Background. Osteoarthritis and the pain associated with it result in gait pattern alteration, in particularly gait asymmetry when the disease is unilateral [1–2]. The quantification of such asymmetry could assist with the diagnosis and follow up. Various asymmetry indices have been proposed to compare the spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic parameters of lower limbs during the gait cycle. One, the Continuous Relative Phase [3] compares the joints angle and its derivatives to assess the gait asymmetry during the gait cycle. However, the indices rely on marker based gait measurement systems that are costly and generally require manual examination, calibration procedures and the precise placement of sensors/markers on the body of the patient. Aim. Create an automatic method to assess gait asymmetry with low cost depth camera system like Kinect. Methods. To overcome these issues, a new asymmetry index was proposed in [4]. It uses an inexpensive, easy-to-use and markerless depth camera (Microsoft Kinect™) output. Without requiring joint localization, it directly uses depth images provided by the Kinect™ (see figure 1). It is based on the longitudinal spatial difference between lower-limb movements averaged during several gait cycles. To evaluate the relevance of this index ILong, its sensitivity versus the position of the sensor and the sensitivity versus the number of gait cycle, fifteen healthy subjects were tested on a treadmill walking normally and with an artificially induced gait asymmetry created by placing a thick sole under one shoe. The gait movement was simultaneously recorded using two Kinects™, one placed in front of and another behind the subject, and a motion capture system. Results. The Continuous Relative Phase computed with the Kinect™ skeleton failed to assess gait asymmetry. With the Kinect™ placed in front of and behind the patient the proposed longitudinal index distinguished the asymmetrical gait (p < 0.001). Moreover, the correlation coefficient between the index measured by Kinect™ and the ground truth of this index measured by motion capture is more than .85 when using one stride and reaches .90 when using at least five strides, see figure 2. Conclusion. This gait asymmetry index measured with a Kinect™ is low cost, automatic, easy to use and is a promising development for clinical gait analysis for Osteoarthritis disease diagnostic and follow up. For figures, please contact authors directly

Introduction:. Appropriate transverse rotation of the tibial component is critical to achieving a balance of tibial coverage and proper tibio-femoral kinematics in total knee replacement (TKR), yet no consensus exists on the best anatomic references to determine rotation. Historically, surgeons have aligned the tibial component to the medial third of the tibial tubercle. 1. , but recent literature suggests this may externally rotate the tibial component relative to the femoral epicondylar axis (ECA) and that the medial border of the tubercle is more reliable. 2. Meanwhile, some TKR components are designed with asymmetry of the tibial tray assuming that maximizing component coverage of the resected tibia will result in proper alignment. The purpose of this study was to determine how different rotational landmarks and natural variation in osteoarthritic patient anatomy may affect asymmetry of the resected tibial plateau. Methods:. Pre-operative computed-tomography scans were collected from 14,791 TKR patients. The tibia and femur were segmented and anatomic landmarks identified: tibial mechanical axis, medial third and medial border of the tibial tubercle, PCL attachment site, and the surgical ECA of the femur. Virtual surgery was performed with an 8-mm resection (referencing the high side) made perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis in the frontal plane, with 3° posterior slope, and transversely aligned with three different landmarks: the ECA, the medial border, and medial third of the tubercle. In each of these rotational alignments, the relative asymmetry of the medial and lateral plateaus was calculated (Medial AP/Lateral AP) (Fig. 1). Results:. Rotational alignment of the tibial component to the ECA, medial border, and medial third of the tubercle resulted in progressive external rotation of the tibial tray on the bone. Alignment to the medial border and medial third of the tubercle resulted in average 0.9° ± 5.7° and 7.8° ± 5.3° external rotations of the tray relative to the ECA, respectively (Fig. 2). Greater external rotation of the tibial implant relative to the bone increased the appearance of tibial asymmetry (Fig. 3). Referencing the medial border and medial third of the tubercle resulted in apparent tibial bone asymmetry of 1.10 ± 0.10 and 1.12 ± 0.10, respectively. Discussion:. Assuming the ECA is the appropriate rotational reference to re-establish appropriate kinematics. 2. , alignment to the medial border of the tubercle resulted in the most favorable tray alignment. However, there was a great deal of variation between the relative position of the ECA and the tubercle across the patient population. Rotational alignment to either the medial border or medial third of the tubercle resulted in external tray alignment relative to the ECA of greater than 3 degrees for 36% and 84% of patients, respectively. In addition, increased tray asymmetry (broader medial plateau) necessitates relative external rotation of the tray on the bone reducing the flexibility of intra-operative rotational adjustment. Tray asymmetry greater than 1.10 (the asymmetry of the resected tibia when aligned to the ECA) may result in external mal-rotation for a significant portion of the patient population

Introduction:

Malrotation of the tibial component is a common error in TKR, and has been frequently cited as the cause of clinical symptoms. Correct rotational orientation of the tibial tray is difficult to achieve because the resected surface of the tibia is internally rotated and is not symmetrical in shape. This suggests that anatomically contoured components may lead to improved rotational positioning.

This study was undertaken to test the hypotheses: 1.

Use of an anatomically shaped tibial tray can reduce the prevalence of malrotation and cortical over-hang in TKA while increasing coverage of the resected tibial surface, and

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have failed to highlight differences in function or outcome when comparing knee replacement designs and implantation techniques. Ankle-worn inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to remotely measure and monitor the bi-lateral impact load of patients, augmenting traditional PROMs with objective data. The aim of this study was to compare IMU-based impact loads with PROMs in patients who had undergone conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA). 77 patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty (29 RA-TKA, 37 TKA, and 11 UKA) for osteoarthritis were prospectively enrolled. Remote patient monitoring was performed pre-operatively, then weekly from post-operative weeks two to six using ankle-worn IMUs and PROMs. IMU-based outcomes included: cumulative impact load, bone stimulus, and impact load asymmetry. PROMs scores included: Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol Five-dimension with EuroQol visual analogue scale, and the Forgotten Joint Score. On average, patients showed improved impact load asymmetry by 67% (p=0.001), bone stimulus by 41% (p<0.001), and cumulative impact load by 121% (p=0.035) between post-operative week two and six. Differences in IMU-based outcomes were observed in the initial six weeks post-operatively between surgical procedures. The mean change scores for OKS were 7.5 (RA-TKA), 11.4 (TKA), and 11.2 (UKA) over the early post-operative period (p=0.144). Improvements in OKS were consistent with IMU outcomes in the RA-TKA group, however, conventional TKA and UKA groups did not reflect the same trend in improvement as OKS, demonstrating a functional decline. Our data illustrate that PROMs do not necessarily align with patient function, with some patients reporting good PROMs, yet show a decline in cumulative impact load or load asymmetry. These data also provide evidence for a difference in the functional outcome of TKA and UKA patients that might be overlooked by using PROMs alone

Advances in algorithms developed with sensor data from smart phones demonstrates the capacity to passively collect qualitative gait metrics. The purpose of this feasibility study was to assess the recovery of these metrics following joint reconstruction. A secondary data analysis of an ethics approved global, multicenter, prospective longitudinal study evaluating gait quality data before and after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA, n=476), partial knee arthroplasty (PKA, n=139), and total hip arthroplasty (THA, n=395). A minimum 24 week follow-up was required (mean 45±12, range 24 - 78). Gait bouts and gait quality metrics (walking speed, step length, timing asymmetry, and double support percentage) were collected from a standardized smartphone operating system. Pre- and post-operative values were compared using paired-samples t-tests (p<0.05). A total of 595 females and 415 males with a mean age of 61.9±9.3 years and mean BMI of 30.2±6.1 kg/m. 2. were reviewed. Walking speeds were lowest at post-operative week two (all, p<.001). Speeds exceeded pre-operative means consistently by week 21 (p=0.015) for PKA, and week 13 (p=0.007) for THA. The average weekly step length was lowest in post-operative week two (all, p<0.001). PKA and THA cases achieved pre-operative step lengths by week seven (p=0.064) and week 9 (p=0.081), respectively. The average weekly gait asymmetry peaked at week two post-operatively (all, p <0.001). Return to pre-operative baseline asymmetry was achieved by week 11 (p=0.371) for TKA, week six (p=0.541) for PKA, and week eight (p=.886) for THA. Double limb support percentages peaked at week two (all, p<0.001) and returned to pre-operative levels by week 24 (p=0.089) for TKA, week 12 (p=0.156) for PKA, and week 10 (p=0.143) for THA. Monitoring gait quality in real-world settings following joint reconstruction using smartphones is feasible, and may provide the advantage of removing the Hawthorne effect related to typical gait assessments and in-clinic observations

A primary goal of revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (rTKA) is restoration of the Joint Line (JL) and Posterior Condylar Offsets (PCO). The presence of a native contralateral joint allows JL and PCO to be inferred in a way that could account for patient-specific anatomical variations more accurately than current techniques. This study assesses bilateral distal femoral symmetry in the context of defining targets for restoration of JL and PCO in rTKA. 566 pre-operative CTs for bilateral TKAs were segmented and landmarked by two engineers. Landmarks were taken on both femurs at the medial and lateral epicondyles, distal and posterior condyles and hip and femoral centres. These landmarks were used to calculate the distal and posterior offsets on the medial and lateral sides (MDO, MPO, LDO, LPO respectively), the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), TEA to PCA angle (TEAtoPCA) and anatomic to mechanical axis angle (AAtoMA). Mean bilateral differences in these measures were calculated and cases were categorised according to the amount of asymmetry. The database analysed included 54.9% (311) females with a mean population age of 68.8 (±7.8) years. The mean bilateral difference for each measure was: LDFA 1.4° (±1.0), TEAtoPCA 1.3° (±0.9), AAtoMA 0.5° (±0.5), MDO 1.4mm (±1.1), MPO 1.0mm (±0.8). The categorisation of asymmetry for each measure was: LDFA had 39.9% of cases with <1° bilateral difference and 92.4% with <3° bilateral difference, TEAtoPCA had 45.8% <1° and 96.6% <3°, AAtoMA had 85.7% <1° and 99.8% <3°, MDO had 46.2% <1mm and 90.3% <3mm, MPO had 57.0% <1mm and 97.9% <3mm. This study presents evidence supporting bilateral distal femoral symmetry. Using the contralateral anatomy to obtain estimates for JL and PCO in rTKA may result in improvements in intraoperative accuracy compared to current techniques and a more patient specific solution to operative planning

Introduction. Recent advances in algorithms developed with passively collected sensor data from smart phones and watches demonstrate new, objective, metrics with the capacity to show qualitative gait characteristics. The purpose of this feasibility study was to assess the recovery of gait quality following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty collected using a smartphone-based care platform. Methods. A secondary data analysis of an IRB approved multicenter prospective trial evaluating the use of a smartphone-based care platform for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA, n=88), unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA, n=28), and total hip arthroplasty (THA, n=82). Subjects were followed from 6 weeks preoperative to 24 weeks postoperative. The group was comprised of 117 females and 81 males with a mean age of 61.4 and BMI of 30.7. Signals were collected from the participants' smartphones. These signals were used to estimate gait quality according to walking speed, step length, and timing asymmetry. Post-operative measures were compared to preoperative baseline levels using a Signed-Rank test (p<0.05). Results. Mean walking speeds were lowest at postoperative week 2 for all three procedures (p<.001). The TKA population stabilized to preoperative speeds by week 17. For UKA cases, mean walking speeds rebounded to preoperative speed consistently by week 9 (p>.05). THA cases returned to preoperative walking speeds with a stable rebound starting at week 6 (p>.05), and improvement was seen at week 14 (p=.025). The average weekly step length was lowest in postoperative week 2 for both TKA and UKA (p<.001), and at week 3 for THA (p<.001). The TKA population rebounded to preoperative step lengths at week 9 (p=0.109), UKA cases at week 7 (p=.123), and THA cases by week 6 (p=.946). For TKA subjects, the change in average weekly gait asymmetry peaked at week 2 postoperatively (p <0.001), returning to baseline symmetry by week 13 (p=.161). For UKA cases, mean gait asymmetry also reached its maximum at week 2 (p =.006), returning to baseline beginning at week 7 (p=0.057). For THA cases mean asymmetry reached its maximum in week 2 (p <0.001) and was returned to baseline values at week 6 (p=.150). Discussion and Conclusion. Monitoring gait quality in real-world patient care following hip and knee arthroplasty using smart phone technology demonstrated recovery curves similar to previously reported curves captured by traditional gait analysis methods and patient reported outcome scores. Capturing such real-world gait quality metrics passively through the phone may also provide the advantage of removing the Hawthorne effect related to typical gait assessments and in-clinic observations, leading to a more accurate picture of patient function

The demand for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has grown significantly in recent years. The two major fixation methods for stems in revision TKA include cemented and ‘hybrid’ fixation. We explore the optimal fixation method using data from recent, well-designed comparative studies. We performed a systematic review of comparative studies published within the last 10 years with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. To allow for missing data, a random-effects meta-analysis of all available cases was performed. The odds ratio (OR) for the relevant outcome was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. The effects of small studies were analyzed using a funnel plot, and asymmetry was assessed using Egger's test. The primary outcome measure was all-cause failure. Secondary outcome measures included all-cause revision, aseptic revision and radiographic failure. There was a significantly lower failure rate for hybrid stems when compared to cemented stems (p = 0.006) (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.87). Heterogeneity was 4.3% and insignificant (p = 0.39). There was a trend toward superior hybrid performance for all other outcome measures including all-cause re-revision, aseptic re-revision and radiographic failure. Recent evidence suggests a significantly lower failure rate for hybrid stems in revision TKA. There is also a trend favoring the use of hybrid stems for all outcome variables assessed in this study. This is the first time a significant difference in outcome has been demonstrated through systematic review of these two modes of stem fixation. We therefore recommend the use, where possible, of hybrid stems in revision TKA

Accurate measurement of pelvic tilt (PT) is critical in diagnosing hip and spine pathologies. Yet a sagittal pelvic radiograph with good quality is not always available. Studies explored the correlation between PT and sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle from anteroposterior (AP) radiographs yet demonstrated conflicting conclusions about its feasibilities. This study aims to perform a cohort-controlled meta-analysis to examine the correlation between the SFP angle and PT and proposes an application range of the method. This study searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies that evaluated the correlation between SFP angle and PT. The Pearson's correlation coefficient r from studies were tabulated and compared. Pooled r for overall and gender/age (teenage or adult) controlled subgroup were reported using Fisher's Z transformation. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using Egger's regression test for the funnel plot asymmetry. Eleven studies were recruited, with nine reported r (totalling 1,247 patients). The overall pooled r was 0.61 with high inter-study heterogeneity (I2 = 75.95%). Subgroup analysis showed that the adult group had a higher r than the teenage group (0.70 versus 0.56, p < 0.001). Although statistically insignificant (p = 0.062), the female group showed a higher r than the male group (0.72 versus 0.65). The SFP method must be used with caution and should not be used in the male teenage group. The current studies did not demonstrate that the SFP method was superior to other AP landmarks correlating to PT. Identical heterogeneity was observed among studies, indicating that more ethnicity-segregated and gender-specific subgroup studies might be necessary. More data input analysing the errors will be useful

Malreduction of the syndesmosis is a poor prognosticator following ankle fracture and has been documented in as many as 52% of patients following fracture fixation. The current standard for assessment of reduction of the syndesmosis is bilateral computed tomography (CT) scan of the ankle. Multiple radiographic parameters are utilized to define malreduction, however, there has been limited investigation into the accuracy of these measurements to differentiate malreduction from inherent anatomical asymmetry. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of positive malreduction standards within the syndesmosis of native, uninjured ankles. Bilateral lower extremity CT scans including ankles were screened. Studies were excluded if the patient was skeletally immature, had pathology below the knee or if they had congenital neuromuscular syndromes. The resulting cohort consisted of 207 patients. The indication for bilateral CT scan was femoral acetabular impingement in 110 patients (53%), rotation assessment following arthroplasty in 32 patients (15%), rotation assessment following femoral fracture in 30 patients (14%), rotational assessment for patellar instability in 30 patients (14%) and five miscellaneous indications (2%). Fifty patients were reviewed by three observers independently and to determine inter-observer reliability. A single observer repeated the measurements within the same cohort four weeks later to evaluate intra-observer reliability. Three observers then measured the anterior syndesmotic distance, posterior syndesmotic distance, central syndesmotic distance, fibular rotation and sagittal fibular translation at 1cm from the distal tibial articular surface. Overall side to side variability between the left and right ankle were assessed. Previously studied malreduction standards were evaluated. These included: anterior to posterior syndesmotic distance > 2mm, central syndesmotic difference > 1.5mm, average syndesmotic distance > 2mm, fibular rotational difference > 10o and sagittal translational difference > 2mm. The inter- and intra-observer reliability was good to excellent for anterior, posterior and central syndesmotic distance, and fibular rotation measurements. Sagittal fibular translation had an ICC of 0.583, and thus was only of fair reliability. Side to side comparison revealed statistically significant difference in only anterior syndesmotic difference (p=0.038). A difference of anterior to posterior syndesmotic distance of greater than 2mm was observed in 43 patients (20.2%). Thirty eight patients (17.8%) had a central syndesmotic difference of greater than 1.5mm. A fibular rotational difference of greater than 10o was observed in 49 patients (23%). The average difference between the anterior and posterior syndesmosis was greater than 2mm in 17 patients (8.2%). Nine patients (4.2%) had sagittal translation of greater than 2mm. Eighty one patients (39%) demonstrated at least one parameter beyond previously set standards for malreduction. Only one parameters was anomalous in 54 patients (26%), 18 patients (8%) had two positive parameters, while eight patients (4%) had three. One patient was asymmetrical in all measured parameters. In this study there was no statistically significant asymmetry between ankles. However, 39% of native syndesmoses would be classified as malreduced on CT scan using previously studied malreduction limits. Current radiographic parameters are not sufficient to differentiate mild inherent anatomical asymmetry from malreduction of the syndesmosis

Introduction. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated significant benefits, including improved accuracy of component positioning compared to conventional jig-based TKA. However, previous studies have often failed to associate these findings with clinically significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide a more nuanced assessment of a patient's functional recovery after TKA. This study aims to compare outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted and conventional TKA in the early postoperative period using conventional PROMS and wearable sensors. Method. 100 patients with symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA were included in this study (44 robotic-assisted TKA and 56 conventional TKA). Functional outcomes were assessed using ankle-worn IMUs and PROMs. IMU- based outcomes included impact load, impact asymmetry, maximum knee flexion angle, and bone stimulus. PROMs, including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol-Five Dimension (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) were evaluated at preoperative baseline, weeks 2 to 6 postoperatively, and at 3-month postoperative follow-up. Results. By postoperative week 6, when compared to conventional TKA, robotic-assisted TKA was associated with significant improvements in maximum knee flexion angle (118o ± 6.6 vs. 113o ± 5.4; p=0.04), symmetrical loading of limbs (82.3% vs.22.4%; p<0.01), cumulative impact load (146.6% vs 37%; p<0.01), and bone stimulus (25.1% vs 13.6%; p<0.01). Whilst there were no significant differences in PROMs (OKS, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS, and FJS-12) at any time point between the two groups, when comparing OKS subscales, significantly more robotic-assisted TKA patients achieved an ‘excellent’ outcome at 6 weeks compared to conventional (47% vs 41%, p= 0.013). Conclusions. IMU-based metrics detected an earlier return to function among patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA compared to conventional TKA that PROMs were unable to detect within the first six weeks of surgery

Introduction. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) in patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can be problematic for both patients and surgeons. Patients can acquire gait asymmetry, back pain, and arthritis. Surgical considerations include timing of correction and arthroplasty planning. This study audits standing long leg films performed at skeletal maturity in our patients. The aim of this study is to identify if surgical procedure or AVN type could predict the odds of needing an LLD Intervention (LLDI) and influence our surveillance. Materials and Methods. Hospital database was searched for all patients diagnosed with DDH. Inclusion criteria were patients with appropriately performed long leg films at skeletal maturity. Exclusion criteria were patients with non DDH pathology, skeletally immature and inadequate radiographs. All data was tabulated in excel and SPSS was used for analysis. Traumacad was used for measurements and AVN and radiologic outcome grades were independently classified in duplicate. Results. 110 patients were identified. The mean age of follow-up was 15 years with final average LLD of 1mm(±5mm). The DDH leg tended to be longer and length primarily in the femur. 31(28.2%) patients required an LLDI. 19 Patients had a final LLD >1.5cm. There was no statistical significant difference in the odds of needing an LLDI by type of surgical procedure or AVN. AVN type 4 was associated with greatest odds of intervention. The DDH leg was more likely to require ipsilateral epiphysiodesis or contralateral lengthening in Type 1 and 2 AVN. Conclusions. The DDH leg tends to be longer, leg lengths should be monitored, and leg length interventions are frequently required irrespective of previous DDH surgical procedure or the presence of AVN

Knee replacement is a proven and reproducible procedure to alleviate pain, re-establish alignment and restore function. However, the quality and completeness to which these goals are achieved is variable. The idea of restoring function by reproducing condylar anatomy and asymmetry has been gaining favor. As knee replacements have evolved, surgeons have created a set of principles for reconstruction, such as using the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA) in order to place the joint line of the symmetric femoral component parallel to the TEA, and this has been shown to improve kinematics. However, this bony landmark is really a single plane surrogate for independent 3-dimensional medial and lateral femoral condylar geometry, and a difference has been shown to exist between the natural flexion-extension arc and the TEA. The TEA works well as a surrogate, but the idea of potentially replicating normal motion by reproducing the actual condylar geometry and its involved, individual asymmetry has great appeal. Great variability in knee anatomy can be found among various populations, sizes, and genders. Each implant company creates their specific condylar geometry, or “so called” J curves, based on a set of averages measured in a given population. These condylar geometries have traditionally been symmetric, with the individualised spatial placement of the (symmetric) curves achieved through femoral component sizing, angulation, and rotation performed at the time of surgery. There is an inherent compromise in trying to achieve accurate, individual medial and lateral condylar geometry reproduction, while also replicating size and avoiding component overhang with a set implant geometry and limited implant sizes. Even with patient-specific instrumentation using standard over-the-counter implants, the surgeon must input his/her desired endpoints for bone resection, femoral rotation, and sizing as guidelines for compromise. When all is done, and soft tissue imbalance exists, soft tissue release is the final, common compromise. The custom, individually made knee design goals include reproducible mechanical alignment, patient-specific fit and positioning, restoration of articular condylar geometry, and thereby, more normal kinematics. A CT scan allows capture of three-dimensional anatomical bony details of the knee. The individual J curves are first noted and corrected for deformity, after which they are anatomically reproduced using a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) file of the bones in order to maximally cover the bony surfaces and concomitantly avoid implant overhang. No options for modifications are offered to the surgeon, as the goal is anatomic restoration. Given these ideals, to what extent are patients improved? The concept of reproducing bony anatomy is based on the pretext that form will dictate function, such that normal-leaning anatomy will tend towards normal-leaning kinematics. Therefore, we seek to evaluate knee function based on objective assessments of movement or kinematics. In summary, the use of custom knee technology to more closely reproduce an individual patient's anatomy holds great promise in improving the quality and reproducibility of postoperative function. Compromises of fit and rotation are minimised, and implant overhang is potentially eliminated as a source of pain. Early results have shown objective improvements in clinical outcomes. Admittedly, this technology is limited to those patients with mild to moderate deformity at this time, since options like constraint and stems are not available. Yet these are the patients who can most clearly benefit from a higher functional state after reconstruction. Time will reveal if this potential can become a reproducible reality

Introduction. Femoral component design is a key part of hip arthroplasty performance. We have previously reported that a hip resurfacing offered functional improved performance over a long stem. However resurfacing is not popular for many reasons, so there is a growing trend towards shorter femoral stems, which have the added benefit of ease of introduction through less invasive incisions. Concern is also developing about the impact of longer stems on lifetime risk of periprosthetic fracture, which should be reduced by the use of a shorter stem. For these reasons, we wanted to know whether a shorter stem offered any functional improvement over a conventional long stem. We surmised that longer stems in hip implants might stiffen the femoral shaft, altering the mechanical properties. Materials and Methods. From our database of over 800 patients who have been tested in the lab, we identified 95 patients with a hip replacement performed on only one side, with no other lower limb co-morbidities, and a control group:. 19 with long stem implant, age 66 ± 14 (LONG). 40 with short stem implant, age 69 ± 9 (SHORT). 26 with resurfacing, age 60 ± 8 (RESURF). 43 healthy control with no history of arthroplasty, age 59 ± 10 (CONTROL). All groups were matched for BMI and gender. Participants were asked to walk on an instrumented treadmill. Initially a 5 minute warm up at 4 km/h, then tests at increasing speed in 0.5 km/h increments. Maximum walking speed was determined by the patients themselves, or when subjects moved from walking to running. Ground reaction forces (GRF) were measured in 20 second intervals at each speed. Features were calculated based on the mean GRF for each trial, and on symmetry measures such as first peak force (heel strike), second peak force (toe-off), the rate at which the foot was loaded and unloaded, and step length. Results. When measured by top walking speed, stemmed implants of either type appear slower than those which do not include the femoral shaft (resurfacing). The latter group walking speed was equal to the control group (Figure 1). When looking at the whole gait cycle at any one speed, no major differences appear in the first or second peak forces (Figure 2 – 5km/h, implanted side compared). When checked for asymmetry, resurfacing patients did not demonstrate any asymmetry between legs, while either stemmed groups demonstrated slight differences between legs in terms of force related features (Figure 3). Discussion. We sought to show if stem length has an impact on top walking speed and asymmetry of gait. This small study contributes to that debate. We could not demonstrate any functional superiority of the short over the long stem, but the short femoral stem seems to transmit load just as well as the longer stem, allowing good load transfer at toe-off, and comparable walking speed. The results stress the advantages of non stemmed implants as published before. Our study adds to the discussion as to whether long stems are still needed in primary arthroplasty

The use of smart trial components is now allowing a better assessment of soft tissue balancing at the time of total knee replacement surgery. A balanced knee can be defined as one that possesses symmetry, ie. equal and centered lateral and medial forces through the full range of flexion. There is still a need for a standard reproducible surgical test to quickly confirm optimized balancing at surgery with such devices. The Heel Push test is the established standard, by pushing the foot in a cephalad direction while supporting the thigh and keeping the leg stable in the vertical plane. A common variation of this test is the Thigh Pull test where the foot is actively assisted during the cephalad pull of the thigh through deep flexion. The test is an open chain test. The Thigh Pull test may be an improvement since the weight of the leg is alleviated and no supplemental compressive forces are introduced. The directional changes of the lower extremity are thus a result of ligamentous tension and balances. The purpose of this study is to compare the two tests using a standard testing methodology and observe the variation in kinetic parameters in a controlled biomechanical setting. A custom l rig was developed, which independently controls all six degrees of freedom about the knee joint. In addition a commercial navigation system was used to derive instantaneous alignment values and flexion angles between the tibia and femur. The pelvis was fixed to the table and the foot was fitted onto a low friction carriage along a slide rail. The knee design used was cruciate retaining. The pressure mapping system was a wireless tibial trial that provided magnitude of load per compartment. The study is a preliminary cadaveric study reporting the data from two. In this experiment the leg was then tested with the Heel Push and Thigh Pull tests after obtaining optimum soft tissue balance of the cadaveric specimen. From this standard neutral state a series of single surgical variables were introduced to mimic common intra-operative surgical corrections. This was achieved through custom tibial liner and angle shims. The results defied theoretical anticipation. Though the total contact forces with heel push were generally higher than with thigh pull, the relative load distribution between compartments did not follow a trend (see Figure 1). Furthermore in deeper flexion the persistence of relatively high contact pressures would suggest that ligaments still generate intra-articular forces despite the much weaker gravitational effect. The clinical relevance lies in the asymmetry of the load distribution between medial and lateral compartment for the two methods tested. The load asymmetry as tested by the Thigh Pull test may correspond to an open chain in swing phase. This asymmetry would force some axial rotation and tibial femoral alignment deviation that can significantly affect the forces at the time of heel strike. The Heel Push test would be more representative of the compressive forces in a closed chain mode as seen during the stance phase of gait

Knee replacement is a proven and reproducible procedure to alleviate pain, re-establish alignment and restore function. However, the quality and completeness to which these goals are achieved is variable. The idea of restoring function by reproducing condylar anatomy and asymmetry has been gaining favor. As knee replacements have evolved, surgeons have created a set of principles for reconstruction, such as using the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA) in order to place the joint line of the symmetric femoral component parallel to the TEA, and this has been shown to improve kinematics. However, this bony landmark is really a single plane surrogate for independent 3-dimensional medial and lateral femoral condylar geometry, and a difference has been shown to exist between the natural flexion-extension arc and the transepicondylar axis. The TEA works well as a surrogate, but the idea of potentially replicating normal motion by reproducing the actual condylar geometry and its involved, individual asymmetry has great appeal. Great variability in knee anatomy can be found among various populations, sizes, and genders. Each implant company creates their specific condylar geometry, or “so called” J curves, based on a set of averages measured in a given population. These condylar geometries have traditionally been symmetric, with the individualised spatial placement of the (symmetric) curves achieved through femoral component sizing, angulation, and rotation performed at the time of surgery. There is an inherent compromise in trying to achieve accurate, individual medial and lateral condylar geometry reproduction, while also replicating size and avoiding component overhang with a set implant geometry and limited implant sizes. Even with patient-specific instrumentation using standard over-the-counter implants, the surgeon must input his/her desired endpoints for bone resection, femoral rotation, and sizing as guidelines for compromise. When all is done, and soft tissue imbalance exists, soft tissue release is the final, common compromise. The custom, individually made knee design goals include reproducible mechanical alignment, patient-specific fit and positioning, restoration of articular condylar geometry, and thereby, more normal kinematics. A CT scan allows capture of three-dimensional anatomical bony details of the knee. The individual J curves are first noted and corrected for deformity, after which they are anatomically reproduced using a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) file of the bones in order to maximally cover the bony surfaces and concomitantly avoid implant overhang. No options for modifications are offered to the surgeon, as the goal is anatomic restoration. In summary, the use of custom knee technology to more closely reproduce an individual patient's anatomy holds great promise in improving the quality and reproducibility of post-operative function. Compromises of fit and rotation are minimised, and implant overhang is potentially eliminated as a source of pain. Early results have shown objective improvements in clinical outcomes. Admittedly, this technology is limited to those patients with mild to moderate deformity at this time, since options like constraint and stems are not available. Yet these are the patients who can most clearly benefit from a higher functional state after reconstruction. Time will reveal if this potential can become a reproducible reality

Limb symmetry on a battery of functional tests is becoming more common as a clinical rehabilitation tool serving as a proxy assessment for readiness to return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The predictive capability of each included test for determining the likelihood of a second ACL injury is not well known. This study combines 14 established functional tests into a comprehensive return-to-sport assessment (RTSA). Study purpose: to determine if any of the functional tests were independently related to a second ACL injury occurring after the patient was cleared for return to sport. The RTSA was administered to 226 individuals after primary, unilateral ACLR who were followed for at least 24 months (51% female; mean ± SD age, 18.9 ± 4.0 years at RTSA, 9.4 ± 2.4 months post-surgery). The RTSA included 14 tests that involved calculation of Limb Symmetry Indices (LSI): leg press [LP], eccentric hamstring strength [HS], hip adductor strength [HA], Y Balance Test (anterior [YANT], posteromedial [YPM], posterolateral [YPL]), single hop [SH], triple hop [TH], crossover hop [CH], 6 meter timed hop [TiH], lateral hop [LH], medial hop [MH], vertical jump [VJ], single leg squat [SLS]. LSI averaged values of three trials for each leg for LP, HS, HA, SH, TH, CH, TiH, LH, MH, VJ, and SLS. The lowest bilateral difference across three trials was used for YANT, YPM, and YPL. Logistic regression using backward elimination was used to predict the odds of a second non-contact ACL injury using the RTSA, sex, age, and months post-surgery at RTSA as the independent variables. Twenty-five (11%) patients returned to have a subsequent ACL surgery. Twenty of the 25 experienced a second non-contact ACL injury (70% female; 10 ipsilateral, 10 contralateral). Of the 14 female athletes, there were eight contralateral and six ipsilateral tears. In males, there were two contralateral and four ipsilateral tears. The mean time from surgery to injury was 20.5 ± 9.8 months. Age (OR; 95%CI: 0.75; 0.58, 0.92), LP (0.97; 0.93, 0.99), YANT (1.21; 1.02, 1.43), and TiH (1.10; 1.01, 1.20) were found to be significantly associated with the odds of re-injury. Age, YANT, and the LSI of LP and TiH have a statistically significant impact on the odds of a second ACL injury after ACL reconstruction. YANT has an OR of 1.21, indicating that a 1cm increase in asymmetry will increase the likelihood of re-injury by 21%, holding all else constant. A 1% increase in the TiH LSI results in a 10% increase in the odds of re-injury. The risk of re-injury decreases as age increases. The OR for LP symmetry was near 1.0 and therefore may not have a clinically relevant effect on re-injury risk. Although LSI is a straightforward, quantitative measure, clinicians should not solely rely on it as a proxy for recovery of knee function. Many tests are available for clinical assessments, but this study found only a few of the tests to have significant associations with a subsequent ACL injury following return to play after ACL reconstruction

Introduction:. Adequate coverage of the resected tibial plateau with the tibial tray is necessary to reduce the theoretical risk of tibial subsidence after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Maximizing tibial coverage is balanced against avoiding excessive overhang of the tray causing soft tissue irritation, and establishing proper tray alignment improving implant longevity and patella function. 1. Implant design factors, including the number of tray sizes, tray shape, and tray asymmetry influence the ability to cover the tibial plateau. 2. Furthermore, rotating platform (RP) tray designs decouple restoring proper tibial rotation from maximizing tibial coverage, which may enhance the ability to maximize coverage. The purpose of the current study was to assess the ability of five modern tray designs (Fig. 1), including symmetric, asymmetric, fixed-bearing, and RP designs, to maximize coverage of the tibial plateau across a large patient population. Methods:. Lower limb computed-tomography scans were collected from 14,791 TKA patients and the tibia was segmented. Virtual surgery was performed with an 8-mm tibial resection (referencing the high side) made perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis in the frontal plane, with 3° posterior slope, and aligned transversely to the medial third of the tibial tubercle. An automated algorithm placed the largest possible tray on the plateau, optimizing the ML and AP placement (and I-E rotation for the RP tray), to minimize overhang. The largest sized tray that fit the plateau with less than 2-mm of tray overhang was identified for each of the five implant systems. The surface area of the tibial tray was divided by the area of the resected plateau and the percentage of patients with greater than 85% plateau coverage was calculated. Results:. The percentage of patients with greater than 85% plateau coverage across the tray designs ranged from 17.0% to 61.4% (Fig. 1). The tray with the greatest number of size options (Tray 4, 10 sizes) had the best coverage among the fixed-bearing trays. The RP variant of the same tray had the best overall coverage. Tibial asymmetry did not significantly improve the overall tibial coverage across the patient distribution for both asymmetric designs. Incorporating a broader medial condyle improved fit along the posterior medial corner for Tray 2, but increased the average under-hang along the posterior lateral plateau offsetting any improvement in total coverage. Discussion:. This analysis represents the most comprehensive assessment of tray coverage to date across a large TKA-patient population. Large variations exist in the size and shape of the proximal tibia among TKA patients. 3. Developing a tray design which provides robust coverage despite this variation remains challenging. This analysis suggests that tibial asymmetry may not robustly improve coverage. Conversely, incorporating an increased number of tray sizes and utilizing an RP implant to decouple coverage from alignment may provide the most reliable solution for maximizing coverage across the patient population

Knee replacement is a proven and reproducible procedure to alleviate pain, re-establish alignment and restore function. However, the quality and completeness to which these goals are achieved is variable. The idea of restoring function by reproducing condylar anatomy and asymmetry has been gaining favor As knee replacements have evolved, surgeons have created a set of principles for reconstruction, such as using the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA) in order to place the joint line of the symmetric femoral component parallel to the TEA, and this has been shown to improve kinematics. However, this bony landmark is really a single plane surrogate for 3-dimensional medial and lateral femoral condylar geometry, and a difference has been shown to exist between the natural flexion-extension arc and the TEA. The TEA works well as a surrogate, but the idea of potentially replicating normal motion by reproducing the actual condylar geometry and its involved, individual asymmetry has great appeal. Great variability in knee anatomy can be found among various populations, sizes, and genders. Each implant company creates their specific condylar geometry, or “so called” J curves, based on a set of averages measured in a given population. These condylar geometries have traditionally been symmetric, with the individualised spatial placement of the (symmetric) curves achieved through femoral component sizing, angulation, and rotation performed at the time of surgery. There is an inherent compromise in trying to achieve accurate, individual medial and lateral condylar geometry reproduction, while also replicating size and avoiding component overhang with a set implant geometry and limited implant sizes. Even with patient-specific instrumentation using standard over-the-counter implants, the surgeon must input his/her desired endpoints for bone resection, femoral rotation, and sizing as guidelines for compromise. When all is done, and soft tissue imbalance exists, soft tissue release is the final, common compromise. The custom, individually made knee design goals include reproducible mechanical alignment, patient-specific fit and positioning, restoration of articular condylar geometry, and thereby, more normal kinematics. A CT scan allows capture of three-dimensional anatomical bony details of the knee. The individual J curves are first noted and corrected for deformity, after which they are anatomically reproduced using a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) file of the bones in order to maximally cover the bony surfaces and concomitantly avoid implant overhang. No options for modifications are offered to the surgeon, as the goal is anatomic restoration. Given these ideals, to what extent are patients improved? The concept of reproducing bony anatomy is based on the pretext that form will dictate function, such that normal-leaning anatomy will tend towards normal-leaning kinematics. Therefore, we seek to evaluate knee function based on objective assessments of movement or kinematics. The use of custom knee technology to more closely reproduce an individual patient's anatomy holds great promise in improving the quality and reproducibility of post-operative function. Compromises of fit and rotation are minimised, and implant overhang is potentially eliminated as a source of pain. Early results have shown objective improvements in clinical outcomes. Admittedly, this technology is limited to those patients with mild to moderate deformity at this time, since options like constraint and stems are not available. Yet these are the patients who can most clearly benefit from a higher functional state after reconstruction. Time will reveal if this potential can become a reproducible reality

Knee replacement is a proven and reproducible procedure to alleviate pain, re-establish alignment and restore function. However, the quality and completeness to which these goals are achieved is variable. The idea of restoring function by reproducing condylar anatomy and asymmetry has been gaining favor. As knee replacements have evolved, surgeons have created a set of principles for reconstruction, such as using the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA) in order to place the joint line of the symmetric femoral component parallel to the TEA, and this has been shown to improve kinematics. However, this bony landmark is really a single plane surrogate for 3-dimensional medial and lateral femoral condylar geometry, and a difference has been shown to exist between the natural flexion-extension arc and the TEA. The TEA works well as a surrogate, but the idea of potentially replicating normal motion by reproducing the actual condylar geometry and its involved, individual asymmetry has great appeal. Great variability in knee anatomy can be found among various populations, sizes, and genders. Each implant company creates their specific condylar geometry, or “so called” J curves, based on a set of averages measured in a given population. These condylar geometries have traditionally been symmetric, with the individualised spatial placement of the (symmetric) curves achieved through femoral component sizing, angulation, and rotation performed at the time of surgery. There is an inherent compromise in trying to achieve accurate, individual medial and lateral condylar geometry reproduction, while also replicating size and avoiding component overhang with a set implant geometry and limited implant sizes. Even with patient-specific instrumentation using standard over-the-counter implants, the surgeon must input his/her desired endpoints for bone resection, femoral rotation, and sizing as guidelines for compromise. When all is done, and soft tissue imbalance exists, soft tissue release is the final, common compromise. The custom, individually made knee design goals include reproducible mechanical alignment, patient-specific fit and positioning, restoration of articular condylar geometry, and thereby, more normal kinematics. A CT scan allows capture of three-dimensional anatomical bony details of the knee. The individual J curves are first noted and corrected for deformity, after which they are anatomically reproduced using a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) file of the bones in order to maximally cover the bony surfaces and concomitantly avoid implant overhang. No options for modifications are offered to the surgeon, as the goal is anatomic restoration. Given these ideals, to what extent are patients improved? The concept of reproducing bony anatomy is based on the pretext that form will dictate function, such that normal-leaning anatomy will tend towards normal-leaning kinematics. Therefore, we seek to evaluate knee function based on objective assessments of movement or kinematics. In summary, the use of custom knee technology to more closely reproduce an individual patient's anatomy holds great promise in improving the quality and reproducibility of post-operative function. Compromises of fit and rotation are minimised, and implant overhang is potentially eliminated as a source of pain. Early results have shown objective improvements in clinical outcomes. Admittedly, this technology is limited to those patients with mild to moderate deformity at this time, since options like constraint and stems are not available. Yet these are the patients who can most clearly benefit from a higher functional state after reconstruction. Time will reveal if this potential can become a reproducible reality