Scaphoid waist fractures (SWF) are notable in upper limb trauma and predominantly occur in young men. Morbidities associated with SWF include fracture non-union, premature arthritis and humpback deformity. Delayed treatment and non-adherence to fracture immobilisation increases likelihood of these complications. There is evidence that men engage in negative health behaviours such as delayed help-seeking. The Scaphoid Waist Internal Fixation for Fractures Trial (SWIFFT) conducted interviews in individuals who had sustained a SWF. Although SWIFFT showed multiple social determinants for the overall injury and healing experience, a key factor this novel study considers is age and sex. This study aimed to analyse interview data from young male participants in SWIFFT to help distinguish the experience of SWF in young men, through exploring the influence of masculinity. A purposive sample of 12 young male participants were selected from SWIFFT. These participants were enrolled from a possibility of 13 different centres across Britain. There were 17 semi-structured interviews produced from these participants, and this was thought to be sufficient for data saturation. These interviews were evaluated through deductive thematic analysis with an open-coding approach, with respondents’ experiences being compared against themes documented in men's health literature. The “Braun and Clarke (2006) Six Phases of Thematic Analysis” methodology was adopted to perform this.Introduction and Objective
Materials and Methods
There is an ever increasing demand for quality clinical trials in surgery. Surgeons' co-operation and enthusiasm to participate are important, if not crucial in success of such studies, especially if they are multi-centred. Clinician's individual uncertainty (equipoise) about a case has been often cited as an ethical basis for inviting a patient to take part in a clinical trial. This study aims to establish current attitudes of surgeons participating in a national multi-centred randomised controlled trial and explores an on line tool for instant assessment of collective uncertainty (equipoise) for individual clinical cases eligible for a trial. Surgeons taking part in the UK Heel Fracture Trial were invited to take part. If agreed, they were asked to evaluate treatment prognosis for eligible for the trial anonymised cases of calcaneal fractures online by means of specially designed system. The cases were published on a password protected website on ad-hoc basis during the three years course of the trial. Their responses were submitted instantly on line.Study aim
Study design
Evidence suggests classification system (CS) guided treatments are more effective than generalized and practice guidelines based treatments for low back pain (LBP) patients. This study evaluated clinicians' and managers' attitudes towards LBP classification and its usefulness in guiding LBP management. Data from 3 semi-structured interviews with physiotherapy service managers and advanced spinal physiotherapy practitioner and a focus group (5 physiotherapists) in two NHS Health Boards, South Wales, UK, was thematically analysed.Background
Methods
