Rupture of the pectoralis major (PM) tendon is a rare yet severe injury. Several techniques have been described for PM fixation including a transosseus technique, when cortical buttons are placed at the superior, middle and inferior PM tendon insertion positions. The concern with this technique is the risk that bicortical drilling poses to the axillary nerve as it courses posteriorly to the humerus. This cadaveric study investigates the proximity of the posterior branch of the axillary nerve to the drill positions for transosseus PM tendon repair. Drills were placed through the humerus at the superior, middle and inferior insertions of the PM tendon and the distance between these positions and the axillary nerve, which had previously been marked, was measured using computed tomography (CT) imaging. This investigation demonstrates that the superior border of PM tendon insertion is the fixation position that poses the highest risk of damage to the axillary nerve. Caution should be used when performing bicortical drilling during cortical button PM tendon repair, especially when drilling at the superior border of the PM insertion. We describe ‘safe’ and ‘danger’ zones for transosseus drilling of the humerus reflecting the risk posed to the axillary nerve

Abstract. Objective. Radial to axillary nerve and spinal accessory (XI) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfers are standard procedures to restore function after C5 brachial plexus dysfunction. The anterior approach to the SSN may miss concomitant pathology at the suprascapular notch and sacrifices lateral trapezius function, resulting in poor restoration of shoulder external rotation. A posterior approach allows decompression and visualisation of the SSN at the notch and distal coaptation of the medial XI branch. The medial triceps has a double fascicle structure that may be coapted to both the anterior and posterior division of the axillary nerve, whilst preserving the stabilising effect of the long head of triceps at the glenohumeral joint. Reinnervation of two shoulder abductors and two external rotators may confer advantages over previous approaches with improved external rotation range of motion and strength. Methods. Review of the clinical outcomes of 22 patients who underwent a double nerve transfer from XI and radial nerves. Motor strength was evaluated using the MRC scale and grade 4 was defined as the threshold for success. Results. 18/22 patients had adequate follow-up (Mean: 29.5 months). Of these, 72.2% achieved ≥grade 4 power of shoulder abduction and a mean range of motion of 103°. 64.7% achieved ≥grade 4 external rotation with a mean range of motion of 99.6°. Conclusions. The results suggest the use of the combined nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder function via a posterior approach, involving the medial head branch of triceps to the axillary nerve and the XI to SSN

Analysis of orthopaedic malpractice claims has shown that highest impact allegations (highest payment dollars per claim) were those that were related to failure to protect anatomic structures in surgical fields. The prevalence of subclinical peripheral neurologic deficit following reverse and anatomic shoulder arthroplasty has been reported to be 47% and 4%, respectively. We propose the following five rules in order to avoid neurovascular injury during shoulder arthroplasty cases:. Pre-operative planning would assure a smooth operation without intra-operative difficulties. Adequate planning would include appropriate imaging, obtaining previous operative reports, complete pre-operative neurovascular examination and requesting the necessary operative equipment. Tug test: It is crucial to palpate the axillary nerve and be aware of its location. The tug test is a systematic technique for locating and protecting the axillary nerve. Neuromonitoring has been utilised in shoulder surgery in the past. Nagda et al showed that nerve alerts during shoulder arthroplasty occurred 56.7% of the time and 50% of the events were with the arm in abduction, external rotation and extension; 76.7% of signals returned to normal with retractor removal and change in arm positioning. We recommend removing all retractors and returning the arm to neutral position several times during surgery, especially during the glenoid exposure when the arm is in abduction and external rotation. Newer commercially available nerve stimulators are extremely useful in locating and protecting neurovascular structures. We recommend brachial plexus exploration and axillary nerve dissection with the aid of a nerve stimulator in all revision cases. Availability of a nerve/microvascular surgeon as an assistant in revision cases for brachial plexus exploration using a microscope is crucial for successful revision surgery

In reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), a high complication rate is noted in the international literature (24.7%), and limited local literature is available. The complications in our developing health system, with high HIV, tuberculosis and metabolic syndrome prevalence may be different from that in developed health systems where the literature largely emanates from. The aim of this study is to describe the complications and complication rate following RSA in a South African cohort. An analytical, cross-sectional study was done where all patients’ who received RSA over an 11 year period at a tertiary hospital were evaluated. One-hundred-and-twenty-six primary RSA patients met the inclusion criteria and a detailed retrospective evaluation of their demographics, clinical variables and complication associated with their shoulder arthroplasty were assessed. All fracture, revision and tumour resection arthroplasties were excluded, and a minimum of 6 months follow up was required. A primary RSA complication rate of 19.0% (24/126) was noted, with the most complications occurring after 90 days at 54.2% (13/24). Instability was the predominant delayed complication at 61.5% (8/13) and sepsis being the most common in the early days at 45.5% (5/11). Haematoma formation, hardware failure and axillary nerve injury were also noted at 4.2% each (1/24). Keeping in mind the immense difference in socioeconomical status and patient demographics in a third world country the RSA complication rate in this study correlates with the known international consensus. This also proves that RSA is still a suitable option for rotator cuff arthropathy and glenohumeral osteoarthritis even in an economically constrained environment like South Africa

A fracture of the tuberosity is associated with 16% of anterior glenohumeral dislocations. Manipulation of these injuries in the emergency department is safe with less than 1% risk of fracture propagation. However, there is a risk of associated neurological injury, recurrent instability and displacement of the greater tuberosity fragment. The risks and outcomes of these complications have not previously been reported. The purpose of this study was to establish the incidence and outcome of complications associated with this pattern of injury. We reviewed 339 consecutive glenohumeral dislocations with associated greater tuberosity fractures from a prospective trauma database. Documentation and radiographs were studied and the incidence of neurovascular compromise, greater tuberosity fragment migration and intervention and recurrent instability recorded. The mean age was 61 years (range, 18–96) with a female preponderance (140:199 male:female). At presentation 24% (n=78) patients had a nerve injury, with axillary nerve being most common (n=43, 55%). Of those patients with nerve injuries 15 (19%) did not resolve. Greater tuberosity displacement >5mm was observed in 36% (n=123) of patients with 40 undergoing acute surgery, the remainder did not due to comorbidities or patient choice. Persistent displacement after reduction accounted for 60 cases, later displacement within 6 weeks occurred in 63 patients. Recurrent instability occurred in 4 (1%) patients. Patient reported outcomes were poor with average EQ5D being 0.73, QDASH score of 16 and Oxford Shoulder Score of 41. Anterior glenohumeral dislocation with associated greater tuberosity fracture is common with poor long term patient reported outcomes. Our results demonstrate there is a high rate of neurological deficits at presentation with the majority resolving spontaneously. Recurrent instability is rare. Late tuberosity fragment displacement occurs in 18% of patients and regular follow-up for 6 weeks is recommended to detect this

The patterns of nerve and associated skeletal injury were reviewed in 84 patients referred to the brachial plexus service who had damage predominantly to the infraclavicular brachial plexus and its branches. Patients fell into four categories: 1. Anterior glenohumeral dislocation (46 cases); 2. ‘Occult’ shoulder dislocation or scapular fracture (17 cases); 3. Humeral neck fracture (11 cases); 4. Arm hyperextension (9 cases). The axillary (38/46) and ulnar (36/46) nerves were most commonly injured as a result of glenohumeral dislocation. The axillary nerve was ruptured in only 2 patients who had suffered high energy trauma. Ulnar nerve recovery was often incomplete. ‘Occult’ dislocation refers to patients who had no recorded shoulder dislocation but the history was suggestive that dislocation had occurred with spontaneous reduction. These patients and those with scapular fractures had a similar pattern of nerve involvement to those with known dislocation, but the axillary nerve was ruptured in 11 of 17 cases. In cases of humeral neck fracture, nerve injury resulted from medial displacement of the humeral shaft. Surgery was performed in 7 cases to reduce and fix the fracture. Arm hyperextension cases were characterised by injury to the musculocutaneous nerve, with the nerve being ruptured in 8 of 9. Five had humeral shaft fracture or elbow dislocation. There was variable involvement of the median and radial nerves, with the ulnar nerve being least affected. Most cases of infraclavicular brachial plexus injury associated with shoulder dislocation can be managed without operation. Early nerve exploration and repair should be considered for:. Axillary nerve palsy without recorded shoulder dislocation or in association with fracture of the scapula. Musculocutaneous nerve palsy with median and/or radial nerve palsy. Urgent operation is necessary for nerve injury resulting from fracture of the humeral neck to relieve ongoing pressure on the nerves

The standard approach is through the deltopectoral interval. Among patients with prior incisions, one makes every effort to either utilise the old incision or to incorporate it into a longer incision that will allow one to approach the deltopectoral interval and retract the deltoid laterally. The deltopectoral interval is most easily developed just distal to the clavicle, where there is a natural infraclavicular triangle of fat that separates the deltoid and pectoralis major muscles even in very scarred or stiff shoulders. Typically, the deltoid is retracted laterally leaving the cephalic vein on the medial aspect of the exposure. The anterior border of the deltoid is mobilised from the clavicle to its insertion on the humerus. The anterior portion of the deltoid insertion together with the more distal periosteum of the humerus may be elevated slightly. The next step is to identify the plane between the conjoined tendon group and the subscapularis muscle. Dissection in this area must be done very carefully due to the close proximity of the neurovascular group, the axillary nerve, and the musculocutaneous nerve. Scar is then released from around the base of the coracoid. The subacromial space is freed of scar and the shoulder is examined for range of motion. Particularly among patients with prior rotator cuff surgery, there may be severe scarring in the subacromial space. Internal rotation of the arm with dissection between the remaining rotator cuff and deltoid is critical to develop this plane. If external rotation is less than 30 degrees, one can consider incising the subscapularis off bone rather than through its tendinous substance. For every 1 cm that the subscapularis is advanced medially, one gains approximately 20 to 30 degrees of external rotation. The rotator interval between the subscapularis and supraspinatus is then incised. This release is then continued inferiorly to incise the inferior shoulder capsule from the neck of the humerus. This is performed by proceeding from anterior to posterior with progressive external rotation of the humerus staying directly on the bone with electrocautery and great care to protect the axillary nerve. The key for glenoid exposure as well as improvement in motion is deltoid mobilization, a large inferior capsular release, aggressive humeral head cut and osteophyte removal

Treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) is controversial in many respects, including the choice of surgical approach for fixation when using a locking plate. The classic deltopectoral (DP) approach is believed to increase the risk of avascular necrosis while making access to the greater tuberosity more difficult. The deltoid split (DS) approach was developed to respect minimally invasive surgery principles. The purpose of the present study (NCT-00612391) was to compare outcomes of PHF treated by DP and DS approaches in terms of function (Q-DASH, Constant score), quality of life (SF12), and complications in a prospective randomized multicenter study. From 2007 to 2016, all patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria in two University Trauma Centers were invited to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria were: PHF Neer II/III, isolated injury, skeletal maturity, speaking French or English, available for follow-up (FU), and ability to fill questionnaires. Exclusion criteria: Pre-existing pathology to the limb, patient-refusing or too ill to undergo surgery, patient needing another type of treatment (nail, arthroplasty), axillary nerve impairment, open fracture. After consent, patients were randomized to one of the two treatments using the dark envelope method. Pre-injury status was documented by questionnaires (SF12, Q-DASH, Constant score). Range of motion was assessed. Patients were followed at two weeks, six weeks, 3-6-12-18-24 months. Power calculation was done with primary outcome: Q-DASH. A total of 92 patients were randomised in the study and 83 patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. The mean age was 62 y.o. (+- 14 y.) and 77% were females. There was an equivalent number of Neer II and III, 53% and 47% respectively. Mean FU was of 26 months. Forty-four patients were randomized to the DS and 39 to the DP approach. Groups were equivalent in terms of age, gender, BMI, severity of fracture and pre-injury scores. All clinical outcome measures were in favor of the deltopectoral approach. Primary outcome measure, Q-DASH, was better statistically and clinically in the DP group (12 vs 26, p=0,003). Patients with DP had less pain and better quality of life scores than with DS (VAS 1/10 vs 2/10 p=0,019 and SF12M 56 vs 51, p=0,049, respectively). Constant-Murley score was higher in the DP group (73 vs 60, p=0,014). However, active external rotation was better with the DS approach (45° vs 35°). There were more complications in DS patients, with four screw cut-outs vs zero, four avascular necrosis vs one, and five reoperations vs two. Calcar screws were used for a majority of DP fixations (57%) vs a minority of DS (27%) (p=0,012). The primary hypothesis on the superiority of the deltoid split incision was rebutted. Functional outcome, quality of life, pain, and risk of complication favoured the classic deltopectoral approach. Active external rotation was the only outcome better with DS. We believe that the difficulty of adding calcar screws and intramuscular dissection in the DS approach were partly responsible for this difference. The DP approach should be used during Neer II and III PHF fixation

Latissimus dorsi anterior to major transfers have been advocated in the setting of loss of external rotation and elevation in conjunction with reverse shoulder replacement. Reverse shoulder replacement is a prosthesis specifically designed for shoulders with poor rotator cuff function. In the vast majority of cases, some teres minor function at the minimum is maintained in shoulders destined for a reverse shoulder replacement. However, in certain circumstances there is complete loss of any external rotation, and a muscle transfer can be performed in order to restore some external rotation function. A reverse shoulder replacement in the absence of any rotator cuff function goes into obligate internal rotation with elevation. A minimum of external rotation strength is necessary in order to maintain the arm in normal rotation. The first tip is patient selection. Physical examination of active external rotation, external rotation strength and forward elevation should be just performed. A latissimus transfer is indicated in patients who cannot maintain their arm in neutral to at least a few degrees of external rotation. A lag sign is another physical examination finding which can indicate complete loss of rotator cuff function. The latissimus dorsi transfer is performed by first identifying and releasing the latissimus from its insertion on the anterior humerus. The arthroplasty is performed. The passage for the latissimus muscle is developed carefully and being mindful of the axillary nerve in particular. The latissimus is directed inferior to the nerve and around the medial and posterior aspect of the proximal humerus. Different ways of securing the transfer to the humerus have been described including bone tunnels and anchors. Often it is easier to place the anchors and/or the bone tunnels prior to inserting the humeral prosthesis. The latissimus is secured in the new position, enabling it to participate in external rotation. The value of this is difficult to clearly establish. Most studies are evidence level IV and there are no good comparative studies in a controlled patient population. This is a good option for shoulders with no active external rotation, but they may increase overall complication rate. Complications include dislocation, infection, and transient nerve palsy

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is becoming a frequent treatment of choice for patients with shoulder disorders. Complication rates after reverse shoulder arthroplasty may be three-fold that of conventional total shoulder arthroplasty especially in high risk patient populations and diagnoses like revision arthroplasty, fracture sequelae, and severe glenoid bone loss. Complications include component malposition, stiffness, neurological injury, infection, dislocation or instability, acromial or scapular spine fractures, scapular notching, and loosening of implants. Recognition of preoperative risk factors and appropriate 3D planning are essential in optimizing patient outcome and intraoperative success. Failure of reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a significant challenge requiring appropriate diagnosis of the failure mode. The most common neurological injuries involve the brachial plexus and the axillary nerve due to traction, manipulation of the arm, aberrant retractor placement, or relative lengthening of the arm. Intraoperative fractures are relatively uncommon but include the greater tuberosity, acromion, and glenoid. Tuberosity fracture can be repaired intraoperatively with suture techniques, glenoid fractures may be insignificant rim fractures or jeopardise baseplate fixation and require abandoning RSA until glenoid fracture ORIF heals and then a second stage RSA. Periprosthetic infection after RSA ranges from 1 to 10% and may be higher in revision cases and frequently is Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Dislocation was one of the most common complications after RSA approximately 5% but with increased surgeon experience and prosthetic design, dislocation rates are approaching 1–2%. An anterosuperior deltoid splitting approach has been associated with increased stability as well as subscapularis repair after RSA. Scapular notching is the most common complication after RSA. Notching may be caused by direct mechanical impingement of the humerosocket polyethylene on the scapular neck and from osteolysis from polyethylene wear. Sirveaux classified scapular notching based on the defect size as it erodes behind the baseplate towards the central post. Acromial fractures are infrequent but more common is severely eroded acromions from CTA, with osteoporosis, with excessive lengthening, and with superior baseplate screws that penetrate the scapular spine and create a stress riser. Nonoperative care is the mainstay of acromial and scapular spine fractures. Recognizing preoperative risk factors and understanding component positioning and design is essential to maximizing successful outcomes

Shoulder arthritis in the young adult is a deceptive title. The literature is filled with articles that separate outcomes based on an arbitrary age threshold and attempt to provide recommendations for management and even potential criteria for implanting one strategy over another using age as the primary determinant. However, under the age of 50, as few as one out of five patients will have arthritis that can be accurately classified as osteoarthritis. Other conditions such as post-traumatic arthritis, post-surgical arthritis including capsulorrhaphy arthropathy, and rheumatoid arthritis create a mosaic of pathologic bone and soft tissue changes in our younger patients that distort the conclusions regarding “shoulder arthritis” in the young adult. In addition, we are now seeing more patients with unique conditions that are still poorly understood, including arthritis of the pharmacologically performance-enhanced shoulder. Early arthritis in the young adult is often recognised at the time of arthroscopic surgery performed for other preoperative indications. Palliative treatment is the first option, which equals “debridement.” If the procedure fails to resolve the symptoms, and the symptoms can be localised to an intra-articular source, then additional treatment options may include a variety of cartilage restoration procedures that have been developed primarily for the knee and then subsequently used in the shoulder, including microfracture, and osteochondral grafting. The results of these treatments have been rarely reported with only case series and expert opinion to support their use. When arthritis is moderate or severe in young adults, non-arthroplasty interventions have included arthroscopic capsular release, debridement, acromioplasty, distal clavicle resection, microfracture, osteophyte debridement, axillary nerve neurolysis, and bicep tenotomy or tenodesis, or some combination of these techniques. Again, the literature is very limited, with most case series less than 5 years of follow-up. The results are typically acceptable for pain relief, some functional improvement, but not restoration to completely normal function from the patient's perspective. Attempts to resurface the arthritic joint have resulted in limited benefits over a short period of time in most studies. While a few remarkable procedures have provided reasonable outcomes, they are typically in the hands of the developer of the procedure and subsequently, other surgeons fail to achieve the same results. This has been the case with fascia lata grafting of the glenoid, dermal allografts, meniscal allografts, and even biologic resurfacing with large osteochondral grafts for osteoarthritis. Most surgical interventions that show high value in terms of improvement in quality of life require 10-year follow-up. It is unlikely that any of these arthroscopic procedures or resurfacing procedures will provide outcomes that would be valuable in terms of population healthcare; they are currently used on an individual basis to try to delay progression to arthroplasty, with surgeon bias based on personal experience, training, or expert opinion. Arthroplasty in the young adult remains controversial. Without question, study after study supports total shoulder arthroplasty over hemiarthroplasty once the decision has been made that joint replacement is the only remaining option

Optimal surgical management of proximal humeral fractures remains controversial. We report our experience and the study on our surgical technique for proximal humeral fractures and fracture-dislocations using locking plates in conjunction with calcium sulphate augmentation and tuberosity repair using high strength sutures. We used the extended deltoid-splitting approach for fracture patterns involving displacement of both lesser and greater tuberosities and for fracture-dislocations. We retrospectively analysed 22 proximal humeral fractures in 21 patients. 10 were male and 11 female with an average age of 64.6 years (Range 37 to 77). Average follow-up was 24 months. Fractures were classified according to Neer and Hertel systems. Pre-operative radiographs and CT scans in three and four-part fractures were done to assess the displacement and medial calcar length for predicting the humeral head vascularity. According to the Neer classification, there were 5 two-part, 6 three-part, 5 four-part fractures and 6 fracture-dislocations (2 anterior and 4 posterior). Results were assessed clinically with DASH scores, modified Constant & Murley scores and serial post-operative radiographs. The mean DASH score was 16.18 and modified Constant & Murley score was 64.04 at the last follow-up. 18 out of 22 cases achieved good clinical outcome. All the fractures united with no evidence of infection, failure of fixation, malunion, tuberosity failure, avascular necrosis or adverse reaction to calcium sulphate bone substitute. There was no evidence of axillary nerve injury. The CaSO4 bone substitute was replaced by normal appearing trabecular bone texture at an average of 6 months in all patients

Our purpose was to study the functional outcome and electrophysiologically to assess the axially nerve function in patients who have undergone surgery using a deltoid-splitting approach to treat complex proximal humeral fractures. This was a prospective observational study and was carried out in the Shoulder injury clinic at a university teaching hospital. Over a one-year period we treated fourteen locally-resident patients (median age 59 years) who presented with a three- or four-part proximal humeral fracture. All patients were treated using the extended deltoid-splitting approach, with open reduction, bone grafting and plate osteosynthesis. All patients were prospectively reviewed and underwent functional testing using the DASH, Constant and SF-36 scores as well as spring balance testing of deltoid power, and dynamic muscle function testing. At one year after surgery, all patients underwent EMG and nerve latency studies to assess axillary nerve function. Thirteen of the fourteen patients united their fractures without complications, and had DASH and Constant score that were good, with comparatively minor residual deficits on assessment of muscle power. Of these thirteen patients, only one had evidence of slight neurogenic change in the anterior deltoid. This patient had no evidence of anterior deltoid paralysis and her functional scores, spring balance and dynamic muscle function test results were indistinguishable from the patients with normal electrophysiological findings. One of the fourteen patients developed osteonecrosis of the humeral head nine months after surgery and had poor functional scores, without evidence of nerve injury on electrophysiological testing. Reconstruction through an extended deltoid-splitting approach provides a useful alternative in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. The approach provides good access for reduction and implant placement and does not appear to be associated with clinically-significant adverse effects