There were 70000 people admitted to hospital with fractured hips in 2007 and the incidence is rising by 2% each year. Hip fractures represent significant morbidity and mortality to patients and cost the NHS £1.8 billion annually. In 2008 the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) issued a 14-point guideline to be followed for the management of hip fractures. The aim was to improve secondary prevention of osteoporosis, reduce the falls risk and further fractures. This aimed to provide better care to improve the outcomes for patients and reduce the burden of hip fractures on society. The aim of the audit was to see if the BOAST guidelines are met before and after the transition to a level 1 MTC (Major Trauma Centre) and to measure any impact the change had. Methods: Prospective data was collected for three months in 2010, 2011 and 2012. 94 case notes were reviewed and compared to the outcomes laid out in the BOAST guidelines to see if standards were met. Overall adherence to the guideline's recommendations was high throughout the 3 sample months. For each of the 3 sample months 100% adherence was seen in all of the following criteria: further imaging if x-rays unclear, appropriate analgesia, pre-op assessment, seniority of surgeon, orthogeriatrician involvement, seniority of surgeons and submission to the National Hip Fracture Database. The main common area where adherence was less than 100% was with A and E breaches (i.e. greater than 4 hours referral to the ward). Despite relocation and transition to a level 1 MTC, the management of fractured neck of femur patients compared to the BOAST guidelines remained of a high standard. Further improvements have also been made since moving to the new hospital site where shortcomings in management have been identified. Improvements from year one to three include prophylactic antibiotics and warfarin reversal; there is now a new trust protocol in place for warfarin reversal in the case of hip fractures. Elsewhere adherence to the guidelines remains high across the sample months. Confirming that despite moving to a level 1 status the trauma team continues to be performing well and managing this group appropriately. In January 2012 BOAST published a second version of the hip fracture guidelines: A and E breaches were removed from the guidelines. There have also been several new additions to the guidelines, which prompt a further re-audit in the future

Aim. The primary aim of this quality improvement project was to assess compliance with BOAST 4 guidelines for the delivery of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients presenting to a major trauma centre with open limb fracture and evaluate the impact of implemented changes on attainment of these guidelines. Secondary aims were to assess adherence to local guidelines for the type of antibiotic prescribed. Method. A multi-cycle audit and quality improvement project was carried out for all patients presenting to Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (BSUH) with open limb fractures from 1st September 2018 to 31st January 2019, and 1. st. November 2019 to 31. st. March 2020. Patients were identified through retrospective screening of electronic operation records (Bluespier) by authors, and paper records were subsequently reviewed for data pertaining to antibiotic prescriptions. Following the initial audit cycle, targeted teaching was carried out for orthopaedic trainees, new posters were placed in key clinical areas to highlight local guidelines, and alterations to the trauma clerking proforma were implemented, to include BOAST 4 guidelines. Results. In cycle 1, a total of 52 patients received surgical treatment for open limb fractures, of which 48 (92.3%) were prescribed antibiotics prior to definitive management, with a mean time to administration of 271 minutes. Of these, 41 (78.8%) received prescriptions according to BSUH guidelines. The use of STAT prescriptions was found to significantly reduce the mean time to administration from 298 minutes to 144 minutes (p = 0.044). In cycle 2, a total of 29 patients received surgical treatment for open limb fractures, of which all 100% were prescribed antibiotics prior to definitive management, with a reduced mean time to administration (233 minutes). Of these, 26 (89.7%) received prescriptions according to BSUH guidelines, and a significantly greater proportion (p = 0.0003) received initial STAT ‘once-only’ prescriptions (51.7% vs. 15.4%). Conclusions. This quality improvement project has demonstrated the successful implementation of targeted changes to improve the attainment of BOAST 4 guidelines. Following a multi-cycle audit, all patients now receive antibiotic prophylaxis, with a higher proportion receiving antibiotics according to local BSUH guidelines. Furthermore, the use of STAT ‘once-only’ prescriptions, which was shown to be beneficial during the first audit cycle, has now significantly increased following intervention

Introduction. Lower limb open fractures are severe injuries, with a joint orthoplastic approach for management recommended by BOAST. An initial audit highlighted a discrepancy in time to definitive wound coverage between the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH), which at the time was not an orthoplastic centre, and the Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GRI) which was. Our aim was to perform a secondary audit to identify if the introduction of an orthoplastic service at the QEUH led to a reduction in time to definitive wound coverage. Materials and Methods. Forty-six patients with open lower limb fractures treated at the QEUH in 2019 following introduction of the orthoplastic service were identified. Management including time to antibiotics and wound coverage, and rates of complication were compared with previous audit data. Results. Days to washout was similar between the second cohort of QEUH patients and the first (p=0.522), as was days to definitive management without plastics input (p=0.143). When plastics input was required, there was a reduction in days to wound coverage in the second cohort of QEUH patients compared to the first (3 days vs 8.5 days; p=0.002), and a similar time if compared to the GRI cohort (p=0.778). Conclusions. Time to definitive wound coverage was reduced in those that required plastics input in the second cohort of QEUH patients, with a similar time to that of the original GRI cohort. The QEUH now displays improved concordance with the BOAST guidelines, with definite wound coverage on average occurring within 72 hours

All skeletally immature patients who presented with a supracondylar fracture between 01/09/2013 and 24/11/2015 (n = 50) were used to compare the current management of supra-condylar fractures of the humerus in children to the standards set by the BOAST 11 guidelines. 8.1% did not have full documentation of their neurovascular assessment. 93.9% underwent surgery within 24 hours of presentation. Average time to theatre for neurovascularly compromised patients was 4 hours 46 minutes. 81.8% were managed with 2 K-wires as recommended. Only 39.4% of the patients had their wires removed within 3 – 4 weeks. Only 6.1% had the recommended 2 mm wires. AO recommends the use of 2mm wires if 2 lateral wires are used whereas the BOAST 11 guideline recommends 2mm wires where possible. The results clearly demonstrate a need for further education and awareness of the BOAST 11 guidelines. Of particular interest is the documentation of patients' neurovascular status for appropriate management and for medico-legal purposes. Long term outcome comparison of surgical fixation with 2mm and 1.6mm wires would be useful to support the use of 2mm wires as recommended by the professional consensus in the BOAST 11 guidelines

Introduction. A significant burden of disease exists with respect to critical sized bone defects; outcomes are unpredictable and often poor. There is no absolute agreement on what constitutes a “critically-sized” bone defect however it is widely considered as one that would not heal spontaneously despite surgical stabilisation, thus requiring re-operation. The aetiology of such defects is varied. High-energy trauma with soft tissue loss and periosteal stripping, bone infection and tumour resection all require extensive debridement and the critical-sized defects generated require careful consideration and strategic management. Current management practice of these defects lacks consensus. Existing literature tells us that tibial defects 25mm or great have a poor natural history; however, there is no universally agreed management strategy and there remains a significant evidence gap. Drawing its origins from musculoskeletal oncology, the Capanna technique describes a hybrid mode of reconstruction. Mass allograft is combined with a vascularised fibula autograft, allowing the patient to benefit from the favourable characteristics of two popular reconstruction techniques. Allograft confers initial mechanical stability with autograft contributing osteogenic, inductive and conductive capacity to encourage union. Secondarily its inherent vascularity affords the construct the ability to withstand deleterious effects of stressors such as infection that may threaten union. The strengths of this hybrid construct we believe can be used within the context of critical-sized bone defects within tibial trauma to the same success as seen within tumour reconstruction. Methodology. Utilising the Capanna technique in trauma requires modification to the original procedure. In tumour surgery pre-operative cross-sectional imaging is a pre-requisite. This allows surgeons to assess margins, plan resections and order allograft to match the defect. In trauma this is not possible. We therefore propose a two-stage approach to address critical-sized tibial defects in open fractures. After initial debridement, external fixation and soft tissue management via a combined orthoplastics approach, CT imaging is performed to assess the defect geometry, with a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer placed at index procedure to maintain soft tissue tension, alignment and deliver local antibiotics. Once comfortable that no further debridement is required and the risk of infection is appropriate then 3D printing technology can be used to mill custom jigs. Appropriate tibial allograft is ordered based on CT measurements. A pedicled fibula graft is raised through a lateral approach. The peroneal vessels are mobilised to the tibioperoneal trunk and passed medially into the bone void. The cadaveric bone is prepared using the custom jig on the back table and posterolateral troughs made to allow insertion of the fibula, permitting some hypertrophic expansion. A separate medial incision allows attachment of the custom jig to host tibia allowing for reciprocal cuts to match the allograft. The fibula is implanted into the allograft, ensuring nil tension on the pedicle and, after docking the graft, the hybrid construct is secured with multi-planar locking plates to provide rotational stability. The medial window allows plate placement safely away from the vascular pedicle. Results. We present a 50-year-old healthy male with a Gustilo & Anderson 3B proximal tibial fracture, open posteromedially with associated shear fragment, treated using the Capanna technique. Presenting following a fall climbing additional injuries included a closed ipsilateral calcaneal and medial malleolar fracture, both treated operatively. Our patient underwent reconstruction of his tibia with the above staged technique. Two debridements were carried out due to a 48-hour delay in presentation due to remote geographical location of recovery. Debridements were carried out in accordance with BOAST guidelines; a spanning knee external fixator applied and a small area of skin loss on the proximal medial calf reconstructed with a split thickness skin graft. A revision cement spacer was inserted into the metaphyseal defect measuring 84mm. At definitive surgery the external fixator was removed and graft fixation was extended to include the intra-articular fragments. No intra-operative complications were encountered during surgeries. The patient returned to theatre on day 13 with a medial sided haematoma. 20ml of haemoserous fluid was evacuated, a DAIR procedure performed and antibiotic-loaded bioceramics applied locally. Samples grew Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic treatment was rationalised to Co-Trimoxazole 960mg BD and Rifampicin 450mg BD. The patient has completed a six-week course of Rifampicin and continues on suppressive Co-Trimoxazole monotherapy until planned metalwork removal. There is no evidence of ongoing active infection and radiological evidence of early union. The patient is independently walking four miles to the gym daily and we believe, thus far, despite accepted complications, we have demonstrated a relative early success. Conclusions. A variety of techniques exist for the management of critical-sized bone defects within the tibia. All of these come with a variety of drawbacks and limitations. Whilst acceptance of a limb length discrepancy is one option, intercalary defects of greater than 5 to 7cm typically require reconstruction. In patients in whom fine wire fixators and distraction osteogenesis are deemed inappropriate, or are unwilling to tolerate the frequent re-operations and potential donor site morbidity of the Masqualet technique, the Capanna technique offers a novel solution. Through using tibial allograft to address the size mismatch between vascularised fibula and tibia, the possible complication of fatigue fracture of an isolated fibula autograft is potentially avoidable in patients who have high functional demands. The Capanna technique has demonstrated satisfactory results within tumour reconstruction. Papers report that by combining the structural strength of allograft with the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of a vascularised autograft that limb salvage rates of greater than 80% and union rates of greater than 90% are achievable. If these results can indeed be replicated in the management of critical-sized bone defects in tibial trauma we potentially have a treatment strategy that can excel over the more widely practiced current techniques

St Mary's Hospital, the major trauma centre for West London, treated 168 patients with lower limb open fractures in 2011 & 2012. This audit compared antibiotic administration in the emergency department against the current BOAST IV guidelines. The choice, timing, dose, and documentation of antibiotic administration was collected from the casualty cards and the transfer documentation for any patient initially seen at another hospital. The severity of the injury (as the Gusitollo-Anderson classification) after the initial debridement and any infectious complications that presented before discharge were also recorded. The results showed a higher compliance with the BOAST IV guidelines for those patients directly admitted rather than transferred to the major trauma centre. In direct admissions the recommended antibiotics were either not given or not adequately documented in 7% of cases. In those patients transferred from another emergency department the documentation was inadequate in 27% of cases. The likely causes of these results are discussed alongside the unit's bone infection rates

Aims. The BOA/BAPRAS guidelines for the management of open tibial fractures (2009) recommend early senior combined orthoplastics input and appropriate facilities to manage a high caseload. St Georges Hospital is one of four London Trauma Centres fulfilling these criteria. Our aim is to determine whether becoming a trauma centre has affected the management of patients with open tibial fractures. Methods. Data were obtained prospectively on consecutive open tibial fractures during two 8 month periods: before and after becoming a Major Trauma Centre (May 2009–Dec 2009 and April 2010–Oct 2010 respectively). Data on patient pathway including, admitting hospital, length of stay, timing and number of operations were recorded. Results. 29 open tibial fractures were admitted during the 8 months after designation as a major trauma centre compared to 15 before. 72% of patients came directly, or as A&E hot transfers (previously 60%). Of the eight tertiary transfers, six were from hospitals outside the South West Trauma Network. The time to transfer patients initially admitted to local orthopaedic departments has fallen from 8.6 to 1.6 days. Despite this improvement as a trauma centre, these patients remained in hospital longer (16.3 vs 14.9) and had more operations (3.7 vs 2.6) than direct admissions. As a trauma centre there were improvements in time to definitive skeletal stabilisation (4.7 to 2.2), skin coverage (8.3 to 3.7 days), average number of operations (4.2 to 2.3) and average length of hospital admission fell from 23 to 16 days. Conclusions. The volume and management of open tibial fractures has been directly affected by introduction of a trauma centre within the London Trauma Network. Implementation of BOAST guidelines has resulted in improved management of open lower limb fractures independent of fracture grade. Our data strongly support the continuing development of trauma networks