Background. The aim of the study was to assess the outcome of internal fixation using two ordinary plates with autogenous bone grafting in the management of non-union of femoral shaft fractures over a period of eleven years. Method. A retrospective study of double plating and autogenous bone grafting for un-united femoral shaft fractures performed by the two Senior Authors between 1996 and 2007. During this period, twenty-one cases were carried out. Details of preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative findings were assessed. Postoperative follow up was recorded over a period of minimum two years. The procedure was performed using two ordinary plates; a broad lateral and narrow anterior plates. Autogenous cancellous grafts from iliac crest were used in all of the cases, and in some, half fibulas were inserted through the medullary canal of the femur. Results. A total of twenty-one patients were included in the study. All of them received previous treatment. The primary treatment was by intramedullary nailing in thirteen patients, uni-plating in four, external fixator in three, and traction in one. The average age was 32 (range from 16 to 52). The average interval between the initial fracture and the treatment of the non-unions was 13 months (range from 6 to 28 months). All wounds, both at fracture site and the graft donor site, healed primarily except one. That was at an iliac crest graft donor site, where superficial infection occurred, and was treated with antibiotics and healed 6 weeks later. All patients achieved union on an average of 16 weeks (range from 12 to 28 weeks). There has been no failure in implants. The average lower limb shortening was 0.75 cm (range from 0.5 to 1.0 cm). No one requested shoe raise. All the patients regained the preoperative range of motion at the hip and knee joints except four, who had limited flexion to 100 degrees. Conclusion. We conclude that double plating with autogenous bone grafting is not only a convenient method to treat non-union of femoral shaft fractures as it requires minimal instrumentation and equipment, but it should also be considered as a safe and accepted treatment method as postoperatively patients can be discharged early on crutches, with a high success rate. It is less expensive, an important consideration in developing countries

The optimal method for the management of neglected traumatic bifacetal dislocation of the subaxial cervical spine has not been established. We treated four patients in whom the mean delay between injury and presentation was four months (1 to 5). There were two dislocations at the C5-6 level and one each at C4-5 and C3-4. The mean age of the patients was 48.2 years (27 to 60). Each patient presented with neck pain and restricted movement of the cervical spine. Three of the four had a myelopathy.

We carried out a two-stage procedure under the same anaesthetic. First, a posterior soft-tissue release and partial facetectomy were undertaken. This allowed partial reduction of the dislocation which was then supplemented by interspinous wiring and corticocancellous graft. Next, through an anterior approach, discectomy, tricortical bone grafting and anterior cervical plating were carried out.

All the patients achieved a nearly anatomical reduction and sagittal alignment. The mean follow-up was 2.6 years (1 to 4). The myelopathy settled completely in the three patients who had a pre-operative neurological deficit. There was no graft dislodgement or graft-related problems. Bony fusion occurred in all patients and a satisfactory reduction was maintained.

The posteroanterior procedure for neglected traumatic bifacetal dislocation of the subaxial cervical spine is a good method of achieving sagittal alignment with less risk of iatrogenic neurological injury, a reduced operating time, decreased blood loss, and a shorter hospital stay compared with other procedures.