Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology and treatment of Perthes’ disease of the hip.

Aims

The aim of this study was to inform the epidemiology and treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

Aims. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is one of the most common hip diseases of adolescence that can cause marked disability, yet there is little robust evidence to guide treatment. Fundamental aspects of the disease, such as frequency, are unknown and consequently the desire of clinicians to undertake robust intervention studies is somewhat prohibited by a lack of fundamental knowledge. Methods. The study is an anonymized nationwide comprehensive cohort study with nested consented within the mechanism of the British Orthopaedic Surgery Surveillance (BOSS) Study. All relevant hospitals treating SCFE in England, Scotland, and Wales will contribute anonymized case details. Potential missing cases will be cross-checked against two independent external sources of data (the national administrative data and independent trainee data). Patients will be invited to enrich the data collected by supplementing anonymized case data with patient-reported outcome measures. In line with recommendations of the IDEAL Collaboration, the study will primarily seek to determine incidence, describe case mix and variations in surgical interventions, and explore the relationships between baseline factors (patients and types of interventions) and two-year outcomes. Discussion. This is the first disease to be investigated using the BOSS Study infrastructure. It provides a robust method to determine the disease frequency, and a large unbiased sample of cases from which treatment strategies can be investigated. It may form the basis for definitive robust intervention studies or, where these are demonstrated not to be feasible, this may be the most robust cohort study

Purpose. To assess the use of radiographic measurement compared to descriptive classification in the evaluation of Perthes' disease. Method. Fifteen consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic surgeons, members of the BOSS Collaborative from different UK centres, were asked to rate a series of 100 healed AP radiographs of hips affected by Perthes' Disease from the Liverpool Perthes' Disease Register using the Stulberg' s grading. Two independent observers categorised roundness error using Digitimizer™ software. Kappa scores were used to determine the inter-observer concordance amongst the 15 observers for Stulberg classification. Lin concordance was used to determine roundness error assessment. The relationship between the two outcomes was explored statistically and graphically; considering the mean Stulberg grade recorded by the 15 observers as a continuous outcome. Results. There was moderate to fair agreement regarding the Stulberg' s grading among the Consultant surgeons with an overall Kappa error of 0.377 (95% 0.353 – 0.393). The Lin concordance between the two independent observers evaluating roundness error was 0.50 (95% CI 0.36–0.64). There was a strong correlation between the Stulberg grading and roundness error measurement. Using a box and whisker chart the roundness error correlated well with modal Stulberg grade. Conclusion. Roundness error appears to be a useful radiographic measure of hip shape in Perthes' disease by offering a continuous estimate of hip deformity. It correlates well with surgeon-reported hip shape and can be a useful tool in clinical trials