft reconstruction, and partial resurfacing arthroplasty. Few in-vitro studies have quantified their biomechanical characteristics and none have made direct comparisons. The purpose of this study was to compare joint stability and range of motion (ROM) among these procedures using an in-vitro shoulder simulator. It was hypothesized that all procedures would prevent defect engagement, but allograft and partial resurfacing would most accurately restore intact biomechanics; while remplissage would provide the greatest stabilization, possibly at the expense of motion. Method. Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested on an active in-vitro shoulder simulator. Each specimen underwent testing in 11 conditions: intact, Bankart lesion, Bankart repair, and two unrepaired Hill-Sachs lesions (30% & 45%) which were then treated with each of the three techniques. Anterior joint stability, ROM in extension and internal-external rotation, and glenohumeral engagement were assessed. Stability was quantified as resistance, in N/mm, to an anteriorly applied load of 70N. Results. Remplissage significantly increased joint stiffness compared to both defects (6.43.8 N/mm, p=0.01) and the allograft and partial resurfacing (p <= 0.04). No technique significantly surpassed the stability of the intact state (p>0.05). In adduction, the remplissage significantly reduced internal-external rotation compared to both defects (p <= 0.01), but only the 30% repair caused a significant change compared to the intact state (14.511.3 N/mm, p=0.05). In abduction, all repairs reduced rotation ROM compared to the Hill-Sachs defect (>= 8.24o, p <= 0.04), but none with respect to the intact condition (p >= 0.05). Remplissage had significantly less extension than either resurfacing procedure (>= 15.4o, p <= 0.02) and resulted in a greater reduction in extension ROM for 45% defects compared to 30% defects (11.918.91, p=0.06). All unrepaired lesions engaged during extension. None of the remplissage or allograft reconstructions engaged, however, 75% of partial resurfacing arthroplasties partially engaged. Conclusion. This study is the first biomechanical evaluation to directly compare three surgical procedures for engaging Hill-Sachs lesions. Each procedure enhanced stability; however, the enhancement provided by the resurfacing repairs more closely resembled the intact state. Remplissage of the 30% and the 45% defects improved stability and eliminated glenohumeral engagement but caused significant and progressive reductions in ROM. In comparison, both the allograft and partial resurfacing procedures re-established ranges of motion approaching those of the intact joint; however, the partial resurfacing could not fully prevent engagement. These findings indicate that the effects of each technique are not equivalent and further clinical and biomechanical studies are required

Purpose. The remplissage technique of insetting the infraspinatus tendon and posterior joint capsule into an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion has gained in popularity. However, a standardized technique for suture anchor and suture placement has not been defined for this novel procedure. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to compare three remplissage techniques by evaluating their effects on joint stiffness and motion. Method. Cadaveric forequarters (n=7) were mounted on a custom active biomechanical shoulder simulator. Three randomly ordered techniques were conducted: T1- anchors in the valley of the defect, T2- anchors in the rim of the humeral head; T3- anchors in the valley with medial suture placement. The testing conditions included: intact, Bankart, Bankart repair, and 15% & 30% HS lesions with repairs (T1, T2, T3). Outcome measures including internal-external range of motion and stability were recorded. Stability was quantified in terms of glenohumeral joint stiffness against an externally applied anterior force of 70N. Results. In abduction, no significant reduction in range of motion was observed between any of the remplissage techniques compared to the intact for 15% defects. For 30% defects, T1 and T2 produced significant reductions (T1:14.36.7o, p=0.02; T2:20.79.8o, p=0.02), but T3 had the greatest mean reduction (26.816.6o, p=0.08) in range of motion. In adduction, for the 15% defect, T1 did not cause a significant reduction in internal-external rotation range of motion; however, T2 reached and T3 approached a significant difference compared to intact (T2:10.75.8o, p=0.02 and T3:20.914.7o, p=0.06, respectively). For the 30% defect, T1 and T3 repairs significantly reduced range of motion (11.0–28.2o, p <= 0.05), while the reduction in motion following T2 repair was not significant (18.815.9o, p=0.3). All three techniques were found to greatly increase joint stiffness when an external anterior force was applied in abduction and 60o of external rotation; however, no comparisons to the unrepaired defect or the intact state were significant. Additionally, T3 produced the greatest increases in stiffness followed by T1 and T2 (9.20 >= 7.06 >= 6.05 N/mm), but these differences were not significant. Conclusion. All remplissage techniques were observed to decrease shoulder motion. Specifically, T3 was found to consistently produce the greatest mean reductions in rotation while T1 produced the smallest decreases. The remplissage procedure also produced increases in joint stiffness in all cases, with T3 producing the greatest increases; however, excessive variation may have prevented these findings from being statistically significant. The choice of remplissage technique does have an impact on joint stiffness and motion. Further biomechanical and clinical studies are required to determine the optimum technique that maximizes stability and motion