Abstract. Objectives. There is renewed interest in bi-unicondylar arthroplasty (Bi-UKA) for patients with medial and lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, but a spared patellofemoral compartment and functional cruciate ligaments. The bone island between the two tibial components may be at risk of tibial eminence avulsion fracture, compromising function. This finite element analysis compared intraoperative tibial strains for Bi-UKA to isolated medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA-M) to assess the risk of avulsion. Methods. A validated model of a large, high bone-quality tibia was prepared for both UKA-M and Bi-UKA. Load totalling 450N was distributed between the two ACL bundles, implant components and collateral ligaments based on experimental and intraoperative measurements with the knee extended and appropriately sized bearings used. 95th percentile maximum principal elastic strain was predicted in the proximal tibia. The effect of overcuts/positioning for the medial implant were studied; the magnitude of these variations was double the standard deviation associated with conventional technique. Results. For all simulations, strains were an order of magnitude lower than that associated with bone fracture. Highest strain occurred in the spine, under the anteromedial ACL attachment, adjacent to transverse overcut of the medial component. Consequently, Bi-UKA had little effect on strain: <10% increases were predicted when compared to UKA-M with equivalent medial cuts/positioning. However, surgical overcutting/positional variation that resulted in loss of anteromedial bone in the spine increased strain. The biggest increase was for lateral translation of the medial component: 44% and 42% for UKA-M and Bi-UKA, respectively. Conclusions. For a large tibia with high bone quality, Bi-UKA with a well-positioned lateral implant had no tangible effect on the risk of tibial eminence avulsion fracture compared to UKA-M. Malpositioning of the medial component that removes bone from the anterior spine could prove problematic for smaller tibiae. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

An isolated avulsion fracture of the peroneus longus tendon is seldom seen and potentially can go undiagnosed using basic imaging methods during an initial emergency visit. If not managed appropriately it can lead to chronic pain, a reduced range of motions and eventually affect mobility. This article brings to light the effectiveness of managing such injuries conservatively. A 55 year old postman presented to clinic with pain over the instep of his right foot for 2 months with no history of trauma. Clinically the pain was confined to the right first metatarsophalangeal joint with occasional radiation to the calf. X-ray films did not detect any obvious bony injury. MR imaging revealed an ununited avulsion fracture of the base of the 1st metatarsal. The patient was subsequently injected with a mix of steroid and local anesthetic injections at the painful nonunion site under fluoroscopic guidance. Post procedure there was no neurovascular deficit. The patient was reviewed at three months and his pain score and functional outcome improved significantly. Moreover following our intervention, the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire reduced from 33 to 0. At the one year follow up he remained asymptomatic and was discharged. The peroneus longus tendon plays a role in eversion and planter flexion of foot along with providing stabilization to arches of foot. The pattern of injury to this tendon is based on two factors one is the mechanism of insult, if injured, and second is the variation in the insertion pattern of peroneus longus tendon itself. There is no gold standard treatments by which these injuries can be managed. If conservative management fails we must also consider surgery which involves percutaneous fixation, or excision of the non-healed fracture fragment and arthrodesis. To conclude isolated avulsion fractures of peroneus longus tendon are rare injuries and it is important to raise awareness of this injury and the diagnostic and management challenges faced. In this case conservative management was a success in treating this injury however it is important to take factors such as patient selection, patient autonomy and clinical judgement into account before making the final decision

A consensus regarding management of calcaneal fractures eludes orthopaedic surgeons. While operative treatment has gained more acceptance, surgical morbidity remains high. We undertook a retrospective review of early complications and radiological outcomes following internal fixation of calcaneal fractures in our unit over 15 months. A consecutive series of 33 patients who underwent fixation of the Calcaneus was selected. Patient records, X-rays and scans were reviewed. 37 fractures in 33 patients underwent fixation. 81 % were male. Mean age at surgery was 37yrs (19 -59yrs). 35 % were operated within 1 wk of injury and 13% after 2 wks of injury. 43% were Sanders' type III, 18% type II and 13% tuberosity avulsion fractures. 63% had a reversed/zero Bohler's angle. Mean post-op Bohler's angle was 32 degrees. Overall complication rate was 32%, with a combined deep infection rate of 8%. All patients with infection were male, and 70% were smokers. 86% were above 40yrs of age (mean 47yrs). The deep infection rate for intra-articular fractures was 3% and for tuberosity avulsion fractures 40%. Majority of patients with wound complications had been operated within 7 days of injury. Males over 40yrs and smokers seem to be at most risk of wound complications. Time to surgery/delay in surgery up to 2 wks did not seem to have any adverse consequences. Complications increase with fracture complexity and avulsion fractures have highest risk of wound breakdown. Near anatomical restoration of the articular surface is possible in most

Background. Avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal are some of the commonest foot injuries. The robust scientific evidence on the optimal non-operative treatment of these fractures is scant. We designed and conducted a prospective randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of symptomatic treatment versus cast immobilisation with the null hypothesis that cast immobilisation gave substantial benefit over the symptomatic treatment in terms of patient reported outcome measures(PROMs). The alternative hypothesis was that symptomatic treatment was not inferior. Methods. The primary outcome was the validated Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) score ranging from 0 to 100. The non-inferiority boundary was set at −10 points. Power sizing determined a minimum of 12 patients per group. Anticipating a significant loss to follow up, 60 patients of 16 years of age or older were randomised to receive either below knee walking cast immobilisation (n = 24) or symptomatic double- elasticated bandage (n = 36) for 4 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were EuroQol-5D, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores. Data was analysed at the baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post injury by a clinician blinded to a treatment arm. Results. Symptomatic treatment proved to be non-inferior to cast immobilisation treatment in terms of VAS FA at baseline, 4 weeks and 6 months. Secondary outcomes showed similar comparative values between two treatment groups. Loss to follow up reached 43% at 6 months. The imputation of missing data was done and confirmed the non-inferiority of symptomatic treatment. Conclusions. Cast immobilisation does not appear to give benefits over symptomatic treatment of these injuries in terms of validated PROMs in adults. A significant loss to follow up should be expected with these fractures in medium term. Level of Evidence. II. Approval. NRES Yorkshire and the Humber reference: 11/YH/0297. Disclosure. This study was supported with a small research grant from a British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society